Blaming the Victim or Respecting Autonomy? The Impact of Neoliberal Ideology and Gender Inequalities on Rape Myths Acceptance in Europe

Abstract

The study explores how country-level gender equality and neoliberal ideology affect rape myth acceptance (RMA). It hypothesizes that gender equality reduces, while neoliberalism increases RMA. Using data from 22,978 respondents across 23 European countries, the study finds an interactional effect: in less gender-equal countries, stronger neoliberalism increases RMA, whereas in more gender-equal countries, it reduces RMA. This is attributed to different interpretations of individuality. Additionally, both gender equality and neoliberalism influence the impact of individual factors like gender, age, and life satisfaction on RMA. The study suggests further research should focus on contextual influences on RMA.

Keywords

victim blaming rape myth acceptance neoliberalism Europe multilevel modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

K. B.

Cooper

Okamura

(1997). Individual differences and attitudes toward rape: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(3), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297233008

Aosved

A. C.

Long

P. J.

(2006). Co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance. Sex Roles, 55(7-8), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9101-4

Banyard

V. L.

(2008). Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behavior: The case of interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 23(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.83

Barca

L. A.

(2018). The agency factor: Neoliberal configurations of risk in news discourse on the Steubenville, Ohio rape case. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(3), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1408476

Barn

Powers

R. A.

(2021). Rape myth acceptance in contemporary times: A comparative study of university students in India and the United Kingdom. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(7–8), 3514–3535. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0886260518775750

Barnett

N. J.

Felid

H. S.

(1977). Sex differences in university students’ attitudes toward rape. Journal of College Student Personnel, 18(2), 93–96.

Bartling

C. A.

Eisenman

(1993). Sexual harassment proclivities in men and women. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(3), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03337321

Bay-Cheng

L. Y.

(2015). The agency line: A neoliberal metric for appraising young women’s sexuality. Sex Roles, 73(7), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0452-6

Bay-Cheng

L. Y.

Fitz

C. C.

Alizaga

N. M.

Zucker

A. N.

(2015). Tracking homo oeconomicus: Development of the neoliberal beliefs inventory. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), Article e4837. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i1.366

10.

Bell

S. T.

Kuriloff

P. J.

Lottes

(1994). Understanding attributions of blame in stranger rape and date rape situations: An examination of gender, race, identification, and students’ social perceptions of rape victims 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(19), 1719–1734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01571.x

11.

Bendixen

Henriksen

Nøstdahl

R. K.

(2014). Attitudes toward rape and attribution of responsibility to rape victims in a Norwegian community sample. Nordic Psychology, 66(3), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2014.931813

12.

Brownmiller

(1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. Fawcett Columbine.

13.

Bunting

A. B.

Reeves

J. B.

(1983). Perceived male sex orientation and beliefs about rape. Deviant Behavior, 4(3–4), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.1983.9967618

14.

Burn

S. M.

(2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60(11-12), 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9581-5

15.

Burt

M. R.

(1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217

16.

Chapleau

K. M.

Oswald

D. L.

Russell

B. L.

(2007). How ambivalent sexism toward women and men support rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 57(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9196-2

17.

Cohn

E. S.

Dupuis

E. C.

Brown

T. M.

(2009). In the eye of the beholder: Do behavior and character affect victim and perpetrator responsibility for acquaintance rape? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(7), 1513–1535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00493.x

18.

Costin

Schwarz

(1987). Beliefs about rape and women’s social roles: A four-nation study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F088626087002001003

19.

Cowan

(2000). Women’s hostility toward women and rape and sexual harassment myths. Violence Against Women, 6(3), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010022181822

20.

Cowan

Neighbors

DeLaMoreaux

Behnke

(1998). Women’s hostility toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(2), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00154.x

21.

Crall

Goodfriend

. (2016). She asked for it: Statistics and predictors of rape myth acceptance. Modern Psychological Studies, 22(1), 15–27.

22.

