Reducing rape myth acceptance (RMA) is essential to improve the treatment of victims and challenge the societal narratives that excuse sexual aggression. This study examined whether an educational intervention providing myth-debunking information could effectively reduce RMA. Participants first completed a pre-test assessing their agreement with a series of rape myth statements. They were then randomly assigned to either an educational intervention group, which received information designed to challenge common rape myths, or a control group, which received unrelated scientific content. RMA was reassessed immediately after the intervention (post-test) and again after a 2-week delay (follow-up). Results showed that participants in the intervention group exhibited a meaningful reduction in RMA scores both immediately and at follow-up, compared with the control group. These findings suggest that providing concise, evidence-based information may be an effective tool to reduce RMA over time.
AbramsM. P.Nicholas CarletonR.TaylorS.AsmundsonG. J. G. (2009). Human tonic immobility: Measurement and correlates. Depression and Anxiety, 26(6), 550–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20462
2.
AndersonI. (2007). What is a typical rape? Effects of victim and participant gender in female and male rape perception. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466606x101780
3.
AndersonL. A.WhistonS. C. (2005). Sexual assault education programs: A meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00237.x
4.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.PlanteE. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20159
5.
BeichnerD.SpohnC. (2005). Prosecutorial charging decisions in sexual assault cases: Examining the impact of a specialized prosecution unit. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16(4), 461–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403405277195
6.
BernsteinE.KanefskyR.CookM.NewinsA. R. (2022). Acceptance of rape myths and psychological symptoms: The indirect effect of self-blame. Journal of American College Health, 72(6), 1641–1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2022.2086005
7.
BeshersS.Di VitaM. (2021). Changes in rape myth acceptance among undergraduates: 2010 to 2017. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19–20), 9371–9392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519867153
8.
BohnerG. (1998). Vergewaltigungsmythen: Sozialpsychologische Untersuchungen über täterentlastende und opferfeindliche Überzeugungen im Bereich sexueller Gewalt [Rape myths: social psychological studies of perpetrator-relieving and victim-hostile beliefs in sexual violence]. Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.
9.
BohnerG.EysselF.PinaA.SieblerF.VikiG. T. (2009). Rape myth acceptance: Cognitive, affective and behavioural effects of beliefs that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator. In HorvathM.BrownJ. (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 17–45). Willan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843927129
10.
BoskovicI.OrtheyR.OtgaarH.MangiulliI.RassinE. (2023). #StudentsToo. Prevalence of sexual assault reports among students of three European universities and their actions post-assault. PLoS One, 18(4), Article e0283554. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283554
CananS. N.CozzolinoL.MyersJ. L.JozkowskiK. N. (2022). Does gender inclusive language affect psychometric properties of the illinois rape myth acceptance scale-short form? A two-sample validation study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221106144
15.
CananS. N.JozkowskiK. N.CrawfordB. L. (2018). Sexual assault supportive attitudes: Rape myth acceptance and token resistance in Greek and non-Greek college students from two university samples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(22), 3502–3530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516636064
16.
CrowneD. P.MarloweD. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358
17.
DalyK.BouhoursB. (2010). Rape and attrition in the legal process: A comparative analysis of five countries. Crime and Justice, 39(1), 565–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/653101
18.
DefermeD.OtgaarH.DodierO.KörnerA.MangiulliI.MerckelbachH.SauerlandM.PanzavoltaM.LoftusE. (2024). Repressed memories (of sexual abuse against minors) and statutes of limitations in Europe: Status Quo and possible alternatives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 16, 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12715
19.
De KeersmaeckerJ.DunningD.PennycookG.RandD. G.SanchezC.UnkelbachC.RoetsA. (2020). Investigating the robustness of the illusory truth effect across individual differences in cognitive ability, need for cognitive closure, and cognitive style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219853844
20.
DhamiM. K.LundriganS.ThomasS. (2020). Police discretion in rape cases. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 35(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-018-9299-4
21.
DinosS.BurrowesN.HammondK.CunliffeC. (2015). A systematic review of juries’ assessment of rape victims: Do rape myths impact on juror decision-making?. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 43(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2014.07.001
22.
EdwardsK. M.ProbstD. R.TansillE. C.DixonK. J.BennettS.GidyczC. A. (2014). In their own words: A content-analytic study of college women’s resistance to sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(14), 2527–2547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513520470
23.
EysselF.BohnerG. (2011). Schema effects of rape myth acceptance on judgments of guilt and blame in rape cases: The role of perceived entitlement to judge. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(8), 1579–1605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510370593
24.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
25.
FazioL. K.RandD. G.PennycookG. (2019). Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1705–1710. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01651-4
26.
FisherR. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1086/209351
27.
