Intimate partner violence (IPV) is now recognized internationally as a significant problem against which public action is being taken. However, victims commonly disclose little of this violence. The understanding of sociocultural factors that prevent women from talking about their male partner’s violence towards them thus appears to be an important issue. Using a qualitative approach, this study examines the representations that women survivors of IPV draw on to give meaning to the couple relationship and the links that these representations maintain with IPV and the help-seeking process. Nineteen women, who had previously experienced abuse from an intimate partner, participated in semi-structured interviews. Despite the experience of violence, an idealized vision of the couple relationship persists among the majority of respondents and conflicts with their experience of violence. This gap between an ideal and lived experience appears to be a major source of suffering for the participants who thus develop different strategies to preserve their ideal. These strategies appear to have the effect of minimizing and concealing violence.
AimM. A., & LelaurainS. (2020). Penser le rapport aux corps dans une perspective féministe [Thinking about the relationship to bodies from a feminist perspective]. In L. Dany (Ed.), Psychologie du corps et de l’apparence [Psychology of the body and appearance] (pp.113–130). Presses Universitaires de Provence.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2020). Treating women who have experienced intimate partner violence. https://www.psychiatry.org/FileLibrary/Psychiatrists/Cultural-Competency/IPV-Guide/APA-Guide-to-IPV-Among-Women.pdf
3.
ApostolidisT. (2006). Représentations sociales et triangulation: une application en psychologie sociale de la santé [Social representations and triangulation: An application in social psychology of health]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 22(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722006000200011
4.
BonomiA. E., AltenburgerL. E., & WaltonN. L. (2013). “Double crap!” abuse and harmed identity in Fifty Shades of Grey. Journal of Women’s Health, 22(9), 733–44. https://doi:10.1089/jwh.2013.4344
5.
BoonzaierF. (2008). “If the man says you must sit, then you must sit:” The relational construction of woman abuse: Gender, subjectivity and violence. Feminism & Psychology, 18(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507088266
6.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
7.
BrownE., DebaucheA., HamelC., & MazuyM. (2021). Violences et rapports de genre[Violence and gender relations]. Grandes Enquêtes.
8.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
9.
DekelB., & AndipatinM. (2016). Abused women’s understandings of intimate partner violence and the link to intimate femicide. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.1.2394
10.
DenzinN. K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Aldine.
11.
DoiseW. (1986). Levels of explanation in social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
12.
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2014). Violence against women: An EU-wide survey. Publications Office of the European Union. http://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2014-vaw-survey-main-results-apr14_en.pdf
13.
FurlerK., GomezV., & GrobA. (2014). Personality perceptions and relationship satisfaction in couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.02.003
14.
GiordanoP. C., SotoD. A., ManningW. D., & LongmoreM. A. (2010). The characteristics of romantic relationships associated with teen dating violence. Social Science Research, 39(6), 863–874. https://doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.03.009
15.
GoffmanE. (1977). The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society, 4(3), 301–331.
16.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. John Wiley & Sons.
17.
HermanE. (2016). Lutter contre les violences conjugales[Combating domestic violence]. Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
18.
IllouzE. (2012). Pourquoi l’amour fait mal. L’expérience amoureuse dans la modernité. [Why love hurts. The experience of love in the modern world]. Le Seuil.
19.
JacksonS. (1993). “Love and romance as objects of feminist knowledge.”In M. Kennedy, C. Lubelska & V. Valsh (Eds.), Making connections: Women’s studies, women’s movements, women’s lives. Taylor & Francis.
20.
JodeletD. (1989). Les représentations Sociales[Social Representations]. Presses Universitaires de France.
21.
JodeletD. (2002). Les representations sociales dans le champ de la culture. [Social representations in the field of culture]. Social Science Information, 41(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018402041001008
22.
JodeletD. (2008). Le mouvement de retour vers le sujet et l’approche des représentations sociales [The movement back to the subject and the social representations approach]. Connexions, 89(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.3917/cnx.089.0025
23.
KearneyM. H. (2001). Enduring love: A grounded formal theory of women’s experience of domestic violence. Research in Nursing and Health, 24(4), 270–282. https://doi:10.1002/nur.1029
24.
KissL., d’OliveiraA., ZimmermanC., HeiseL., SchraiberL., & WattsC. (2012). Brazilian policy responses to violence against women: Government strategy and the help-seeking behaviors of women who experience violence. Health and Human Rights, 14(1), E64–E77.
25.
