The body of sexual assault research historically focuses on survivors, specifically female survivors. Examining the beliefs of men who endorse sexually violent or coercive behavior fills an important gap in the literature. The current study surveyed 420 male participants on their endorsement of coercive dating tactics as provided in a best-selling men’s dating book, as well as endorsement of dating tactics generated from a sexual willingness framework. Overall, approximately 25% of male participants reported using or endorsing coercive sexual tactics. Several demographic factors and experiences related to higher endorsement of the coercive tactics, including past or present involvement in a fraternity, knowing a sexual assault perpetrator, affiliating with a religion, and frequent pornography viewing. The same individual factors related to endorsing the coercive tactics were associated with endorsing the willful tactics as well. Implications for greater representation in research for sexual minorities are discussed, as well as future direction for effective consent education.
AbbeyA. (2002). Alcohol-related sexual assault: A common problem among college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 14, 118–128. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.118
2.
AbbeyA.ZawackiT.BuckO. P.ClintonA. M.McAuslanP. (2004). Sexual assault and alcohol consumption: What do we know about their relationship and what types of research are still needed?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(3), 271–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(03)00011-9
BannonR. S.BrosiM. W.FoubertJ. D. (2013). Sorority women’s and fraternity men’s rape myth acceptance and bystander intervention attitudes. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 50(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1515/jsarp-2013-0005
5.
BarkerM. J. (2016). Sexual consent. In GoldbergA. (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of LGBTQ studies (3rd ed, pp. 1044–1048). Sage.
6.
BarnettM. D.SligarK. B.WangC. D. C. (2016). Religious affiliation, religiosity, gender, and rape myth acceptance: feminist theory and rape culture. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(8), 1219–1235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516665110
7.
BasowS. A.MinieriA. (2011). “You owe me”: Effects of date cost, who pays, participant gender, and rape myth beliefs on perceptions of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(3), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510363421
8.
BaumM.CohenD.ZhukovY. (2018). Does rape culture predict rape? Evidence from U.S. newspapers, 2000-2013. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 13(3), 263–289. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00016124
9.
BeresM. A. (2007). ‘Spontaneous’ sexual consent: An analysis of sexual consent literature. Feminism & Psychology, 17(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507072914
10.
BeresM. A. (2014). Rethinking the concept of consent for anti-sexual violence activism and education. Feminism & Psychology, 24(3), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353514539652
11.
BerkowitzA.BogenK. W.Meza LopezR. J.MullaM. M.OrchowskiL. M. (2022). Chapter 7-The social norms approach as a strategy to prevent violence perpetrated by men and boys: A review of the literature. In OrchowskiL. M.BerkowitzA. D. (Eds.), Engaging boys and men in sexual assault prevention: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 149–181). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819202-3.00009-2
12.
BurnettA.MatternJ. L.HerakovaL. L.KahlD. H.Jr.TobolaC.BornsenS. E. (2009). Communicating/muting date rape: A co-cultural theoretical analysis of communication factors related to rape culture on a college campus. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(4), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880903233150
CananS. N.JozkowskiK. N.CrawfordB. L. (2018). Sexual assault supportive attitudes: Rape myth acceptance and token resistance in Greek and non-Greek college students from two university samples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(22), 3502–3530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516636064
CarmodyD. C.WashingtonL. M. (2001). Rape myth acceptance among college women: The impact of race and prior victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(5), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F088626001016005003
ChadwickS. B.FranciscoM.van AndersS. M. (2019). When orgasms do not equal pleasure: Accounts of “bad” orgasm experiences during consensual sexual encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 2435–2459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01527-7
19.
ChadwickS. B.van AndersS. M. (2022). Orgasm coercion and negative relationship and psychological outcomes: The role of gender, sexual identity, perpetration tactics, and perceptions of the perpetrator’s intentions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51, 653–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02162-x
20.
ChenJ.WaltersM. L.GilbertL. K.PatelN. (2020). Sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence by sexual orientation, United States. Psychology of Violence, 10(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000252
21.
CoyM.HorvathM. A. H. (2011). Lads’ mags: Young men’s attitudes towards women and acceptance of rape myths about sexual aggression. Feminism & Psychology, 21, 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353509359145
22.
