Abstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV) and its consequences are recognized as a serious global issue. Regular monitoring of prevalence rates and associated factors is essential to evaluate the effectiveness of prevention efforts and to identify vulnerable populations. However, representative and up-to-date data on the 12-month prevalence of IPV and its sociodemographic correlates in Germany remain rare. This study provides such estimates using survey data on sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported physical and sexual IPV victimization from a randomly selected representative sample of the German population aged 16 years and older. Prevalence rates were analyzed descriptively, and associations with sociodemographic characteristics were examined using multiple linear regression analysis. Among the N = 1,522 individuals who were currently in a relationship or had been in one within the past year, 7.8% reported physical IPV victimization (60% were female victims) and 3.7% reported sexual IPV victimization (81% were female victims). For both types of IPV, prevalence rates differed significantly by sex. Physical and sexual IPV were moderately correlated (r = .46, p < .001). Physical IPV victimization was more likely among unemployed, unmarried, and lower-income individuals. Sexual IPV was more prevalent among women, individuals with at least one minor child, those who were unemployed, and those who were not married. Current unemployment showed the strongest association with both forms of IPV. These findings underscore the continued public-health relevance of IPV in Germany, highlighting the importance of sustained monitoring and the need to consider sociodemographic indicators when planning resources and designing inclusive support services.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
