According to the Situational Action Theory, stronger morality inhibits the perception of alternatives to law-breaking action, thus lessening the probability of crime and delinquency. Research indicates that morality might be affected by delinquent peer association and in turn affect criminogenic exposure. This article studies how morality develops during late adolescence using data from the longitudinal project Malmö Individual and Neighbourhood Development Study. Using linear growth modelling, the study finds that a decrease in morality is associated with a simultaneous increase in delinquency peer association. No change in criminogenic exposure was detected. The results are discussed alongside theoretical and methodological implications.
AkersRL (2009) Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime and Deviance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
2.
AndersonSWBecharaADamasioH, et al. (1999) Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience2(11): 1032–1037.
3.
AntonaccioOTittleCR (2008) Morality, self-control, and crime. Criminology46(2): 479–510.
4.
BaumanKEFisherLA (1986) On the measurement of friend behavior in research on friend influence and selection: Findings from longitudinal studies of adolescent smoking and drinking. Journal of Youth and Adolescence15(4): 345–353.
5.
BeierH (2018) Situational peer effects of adolescents’ alcohol consumption: The moderating role of supervision, activity structure, and morality. Deviant Behavior39(3): 363–379.
6.
BernascoW (2019) Adolescent offenders’ current whereabouts predict locations of their future crimes. PLOS ONE14(1).
7.
BollenKACurranPJ (2006) Latent Curve Models: A Structural Equation Perspective. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
8.
BrauerJRTittleCR (2017) When crime is not an option: Inspecting the moral filtering of criminal action alternatives. Justice Quarterly34(5): 818–846.
9.
BrezinaTPiqueroAR (2007) Moral beliefs, isolation from peers, and abstention from delinquency. Deviant Behavior28(5): 433–465.
10.
BruinsmaGJNPauwelsLJRWeermanFM, et al. (2015) Situational action theory: Cross-sectional and cross-lagged tests of its core propositions. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice57(3): 363–398.
11.
CampbellJAitken SchermerJVillaniVC, et al. (2009) A behavioral genetic study of the dark triad of personality and moral development. Twin Research and Human Genetics12(2): 132–136.
12.
ChurchWTIITomekSBollandKA, et al. (2012) A longitudinal examination of predictors of delinquency: An analysis of data from the Mobile Youth Survey. Children and Youth Services Review34: 2400–2408.
13.
CochranJK (2016) Moral propensity, setting, and choice: A partial test of Situational Action Theory. Deviant Behavior37(7): 811–823.
14.
ConnollyEJSchwartzJANedelecJL, et al. (2015) Different slopes for different folks: Genetic influences on growth in delinquent peer association and delinquency during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence44: 1413–1427.
15.
CoppD (ed.) (2006) The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
CushmanFKumarVRailtonP (2017) Moral learning: Psychological and philosophical perspectives. Cognition167: 1–10.
17.
DamonW (2015) Foreword to the Seventh Edition. In: OvertonWFMolenaarPCM (eds) Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, 7th edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., vii–xiii.
18.
DurkheimE (2002) Moral Education. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
19.
EisenbergN (2000) Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology51(1): 665–697.
20.
FaganAABenediniKM (2019) Family influences on youth offending. In: FarringtonDPKazemianLPiqueroAR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 378–403.
21.
GallupeOBaronSW (2014) Morality, self-control, deterrence, and drug use: Street youths and Situational Action Theory. Crime & Delinquency60(2): 284–305.
22.
GallupeOMcLeveyJBrownS (2019) Selection and influence: A meta-analysis of the association between peer and personal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology35(2): 313–335.
23.
GerellM (2017) Smallest is better? The spatial distribution of arson and the modifiable areal unit problem. Journal of Quantitative Criminology33: 293–318.
24.
GerstnerDOberwittlerD (2018) Who’s hanging out and what’s happening? A look at the interplay between unstructured socializing, crime propensity and delinquent peers using social network data. European Journal of Criminology15(1): 111–129.
25.
GreeneJDHaidtJ (2002) How (and where) does moral judgment work?Trends in Cognitive Sciences6(12): 517–523.
26.
GreeneJDSommervilleRBNystromLE, et al. (2001) An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science293(5537): 2105–2108.
27.
HaidtJ (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgement. Psychological Review108(1): 814–834.
28.
HaidtJ (2007) The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science316(5827): 998–1002.
29.
HaidtJ (2008) Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science3(1): 65–72.
30.
HarrisJR (2009) The Nurture Assumption : Why Children Turn out the Way They Do, 2nd edn. New York: Free Press.
31.
HartDCarloG (2005) Moral development in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence15(3): 223–233.
32.
HedströmP (2005) Dissecting the Social. On the Principle of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
HigginsGEJenningsWG (2010) Is unstructured socializing a dynamic process? An exploratory analysis using a semiparametric group-based modeling approach. Criminal Justice Review35(4): 514–532.
34.
