Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

While online social interactions have enhanced connectivity and simplified communication, they have concurrently introduced associated risks, such as cyberbullying, which has garnered significant attention as a pressing public health issue. The relationship between cyberbullying perpetration and cybervictimization has yielded inconsistent results, and there is a lack of research exploring this relationship from the perspective of micro-dynamic interactions. This study examined the dynamic feedback loops among cyberbullying perpetration, cybervictimization, and social networking use intensity (SNUI) using a diary study. A total of 237 college students (M_age = 19.90 years, SD = 2.15) completed a 14-day consecutive measurement of cyberbullying perpetration, cybervictimization, and SNUI. Dynamic structural equation models showed positive cross-lagged and feedback effects between cyberbullying perpetration and cybervictimization, suggesting a self-perpetuating loop. The cross-lagged effects of daily cyberbullying perpetration on SNUI was significant. However, the cross-lagged effects of SNUI on cyberbullying perpetration, of cybervictimization on SNUI, and of SNUI on cybervictimization were insignificant. These findings suggest a spiral of positive association between cyberbullying perpetration and cybervictimization. Furthermore, engagement in cyberbullying perpetration fosters increased utilization of social networking platforms on the subsequent day. This study provides new insights into mitigating cyberbullying by disrupting its self-perpetuating cycle and highlights the need to focus on how social media are used, rather than the intensity of their use.

Keywords

cyberbullying perpetration cybervictimization social networking use intensity dynamic structural equation model feedback effect

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnew

(1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–87.

Allen Weng

Bulgin

Diaz

Zhang

Tan

Armstrong-Hough

. (2025). Communication attributes modify the anxiety risk associated with problematic social media use: Evidence from a prospective diary method study. Addictive Behaviors, 166, Article 108324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108324

Anderson

C. A.

Buckley

K. E.

Carnagey

N. L.

(2008). Creating your own hostile environment: A laboratory examination of trait aggressiveness and the violence escalation cycle. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207311282

Arend

M. G.

Schäfer

(2019). Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation. Psychological Methods, 24(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000195

Asparouhov

Hamaker

E. L.

Muthén

(2018). Dynamic structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(3), 359–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1406803

Bandura

(2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03

Barlett

C. P.

Gentile

D. A.

(2012). Attacking others online: The formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028113

Barlett

C. P.

Gentile

D. A.

Chng

Chamberlin

(2018). Social media use and cyberbullying perpetration: A longitudinal analysis. Violence and Gender, 5(3),191–197. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2017.0047

Boer

Stevens

G. W. J. M.

Finkenauer

de Looze

M. E.

van den Eijnden

R. J. J. M

. (2021). Social media use intensity, social media use problems, and mental health among adolescents: Investigating directionality and mediating processes. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, Article 106645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106645

10.

Camacho

Ortega-Ruiz

Romera

E. M.

(2021). Longitudinal associations between cybervictimization, anger rumination and cyberaggression. Aggressive Behavior, 47(3), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21958

11.

Camacho

Runions

Ortega-Ruiz

Romera

E. M.

(2023). Bullying and cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: Prospective within-person associations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(2), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01704-3

12.

Camacho

Smith

P. K.

Ortega-Ruiz

Romera

E. M.

(2023). Joint trajectories of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: Associations with psychosocial adjustment. Computers in Human Behavior, 148, Article 107924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107924

13.

Camerini

A. L.

Marciano

Carrara

Schulz

P. J.

(2020). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among children and adolescents: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Telematics and Informatics, 49, Article 101362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101362

14.

Cappadocia

M. C.

Craig

W. M.

Pepler

(2013). Cyberbullying prevalence, stability, and risk factors during adolescence. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 28, 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573513491212

15.

Chan

T. K. H.

Cheung

C. M. K.

Lee

Z. W. Y.

(2021). Cyberbullying on social networking sites: A literature review and future research directions. Information and Management, 58(2), Article 103411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103411

16.