FloresS. A.HartlaubM. G. (1998). Reducing rape-myth acceptance in male college students: A meta-analysis of intervention studies. Journal of College Student Development, 39(5), 438–448.
28.
FoubertJ. D.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.BrasfieldH.HillB. (2010). Effects of a rape awareness program on college women: Increasing bystander efficacy and willingness to intervene. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(7), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20397
29.
FrazierA.GonzalesJ. E. (2022). Dispelling a myth: Reevaluating the predictive validity of rape myth acceptance for likelihood of engaging in sexual violence. Sexual Abuse, 34(4), 398–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632211026287
30.
GergerH.KleyH.BohnerG.SieblerF. (2007). The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 33(5), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20195
31.
Goodman-DelahuntyJ.GrahamK. (2011). The influence of victim intoxication and victim attire on police responses to sexual assault. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.127
32.
GrubbA.TurnerE. (2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002
33.
HarseyS. J.Adams-ClarkA. A.FreydJ. J. (2024). Associations between defensive victim-blaming responses (DARVO), rape myth acceptance, and sexual harassment. PLoS One, 19(12), Article e0313642.
34.
HineB.MurphyA. (2019). The influence of “High” vs. “Low” rape myth acceptance on police officers’ judgements of victim and perpetrator responsibility, and rape authenticity. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.08.001
35.
HockettJ. M.SaucierD. A.HoffmanB. H.SmithS. J.CraigA. W. (2009). Oppression through acceptance?: Predicting rape myth acceptance and attitudes toward rape victims. Violence Against Women, 15, 877–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209335489
36.
HohlK.StankoE. A. (2015). Complaints of rape and the criminal justice system: Fresh evidence on the attrition problem in England and Wales. European Journal of Criminology, 12(3), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815571949
37.
HudspithL. F.WagerN.WillmottD.GallagherB. (2023). Forty years of rape myth acceptance interventions: A systematic review of what works in naturalistic institutional settings and how this can be applied to educational guidance for jurors. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 24(2), 981–1000. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211050575
38.
Johansson-LoveJ.GeerJ. H. (2003). Investigation of attitude change in a rape prevention program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260502238542
39.
JohnsonN. L.JohnsonD. M. (2021). An empirical exploration into the measurement of rape culture. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1–2), NP70–NP95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517732347
40.
JohnsonN. L.LippN. S.StoneH. K. (2021). Initial evaluation of a gender-inclusive version of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 10(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000536
41.
JordanJ.MossmanE. (2019). “Get out of my home and Don’t come back!” empowering women through self-defense. Violence Against Women, 25(3), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218768712
42.
KankarašM.CapecchiS. (2025). Neither agree nor disagree: Use and misuse of the neutral response category in Likert-type scales. Metron, 83, 111–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-024-00276-5
43.
KingL. L.RobertsJ. J. (2011). Traditional gender role and rape myth acceptance: From the countryside to the big city. Women & Criminal Justice, 21(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2011.536045
44.
KleinsmithO. M.HahnO. N.HenryD.MerrellL.BlackstoneS.TomchikA. Y.SellJ.GramstadM.SchuetzJ. E.DoyleC. M.HaneyB. M. (2025). Are rape myths inherently gendered? Examining assumed gender ascribed to gender-neutral versions of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale among college students. Violence Against Women, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012251329222
45.
KrahéB. (2016). Societal responses to sexual violence against women: Rape myths and the “real rape” stereotype. In KuryH.RedoS.SheaE. (Eds.), Women and children as victims and offenders: Background, prevention, reintegration: Suggestions for succeeding generations (Vol. 1, pp. 671–700). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08398-8_24
46.
KrahéB.TemkinJ.BieneckS.BergerA. (2008). Prospective lawyers’ rape stereotypes and schematic decision making about rape cases. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14(5), 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160801932380
47.
KrumpalI. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025–2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
LeverickF. (2020). What do we know about rape myths and juror decision making?The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 24(3), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712720923157
50.
LewandowskyS.EckerU. K.SeifertC. M.SchwarzN.CookJ. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
LorenzK.KirknerA.UllmanS. E. (2019). A qualitative study of sexual assault survivors’ post-assault legal system experiences. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 20(3), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2019.1592643
53.
MaddenT. M.KlopferF. J. (1978). The “cannot decide” option in thurstone-type attitude scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38(2), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447803800207
54.
McKimmieB. M.MasserB. M.BongiornoR. (2014). What counts as rape? The effect of offense prototypes, victim stereotypes, and participant gender on how the complainant and defendant are perceived. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2273–2303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513518843
55.
McLeanD. C.ThomasB. R. (2014). Unsuccessful treatments of “Writer’s Block”: A meta-analysis. Psychological Reports, 115(1), 276–278. https://doi.org/10.2466/28.PR0.115c12z0
56.