HilbeJ (2011) Negative Binomial Regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
HirschiT (2002) Causes of Delinquency. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
36.
HirtenlehnerHKunzF (2016) The interaction between self-control and morality in crime causation among older adults. European Journal of Criminology13(3): 393–409.
37.
HoebenEMWeermanFM (2016) Why is involvement in unstructured socializing related to adolescent delinquency?Criminology54(2): 242–281.
38.
HoebenEMBernascoWWeermanFM, et al. (2014) The space–time budget method in criminological research. Crime Science3(12): 1–15.
39.
HoebenEMMeldrumRCWalkerD, et al. (2016) The role of peer delinquency and unstructured socializing in explaining delinquency and substance use: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice47: 108–122.
40.
HoeveMStamsGJJMVan der PutCE, et al. (2012) A meta-analysis of attachment to parents and delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology40(5): 771–785.
41.
HuL-TBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling6(1): 1–55.
42.
IsraelSHasenfratzLKnafo-NoamA (2015) The genetics of morality and prosociality. Current Opinion in Psychology6: 55–59.
43.
IvertA-KAnderssonFSvenssonR, et al. (2018) An examination of the interaction between morality and self-control in offending: A study of differences between girls and boys. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health28(3): 282–294.
44.
JanssenHJBruinsmaGJNDekovićM, et al. (2018) A between- and within-person analysis of parenting and time spent in criminogenic settings during adolescence: The role of self-control and delinquent attitudes. Youth & Society50(2): 229–254.
45.
KandlerCGottschlingJSpinathFM (2016) Genetic and environmental parent–child transmission of value orientations: An extended twin family study. Child Development87(1): 270–284.
46.
KohlbergL (1981) Essays on Moral Development. Vol. 1, The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
47.
KronebergCSchulzS (2018) Revisiting the role of self-control in Situational Action Theory. European Journal of Criminology15(1): 56–76.
48.
KronebergCHeintzeIMehlkopG (2010) The interplay of moral norms and instrumental incentives in crime causation. Criminology48(1): 259–294.
49.
LindströmMMerloJÖstergrenP-O (2002) Individual and neighbourhood determinants of social participation and social capital: A multilevel analysis of the city of Malmö, Sweden. Social Science & Medicine54(12): 1779–1791.
50.
LiuHPowersDA (2007) Growth curve models for zero-inflated count data: An application to smoking behavior. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal14(2): 247–279.
51.
MeeusW (2016) Adolescent psychosocial development: A review of longitudinal models and research. Developmental Psychology52(12): 1969–1993.
52.
MeldrumRCYoungJTNWeermanFM (2009) Reconsidering the effect of self-control and delinquent peers: Implications of measurement for theoretical significance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency46(3): 353–376.
OberwittlerD (2004) A multilevel analysis of neighbourhood contextual effects on serious juvenile offending: The role of subcultural values and social disorganization. European Journal of Criminology1(2): 201–235.
55.
OberwittlerDWikströmP-OH (2009) Why small is better: Advancing the study of the role of behavioral context in crime causation. In: WeisburdDBernascoWBruinsmaGJN (eds) Putting Crime in Its Place. Units of Analysis in Geographic Criminology. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 35–60.
56.
OsgoodDWWilsonJKO’MalleyPM, et al. (1996) Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review61(4): 635–655.
57.
PardiniDLoeberRStouthamer-LoeberM (2005) Developmental shifts in parent and peer influences on boys’ beliefs about delinquent behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence15(3): 299–323.
58.
PauwelsLJRSvenssonRHirtenlehnerH (2018) Testing Situational Action Theory: A narrative review of studies published between 2006 and 2015. European Journal of Criminology15(1): 32–55.
59.
PeplerDJ (2019) Schools and the pathway to crime: A focus on relationships. In: FarringtonDPKazemianLPiqueroAR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology. New York: Oxford University Press, 432–453.
60.
PrattTCCullenFTSellersCS, et al. (2010) The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly27(6): 765–802.
ReineckeJSeddigD (2011) Growth mixture models in longitudinal research. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis95: 415–434.
63.
SampsonRJ (2012) Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64.
SampsonRJRaudenbushSWEarlsF (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science277: 918–924.
65.
SchepersD (2017a) Causes of the causes of juvenile delinquency: Social disadvantages in the context of Situational Action Theory. European Journal of Criminology14(2): 143–159.
66.
SchepersD (2017b) Moral development in adolescence: A test of change and influence in context of SAT with German panel data. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice9(1): 70–97.
67.
SchulzS (2016) ‘Don’t blow your cool’: Provocation, violent coping, and the conditioning effects of self-control. Journal of Quantitative Criminology32(4): 561–587.
68.
SchwartzJASolomonSJValgardsonBA (2019) Socialization, selection, or both? The role of gene–environment interplay in the association between exposure to antisocial peers and delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology35: 1–26.
69.
