Adopting the integrated model of General Strain Theory (GST), the current study tested the relations between cyberbullying roles (i.e., cyberbully, cybervictim, and cyberbully-victim) and delinquent behaviors (i.e., physical fighting and substance use), as well as the potential mediating effects of delinquent peer association and perceived social attachment from parents, friends, and teachers. This was conducted in a cross-sectional sample of 12,642 American adolescents via the use of structural equation models. The results indicated that being involved in cyberbullying might be not only directly associated with an increase in delinquent behaviors, but also indirectly via delinquent peer associations and perceived social attachment from parents, friends, and teachers. Furthermore, both direct and indirect (mediating) relationships between cyberbullying and delinquency might depend upon specific cyberbullying roles and the types of delinquency. Potential implications for prevention and intervention strategies were discussed.
AgnewR. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–88.
2.
AgnewR. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(4), 319–361.
3.
AgnewR. (2006). General strain theory: Current status and directions for further research. In CullenF. T., WrightJ. P., & BlevinsK. R. (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 101-123). Transaction Publishers.
4.
AgnewR., & WhiteH. R. (1992). An empirical test of general strain theory. Criminology, 30(4), 475–500.
5.
AoyamaI. (2010). Cyberbullying: What are the psychological profiles of bullies, victims, and bullyvictims? [Doctoral dissertation]. Baylor University.
6.
BaoW. N., HaasA., ChenX., & PiY. (2014). Repeated strains, social control, social learning, and delinquency: Testing an integrated model of general strain theory in China. Youth & Society, 46(3), 402–424.
7.
BayraktarF., MachackovaH., DedkovaL., CernaA., & ŠevĉíkováA. (2015). Cyberbullying: The discriminant factors among cyberbullies, cybervictims, and cyberbully-victims in a Czech adolescent sample. Journal of Interpersonal Vio-lence, 30(18), 3192–3216.
8.
BeckmanL., HagquistC., & HellströmL. (2012). Does the association with psychosomatic health problems differ between cyberbullying and traditional bullying?Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3-4), 421–434.
9.
BroidyL., & AgnewR. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(3), 275-306.
10.
CarsonD. C., SullivanC. J., CochranJ. K., & LerschK. M. (2008). General strain theory and the relationship between early victimization and drug use. Deviant Behavior, 30(1), 54–88.
11.
CasasJ. A., Del ReyR., & Ortega-RuizR. (2013). Bullying and cyberbullying: Convergent and divergent predictor varia-bles. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 580–587.
12.
CénatJ. M., BlaisM., LavoieF., CaronP. O., & HébertM. (2018). Cyberbullying victimization and substance use among Quebec high schools students: The mediating role of psychological distress. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 207–212.
13.
ChappleC., VaskeJ., & WorthenM. G. (2014). Gender differences in associations with deviant peer groups: Examining individual, interactional, and compositional factors. Deviant Behavior, 35(5), 394–411.
14.
ChoS., & LeeJ. M. (2018). Explaining physical, verbal, and social bullying among bullies, victims of bullying, and bully-victims: Assessing the integrated approach between social control and lifestyles-routine activities theories. Children and Youth Services Review, 91, 372–382.
15.
ChoS., & NormanL. (2019). The mediating effect of social controls on marijuana use among adolescent bullies, victims, and bully-victims: A comparison of various approaches to mediation. Substance Use & Misuse, 54(5), 796–810.
16.
ChoiJ., & KruisN. E. (2019). The effects of life domains on cyberbullying and bullying: Testing the generalizability of Agnew’s integrated general theory. Crime & Delinquency, 65(6), 772–800.
17.
ChuX. W., FanC. Y., LiuQ. Q., & ZhouZ. K. (2018). Stability and change of bullying roles in the traditional and virtual contexts: A three-wave longitudinal study in Chinese early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(11), 2384–2400.
18.
ChurchW. T., WhartonT., & TaylorJ. K. (2009). An examination of differential association and social control theory: Family systems and delinquency. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7(1), 3–15.
19.
CoelhoV. A., & RomãoA. M. (2018). The relation between social anxiety, social withdrawal and (cyber) bullying roles: A multilevel analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 218–226.
20.
CullenF. T., UnneverJ. D., HartmanJ. L., TurnerM. G., & AgnewR. (2008). Gender, bullying victimization, and juvenile delinquency: A test of general strain theory. Victims and Offenders, 3(4), 346–364.
21.
DavidsonL. M., & DemarayM. K. (2007). Social support as a moderator between victimization and internalizing–externalizing distress from bullying. School Psychology Review, 36(3), 383–405.
22.
DodgeK. A., DishionT. J., & LansfordJ. E. (2006). Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions. The Guilford Press.
23.
ErginozE., AlikasifogluM., ErcanO., UysalO., AlpZ., OcakS., TanyildizG. O., EkiciB., YucelI. K., & Albayrak KaymakD. (2015). The role of parental, school, and peer factors in adolescent bullying involvement: Results from the Turkish HBSC 2005/2006 study. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 27(2), NP1591-NP1603.
24.