Chan

T. K. H.

Cheung

C. M. K.

Wong

R. Y. M.

(2019). Cyberbullying on social networking sites: The crime opportunity and affordance perspectives. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(2), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2019.1599500

17.

Chester

D. S.

Clark

M. A.

DeWall

C. N.

(2021). The flux, pulse, and spin of aggression-related affect. Emotion, 21(3), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000730

18.

China Internet Network Information Center. (2025). The 56th statistical report on internet development in China. https://www.cnnic.cn/n4/2025/0721/c88-11328.html

19.

Choi

Carleton

Walsh

Hancock

(2024). Mindfulness buffers the negative effects of social media overuse on work effort through state self-control during crisis: A daily diary study. Behaviour and Information Technology. 44(13), 3115–3132. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2433031

20.

Chu

X. W.

Fan

C. Y.

Liu

Q. Q.

Zhou

Z. K.

(2018). Stability and change of bullying roles in the traditional and virtual contexts: A three-wave longitudinal study in Chinese early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(11), 2384–2400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0908-4

21.

Craig

Boniel-Nissim

King

Walsh

S. D.

Boer

Donnelly

P. D.

Harel-Fisch

Malinowska-Cieślik

Gaspar

Matos

Cosma

Van den Eijnden

Vieno

Elgar

F. J.

Molcho

Bjereld

Pickett

(2020). Social media use and cyber-bullying: A cross-national analysis of young people in 42 countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(6S), S100–S108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.03.006

22.

Ding

Zhao

Huang

Lei

(2025). The bidirectional mediation roles of depression and hostile attribution bias in the relationship between peer conflict and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration: A two-wave study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251322811

23.

Ditch_the_Label. (2018). The annual bullying survey 2018. https://www.ditchthelabel.org/wp–content/uploads/2018/06/The-Annual-Bullying-Survey-2018-2.pdf

24.

Doğan

Şen

İ. E. Y.

Şahin

Y. L.

(2025). The relationship between cyber victimization, social media addiction, social media literacy, and platform usage in adolescents. Current Psychology, 44, 13859–13871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08098-y

25.

Erreygers

Vandebosch

Vranjes

Baillien

De Witte

(2018). Positive or negative spirals of online behavior? Exploring reciprocal associations between being the actor and the recipient of prosocial and antisocial behavior online. New Media and Society, 20(9), 3437–3456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817749518

26.

Frijns

Keijsers

Finkenauer

(2020). Keeping secrets from parents: On galloping horses, prancing ponies and pink unicorns. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.041

27.

Giumetti

G. W.

Kowalski

R. M.

(2022). Cyberbullying via social media and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, Article 101314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101314

28.

Giumetti

G. W.

Kowalski

R. M.

Feinn

R. S.

(2022). Predictors and outcomes of cyberbullying among college students: A two wave study. Aggressive Behavior, 48(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21992

29.

Hamaker

E. L.

Kuiper

R. M.

Grasman

R. P.

(2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889

30.

James

K. M.

Silk

J. S.

Scott

L. N.

Hutchinson

E. A.

Wang

Sequeira

S. L.

Oppenheimer

Ladouceur

C. D.

(2023). Peer connectedness and social technology use during COVID-19 lockdown. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 51(7), 937–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-023-01040-5

31.

Jin

Miao

(2022). Family incivility and cyberbullying perpetration among college students: Negative affect as a mediator and dispositional mindfulness as a moderator. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(23–24), NP21826–NP21849. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211063000

32.

Kahlow

J. A.

Coker

M. C.

Richards

(2020). The multimodal nature of Snapchat in close relationships: Toward a social presence-based theoretical framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, Article 106409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106409

33.

Kasturiratna

K. T. A. S.

Hartanto

Chen

C. H. Y.

Tong

E. M. W.

Majeed

N. M.

(2024). Umbrella review of meta–analyses on the risk factors, protective factors, consequences and interventions of cyberbullying victimization. Nature Human Behaviour, 9, 101–132. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02011-6

34.

