The effectiveness of 3D virtual fitting technology when visualizing the fit and silhouette of pants by analyzing the similarities between real and virtual fit using 20 fit locations, 3 lower body shapes, and fit status was investigated. We produced 61 custom pants for the participants and virtually tried each on a personalized 3D body scan avatar. The technology was not generally effective for visualizing pant fit. Especially, the waist placement of the virtual pants was lower than that for the actual pants. The virtual software indicated less ease than the actual pants and could not express stress folds due to slight misfit. The front silhouette of the virtual pants spread wider than the real pants. The virtual pants for females with a hip tilt shape had the greatest divergence from the actual pants. The virtual pants with good fit appeared more effectively than did those with poor fit.
ApeagyeiP. R.OtienoR. (2007). Usability of pattern customizing technology. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 11, 349–365.
2.
AshdownS. P.DunneL. (2006). A study of automated custom fit: Readiness of the technology for the apparel industry. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24, 121–136.
DoW. H. (2010). The comparison of user preference on domestic versus a foreign 3D virtual try-on system. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 34, 1184–1196.
i-Fashion Center for Apparel Technology. (2007). i-Fashion mall. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ifashion.or.kr
7.
KangI.LeeS. (2010). A study on the shape of shirring using the 3D virtual clothing system. The Journal of Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 34, 1111–1125.
8.
KimD. E.LaBatK. (2013). An exploratory study of users’ evaluations of the accuracy and fidelity of a three-dimensional garment simulation. Textile Research Journal, 83, 171–184.
9.
KooM. R.SuhM. A. (2009). A study on the shape of hem line of semi-flare skirts according to a cutting angle - Based on a comparison between real clothing and 3D virtual clothing. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 17, 499–511.
10.
LafleurB.Magnenat-ThalmannN.ThalmannD. (1991). Cloth animation with self-collision detection. In KuniiT. (Ed.), Modeling in computer graphics (pp. 179–187). Tokyo: Springer Japan.
11.
LeeJ.NamY.CuiM. H.ChoiK. M. (2007). Fit evaluation of 3D virtual garments. Lecture Note in Computer Science, 4559, 550–558.
12.
LeeM.SohnH. (2011). Study on cases of the application of 3D apparel CAD system to domestic and overseas fashion education. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 35, 1112–1124.
13.
LimH. S.IstookC. L. (2011). Comparitive assessment of virtual garments using direct and manual avatars. The Research Journal of the Costumen Culture, 19, 1359–1371.
PetrovaA.AshdownS. P. (2008). Three-dimensional body scan data analysis: Body size and shape dependence of ease values for pants’ fit. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 26, 227–252.
18.
PriceJ.ZamkoffB. (1996). Grading techniques for modern design (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Fairchild Publications.
SchofieldN. A.AshdownS. P.HethornJ.LaBatK.SalussoC. J. (2006). Improving pant fit for women 55 and older through an exploration of two pant shapes. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24, 147–160.
21.
SongH. K.AshdownS. P. (2010). An exploratory study of the validity of visual fit assessment from three-dimensional scans. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 28, 263–278.
22.
SongH. K.AshdownS. P. (2011). Categorization of lower body shapes for adult females based on multiple view analysis. Textile Research Journal, 81, 914–931.
23.
SongH. K.AshdownS. P. (2012). Development of automated custom-made pants driven by body shape. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 30, 315–329.
24.
SpeerJ. K. (2008, 115). Victoria’s secret: Framing the fit problem. Apparel Magazine. Retrieved fromhttp://www.apparelmag.com