FahyA. E., StansfeldS. A., SmukM., SmithN. R., CumminsS., & ClarkC. (2016). Longitudinal associations between cyberbullying involvement and adolescent mental health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 59(5), 502–509.
25.
FantiK. A., DemetriouA. G., & HawaV. V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining risk and protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 168–181.
26.
FisherB. W., GardellaJ. H., & Teurbe-TolonA. R. (2016). Peer cybervictimization among adolescents and the associated in-ternalizing and externalizing problems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(9), 1727–1743.
27.
FlaspohlerP. D., ElfstromJ. L., VanderzeeK. L., SinkH. E., & BirchmeierZ. (2009). Stand by me: The effects of peer and teacher support in mitigating the impact of bullying on quality of life. Psychology in the Schools, 46(7), 636–649.
28.
GlassnerS. D. (2020). Bullying victimization and delinquent involvement: An application of general strain theory. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105099.
29.
GuoS. (2016). A meta-analysis of the predictors of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Psychology in the Schools, 53(4), 432–453.
30.
GuoS., LiuJ., & WangJ. (2020). Cyberbullying roles among adolescents: A social-ecological theory perspective. Journal of School Violence, 20(2), 167–181.
31.
HarmanJ. P., HansenC. E., CochranM. E., & LindseyC. R. (2005). Liar, liar: Internet faking but not frequency of use affects social skills, self-esteem, social anxiety, and aggression. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(1), 1–6.
32.
HayC., MeldrumR., & MannK. (2010). Traditional bullying, cyber bullying, and deviance: A general strain theory approach. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(2), 130–147.
33.
HellfeldtK., López-RomeroL., & AndershedH. (2020). Cyberbullying and psychological well-being in young adolescence: The potential protective mediation effects of social support from family, friends, and teachers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 45.
34.
HoffD. L., & MitchellS. N. (2009). Cyberbullying: Causes, effects, and remedies. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(5), 652–665.
35.
HoltM. K., & EspelageD. L. (2007). Perceived social support among bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(8), 984–994.
36.
HuL. T., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
37.
JenaroC., FloresN., & FríasC. P. (2017). Anxiety and depression in cyberbullied college students: A retrospective study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1-2), 576–602.
38.
JuvonenJ., GrahamS., & SchusterM. A. (2003). Bullying among young adolescents: The strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics, 112(6), 1231–1237.
39.
KabiriS., Shadmanfaat, S. M. S., ChoiJ., & YunI. (2020). The impact of life domains on cyberbullying perpetration in Iran: A partial test of Agnew’s general theory of crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 66, 101633.
40.
KimM. J., CatalanoR. F., HaggertyK. P., & AbbottR. D. (2011). Bullying at elementary school and problem behaviour in young adulthood: A study of bullying, violence and substance use from age 11 to age 21. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21(2), 136–144.
41.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
42.
KowalskiR. M., GiumettiG. W., SchroederA. N., & LattannerM. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137.
43.
KowalskiR. M., & LimberS. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), S13-S20.
44.
LeeJ., HongJ. S., ReskoS. M., & TripodiS. J. (2018). Face-to-face bullying, cyberbullying, and multiple forms of substance use among school-age adolescents in the USA. School Mental Health, 10(1), 12–25.
45.
LiQ., SmithP. K., & CrossD. (2012). Research into cyberbullying. In Cyberbullying in the global playground: Research from international perspectives (pp. 3-12). Wiley.
46.
LitwillerB. J., & BrauschA. M. (2013). Cyber bullying and physical bullying in adolescent suicide: The role of violent behavior and substance use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 675–684.
47.
LivingstoneS., HaddonL., Görzig, A., & ÓlafssonK. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet. The perspective of European children. Full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9-16 years old and their parents in 25 countries. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33731/1/Risks%20and%20safety%20on%20the%20internet%28lsero%29.pdf
48.
LukJ. W., WangJ., Simons-MortonB. G. (2012). The co-occurrence of substance use and bullying behaviors among US adolescents: Understanding demographic characteristics and social influences. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1351–1360.
49.
MacKinnonD. P., LockwoodC. M., & WilliamsJ. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99-128.
50.
Maydeu-OlivaresA. (2017). Maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models for continuous data: Standard errors and goodness of fit. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(3), 383–394.
51.
MishnaF., Khoury-KassabriM., GadallaT., & DaciukJ. (2012). Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully-victims. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 63–70.
52.
MonahanK. C., SteinbergL., & CauffmanE. (2009). Affiliation with antisocial peers, susceptibility to peer influence, and antisocial behavior during the transition to adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1520.
53.
NegriffS., JiJ., & TrickettP. K. (2011). Exposure to peer delinquency as a mediator between self-report pubertal timing and delinquency: A longitudinal study of mediation. Development and Psychopathology, 23(1), 293–304.
54.
NewmanM. L., HoldenG. W., & DelvilleY. (2005). Isolation and the stress of being bullied. Journal of Adolescence, 28(3), 343–357.
55.
