This article describes the development of a scale measuring the extent of men’s belief in female sexual deceptiveness. This belief has been postulated as a component of hostile masculinity and a precursor to more serious sexual-assault-facilitating cognitions, though it has not yet been studied empirically. From a final pool of 22 items, the 14-item Belief in Female Sexual Deceptiveness (BFSD) scale was constructed. Data were collected via online survey from 131 predominantly Hispanic college males; scale items were selected by exploratory factor analysis. Three moderately strongly correlated factors emerged, though they overlapped strongly and are currently considered only for future study. An 8-item short form of the BFSD scale (the BFSD-S) was created, as well. The full BFSD scale showed strong internal consistency and significant correlations with gender role attitudes, unequal/coercive relationship attitudes, history of misperceiving women’s platonic interest as sexual, history of sexual frustration in relationships, adult attachment, belief in immanent justice, attitudes toward intimate partner violence, and rape myth acceptance. Patterns of divergent correlations with other measures also supported the scale’s validity. The BFSD-S performed nearly identically to the BFSD. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed.
AbbeyA. (1987). Misperceptions of friendly behavior as sexual interest: A survey of naturally occurring incidents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 173-194.
2.
AbbeyA.Jacques-TiuraA. J.LeBretonJ. M. (2011). Risk factors for sexual aggression in young men: An expansion of the confluence model. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 450-464. doi:10.1002/ab.20399
3.
AbbeyA.McAuslanP.ZawackiT.ClintonA. M.BuckP. O. (2001). Attitudinal, experiential, and situational predictors of sexual assault perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 784-807. doi:10.1177/088626001016008004
4.
ArciniegaG. M.AndersonT. C.Tovar-BlankZ. G.TraceyT. J. G. (2008). Toward a fuller conception of Machismo: Development of a traditionalMachismo and Caballerismo Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 19-33. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.55.1.19
5.
ArrindellW. A.van der EndeJ. (1985). An empirical test of the utility of the observations-to-variables ratio in factor and components analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 165-178. doi:10.1177/014662168500900205
6.
BurtM. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
7.
CarpenterC. S. (2013). Prevalence of gay men and lesbians. In BaumleA. K. (Ed.), International handbook on the demography of sexuality (pp. 217-228). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5512-3
8.
CostelloA. B.OsborneJ. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
9.
DeanK.MalamuthN. M. (1997). Characteristics of men who aggress sexually and of men who imagine aggressing: Risk and moderating variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 449-455.
10.
DevineP. G.SharpL. B. (2009). Automaticity and control in stereotyping and prejudice. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 61-88). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
11.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
12.
FraleyR. C.WallerN. G.BrennanK. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350-365. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.350
13.
FurnhamA. (2002). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795-817.
14.
GlickP.FiskeS. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
Jacques-TiuraA. J.AbbeyA.ParkhillM. R.ZawackiT. (2007). Why do some men misperceive women’s sexual intentions more frequently than others do? An application of the confluence model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1467-1480. doi:10.1177/0146167207306281
17.
JimenezJ. A.AbreuJ. M. (2003). Race and sex effects on attitudinal perceptions of acquaintance rape. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 252-256.
18.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford.
19.
KennyM. C.McEachernA. G. (2000). Racial, ethnic, and cultural factors of childhood sexual abuse: A selected review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 905-922.
20.
KrumpalI. (2011). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47, 2025-2047. doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
21.
LeavellA. S.Tamis-LeMondaC. S.RubleD. N.ZosulsK. M.CabreraN. J. (2011). African American, White and Latino fathers’ activities with their sons and daughters in early childhood. Sex Roles, 66, 53-65. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0080-8
22.
LeclercB.BeauregardE.ProulxJ. (2008). Modus operandi and situational aspects in adolescent sexual offenses against children: A further examination. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 46-61. doi:10.1177/0306624X07300271
23.
Logan GreeneP.Cue DavisK. (2011). Latent profiles of risk among a community sample of men: Implications for sexual aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1463-1477. doi:10.1177/0886260510369138
24.
LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704-711. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.68.4.704
MaesJ. (1992). Konstruktion und Analyse eines mehrdimensionalen Gerechte-Welt-Fragebogens (Construction and analysis of a multidimensional just world questionnaire). ("Responsibility, Justice, Morality" working group report No. 64). Trier, Germany: Saarland University. Retrieved 12/1/2013 from http://psydok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2006/666/pdf/beri064.pdf .
27.
MalamuthN. M.BrownL. M. (1994). Sexually aggressive men’s perceptions of women’s communications: Testing three explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 699-712. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.699
28.
MalamuthN. M.HeaveyC.LinzD. (1996). The confluence model of sexual aggression: Combining hostile masculinity and impersonal sex. In ColemanE.DwyerM.PalloneN. (Eds.), Sex offender treatment: Biological dysfunction, intrapsychic conflict, interpersonal violence (pp. 13-37). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
29.