Earnshaw

V. A.

Pitpitan

E. V.

Chaudoir

S. R.

(2011). Intended responses to rape as functions of attitudes, attributions of fault, and emotions. Sex Roles, 64(5), 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9920-1

23.

Elliott

(2014). “Who’s to blame?” constructing the responsible sexual agent in neoliberal sex education. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-014-0158-5

24.

European Commission, Brussels. (2020). Eurobarometer 85.3 (2016). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6695 Data file Version 2.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13519

25.

Fortuna

Gulla

(2020). Belief in rape myths: Determinants and consequences. Problems of Forensic Sciences=Z Zagadnień Nauk Sądowych, 121, 21–38. https://arch.ies.gov.pl/images/PDF/2020/vol_121/121_Fortuna.pdf .

26.

Gregor

Grzebalska

(2016). Thoughts on the contested relationship between neoliberalism and feminism. In Kováts

(Ed.), Solidarity in struggle. Feminist perspectives on neoliberalism in east-central Europe (pp. 11–20). Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/budapest/12796.pdf .

27.

Halman

(1996). Individualism in individualized society? International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 37(3–4), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1163/002071596X00019

28.

Harrington

(2022). Neoliberal Sexual Violence Politics: Toxic Masculinity and #MeToo. Palgrave Macmillan.

29.

Hayes

R. M.

Lorenz

Bell

K. A.

(2013). Victim blaming others: Rape myth acceptance and the just world belief. Feminist Criminology, 8(3), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1557085113484788

30.

Heaven

P. C.

Connors

Pretorius

(1998). Victim characteristics and attribution of rape blame in Australia and South Africa. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138(1), 131–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549809600363

31.

Johnson

B. E.

Kuck

D. L.

Schander

P. R.

(1997). Rape myth acceptance and sociodemographic characteristics: A multidimensional analysis. Sex Roles, 36(11), 693–707. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025671021697

32.

Karimi-Malekabadi

Falahatpishe Baboli

(2022). Qeirat values and victim blaming in Iran: The mediating effect of culture-specific gender roles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(3–4), 2485–2509. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F08862605221101184

33.

Katz

Gravelin

C. R.

O’Brien

(2018). Neoliberal beliefs and perceptions of unintended adolescent pregnancy after consensual or forced sex. Sex Roles, 78(11), 810–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0842-z

34.

Lerner

M. J.

(1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Plenum.

35.

Locke

B. D.

Mahalik

J. R.

(2005). Examining masculinity norms, problem drinking, and athletic involvement as predictors of sexual aggression in college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(3), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.279

36.

Lonsway

K. A.

Cortina

L. M.

Magley

V. J.

(2008). Sexual harassment mythology: Definition, conceptualization, and measurement. Sex Roles, 58(9–10), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9367-1

37.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1994). Rape myths. In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(2), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x

38.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 704–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.704

39.

Manoussaki

Veitch

(2015). Ambivalent sexism, right wing authoritarianism and rape myth acceptance in Scotland. International Journal of Gender & Women’s Studies, 3(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijgws.v3n1p9

40.

McMahon

Farmer

G. L.

(2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71

41.

McMahon

(2010). Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. Journal of American College Health, 59(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.483715

42.

Milesi

Süssenbach

Bohner

Megías

J. L.

(2020). The interplay of modern myths about sexual aggression and moral foundations in the blaming of rape victims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2622

43.

Nagar

(2016). Reporting rape: Language, neoliberalism, and the media. Discourse & Communication, 10(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1750481315623900

44.

Nagel

Matsuo

McIntyre

K. P.

Morrison

(2005). Attitudes toward victims of rape: Effects of gender, race, religion, and social class. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(6), 725–737. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0886260505276072

45.

Nelson

Prilleltensky

(2010). Community Psychology: In Pursuit of Liberation and Well-being. Macmillan Publishing Company, Collier Macmillan Publishers.

46.