Koban

Stein

J. P.

Eckhardt

Ohler

(2018). Quid pro quo in Web 2.0. Connecting personality traits and Facebook usage intensity to uncivil commenting intentions in public online discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.015

35.

Kramer

A. D.

Guillory

J. E.

Hancock

J. T.

(2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(24), 8788–8790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111

36.

Kuiper

R. M.

Ryan

(2020). Meta-analysis of lagged regression models: A continuous-time approach. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(3), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1652613

37.

Kwan

G. C. E.

Skoric

M. M.

(2013). Facebook bullying: An extension of battles in school. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.014

38.

Låftman

S. B.

Modin

Ostberg

(2013). Cyberbullying and subjective health. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(1), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.10.020

39.

Lee

S. S.

Jun

Jung

(2025). Gender differences in the moderating effect of cyberbullying peers between cyberbullying offending and cyberbullying victimization in South Korea. Gender Issues, 42(3), 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-025-09368-6

40.

Lau

J. T. F.

P. K. H.

A. M. S.

Tang

Qin

(2016). Validation of the Social Networking Activity Intensity Scale among junior middle school students in China. PLoS ONE, 11(10), Article e0165695. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165695

41.

Lozano-Blasco

Cortés–Pascual

Latorre-Martínez

M. P.

(2020). Being a cybervictim and a cyberbully: The duality of cyberbullying: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, Article 106444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106444

42.

Luo

Liu

(2024). From cross–lagged effects to feedback effects: Further insights into the estimation and interpretation of bidirectional relations. Behavior Research Methods, 56(4), 3685–3705. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02304-0

43.

Marciano

Schulz

P. J.

Camerini

A. L.

(2020). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization in youth: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 25(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz031

44.

P. K. H.

J. B.

Xie

L. Y.

Liu

Jiang

Chen

Y. H.

Lau

J. T. F.

(2024). Communication in social networking sites on offline and online social support and life satisfaction among university students: Tie strength matters. Journal of Adolescent Health, 74(5), 971–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.10.030

45.

Morea

Calvete

(2022). Understanding the perpetuation of cyberbullying victimization in adolescents: The role of executive functions. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 50(10), 1299–1311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-022-00926-0

46.

Müller

C. R.

Pfetsch

Schultze–Krumbholz

Ittel

(2018). Does media use lead to cyberbullying or vice versa? Testing longitudinal associations using a latent cross-lagged panel design. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.007

47.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

48.

Navarro

Yubero

Larrañaga

(2016). Cyberbullying across the globe: Gender, family, and mental health. Springer.

49.

Nobakht

H. N.

Wichstrøm

Steinsbekk

(2025). Longitudinal relations between social media use and cyberbullying victimization across adolescence: Within-person effects in a birth cohort. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02205-9

50.

Orben

Meier

Dalgleish

Blakemore

(2024). Mechanisms linking social media use to adolescent mental health vulnerability. Nature Reviews Psychology, 3, 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00307-y

51.

O’Reilly

Dogra

Whiteman

Hughes

Eruyar

Reilly

(2018). Is social media bad for mental health and wellbeing? Exploring the perspectives of adolescents. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 23(3), 601–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104518775154

52.

Peluchette

J. V.

Karl

Wood

Williams

(2015). Cyberbullying victimization: Do victims’ personality and risky social network behaviors contribute to the problem? Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.028

53.

Peprah

Oduro

M. S.

Addo

I. Y.

(2025). Family affluence and bullying victimisation affect life satisfaction in large-bodied adolescents: Evidence from 37 high-income countries. Child Abuse and Neglect, 160, Article 107213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107213

54.

Riordan

B. C.

Winter

Flett

J. A. M.

Mason

Scarf

Jose

P. E.

Conner

T. S.

(2022). Does the fear of missing out moderate the relationship between social networking use and affect? A daily diary study. Psychological Reports, 125(6), 3084–3099. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211040441

55.