LelaurainS. (2018). Violence conjugale et représentations sociales: vécu et légitimation au prisme des rapports sociaux de sexe[Domestic violence and social representations: Experience and legitmation through the lense of gender relations][Doctoral dissertation]. Aix-Marseille Université.
26.
LelaurainS., FonteD., AimM. A., KhatmiN., DecarsinT., Lo MonacoG., & ApostolidisT. (2018). “One doesn’t slap a girl but…:” Social representations and conditional logics in legitimization of intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 78(9), 637–652. https://doi:10.1007/s11199-017-0821-4
27.
LelaurainS., FonteD., GigerJ.-C., GuignardS., & Lo MonacoG. (2021). Legitimizing intimate partner violence: The role of romantic love and the mediating effect of patriarchal ideologies. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13–14), 6351–6368. https://doi:10.1177/0886260518818427
28.
LelaurainS., GrazianiP., & Lo MonacoG. (2017). Intimate partner violence and help-seeking: A systematic review and social psychological tracks for future research. European Psychologist, 22(4), 263–281. https://doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000304
29.
LiangB., GoodmanL., Tummala-NarraP., & WeintraubS. (2005). A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1–2), 71–84. https://doi:10.1007/s10464-005-6233-6
30.
LuhmannN. (1990). Amour comme passion. De la codification de l’intimité[Love as passion. On the codification of intimacy]. Aubier.
31.
ManseurZ. (2004). Entre projet de départ et soumission: la souffrance de la femme battue [Between initial project and submission: The suffering of the battered woman]. Pensée plurielle, 8(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.3917/pp.008.0103
32.
MoscoviciS. (2008). Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public. Polity Press.
33.
MyraH., & JacksonS. (2001). Where “angels” and “wusses” fear to tread: Sexual coercion in adolescent dating relationships. Journal of Sociology, 37(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/144078301128756184
34.
Peterson Del MarD. (1996). What trouble I have seen: A history of violence against wives. Harvard University Press.
35.
PocockM., JacksonD., & Bradbury-JonesC. (2019). Intimate partner violence and the power of love: A qualitative systematic review. Health Care For Women International. https://doi:10.1080/07399332.2019.1621318
36.
PylesL., KatieM. M., MariameB. B., SuzetteG. G., & DeChiroJ. (2012). Building bridges to safety and justice: Stories of survival and resistance. Affilia: Journal of Women & Social Work, 27(1), 84–94. https://doi:10.1177/0886109912437487
37.
SéveracN. (2003). La violence conjugale, une transgression révélatrice des normes de la conjugalité contemporaine [Domestic violence, a transgression revealing the norms of contemporary conjugality] [Doctoral dissertation]. Université Paris Descartes.
38.
SinghS. (2013). Women want love, man wives: The discourse of romantic love in young adults future marriage goals. Agenda, Empowering Women for Gender Equality, 27(2), 22–29. https://doi:10.1080/10130950.2013.80879
39.
SmithJ. A. (1995). Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 9–26). SAGE Publishing.
40.
SpencerR., ShahrouriM., HalasaL., KhalafI., & ClarkC. (2014). Women’s help seeking for intimate partner violence in Jordan. Health Care for Women International, 35(4), 380–399. https://doi:10.1080/07399332.2013.815755
41.
SprecherS., & MettsS. (1989). Development of the Romantic Beliefs Scale and examination of the effects of gender and gender-role orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6(4), 387–411. https://doi:10.1177/0265407589064001
42.
StaerkléC. (2012). Back to new roots: Societal psychology and social representations. In j. Pires Valentim (Ed.), Societal approaches in social psychology (pp. 81–106). Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.
43.
StoeberJ. (2012). Dyadic perfectionism in romantic relationships: Predicting relationship satisfaction and long-term commitment. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.002
44.
SturdivantS. (1983). Therapy with women: A feminist philosophy of treatment. Springer.
45.
Thapar-BjörkertS., & MorganK. J. (2010). “But sometimes I think… They put themselves in the situation:” Exploring blame and responsibility in interpersonal violence. Violence Against Women, 16(1), 32–59.
46.
TownsA., & AdamsP. (2000). “If I loved him enough, he would be okay:” Women’s accounts of male partner violence. Violence Against Women, 6(6), 558–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010022182038
47.
TownsA., & AdamsP. (2009). Staying quiet or getting out: Some ideological dilemmas faced by women who experience violence from male partners. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 735–754. https://doi:10.1348/014466608X398762
48.
WoodJ. T. (2001). The normalization of violence in heterosexual romantic relationship. Women’s narratives of love and violence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(2), 183–201.