CraigH. (2016). Sexual assault & students: Does involvement in a ‘lad culture’ affect British students’ acceptance of sexual assault? [Masters thesis, University of Huddersfield]. University of Huddersfield Repository. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/30323/1/FINAL%20THESIS.pdf
23.
DeKeseredyW.Hall-SanchezA.NolanJ.SchwartzM. (2017). A campus LGBTQ community’s sexual violence and stalking experiences: The contribution of pro-abuse peer support. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 1(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868017X15099845241783
EdwardsK. M.SylaskaK. M.BarryJ. E.MoynihanM. M.BanyardV. L.CohnE. S.WalshW. A.WardS. K. (2015). Physical dating violence, sexual violence, and unwanted pursuit victimization: A comparison of incidence rates among sexual-minority and heterosexual college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(4), 580–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514535260
26.
EdwardsS.BradshawK. A.HinszV. B. (2014). Denying rape but endorsing forceful intercourse: Exploring differences among responders. Violence and Gender, 1(4), 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2014.0022.cxn
27.
FergusonC. J.HartleyR. D. (2020). Pornography and sexual aggression: Can meta-analysis find a link?Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(1), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020942754
28.
FloodM.HamiltonC. (2003). Youth and pornography in Australia: Evidence on the extent of exposure and likely effects. The Australia Institute. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/103421/
29.
FornicolaE.PetersonZ. D. (2022). An exploratory study of sexual aggression tactics as a function of perpetrator gender and victim gender. International Journal of Sexual Health, 34(3), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2022.2053027
30.
FoubertJ. D.BridgesA. J. (2017). Predicting bystander efficacy and willingness to intervene in college men and women: The role of exposure to varying levels of violence in pornography. Violence Against Women, 23(6), 692–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216648793
31.
FoubertJ. D.Clark-TaylorA.WallA. F. (2020). Is campus rape primarily a serial or one-time problem? Evidence from a multicampus study. Violence Against Women, 26(3–4), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219833820
32.
FreseB.MoyaM.MegiasJ. L. (2004). Social perception of rape: How rape myth acceptance modulates the influence of situational factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260503260245
33.
FreymeyerR. H. (1996). Rape myths and religiosity. Sociological Spectrum, 17(4), 473–489.
34.
FurnhamA. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.1997.9982179
35.
GaldiS.GuizzoF. (2021). Media-induced sexual harassment: The routes from sexually objectifying media to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 84, 645–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01196-0
36.
GlaceA. M.KaufmanK. L. (2020). Sexual consent attitudes and rape-supportive norms among gender and sexual minority students. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 20(1), 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12221
GreeneR. (2003). The Art of Seduction. Profile Books LTD.
39.
HackathornJ. M.AshdownB. K.RifeS. C. (2016). The sacred bed: Sex guilt mediates religiosity and satisfaction for unmarried people. Sexuality & Culture, 20, 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9315-0
40.
HallW. J.JonesB. L. H.WitkemperK. D.CollinsT. L.RodgersG. K. (2019). State policy on school-based sex education: A content analysis focused on sexual behaviors, relationships, and identities. American Journal of Health Behavior, 43(3), 506–519. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.43.3.6
41.
HarrisK. L. (2018). Yes means yes and no means no, but both these mantras need to go: Communication myths in consent education and anti-rape activism. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2018.1435900
42.
HarwayM.SteeleJ. H. (2015). Studying masculinity and sexual assault across organizational culture groups: Understanding perpetrators. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 16(4), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039694
HegartyP.StewartA. L.BlockmanI. G. E.HorvathM. A. H. (2018). The influence of magazines on men: Normalizing and challenging young men’s prejudice with “lads’ mags.”Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 19(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000075
45.
HerbenickD.Guerra-ReyesL.PattersonC.Rosenstock GonzalezY. R.WagnerC.ZounlomeN. (2022). “It was scary, but then it was kind of exciting”: Young women’s experiences with choking during sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51, 1103–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02049-x
46.
HirschJ. S.KhanS. R.WamboldtA.MellinsC. A. (2019). Social dimensions of sexual consent among cisgender heterosexual college students: Insights from ethnographic research. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.06.011
47.
HorvathM. A. H.HegartP.TylerS.MansfieldS. (2012). “Lights on at the end of the party”: Are lads’ mags mainstreaming dangerous sexism?British Journal of Psychology, 103(4), 454–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02086.x
48.
