Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Although socioeconomic inequality has been identified as a significant factor for violence against women, the connection between these two variables has not been widely recognized and addressed in many countries. This study aims to quantify the degree of socioeconomic inequalities in intimate partner violence (IPV) in Vietnam and investigate the contribution of each determinant factor that contributes to the observed inequality. We utilized the Vietnamese National Survey on Domestic Violence against Women (N = 4,019) for the analysis. Household wealth was used as a proxy for socioeconomic status. We used a concentration index to quantify the degree of socioeconomic inequality in emotional, physical, or sexual violence and a combination of these three types of violence. We further decomposed the concentration index to identify the contribution of each determinant to the observed inequality in IPV. We found that the prevalence of IPV was significantly concentrated among the worse-off across all types of IPV and that disparities in husband’s occupation (48%), women’s education (39%), husband’s education (38%), and class (34%) were the primary factors contributing to increased inequalities in IPV. Our results indicated that higher education and engagement in skilled jobs were highly concentrated among the better-off, creating unequal distribution of these variables across wealth. Policy could mitigate the inequality in IPV by expanding women’s access to education and economic opportunities. However, interventions should target both men and women and within couples because husband’s characteristics also play an important role in explaining socioeconomic inequalities in IPV.

Keywords

socioeconomic inequalities domestic violence against women intimate partner violence decomposition analysis concentration index Vietnam

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adu

(2022). Socio-economic inequalities in intimate partner violence justification among women in Ghana: Analysis of the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey Data. International Health, 15(2), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihac032

Alhabib

Nur

Jones

(2010). Domestic violence against women: Systematic review of prevalence studies. Journal of Family Violence, 25(4), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9298-4

Ali

P. A.

Dhingra

McGarry

(2016). A literature review of intimate partner violence and its classifications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.06.008

T. L.

Waling

Bourne

(2022). Men and masculinities studies in Vietnam: A brief review. Sociology Compass, 16(3), e12965. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12965

Anderson

K. L.

(2017). Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches. In Natarajan

(Ed.), Domestic violence (pp. 263–277). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315264905

Atkinson

M. P.

Greenstein

T. N.

Lang

M. M.

(2005). For women, breadwinning can be dangerous: Gendered resource theory and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00206.x

Awang

Hariharan

(2011). Determinants of domestic violence: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Family Violence, 26(6), 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-011-9380-6

Bair-Merritt

M. H.

Crowne

S. S.

Thompson

D. A.

Sibinga

Trent

Campbell

(2010). Why do women use intimate partner violence? A systematic review of women’s motivations. Trauma Violence Abuse, 11(4), 178–189. https://10.1177/1524838010379003

Basile

K. C.

Hall

J. E.

Walters

M. L.

(2013). Expanding resource theory and feminist-informed theory to explain intimate partner violence perpetration by court-ordered men. Violence Against Women, 19(7), 848–880. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213497105

10.

Bloch

Rao

(2002). Terror as a bargaining instrument: A case study of dowry violence in rural India. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1029–1043. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344588

11.

Boonzaier

De La Rey

(2003). “He’s a man, and I’m a Woman”: Cultural constructions of masculinity and femininity in South African Women’s narratives of violence. Violence Against Women, 9(8), 1003–1029. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801203255133

12.

Brown

(2014). Factors related to domestic violence in Asia: The conflict between culture and patriarchy. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24(7), 828–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2014.884962

13.

Chan

K. L.

Tiwari

Fong

D. Y. T.

Leung

W. C.

Brownridge

D. A.

P. C.

(2009). Correlates of in-law conflict and intimate partner violence against Chinese pregnant women in Hong Kong. Journal of interpersonal Violence, 24(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508315780

14.

Chan

M.-K.

Parvez Butt

Marriott

Ehmke

Jacobs

Seghers

Atienza

Gowland

Lawson

Rhodes

(2019). Public good or private wealth? Universal health, education and other public services reduce the gap between rich and poor, and between women and men. Fairer taxation of the wealthiest can help pay for them. http://hdl.handle.net/10546/620599

15.

Chaurasia

Debnath

Srivastava

Purkayastha

(2021). Is socioeconomic inequality boosting intimate partner violence in India? An overview of the National family health survey, 2005–2006 and 2015–2016. Global Social Welfare, 8(3), 263–277.

16.

Cools

Kotsadam

(2017). Resources and intimate partner violence in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 95, 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.027

17.

Curry

Perrin

Wall

(1998). Effects of abuse on maternal complications and birth weight in adult and adolescent women. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 92(4 Part 1), 530–534.

18.

Dang

T. N. H.

Sukontamarn

(2020). Education and subjective well-being among older Vietnamese: Exploring gender differences. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 28(1), 22–37.

