Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a growing public health concern that impacts nearly 50% of men and women in the United States. Research has indicated that individuals with sadistic personality traits are more likely to perpetuate IPV. However, less work has explored how self-reported everyday sadism tendencies are related to an individual’s self-reported experiences with relationship conflicts. Thus, we uniquely investigated associations between everyday sadism and experiences of psychological, physical, and sexual aggressions in relationship conflict. Data was collected from 163 individuals recruited from MTurk (42.9% female; 58.3% White; Mage = 32.83 ± 8.60) who had been in a relationship for 6 months or longer in the past year. Participants completed self-report measures on their demographics, everyday sadism, and relationship conflicts. Path analysis was conducted to assess whether everyday sadism was associated with psychological, physical, and sexual aggression. Additionally, we tested if there were gender differences in the above associations. Everyday sadism was associated with psychological aggression (β = .72, p < .001), physical aggression (β = .75, p < .001), and sexual aggression (β = .72, p < .001) in relationship conflicts above the influence of gender, relationship status, and the interrelationships between the three types of aggressions. There were no observed gender differences. Results indicate a strong association between everyday sadism tendencies and self-reported experiences of psychological, physical, and sexual aggressions. Findings substantiate associations between everyday sadism and IPV, and support community programs that detect and intervene on sadistic behaviors as a practice to reduce IPV.
AakvaagH. F.ThoresenS.Wentzel-LarsenT.DybG.RøysambE.OlffM. (2016). Broken and guilty since it happened: A population study of trauma-related shame and guilt after violence and sexual abuse. Journal of Affective Disorders, 204, 16–23.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.CampbellW. K. (1999). The intrinsic appeal of evil: Sadism, sensational thrills, and threatened egotism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_4
5.
BuckelsE. E. (2012). The pleasures of hurting others: Behavioral evidence for everyday sadism. University of British Columbia.
6.
BuckelsE. E.JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2013). Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2201–2209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613490749
7.
BuckelsE. E.PaulhusD. (2014). Comprehensive assessment of sadistic tendencies (CAST). [Unpublished instrument]. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
8.
BulutT. (2017). The concept of sadism in the current empirical literature. UDK: 343.
ChabrolH.Van LeeuwenN.RodgersR.SéjournéN. (2009). Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(7), 734–739.
11.
ChesterD. S.DeWallC. N.EnjaianB. (2019). Sadism and aggressive behavior: Inflicting pain to feel pleasure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(8), 1252–1268.
12.
DinićB. M.VelimirovićM.SadikovićS. (2019). Dark traits from the variable-centered and person-centered approach and their relations with some risky behaviours. Psihološka istraživanja, 22(1), 17–32.
13.
EndersC. K.BandalosD. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 430–457.
14.
FentemA.StonekingF. (2023). The impact of couples’ conflicts on everyday sadists’ relationship satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 213, 112319.
15.
García-MorenoC.PallittoC.DevriesK.StöcklH.WattsC.AbrahamsN. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization.
16.
GóisA. D.LimaG. A. S. F. D.De LucaM. M. M. (2020). Everyday sadism in the business area. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(3), 393–408.
17.
IhakaR.GentlemanR. (1996). R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5(3), 299–314.
KingB. M. (2022). The influence of social desirability on sexual behavior surveys: A review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(3), 1495–1501.
20.
KlannM. (2017). The dark tetrad and its relations with maladaptive personality traits and sexual tactics. Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville.
21.
LeeS. A. (2019). The dark tetrad and callous reactions to mourner grief: Patterns of annoyance, boredom, entitlement, schadenfreude, and humor. Personality and Individual Differences, 137, 97–100.
22.
LeemisR. W.FriarN.KhatiwadaS.ChenM. S.KresnowM.SmithS. G.CaslinS.BasileK. C. (2022). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2016/2017 Report on Intimate Partner Violence. CDC.
23.
MursteinB. I.AdlerE. R. (1995). Gender differences in power and self-disclosure in dating and married couples. Personal Relationships, 2(3), 199–209.
24.
PaulhusD. L. (2014). Toward a taxonomy of dark personalities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(6), 421–426.
25.
PaulhusD. L.DuttonD. G. (2016). Everyday sadism. In Zeigler-HillV.MarcusD. K. (Eds.), The dark side of personality: Science and practice in social, personality, and clinical psychology (pp. 109–120). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14854-006
26.
PaulhusD. L.JonesD. N. (2015). Measures of dark personalities. In BoyleG. J.SaklofskeD. H.MatthewsG. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 562–594). Elsevier Academic Press.
27.
PlouffeR. A.WilsonC. A.SaklofskeD. H. (2020). The role of dark personality traits in intimate partner violence: A multi-study investigation. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 41(6), 3481–3500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00871-5.
28.
PlouffeR. A.WilsonC. A.SaklofskeD. H. (2022). Examining the relationships between childhood exposure to intimate partner violence, the dark tetrad of personality, and violence perpetration in adulthood. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(5–6), NP3449–NP3473.
29.
RaioC. M.HarpN. R.BrownC. C.NetaM. (2021). Reappraisal—but not suppression—Tendencies determine negativity bias after laboratory and real-world stress exposure. Affective Science, 2(4), 455–467.
30.
ReidyD. E.BerkeD. S.GentileB.ZeichnerA. (2014). Man enough? Masculine discrepancy stress and intimate partner violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 160–164.
31.
RollèL.GiardinaG.CaldareraA. M.GerinoE.BrustiaP. (2018). When intimate partner violence meets same sex couples: A review of same sex intimate partner violence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 393254.
32.
RosseelY. (2010). Mplus estimators: MLM and MLR. First Mplus User Meeting–October 27th.
33.
RussellT. D.DoanC. M.KingA. R. (2017). Sexually violent women: The PID-5, everyday sadism, and adversarial sexual attitudes predict female sexual aggression and coercion against male victims. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 242–249.
34.
RussellT. D.KingA. R. (2016). Anxious, hostile, and sadistic: Maternal attachment and everyday sadism predict hostile masculine beliefs and male sexual violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 340–345.
35.
SolemR. C. (2015). Limitation of a cross-sectional study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 148(2), 205.
36.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS. U. E.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316.
37.
TetreaultC.BatesE. A.BolamL. T. (2021). How dark personalities perpetrate partner and general aggression in Sweden and the United Kingdom. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9–10), NP4743–NP4767.
38.
ThomasK. A.CliffordS. (2017). Validity and Mechanical Turk: An assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.038
39.
ThomasL.EganV. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the relationship between everyday sadism and aggression: Can subclinical sadistic traits predict aggressive behaviour within the general population?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 65, 101750.
40.
TraederC. K.Zeigler-HillV. (2020). The desire for power and perceptions of heterosexual romantic relationships: The moderating roles of perceived power and gender. Sex Roles, 82, 66–80.
41.
TsoukasA.MarchE. (2018). Predicting short-and long-term mating orientations: The role of sex and the dark tetrad. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(9), 1206–1218.
42.
WeathersF. W.BlakeD. D.SchnurrP. P.KaloupekD. G.MarxB. P.KeaneT. M. (2013). The Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5). Instrument available from the National Center for PTSD at www.ptsd.va.gov.
