In this paper I examined undergraduate student identity issues in relation to the elimination of the Department of Consumer Studies at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. The purpose of writing this paper was to provide some insight into our students’ identity, particularly in relation to the broader academic community. A feminist perspective (both theory and method) was used to examine gender issues that exist within textiles and clothing and gender bias in the larger academic community that impacts our female-dominated field.
Barnard, M. (1996). Fashion as communication. London: Routledge Press.
2.
Bem, S. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on gender inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
Bloom, L. (1998). Under the sign of hope: Feminist methodology and narrative interpretation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
4.
Boynton-Arthur, L. (1993). Social science aspects of dress: New directions. The applicability of ethnography and grounded theory to clothing and textile research. In S. Lennon & L. Burns (Eds.), ITAA special publication #5 (pp. 137-145). Monument, CO: International Textiles and Apparel Association.
5.
Brownmiller, S. (1984). Femininity. New York: Fawcett Columbine Press.
6.
Callahan, J. (2000, November). Two weddings, a funeral, and a journal or reflections on some recent encounters with feminism, fashion, and resistance. Paper presented at the ITAA pre-conference workshop on the feminist issue of the Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18(3).
7.
Chapkis, W. (1986). Beauty secrets. Boston: South End Press.
8.
Clough, A. (1990). Eggar challenged on snub to design, Design Week, 5(44): 3-3.
9.
Damhorst, M. (1999). Making connections across the cultures of research, design, and teaching in an era of uncertainty. In N. Owens (Ed.), International Textile and Apparel Association Proceedings (pp. 8-11). Monument, CO: ITAA.
10.
Davis, F. (1992). Fashion, culture, and identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Freitas, A., Kaiser, S., Chandler, J., Hall, C., Kim, Jung-Won, & Hammidi, T.Appearance management as border construction: Least favorite clothing, group distancing, and identity … not!Sociological inquiry, 67(3), 323-335.
12.
Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: Norton Publishers.
13.
Goffman, E. (1968). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Prentice-Hall.
14.
Hollows, J. (2000). Feminism, femininity, and popular culture. Manchester, U.K.: Manchester University Press.
15.
Hutton, S. (1998, October). [Personal Communication]. Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association.
16.
Kerr, N. (1987). The legacy: A centennial history of the state agricultural experiment stations, 1887-1987. Columbia, MO: Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Missouri-Columbia.
17.
Kidwell, C., & Steele, V. (1989). Men and women: Dressing the part. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Press.
18.
Kotsiopulos, A. (2000). Lines have been drawn: Gender gaps in merchandising, retailing, and consumer behavior publications. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18(3), 199-201.
19.
Kunkel, C. (1999). A visual analysis of feminist dress. In M. L. Damhorst, K. A. Miller & S. O. Michelman (Eds.), The meanings of dress (pp. 183-189). New York: Fairchild Publications.
20.
McRobbie, A. (1997). Bridging the gap: Feminism, fashion, and consumption, Feminist Review, 55, 73-89.
21.
McRobbie, A. (1994). Postmodernism and popular culture. London: Routledge.
22.
Michelman, S., & Kaiser, S. (2000a). Feminist issues in textiles and clothing research: Working through/with the contradictions. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18(3), 121-127.
23.
Michelman, S., & Kaiser, S. (2000b). The feminist forum: Voices from the field. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18(3), 182-184.
24.
Michelman, S. (1997). Changing old habits: Dress of women religious and its relationship to personal and social identity. Sociological Inquiry, 67(3), 350-363.
25.
Nava, M. (1992). Changing cultures: Feminism, youth, and consumption. London: Sage.
26.
Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
27.
Rudd, N., & Lennon, S. (2000). Body image and appearance-management behaviors in college women. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18(3), 152-162.
28.
Shilling, C. (1993). The body and social theory. London: Sage Publications.
29.
Smith, D. (1979). A sociology for women in J. Sherman & E. Beck, (Eds.), The prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge (p. 135-135). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
30.
Wilson, E. (1990). These new components of the spectacle: Fashion and Postmodernism. In R. Boyne & A. Rattansi (Eds.) Postmodernism and Society. London: Macmillan.