19.

Edleson

J. L.

(1999). Children’s witnessing of adult domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(8), 839–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626099014008004

20.

Ehrensaft

M. K.

Cohen

Brown

Smailes

Chen

Johnson

J. G.

(2003). Intergenerational transmission of partner violence: A 20-year prospective study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(4), 741. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.4.741

21.

Ellsberg

Caldera

Herrera

Winkvist

Kullgren

(1999). Domestic violence and emotional distress among Nicaraguan women: Results from a population-based study. American psychologist, 54(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.1.30

22.

Erreygers

(2009). Correcting the concentration index. Journal of Health Economics, 28(2), 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.003

23.

Fearon

Hoeffler

(2014). Benefits and costs of the conflict and violence targets for the post-2015 development agenda: Post-2015 consensus. Copenhagen Consensus Center. https://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/sites/default/files/conflict_assessment_-_hoeffler_and_fearon_0.pdf

24.

Fernández

(2006). Cultural beliefs and domestic violence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087(1), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1385.005

25.

Fields

G. S.

(1980). Education and income distribution in developing countries: A review of the literature. The World Bank.

26.

Fisher

Tran

T. D.

Biggs

Dang

T. H.

Nguyen

T. T.

Tran

(2013). Intimate partner violence and perinatal common mental disorders among women in rural Vietnam. International Health, 5(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihs012

27.

General Statistic Office. (2021). The trend of inequality in income distribution in Vietnam 2016–2020 period. https://www.gso.gov.vn/en/data-and-statistics/2021/06/the-trend-of-inequality-in-income-distribution-in-vietnam-2016-2020-period/#:~:text=Through%20the%20GINI%20coefficient%20in,suitable%20threshold%20for%20high%20growth

28.

General Statistics Office. (2010). National study on domestic violence against women in Viet Nam 2010: Full report. United Nations Population Fund. https://asiapacific.unfpa.org/en/publications/national-study-domestic-violence-against-women-viet-nam-2010-full-report

29.

Groves

B. M.

Zuckerman

Marans

Cohen

D. J.

(1993). Silent victims children who witness violence. JAMA, 269(2), 262–264. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03500020096039

30.

Hamberger

L. K.

Larsen

S. E.

Lehrner

(2017). Coercive control in intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.08.003

31.

Hornor

(2005). Domestic violence and children. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 19(4), 206–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2005.02.002

32.

Hornung

C. A.

McCullough

B. C.

Sugimoto

(1981). Status relationships in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family, 43(3), 675–692. https://doi.org/10.2307/351768

33.

Houthakker

H. S.

(1959). Education and income. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 41(1), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925454

34.

Jansen

H. A. F.M.

Nguyen

T. V. N.

Hoang

T. A.

(2016). Exploring risk factors associated with intimate partner violence in Vietnam: Results from a cross-sectional national survey. International Journal of Public Health, 61(8), 923–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0879-8

35.

Johnston

H. B.

Naved

R. T.

(2008). Spousal violence in Bangladesh: A call for a public-health response. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 26(3), 366–377.

36.

Kakwani

Wagstaff

van Doorslaer

(1997). Socioeconomic inequalities in health: Measurement, computation, and statistical inference. Journal of Econometrics, 77(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(96)01807-6

37.

Kanougiya

Sivakami

Rai

(2021). Predictors of spousal coercive control and its association with intimate partner violence evidence from National Family Health Survey-4 (2015–2016) India. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 2185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12232-3

38.

Knodel

Loi

V. M.

Jayakody

Huy

V. T.

(2005). Gender roles in the family: Change and stability in Vietnam. Asian Population Studies, 1(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730500125888

39.

Krantz

Vung

N. D.

(2009). The role of controlling behavior in intimate partner violence and its health effects: A population based study from rural Vietnam. BMC Public Health, 9(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-143

40.

Krause

K. H.

Gordon-Roberts

VanderEnde

Schuler

S. R.

Yount

K. M.

(2016). Why do women justify violence against wives more often than do men in Vietnam? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(19), 3150–3173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515584343

41.

D. D.

Dang

T. N. H.

Nguyen

T. A.

(2021). Elder abuse in Vietnam: A gender perspective. In Selin

(Ed.), Aging across cultures: Growing old in the non-western world (pp. 245–258). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76501-9_16

42.

D. D.

Leon-Gonzalez

Giang

L. T.

(2020). Decomposing gender inequality in functional disability among older people in Vietnam. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 87, 103989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2019.103989

43.

