The study of the risk and protective factors in aggression is of fundamental importance for our society. The aim of this research was to clarify the role of sensitivity to reward/punishment in aggression and provide a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying this relationship, particularly given that previous studies in the literature have yielded mixed results. To this end, two studies were conducted. In Study 1 (484 participants; Mage = 39.09; 48.6s women), we explored the relationship between sensitivity to reward and punishment and four components of aggression: physical, verbal, anger, and hostility. In Study 2 (229 participants; Mage = 21.52; 56.77% women), we investigated the moderating role of emotion regulation ability in this relationship. The findings of Studies 1 and 2 supported the existence of a positive relationship between sensitivity to reward and aggression, that is, a high reactivity to reward acted as a risk factor. With respect to sensitivity to punishment, mediation analysis revealed that this variable may act both as a protective factor as well as a risk factor for behavioral aggression. A higher reactivity to punishment had a direct negative effect on physical and verbal aggression, inhibiting aggressive behavior. However, a higher reactivity to punishment also implied a positive indirect effect on physical and verbal aggression through an increase in anger and hostility. Interestingly, Study 2 revealed that these indirect effects were moderated by emotion regulation ability. Our results could help to inform the design of aggression prevention and intervention programs for reducing the impact of this behavior on our society.
AlujaA.BlanchA. (2011). Neuropsychological behavioral inhibition system (BIS) and behavioral approach system (BAS) assessment: A shortened sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire version (SPSRQ-20). Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(6), 628–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.608760
BerkowitzL. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
4.
BijttebierP.BeckI.ClaesL.VandereyckenW. (2009). Gray’s Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory as a framework for research on personality-psychopathology associations. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(5), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.04.002
5.
BjørnebekkG. (2007). Dispositions related to sensitivity in the neurological basis for activation of approach-avoidance motivation, antisocial attributes and individual differences in aggressive behavior. Social Behavior and Personality, 35(9), 1251–1264. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.9.1251
6.
BurtS. A.DonnellanM. B. (2008). Personality correlates of aggressive and non-aggressive antisocial behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.07.022
CabelloR.SorrelM. A.Fernández-PintoI.ExtremeraN.Fernández-BerrocalP. (2016). Age and gender differences in ability emotional intelligence in adults: A cross-sectional study. Developmental Psychology, 52(9), 1486–1492. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000191
9.
CarlsonS. R.PritchardA. A.DominelliR. M. (2013). Externalizing behavior, the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale and Reward and Punishment Sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(2), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.039
10.
ConstantinouE.PanayiotouG.KonstantinouN.Loutsiou-LaddA.KapardisA. (2011). Risky and aggressive driving in young adults: Personality matters. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(4), 1323–1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.002
11.
CorrP. J. (2016). Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaires: Structural survey with recommendations. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.045
12.
ExtremeraN.Fernández-BerrocalP.SaloveyP. (2006). Spanish version of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Version 2.0: Reliability, age, and gender differences. Psicothema, 18(18), 42–48.
13.
FelstenG.HillV. (1999). Aggression Questionnaire hostility scale predicts anger in response to mistreatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00104-1
14.
Gómez-LealR.Megías-RoblesA.Gutiérrez-CoboM. J.CabelloR.Fernández-BerrocalP. (2020). Personal risk and protective factors involved in aggressive behaviour. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520926322
15.
GraneroR.DomènechJ. M.de la OsaN.EzpeletaL. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire for Children (SPSRQ-C). Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.050
16.
GrayJ. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
17.
GrayJ. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress. Cambridge University Press.
18.
GrayJ. A.McNaughtonN. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Harmon-JonesE.PetersonC. K. (2008). Effect of trait and state approach motivation on aggressive inclinations. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1381–1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.05.001
21.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
22.
HayesA. F.MatthesJ. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 924–936. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
23.
HsiehI. J.ChenY. Y. (2017). Determinants of aggressive behavior: Interactive effects of emotional regulation and inhibitory control. PLoS ONE, 12(4), e0175651. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175651
24.
LiY.QiaoL.SunJ.WeiD.LiW.QiuJ.ZhangQ.ShiH. (2014). Gender-specific neuroanatomical basis of behavioral inhibition/approach systems (BIS/BAS) in a large sample of young adults: A voxel-based morphometric investigation. Behavioural Brain Research, 274, 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.08.041
25.