SmetanaJG (1999) The role of parents in moral development: A social domain analysis. Journal of Moral Education28(3): 311–321.
70.
SmetanaJGJambonMBallC (2014) The social domain approach to children’s moral and social judgements. In: KillenMSmetanaJG (eds) Handbook of Moral Development, 2nd edn. New York: Psychology Press, 23–45.
71.
StamsGJJMBrugmanDDekoviM, et al. (2006) The moral judgment of juvenile delinquents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology34: 697–713.
72.
SvenssonR (2015) An examination of the interaction between morality and deterrence in offending: A research note. Crime & Delinquency61(611): 3–18.
73.
SvenssonRPauwelsLJRWeermanFM (2010) Does the effect of self-control on adolescent offending vary by level of morality? A test in three countries. Criminal Justice and Behavior37(6): 732–743.
74.
SvenssonRWeermanFMPauwelsLJR, et al. (2013) Moral emotions and offending: Do feelings of anticipated shame and guilt mediate the effect of socialization on offending?European Journal of Criminology10(1): 22–39.
75.
SvenssonRWeermanFMPauwelsLJR, et al. (2017) Explaining individual changes in moral values and moral emotions among adolescent boys and girls: A fixed-effects analysis. European Journal of Criminology14(3): 290–308.
76.
TangneyJPStuewigJMashekDJ (2006) Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology58: 345–372.
77.
TreiberK (2011) The neuroscientific basis of Situational Action Theory. In: BeaverKMWalshA (eds) The Ashgate Research Companion to Biosocial Theories of Crime. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 213–246.
78.
TurielE (2015) Moral development. In: OvertonWFMolenaarPCMLernerRM (eds) Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, 7th edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 484–522.
79.
WagnerBRiggsPMikulich-GilbertsonS (2015) The importance of distribution-choice in modeling substance use data: A comparison of negative binomial, beta binomial, and zero-inflated distributions. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse41(6): 489–497.
80.
WeermanFMWilcoxPSullivanCJ (2018) The short-term dynamics of peers and delinquent behavior: An analysis of bi-weekly changes within a high school student network. Journal of Quantitative Criminology34(2): 431–463.
81.
WikströmP-OH (2004) Crime as alternative: Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In: McCordJ (ed.) Beyond Empiricism: Institutions and Intentions in the Study of Crime. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1–37.
82.
WikströmP-OH (2005) The social origins of pathways in crime: Towards a developmental ecological action theory of crime involvement and its changes. Integrated Developmental & Life-Course Theories of Offending14: 211–246.
83.
WikströmP-OH (2006) Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: Situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime. In: WikströmP-OHSampsonRJ (eds) The Explanation of Crime: Context, Mechanisms and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 61–107.
84.
WikströmP-OH (2010) Explaining crime as moral actions. In: HitlinSVaiseyS (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Morality. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 211–239.
85.
WikströmP-OH (2011) Social sources of crime propensity: A study of the collective efficacy of families, schools, and neighbourhoods. In: BliesnerTBeelmannAStemmlerM (eds) Antisocial Behavior and Crime: Contributions of Developmental and Evaluation Research to Prevention and Intervention. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe Publishing, 109–122.
86.
WikströmP-OH (2014) Why crime happens: A situational action theory. In: ManzoG (ed.) Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 74–94.
87.
WikströmP-OH (2019) Explaining crime and criminal careers: The DEA model of Situational Action Theory. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-019-00116-5.
88.
WikströmP-OHSampsonRJ (2003) Social mechanisms of community influences on crime and pathways in criminality. In: LaheyBBMoffittTECaspiA (eds) Causes of Conduct Disorder and Juvenile Delinquency. New York: The Guilford Press, 118–148.
89.
WikströmP-OHSvenssonR (2010) When does self-control matter? The interaction between morality and self-control in crime causation. European Journal of Criminology7(5): 395–410.
90.
WikströmP-OHTreiberK (2007) The role of self-control in crime causation: Beyond Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime. European Journal of Criminology4(2): 237–264.
91.
WikströmP-OHTreiberK (2009) What drives persistent offending? The neglected and unexplored role of the social environment. In: SavageJ (ed.) The Development of Persistent Criminality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 389–420.
92.
WikströmP-OHTreiberK (2016) Social disadvantage and crime: A criminological puzzle. American Behavioral Scientist60(10): 1232–1259.
93.
WikströmP-OHTreiberKH (2019) The dynamics of change: Criminogenic interactions and life-course patterns in crime. In: FarringtonDPKazemianLPiqueroAR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology. New York: Oxford University Press, 272–294.
94.
WikströmP-OHOberwittlerDTreiberK, et al. (2012) Breaking Rules: The Social and Situational Dynamics of Young People’s Urban Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
95.
YoungJTNRebellonCJBarnesJC, et al. (2014) Unpacking the Black Box of peer similarity in deviance: Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology52(1): 60–86.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