McMahonS.FarmerG. L. (2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71
MeloyM. L.MillerS. L. (2011). The victimization of women: Law, policies, and politics. Oxford University Press.
59.
MennickeA.AndersonD.OehmeK.KennedyS. (2014). Law enforcement officers’ perception of rape and rape victims: A multimethod study. Violence and Victims, 29(5), 814–827. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-13-00017
60.
MerkenS.JamesV. (2020). Perpetrating the myth: Exploring media accounts of rape myths on “Women’s” networks. Deviant Behavior, 41(9), 1176–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2019.1603531
61.
MöllerA.SöndergaardH. P.HellströmL. (2017). Tonic immobility during sexual assault – A common reaction predicting post-traumatic stress and severe depression. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 96(8), 932–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13174
62.
NicholsA. L.ManerJ. K. (2008). The good-subject effect: Investigating participant demand characteristics. The Journal of General Psychology, 135(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.3200/GENP.135.2.151-166
63.
O’NealE. N. (2019). “Victim is not credible”: The influence of rape culture on police perceptions of sexual assault complainants. Justice Quarterly, 36(1), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1406977
64.
OrthU. (2002). Secondary victimization of crime victims by criminal proceedings. Social Justice Research, 15(4), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021210323461
65.
OtgaarH.MangiulliI.RiesthuisP.DodierO.PatihisL. (2022). Changing beliefs in repressed memory and dissociative amnesia. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36, 1234–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4005
66.
ParkerC.ScottS.GeddesA. (2019). Snowball Sampling, In AtkinsonP.DelamontS.CernatA.SakshaugJ. W.WilliamsR. A. (Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036831710
67.
PearsonJ.BarkerD. (2018). Male rape: What we know, don’t know and need to find out – A critical review. Crime Psychology Review, 4(1), 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744006.2019.1591757
68.
ReddyL. N.CampbellC. M.MorczekA. L. (2022). Exploring the impact of informal rape myth education in a nonstudent sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(3–4), NP1298–NP1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520927496
ScheweP.O’DonohueW. (1996). Rape prevention with high-risk males: Short-term outcome of two interventions. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 25(5), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02437542
72.
SchlegelA.CourtoisR. (2019). Scales for evaluating the acceptance of the rape myth: Benefits and limitations. International Journal of Risk and Recovery, 2(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijrr.v2i1.3587
73.
ShawJ.CampbellR.CainD.FeeneyH. (2017). Beyond surveys and scales: How rape myths manifest in sexual assault police records. Psychology of Violence, 7(4), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000072
74.
SleathE.BullR. (2012). Comparing rape victim and perpetrator blaming in a police officer sample: Differences between police officers with and without special training. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(5), 646–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811434696
75.
SmithO.SkinnerT. (2017). How rape myths are used and challenged in rape and sexual assault trials. Social & Legal Studies, 26(4), 441–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663916680130
76.
SüssenbachP.EysselF.ReesJ.BohnerG. (2017). Looking for blame: Rape myth acceptance and attention to victim and perpetrator. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(15), 2323–2344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515591975
77.
SwireB.EckerU. K. H.LewandowskyS. (2017). The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(12), 1948–1961. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000422
78.
TemkinJ. (2010). “And always keep a-hold of nurse, for fear of finding something worse”: Challenging rape myths in the courtroom. New Criminal Law Review, 13(4), 710–734. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2010.13.4.710
79.
TemkinJ.KrahéB. (2008). Sexual assault and the justice gap: A question of attitude. Hart Publishing.
80.
TemkinJ.GrayJ. M.BarrettJ. (2018). Different functions of rape myth use in court: Findings from a trial observation study. Feminist Criminology, 13(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116661627
81.
TestaM.ParksK. A.HoffmanJ. H.CraneC. A.LeonardK. E.ShyhallaK. (2015). Do drinking episodes contribute to sexual aggression perpetration in college men?Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 76(4), 507–515.
82.
TidmarshP.HamiltonG.SharmanS. J. (2020). Changing police officers’ attitudes in sexual offense cases: A 12-month follow-up study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(9), 1176–1189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820921201
83.
TrottierD.BenbouricheM.BonnevilleV. (2021). A meta-analysis on the association between rape myth acceptance and sexual coercion perpetration. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(3), 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1704677
84.
UrbanR. E.Porras PylandC. (2021). Development and preliminary validation of the gender inclusive rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211055076
85.
ZidenbergA. M.WielingaF.SparksB.MargeotesK.HarkinsL. (2022). Lost in translation: A quantitative and qualitative comparison of rape myth acceptance. Psychology, Crime & Law, 28(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1905810