Runions

K. C.

(2013). Toward a conceptual model of motive and selfcontrol in cyber-aggression: Rage, revenge, reward, and recreation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 751–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9936-2

56.

Runions

K. C.

Bak

(2015). Online moral disengagement, cyberbullying, and cyberaggression. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(7), 400–405. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0670

57.

Schultzberg

Muthén

(2018). Number of subjects and time points needed for multilevel time-series analysis: A simulation study of dynamic structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 25(4), 495–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1392862

58.

Shapka

J. D.

Onditi

H. Z.

Collie

R. J.

Lapidot-Lefler

(2018). Cyberbullying and cybervictimization within a cross-cultural context: A study of Canadian and Tanzanian adolescents. Child Development, 89(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12829

59.

She

P. K. H.

J. B.

Liu

Jiang

Chen

Y. H.

Lau

J. T. F.

(2023). The double-edged sword effect of social networking use intensity on problematic social networking use among college students: The role of social skills and social anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, Article 107555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107555

60.

Shen

Meng

Zhang

Huang

Luo

Zhang

X. Y.

(2020). Internet addiction among college students in a Chinese population: Prevalence, correlates, and its relationship with suicide attempts. Depression and Anxiety, 37(8), 812–821. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23036

61.

Smith

P. K.

Mahdavi

Carvalho

Fisher

Russell

Tippett

(2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x

62.

Sun

M. Z.

Z. J.

B. N.

Chen

C. P.

Chen

Q. W.

Wang

D. F.

(2024). Prevalence of cyberbullying involvement and its association with clinical correlates among Chinese college students. Journal of Affective Disorders, 367, 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.198

63.

Tie

Zhu

Qiu

(2023). How does COVID-19-related social media usage influence disordered eating? A daily diary study among Chinese adults during lockdown. Journal of Eating Disorders, 11(1), 230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00952-3

64.

Van Ouytsel

Ponnet

Walrave

Temple

J. R

. (2019). Longitudinal associations between sexting, cyberbullying, and bullying among adolescents: Cross-lagged panel analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 73, 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.03.008

65.

Wachs

Mazzone

Milosevic

Wright

M. F.

Blaya

Gámez-Guadix

O’Higgins Norman

(2021). Online correlates of cyberhate involvement among young people from ten European countries: An application of the Routine Activity and Problem Behaviour Theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 123, Article 106872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106872

66.

Wang

Xie

Wang

Lei

Jiang

(2019). Cyberbullying and depression among Chinese college students: A moderated mediation model of social anxiety and neuroticism. Journal of Affective Disorders, 256, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.061

67.

Wang

Hawk

S. T.

Wong

(2025). Daily perceptions of social status and aggressive and prosocial behaviors on social media: The moderating role of narcissism. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 54, 2354–2372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02199-4

68.

Wright

M. F.

(2025). Emotional and cognitive mechanisms of cyber-displaced aggression: Exploring the impact of young adults’ victimization. BMC Public Health, 25(1), Article 2209. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23450-4

69.

Xiao

Zhou

Wang

Lin

Jiang

Wei

(2025). The relationship between envy and problematic social media use: Evidence from longitudinal study and daily diary investigation. International Journal of Psychology, 60(4), Article e70081. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.70081

70.

Xie

Hong

Kang

Xiao

Liu

Shapka

J. D.

(2022). Examining the validity and reliability of the short form of Cyberbullying and Cybervictimization (CAV) Scale. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30(5), 1155–1159. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2022.05.029

71.

Yue

Rich

(2023). Social media and adolescent mental health. Current Pediatrics Reports, 11, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-023-00298-z

72.

Zhu

Huang

Evans

Zhang

(2021). Cyberbullying among adolescents and children: A comprehensive review of the global situation, risk factors, and preventive measures. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, Article 634909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.634909

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB

A Self-Perpetuating Loop: Bivariate Dynamic Bidirectional Relationships Linking Cyberbullying Perpetration,Cybervictimization,and Social Networking Use Intensity

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material