Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The role of witnesses is central to understanding and preventing cyberbullying, yet tools for measuring their attitudes and intentions remain limited. This study aimed to: (1) validate the Attitudes toward Witnesses’ Actions questionnaire, (2) validate a new instrument designed to measure the Behavioral Intentions of Cyberbullying Witnesses (BICW), and (3) examine whether witnesses’ cyberbullying intentions mediate the relationship between their attitudes and cyberbullying perpetration. A total of 1,156 adolescents (M_age = 14.39, SD = 1.65; girls = 54.30%) participated in this longitudinal study by completing self-report questionnaires across three waves. Both exploratory and confirmatory analyses were conducted to evaluate the structure of the instruments. Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and bifactor analyses were applied to the Attitudes toward Witnesses’ Actions questionnaire, while path analysis was used to examine the mediating role of intentions in the relationship between attitudes and cyberbullying perpetration. The findings supported a bifactor ESEM model for the Attitudes toward Witnesses’ Actions questionnaire, identifying a total score and five different factors. For the BICW questionnaire, factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure. Both instruments demonstrated adequate psychometric properties. Although witnesses’ attitudes, intentions, and perpetration were correlated, cyberbullying intentions did not mediate the relationship between attitudes and cyberbullying perpetration. This study provides validated tools for assessing witnesses’ attitudes and intentions in cyberbullying contexts, offering critical insights for clinical practice. These tools can facilitate the promotion of provictim behaviors and inform the development of interventions targeting attitudinal changes to prevent cyberbullying.

Keywords

behavioral intentions of cyberbullying witnesses witnesses’ cyberbullying attitudes cyberbullying perpetration validation mediational effect

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aboujaoude

Savage

M. W.

Starcevic

Salame

W. O.

(2015). Cyberbullying: Review of an old problem gone viral. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.011

Anderson

C. A.

Bushman

B. J.

(2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231

Asparouhov

Muthén

(2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204

Barlett

C. P.

Gentile

D. A.

Chew

(2016). Predicting cyberbullying from anonymity. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000055

Barlińska

Szuster

Winiewski

(2013). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2137

Bartholomew

L. K.

Parcel

G. S.

Kok

Gottlieb

N. H.

Fernández

M. E.

(2011). Planning health promotion programs; An intervention mapping approach. Jossey Bass. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.32.6.33.s38

Berne

Frisén

Schultze-Krumbholz

Scheithauer

Naruskov

Luik

Katzer

Erentaite

Zukauskiene

(2013). Cyberbullying assessment instruments: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.022

Boulton

Lloyd

Down

Marx

(2012). Predicting undergraduates’ selfreported engagement in traditional and cyberbullying from attitudes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0369

Buckels

E. E.

Trapnell

P. D.

Paulhus

D. L.

(2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016

10.

Calvete

Cortazar

Fernández-González

Echezarraga

Beranuy

León

González-Cabrera

Orue

(2021). Effects of a brief preventive intervention in cyberbullying and grooming in adolescents. Psychosocial Intervention, 30(2), 75–84.

11.

Calvete

Orue

Echezarraga

Cortazar

Fernández-González

(2022). A growth mindset intervention to promote resilience against online peer victimization: A randomized controlled trial. Computers in Human Behavior, 135, Article 107373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107373

12.

Calvete

Orue

Estévez

Villardón

Padilla

(2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1128–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.017

13.

Camerini

A. L.

Marciano

Carrara

Schulz

P. J.

(2020). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among children and adolescents: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Telematics and Informatics, 49, Article 101362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101362

14.

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

15.

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

16.

Chun

Lee

Kim

Lee

(2020). An international systematic review of cyberbullying measurements. Computers in Human Behavior, 113, Article 106485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106485

17.

Comrey

A. L.

Lee

H. B.

(1992). Interpretation and application of factor analytic results. In Comrey

A. L.

Lee

H. B.

(Eds.), A first course in factor analysis (p. 2). Lawrence Eribaum Associates.

18.

Crick

N. R.

Dodge

K. A.

(1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74

19.

Derks

Fischer

A. H.

Bos

A. E.

(2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004

20.

DeSmet

Bastiaensens

Van Cleemput

Poels

Vandebosch

Cardon

De Bourdeaudhuij

(2016). Deciding whether to look after them, to like it, or leave it: A multidimensional analysis of predictors of positive and negative bystander behavior in cyberbullying among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 398–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.051

21.

DeSmet

Bastiaensens

Van Cleemput

Poels

Vandebosch

Deboutte

Herrewijn

Malliet

Pabian

Van Broeckhoven

De Troyer

Deglorie

Van Hoecke

Samyn

De Bourdeaudhuij

(2018). Psychometric data of a questionnaire to measure cyberbullying bystander behavior and its behavioral determinants among adolescents. Data in Brief, 18, 1588–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.087

22.

Fishbein

Ajzen

(2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838020

23.

Fornell

Larcker

D. F.

(1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

24.

Gámez-Guadix

Gini

(2016). Individual and class justification of cyberbullying and cyberbullying perpetration: A longitudinal analysis among adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 44, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.04.001

25.