MayerJ. D.CarusoD. R.SaloveyP. (2016). The ability model of emotional intelligence: Principles and updates. Emotion Review, 8(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916639667
MegíasA.Gómez-LealR.Gutiérrez-CoboM. J.CabelloR.Fernández-BerrocalP. (2018). The relationship between aggression and ability emotional intelligence: The role of negative affect. Psychiatry Research, 270, 1074–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.027
28.
Megías-RoblesA.Gutiérrez-CoboM. J.Gómez-LealR.CabelloR.GrossJ. J.Fernández-BerrocalP. (2019). Emotionally intelligent people reappraise rather than suppress their emotions. PLoS ONE, 14(8), e0220688. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220688
29.
MorganJ. E.BowenK. L.MooreS. C.GoozenS. H. M. van. (2014). The relationship between reward and punishment sensitivity and antisocial behavior in male adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.054
30.
PedersonC. A.FiteP. J.BortolatoM. (2018). The role of functions of aggression in associations between behavioral inhibition and activation and mental health outcomes. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 27(8), 811–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1370053
31.
PickeringA. D.CorrP. J. (2008). J.A. Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality. In BoyleG. J.MatthewsG.SaklofskeD. H. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Volume 1—Personality theories and models (pp. 239–256). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200462.n11
32.
PondR. S.KashdanT. B.DeWallC. N.SavostyanovaA.LambertN. M.FinchamF. D. (2012). Emotion differentiation moderates aggressive tendencies in angry people: A daily diary analysis. Emotion, 12(2), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025762
33.
RamírezJ. M.AndreuJ. M. (2006). Aggression, and some related psychological constructs (anger, hostility, and impulsivity) Some comments from a research project. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(3), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.015
RobertonT.DaffernM.BucksR. S. (2014). Maladaptive emotion regulation and aggression in adult offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(10), 933–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.893333
36.
RodríguezJ. M. A.FernándezM. E. P.GómezJ. L. G. (2002). Adaptación psicométrica de la versión española del Cuestionario de Agresión. [Validation of the Spanish version of the Aggression Questionnaire.]. Psicothema, 14(2), 476–482.
37.
RöllJ.KoglinU.PetermannF. (2012). Emotion regulation and childhood aggression: Longitudinal associations. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 43(6), 909–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-012-0303-4
38.
Rubio-GarayF.CarrascoM. A.AmorP. J. (2016). Aggression, anger and hostility: Evaluation of moral disengagement as a mediational process. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12270
39.
Sánchez-GarcíaM.ExtremeraN.Fernández-BerrocalP. (2016). The factor structure and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test. Psychological Assessment, 28(11), 404–1415. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000269
40.
ShoreyR. C.CorneliusT. L.IdemaC. (2011). Trait anger as a mediator of difficulties with emotion regulation and female-perpetrated psychological aggression. Violence and Victims, 26(3), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.26.3.271
41.
SmitsD. J. M.De BoeckP. (2007). From anger to verbal aggression: Inhibition at different levels. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.006
42.
SmitsD. J. M.KuppensP. (2005). The relations between anger, coping with anger, and aggression, and the BIS/BAS system. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(4), 783–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.023
43.
TorrubiaR.ÁvilaC.CaserasX. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity scales. In CorrP. J. (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 188–227). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819384.007
44.
TullM. T.GratzK. L.LatzmanR. D.KimbrelN. A.LejuezC. W. (2010). Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and emotion regulation difficulties: A multimodal investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 989–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.010
45.
VelottiP.GarofaloC.PetrocchiC.CavalloF.PopoloR.DimaggioG. (2016). Alexithymia, emotion dysregulation, impulsivity and aggression: A multiple mediation model. Psychiatry Research, 237, 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.025
46.
Vigil-ColetA.Lorenzo-SevaU.Codorniu-RagaM. J.MoralesF. (2005). Factor structure of the Buss–Perry aggression questionnaire in different samples and languages. Aggressive Behavior, 31(6), 601–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20097
47.
von CollaniG.WernerR. (2005). Self-related and motivational constructs as determinants of aggression. An analysis and validation of a German version of the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1631–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.027
48.
World Medical Association. (2008). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