Niemi

Young

(2016). When and why we see victims as responsible: The impact of ideology on attitudes toward victims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(9), 1227–1242. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167216653933

47.

Nyúl

Ferenczy

(2015). A nemi erőszak mítoszok és elfogadottságuk Magyarországon [OTDK dolgozat (XXXII. Országos Tudományos Diákköri Konferencia)].

48.

Nyúl

Ferenczy

Kende

Szabó

(2018). A nemierőszak-mítoszok elfogadása skála (NEMES) magyar adaptációja. Alkalmazott Pszichológia, 18(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.17627/ALKPSZICH.2018.1.115

49.

Nyúl

Kende

(2021). Rape myth acceptance as a relevant psychological construct in a gender-unequal context: The Hungarian adaptation of the updated Illinois rape myths acceptance scale. Current Psychology, 42(4), 3098–3111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01631-9

50.

Parti

Szabó

Virág

(2016). A média azt üzente…: Szexuális erőszakkal kapcsolatos ismeretek, vélemények és attitűdök vizsgálata egy médiakampány kapcsán. Médiakutató, 17(2), 7–24. https://mediakutato.hu/cikk/2016_02_nyar/01_a_media_uzenete.pdf .

51.

Payne

D. L.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using theIllinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238

52.

Peczkowska

N. M.

(2015). Rape myth acceptance among residents of the United States and Poland [PhD Thesis]. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology.

53.

Pedersen

S. H.

Strömwall

L. A.

(2013). Victim blame, sexism and just-world beliefs: A cross-cultural comparison. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20(6), 932–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2013.770715

54.

Rollero

Tartaglia

(2019). The effect of sexism and rape myths on victim blame. Sexuality & Culture, 23(1), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9549-8

55.

Stephens

Kamimura

Yamawaki

Bhattacharya

Birkholz

Makomenaw

Olson

L. M.

(2016). Rape myth acceptance among college students in the United States, Japan, and India. Sage Open, 6(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2158244016675015

56.

Stringer

(2014). Knowing the Victim. Feminism, agency and victim politics in neoliberal times. Routledge.

57.

Strömwall

L. A.

Alfredsson

Landström

(2013). Rape victim and perpetrator blame and the just world hypothesis: The influence of victim gender and age. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 19(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2012.683455

58.

Suarez

Gadalla

T. M.

(2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(11), 2010–2035. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0886260509354503

59.

Timmer

D. A.

Norman

W. H.

(1984). The ideology of victim precipitation. Criminal Justice Review, 9(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F073401688400900209

60.

Viki

G. T.

Abrams

(2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47(5–6), 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021342912248

61.

Virág

(2001). A szexuális erőszak áldozatai [Doktori (PhD) értekezés, Miskolci Egyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar]. http://midra.uni-miskolc.hu/document/5730/1175.pdf

62.

Virágh

E. A.

(2025). Neoliberalism, authoritarian neoliberalism, and #metoo: Discursive constructions of sexual harassment and victimhood in Hungary. Szociológiai Szemle, 35(3), 140–166. https://doi.org/10.51624/SzocSzemle.18775

63.

Walby

(2020). Varieties of gender regimes. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 27(3), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxaa018

64.

Ward

A. T.

(2020). Ideology and Rape Culture: Examining the Influence of Neoliberalism on Rape Myth Acceptance [PhD Thesis]. University of Cincinnati.

65.

Ward

(1995). Attitudes toward rape: Feminist and social psychological perspectives. Sage.

66.

Ward

Newlon

Krahé

Myambo

Payne

Tastaban

Yuksel

Ghadially

Kumar

Lee

H. B.

(1992). The attitudes toward rape victims scale: Psychometric data from 14 countries. (Manuscript). https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/3260/file/the_attitudes_1992.pdf.

67.

Yamawaki

Tschanz

B. T.

(2005). Rape perception differences between Japanese and American college students: On the mediating influence of gender role traditionality. Sex Roles, 52(5), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-2680-7