Gámez-Guadix

Gini

Calvete

(2015). Stability of cyberbullying victimization among adolescents: Prevalence and association with bully–victim status and psychosocial adjustment. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.007

26.

Glasman

L. R.

Albarracín

(2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778

27.

Guo

(2016). A meta-analysis of the predictors of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Psychology in the Schools, 53(4), 432–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21914

28.

Hair

J. F.

Black

W. C.

Babin

B. J.

Anderson

R. E.

(2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall.

29.

Hayashi

Tahmasbi

(2022). Psychological predictors of bystanders’ intention to help cyberbullying victims among college students: An application of theory of planned behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(13–14), NP11333–NP11357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521992158

30.

Heirman

Walrave

(2008). Assessing concerns and issues about the mediation of technology in cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology, 2(2), Article 1.

31.

Heirman

Walrave

(2012). Predicting adolescent perpetration in cyberbullying: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Psicothema, 24, 614–620.

32.

Huang

Y. Y.

Chou

(2010). An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1581–1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.005

33.

Kowalski

R. M.

Giumetti

G. W.

Schroeder

A. N.

Lattanner

M. R.

(2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618

34.

Lambe

L. J.

Della Cioppa

Hong

I. K.

Craig

W. M.

(2019). Standing up to bullying: A social ecological review of peer defending in offline and online contexts. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.005

35.

Lee

Y. C.

W. L.

(2018). Factors in cyber bullying: The attitude-social influence-efficacy model. Anales De Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 34(2), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.2.295411

36.

Leung

A. N. M.

(2021). To help or not to help: Intervening in cyberbullying among Chinese cyber-bystanders. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 483250. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.483250

37.

Little

T. D.

(2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.

38.

Macháčková

Dedkova

Sevcikova

Cerna

(2013). Bystanders’ support of cyberbullied schoolmates. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2135

39.

Markey

P. M.

(2000). Bystander intervention in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00056-4

40.

Markon

K. E.

(2019). Bifactor and hierarchical models: Specification, inference, and interpretation. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095522

41.

Muthén

(2021). Mplus user’s guide, Version 8.10. Muthén & Muthén

42.

Navarro

Yubero

Larrañaga

(2015). Psychosocial risk factors for involvement in bullying behaviors: Empirical comparison between cyberbullying and social bullying victims and bullies. School Mental Health, 7, 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-015-9157-9

43.

Orue

Fernández-González

Machimbarrena

J. M.

González-Cabrera

Calvete

(2023). Bidirectional relationships between cyberbystanders’ roles, cyberbullying perpetration, and justification of violence. Youth & Society, 55(4), 611–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X211053356

44.

Palladino

B. E.

Nocentini

Menesini

(2016). Evidence-based intervention against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of the NoTrap! Program in two independent trials. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21636

45.

Panumaporn

Hongsanguansri

Atsariyasing

Kiatrungrit

(2020). Bystanders’ behaviours and associated factors in cyberbullying. General Psychiatry, 33(3), Article e100187. https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2019-100187

46.

Pepler

Mishna

Doucet

Lameiro

(2021). Witnesses in cyberbullying: Roles and dilemmas. Children & Schools, 43(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdaa027

47.

Pew Research Center. (October 22, 2014). Online harassment. http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/10/22/online-harassment/

48.

Reise

S. P.

Scheines

Widaman

K. F.

Haviland

M. G.

(2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412449831

49.

Rodriguez

Reise

S. P.

Haviland

M. G.

(2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249

50.

Salmivalli

(2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent behavior, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009/08.007

51.

Salmivalli

Kärnä

Poskiparta

(2011). Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(5), 405–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411407457

52.

Sobol

Przepiórka

Błachnio

(2024). Factors contributing to the defending behavior of adolescent cyberbystanders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 162, Article 108463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108463

53.

Thornberg

(2007). A classmate in distress: Schoolchildren as bystanders and their reasons for how they act. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-006-9009-4

54.

Tokunaga

R. S.

(2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014

55.

Vlaanderen

Bevelander

K. E.

Kleemans

(2020). Empowering digital citizenship: An anti-cyberbullying intervention to increase children's intentions to intervene on behalf of the victim. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, Article 106459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106459

56.

Walton

G. M.

Wilson

T. D.

(2018). Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems. Psychological Review, 125(5), 617–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000115

57.

Wang

Ngai

S. S. Y.

(2022). Cyberbullying perpetration among Chinese adolescents: the role of power imbalance, fun-seeking tendency, and attitude toward cyberbullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(23–24), NP21646–NP21671. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211062988

58.

Watkins

M. W.

(2013). Omega [Computer software]. Ed & Psych Associates.

59.

Wolf

Levordashka

Ruff

Kraaijeveld

Lueckmann

Williams

(2015). Ostracism online: A social media ostracism paradigm. Behavior Research Methods, 47(2), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0475-x

60.

Zhu

Huang

Evans

Zhang

(2021). Cyberbullying among adolescents and children: A comprehensive review of the global situation, risk factors, and preventive measures. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, Article 634909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.634909

Validation of Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions of Cyberbullying Witnesses Questionnaire: Exploring Mechanisms of Intention in the Relationship Between Attitudes and Perpetration

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References