HuntM. O. (2000). Status, religion, and the “belief in a just world”: Comparing African Americans, Latinos, and Whites. Social Science Quarterly, 81(1), 325–343. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42864385
49.
JacobsonS.MyungE.JohnsonS. L. (2016). Open media or echo chamber: The use of links in audience discussion on the Facebook Pages of partisan news organizations. Information, Community, & Society, 19(7), 875–891. http://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1064461
50.
JavaidA. (2015). Male rape myths: Understanding and explaining social attitudes surrounding male rape. Masculinites and Social Change, 4(3), 270–294. https://doi.org/10.17583/mcs.2015.1579
51.
JeffreyN. K.BarataP. C. (2018). “She didn’t want to. . .and I’d obviously insist”: Canadian university men’s normalization of their sexual violence against intimate partners. Journal of Aggression Maltreatment and Trauma, 28(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2018.1500406
52.
JenkinsS. R. (2000). Introduction to the special issue: Defining gender, relationships, and power. Sex Roles, 42, 467–493. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007010604246
53.
JohnsonN. L.JohnsonD. M. (2017). An empirical exploration into the measurement of rape culture. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1–2), NP70–NP95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517732347
54.
JozkowskiK. N.ManningJ.HuntM. (2018). Sexual consent in and out of the bedroom: Disjunctive views of heterosexual college students. Women’s Studies in Communication, 41(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2018.1470121
KleinkeC. L.MeyerC. (1990). Evaluation of rape victim by men and women with high and low belief in a just world. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14(3), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1990.tb00024.x
57.
LamontE.RoachT.KahnS. (2018). Navigating campus hookup culture: LGBTQ students and college hookups. Sociological Forum, 33(4), 1000–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12458
58.
Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.FoubertJ. D.BrasfieldH. M.HillB.Shelley-TremblayS. (2011). The men’s program: Does it impact college men’s self-reported bystander efficacy and willingness to intervene?Violence Against Women, 17(6), 743–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211409728
59.
LawsonS. L.Munoz-RojasD.GutmaL. S.SimanM. N. (2012). Changing attitudes and perceptions of Hispanic men ages 18 to 25 about rape and rape prevention. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 33(12), 864–870. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2012.728279
60.
LeonhardtN. D.BusbyD. M.WilloughbyB. J. (2020). Sex guilt or sanctification? The indirect role of religiosity on sexual satisfaction. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 12(2), 213–222. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/rel0000245
61.
LevyI.AdamK. M. (2018). Online commenting about a victim of female-on-male rape: The case of Shia LaBeouf’s sexual victimization. Sex Roles, 79(9), 578–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0893-9
62.
LofgreenA. M.MattsonR. E.WagnerS. A.OrtizE. G.JohnsonM. D. (2021). Situational and dispositional determinants of college men’s perception of women’s sexual desire and consent for sex: A factorial vignette analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1–2), 1064–1097. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0886260517738777
63.
LohC.GidyczC. A.LoboT. R.LuthraR. (2005). A prospective analysis of sexual assault perpetration: Risk factors related to perpetrator characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(10), 1325–1348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505278528
64.
LonswayK. A.ArchambaultJ.BerkowitzA. (2018). False reports: Moving beyond the issue to successfully investigate and prosecute non-stranger sexual assault. End Violence Against Women International On Line Training Institute (OLTI).
65.
MarcantonioT. L.WillisM.JozkowskiK. N. (2022). Effects of typical and binge drinking on sexual consent perceptions and communication. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 48(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2021.1986445
66.
MargL. Z. (2020). College men’s conceptualization of sexual consent at a large, racially/ethnically diverse Southern California University. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 15(3), 371–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2020.1737291
67.
MarksM. J.ZaikmanY. (2023). Perceptions of a hypothetical sexual assault: The impact of the interrelationships between eight situational factors. Violence Against Women, 29(9), 1719�1742. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221117601
MennickeA.KennedyS. C.GromerJ.Klem-O’ConnerM. (2018). Evaluation of a social norms sexual violence prevention marketing campaign targeted toward college men: Attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors over 5 years. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(7–8), NP3999–NP4021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518780411
70.
MetzJ.MyersK.WallaceP. (2021). ‘Rape is a man’s issue:’ Gender and power in the era of affirmative consent. Journal of Gender Studies, 30(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2020.1834367
71.