MalamuthN. M.HeaveyC. L.LinzD. (1993). Predicting men’s antisocial behavior against women: The interactional model of sexual aggression. In HallG. C. N.HirschmanR. (Eds.), Sexual aggression: Issues in etiology, assessment, and treatment (pp. 63-98). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
30.
MalamuthN. M.LinzD.HeaveyC. L.BarnesG.AckerM. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men’s conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 353-369.
31.
MalamuthN. M.SockloskieR. J.KossM. P.TanakaJ. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 670-681.
32.
MarxB. P.GrossA. (1995). Date rape: An analysis of two contextual variables. Behavior Modification, 19, 451-463. doi:10.1177/01454455950194003
33.
MarxB. P.Van WieV.GrossA. (1996). Date rape risk factors: A review and methodological critique of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 1, 27-45.
34.
McLellan-LemalE.ToledoL. O.DanielsC.Villar-LoubetO.SimpsonC.AdimoraA. A.MarksG. (2013). “A man’s gonna do what a man wants to do”: African American and Hispanic women’s perceptions about heterosexual relationships: A qualitative study. BMC Women’s Health, 13(1), Article 27. doi:10.1186/1472-6874-13-27
35.
MuehlenhardC. L.HollabaughL. C. (1988). Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women’s token resistance to sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 872-879.
36.
NelsonP. (1978). Personality, sexual functions, and sexual behavior: An experiment in methodology (Doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville.
37.
NoelN. E.MaistoS. A.JohnsonJ. D.JacksonL. A. (2009). The effects of alcohol and cue salience on young men’s acceptance of sexual aggression. Addictive Behaviors, 34, 386-394. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.11.016
38.
O’Dougherty WrightM.NortonD. L.MatusekJ. A. (2010). Predicting verbal coercion following sexual refusal during a hookup: Diverging gender patterns. Sex Roles, 62, 647-660. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9763-9
39.
OjedaL.RosalesR.GoodG. E. (2008). Socioeconomic status and cultural predictors of male role attitudes among Mexican American men: Son más machos?Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 9, 133-138. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.9.3.133
40.
ParkhillM.AbbeyA. (2008). Does alcohol contribute to the confluence model of sexual assault perpetration?Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 27, 529-554.
41.
ParrottD. J.ZeichnerA. (2003). Effects of hypermasculinity on physical aggression against women. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4, 70-78. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.70
42.
PaulhusD. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In BraunH.I.JacksonD.N.WileyD.E. (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 49-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
PayneD. L.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 27-68.
44.
PolaschekD.WardT. (2002). The implicit theories of potential rapists: What our questionnaires tell us. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 385-406.
45.
PowerC.AielloL. (1997). Female proto-symbolic strategies. In HagerL. D. (Ed.), Women in human evolution (pp. 153-171). New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
PreacherK. J.MacCallumR. C. (2002). Exploratory factor analysis in behavior genetics research: Factor recovery with small sample sizes. Behavior Genetics, 32, 153-161.
47.
RaffaelliM.OntaiL. L. (2004). Gender socialization in Latino/a families: Results from two retrospective studies, Sex Roles, 50, 287-299.
48.
R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
RevelleW.RocklinT. (1979). Very simple structure—Alternative procedure for estimating the optimal number of interpretable factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 403-414.
51.
ShotlandR. L.HunterB. A. (1995). Women’s “token resistant” and compliant sexual behaviors are related to uncertain sexual intentions and rape. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 226-236. doi:10.1177/0146167295213004
52.
SibleyC. G.LiuJ. H. (2004). Short-term temporal stability and factor structure of the revised experiences in close relationships (ECR-R) measure of adult attachment. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 969-975. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00165-X
53.
UlloaE. C.JaycoxL. H.MarshallG. N.CollinsR. L. (2004). Acculturation, gender stereotypes, and attitudes about dating violence among Latino youth. Violence & Victims, 19, 273-288.
54.
UzielL. (2010). Rethinking social desirability scales: From impression management to interpersonally oriented self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 243-262. doi:10.1177/1745691610369465
55.
VelicerW. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321-327.
56.
WardT.BeechA. (2006). An integrated theory of sexual offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 44-63. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2005.05.002
57.
WidmanL.OlsonM. (2013). On the relationship between automatic attitudes and self-reported sexual assault in men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 813-823. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9970-2
58.
WillanV.PollardP. (2003). Likelihood of acquaintance rape as a function of males’ sexual expectations, disappointment, and adherence to rape-conducive attitudes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 637-661.
59.
WilliamsL. R.AdamsH. L. (2013). Friends with benefits or “friends” with deficits? The meaning and contexts of uncommitted sexual relationships among Mexican American and European American adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1110-1117. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.04.023
60.
YeaterE. A.LenbergK. L.AvinaC.RinehartJ. K.O’DonohueW. (2008). When social situations take a turn for the worse: Situational and interpersonal risk factors for sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 59, 151-163. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9437-z
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