NiemeläS., Brunstein-KlomekA., SillanmäkiL., HeleniusH., PihaJ., KumpulainenK., MoilanenI., TamminenT., AlmqvistF., & SouranderA. (2011). Childhood bullying behaviors at age eight and substance use at age 18 among males. A nationwide prospective study. Addictive Behaviors, 36(3), 256–260.
56.
NixonC. L. (2014). Current perspectives: The impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 5, 143–158.
57.
Olenik-ShemeshD., HeimanT., & EdenS. (2012). Cyberbullying victimisation in adolescence: Relationships with loneliness and depressive mood. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3-4), 361–374.
58.
Owens-SabirM. C. (2007). The effects of race and family attachment on self-esteem, self-control, and delinquency. LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.
59.
ParkY., & MetcalfeC. (2020). Bullying victimization as a strain: Examining changes in bullying victimization and delinquency among Korean students from a developmental general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 57(1), 31–65.
60.
PatchinJ. W., & HindujaS. (2011). Traditional and nontraditional bullying among youth: A test of general strain theory. Youth & Society, 43(2), 727–751.
61.
PerrenS., DooleyJ., ShawT., & CrossD. (2010). Bullying in school and cyberspace: Associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 4(1), 28.
62.
PriceM., & DalgleishJ. (2010). Cyberbullying: Experiences, impacts and coping strategies as described by Australian young people. Youth Studies Australia, 29(2), 51–59.
63.
RadliffK. M., WheatonJ. E., RobinsonK., & MorrisJ. (2012). Illuminating the relationship between bullying and substance use among middle and high school youth. Addictive Behaviors, 37(4), 569–572.
64.
RothonC., HeadJ., KlinebergE., & StansfeldS. (2011). Can social support protect bullied adolescents from adverse outcomes? A prospective study on the effects of bullying on the educational achievement and mental health of adolescents at secondary schools in East London. Journal of Adolescence, 34(3), 579–588.
65.
SchreckC. J., StewartE. A., & FisherB. S. (2006). Self-control, victimization, and their influence on risky lifestyles: A longitudinal analysis using panel data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22(4), 319–340.
66.
SelkieE. M., KotaR., ChanY. F., & MorenoM. (2015). Cyberbullying, depression, and problem alcohol use in female college students: A multisite study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(2), 79–86.
67.
SlonjeR., & SmithP. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 147–154.
68.
SlonjeR., SmithP. K., & FrisénA. (2017). Perceived reasons for the negative impact of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14(3), 295–310.
69.
SmithP. K., & SlonjeR. (2007). Cyberbullying: The nature and extent of a new kind of bullying, in and out of school. In JimersonS. R. (Ed.), The international handbook of school bullying. Routledge.
70.
SmokowskiP. R., EvansC. B., & CotterK. L. (2014). The differential impacts of episodic, chronic, and cumulative physical bullying and cyberbullying: The effects of victimization on the school experiences, social support, and mental health of rural adolescents. Violence and Victims, 29(6), 1029–1046.
71.
SpearsB., SleeP., OwensL., & JohnsonB. (2009). Behind the scenes and screens: Insights into the human dimension of covert and cyberbullying. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 189–196.
72.
TsitsikaA., JanikianM., WójcikS., MakarukK., TzavelaE., TzavaraC., GreydanusD., MerrickJ., & RichardsonC. (2015). Cyberbullying victimization prevalence and associations with internalizing and externalizing problems among adolescents in six European countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1–7.
73.
TtofiM. M., BowesL., FarringtonD. P., & LöselF. (2014). Protective factors interrupting the continuity from school bullying to later internalizing and externalizing problems: A systematic review of prospective longitudinal studies. Journal of School Violence, 13(1), 5–38.
74.
UndheimA. M., WallanderJ., & SundA. M. (2016). Coping strategies and associations with depression among 12- to 15-year-old Norwegian adolescents involved in bullying. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 204(4), 274–279.
75.
VöllinkT., BolmanC. A., DehueF., & JacobsN. C. (2013). Coping with cyberbullying: Differences between victims, bully-victims and children not involved in bullying. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 7–24.
76.
WaltersG. D., & EspelageD. L. (2017). Mediating the bullying victimization–delinquency relationship with anger and cognitive impulsivity: A test of general strain and criminal lifestyle theories. Journal of Criminal Justice, 53, 66–73.
77.
WangJ., IannottiR. J., & LukJ. W. (2011). Peer victimization and academic adjustment among early adolescents: Moderation by gender and mediation by perceived classmate support. Journal of School Health, 81(7), 386–392.
78.
WangJ., IannottiR. J., & NanselT. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(4), 368–375.
79.
WangW., XieX., WangX., LeiL., HuQ., & JiangS. (2019). Cyberbullying and depression among Chinese college students: A moderated mediation model of social anxiety and neuroticism. Journal of Affective Disorders, 256, 54–61.
80.
WrightM. F. (2016). Cybervictimization and substance use among adolescents: The moderation of perceived social support. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 16(1-2), 93–112.
81.
WrightM. F., & LiY. (2012). Kicking the digital dog: A longitudinal investigation of young adults’ victimization and cyber-displaced aggression. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(9), 448–454.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