MilroyJ. J.HannaK.VandeLindeT.LeeD. S.KaufmanK. L.RajA.BarkerK. M.SitneyM.LipmanA.GlaceA.Kyler-YanoJ. (2022). Prevention of sexual violence in sport: A socioecological review. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(13–14), NP10618–NP10641. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211067003
OrchowskiL.BogenK. W.BerkowitzA. (2022). False reporting of sexual victimization: Prevalence, definitions, and public perceptions. In: GeffnerR.WhiteJ. W.HambergerL. K.RosenbaumA.Vaughan-EdenV.ViethV. I. (Eds.) Handbook of interpersonal violence and abuse across the lifespan (pp. 3691–3713). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89999-2_193
74.
O’SullivanL. F. (2005). Sexual coercion in dating relationships: Conceptual and methodological issues. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990500037246
75.
PayneD. L.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238
RerickP. O.LivingstonT. N.DavisD. (2020). Does the horny man think women want him too? Effects of male sexual arousal on perceptions of female sexual willingness. TheJournal of Social Psychology, 160(4), 520–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1692330
79.
RighiM. K.BogenK. W.KuoC.OrchowskiL. M. (2019). A qualitative analysis of beliefs about sexual consent among high school students. Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact Case Reports, 36(15–16), NP8290–NP8316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519842855
80.
Romero-SanchezM.Toro-GarciaV.HorvathM. A. H.MegiasJ. L. (2017). More than a magazine: Exploring the links between lads’ mags, rape myth acceptance, and rape proclivity. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(4), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515586366
81.
RussellK. J.HandC. J. (2017). Rape myth acceptance, victim blame attribution and Just World Beliefs: A rapid evidence assessment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.008
82.
SalazarL. F.Vivolo-KantorA.HardinJ.BerkowitzA. (2014). A web-based violence bystander intervention for male college students: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(9), e3426. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3426
83.
SantelliJ. S.KantorL. M.GriloS. A.SpeizerI. S.LindbergL. D.HeitelJ.SchaletA. T.LyonM. E.Mason-JonesA. J.McGovernT.HeckC. J.RogersJ.OttM. A. (2017). Abstinence-only-until-marriage: An updated review of US policies and programs and their impact. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61(3), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.05.031
84.
SchaletA. T.SantelliJ. S.RussellS. T.HalpernC. T.MillerS. A.PickeringS. S.GoldbergS. K.HoeningJ. M. (2014). Invited commentary: Broadening the evidence for adolescent sexual and reproductive health and education in the United States. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(10), 1595–1610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0178-8
85.
SchulhoferS. J. (2016). Consent: What it means and why it’s time to require it. The University of the Pacific Law Review, Symposium: Sex Crimes & Offenses in an Era of Reform, 47(4), 665–681.
86.
SchulhoferS. J.MurphyE. E. (2020). Model penal code: Sexual assault and related offenses. American Law Institute.
87.
SeabrookR. C.WardL. M. (2019). Bros will be bros? The effect of fraternity membership on perceived culpability for sexual assault. Violence Against Women, 25(12), 1471–1490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218820196
88.
Stanger-HallK. F.HallD. W. (2011). Abstinence-only education and teen pregnancy rates: Why we need comprehensive sex education in the US. PLoS One, 6(10), e24658. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024658
StewartA. L. (2014). The men’s project: A sexual assault prevention program targeting college men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 15(4), 481–485. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0033947
91.
TreatT. A.CorbinW. R.PapovaA.RichnerK.CraneyR.FrommeK. (2021). Selection and socialization accounts of the relation between fraternity membership and sexual aggression. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 35(3), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000662
92.
TurchikJ. A. (2012). Sexual victimization among male college students: Assault severity, sexual functioning, and health risk behaviors. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13(3), 243–255. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0024605
93.
West-EberhardM. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University.
94.
WillisM.JozkowskiK. N. (2018). Barriers to the success of affirmative consent initiatives: An application of the social ecological model. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 13(3), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2018.1443300
95.
WillisM.JozkowskiK. N. (2019). Sexual consent in K-12 sex education: An analysis of current health education standards in the United States. Sex Education, 19(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2018.1510769
96.
WrightP. J.BaeS. A. (2015). National prospective study of pornography consumption and gendered attitudes toward women. Sexuality & Culture, 19, 444–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-014-9264-z
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