D. D.

Leon-Gonzalez

Giang

T. L.

Nguyen

A. T.

(2021). Socio-economic-related health inequality in non-communicable diseases among older people in Viet Nam. Ageing and Society, 41(6), 1421–1448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X19001843

44.

Macmillan

Gartner

(1999). When she brings home the bacon: Labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(4), 947–958. https://doi.org/10.2307/354015

45.

McCloskey

L. A.

(1996). Socioeconomic and coercive power within the family. Gender & Society, 10(4), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124396010004006

46.

Nguyen

Foulks

E. F.

Carlin

(1991). Proverbs as psychological interpretations among Vietnamese. Asian Folklore Studies, 50(2), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.2307/1178388

47.

Nguyen

T. D.

(2006). Prevalence of male intimate partner abuse in Vietnam. Violence Against Women, 12(8), 732–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206291555

48.

Nguyen

T. Q. T.

Simkin

(2017). Gender discrimination in Vietnam: The role of personal face. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(6), 609–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1095083

49.

O’Donnell

Van Doorslaer

Wagstaff

Lindelow

(2007). Analyzing health equity using household survey data: A guide to techniques and their implementation. The World Bank.

50.

Ravallion

(2014). Income inequality in the developing world. Science, 344(6186), 851–855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251875

51.

Robertson

Murachver

(2011). Women and men’s use of coercive control in intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims, 26(2), 208-17. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.26.2.208

52.

Schuler

S. R.

Anh

H. T.

V. S.

Minh

T. H.

Mai

B. T. T.

Thien

P. V.

(2006). Constructions of gender in Vietnam: In pursuit of the “Three Criteria.” Culture, Health & Sexuality, 8(5), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050600858924

53.

Shiu-Thornton

Senturia

Sullivan

(2005). “Like a Bird in a Cage”: Vietnamese women survivors talk about domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(8), 959–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505277677

54.

Tanha

Beck

C. J. A.

Figueredo

A. J.

Raghavan

(2010). Sex differences in intimate partner violence and the use of coercive control as a motivational factor for intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(10), 1836–1854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509354501

55.

The Prime Minister. (2009). Decision No.445/QĐ-TTG approving modification of the master plan for development of Vietnam’s urban system by 2025 with vision to 2050 [Quyết định số 445/QĐ-TTG của Thủ tướng Chính phủ: Phê duyệt điều chỉnh định hướng Quy hoạch tổng thể phát triển hệ thống đô thị Việt Nam đến năm 2025 và tầm nhìn đến năm 2050]. Socialist Republic of Vietnam. https://moc.gov.vn/vn/Pages/ChiTietVanBan.aspx?vID=702&TypeVB=0

56.

UNFPA. (2020). National study on violence against women in Viet Nam 2019: Summary report. https://asiapacific.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/1._eng_summary_report_0.pdf

57.

United Nations Development Programme. (2014). Human development report 2014: Sustaining human progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2014

58.

Van de Poel

Van Doorslaer

O’Donnell

(2012). Measurement of inequity in health care with heterogeneous response of use to need. Journal of Health Economics, 31(4), 676–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.05.005

59.

Vung

N. D.

Ostergren

P.-O.

Krantz

(2008). Intimate partner violence against women in rural Vietnam—Different socio-demographic factors are associated with different forms of violence: Need for new intervention guidelines? BMC Public Health, 8(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-55

60.

Vung

N. D.

Ostergren

P.-O.

Krantz

(2009). Intimate partner violence against women, health effects and health care seeking in rural Vietnam. European Journal of Public Health, 19(2), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckn136

61.

Wagstaff

O’Donnell

Van Doorslaer

Lindelow

(2008). Analyzing health equity using household survey data: A guide to techniques and their implementation. The World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/175a76f9-e1cd-5d3f-849e-8688821fb2ff/content

62.

Wagstaff

van Doorslaer

Watanabe

(2003). On decomposing the causes of health sector inequalities with an application to malnutrition inequalities in Vietnam. Journal of Econometrics, 112(1), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00161-6

63.

Watson

Klohnen

E. C.

Casillas

Nus Simms

Haig

Berry

D. S.

(2004). Match makers and deal breakers: Analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. Journal of Personality, 72(5), 1029–1068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00289.x

64.

WHO,United Nations, UNFPA, UNICEF, UNODC, HRP, & UN Women. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates. https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1347689/retrieve

65.

World Health Organization. (2010). Preventing intimate partner and sexual violence against women: Taking action and generating evidence. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241564007_eng.pdf

66.

World Health Organization. (2021). Violence against women. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women

67.

Yoshihama

(2002). Breaking the web of abuse and silence: Voices of battered women in Japan. Social Work, 47(4), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/47.4.389

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence from Vietnam

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material