To Stay or to Leave: Factors Influencing Victims’ Decisions to Stay or Leave a Domestic Violence Emergency Shelter

Abstract

Domestic violence (DV) emergency shelters play a vital role in supporting victims who seek to leave abusive partners and gain independence. Research indicates that numerous positive outcomes for victims and their children are associated with utilization of DV shelter programs. Yet, research also suggests that DV shelter programs may be unable to comprehensively meet the needs of all victims, and many choose to leave shelters soon after their arrival. To better understand the ways in which DV shelter programs support victims but also fail to meet their needs, this article explores the factors that influence victims’ decisions to stay or leave a DV emergency shelter program through qualitative interviews with 33 DV shelter residents. Study participants indicate that three types of factors influence their decision to stay or leave the shelter program: (a) contextual factors, (b) partner or family relationship factors, and (c) shelter-specific factors. Shelter-specific factors cited as important contributors to satisfaction or dissatisfaction with shelter living include policies, staff and services, displacement from one’s home community, and facilities. Findings provide information from the perspective of victims on the factors that influence one’s decision to stay or leave a DV program and can be used to support service providers and advocates in building programs that are both supportive of victims’ needs and conductive to longer shelter stays.

Keywords

domestic violence battered women treatment/intervention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

D. K.

Saunders

D. G.

(2003). Leaving an abusive partner an empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4, 163-191.

Baker

C. K.

Billhardt

K. A.

Warren

Rollins

Glass

N. E.

(2010). Domestic violence, housing instability, and homelessness: A review of housing policies and program practices for meeting the needs of survivors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 430-439.

Barnett

O. W.

(2000). Why battered women do not leave, part 1 external inhibiting factors within society. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1, 343-372.

Bennett

Riger

Schewe

Howard

Wasco

(2004). Effectiveness of hotline, advocacy, counseling, and shelter services for victims of domestic violence a statewide evaluation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 815-829.

Breiding

M. J.

Chen

Black

M. C.

(2014). Intimate partner violence in the United States—2010. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Campbell

J. C.

Webster

D. W.

Glass

(2009). The danger assessment validation of a lethality risk assessment instrument for intimate partner femicide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 653-674.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Intimate partner violence: Definitions. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/definitions.html

Curran

(2008). Moving from rules to rights and responsibilities. Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Retrieved from http://wscadv.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Moving-From-Rules-To-Rights-And-Responsibilities.pdf

Davies

Lyon

(2013). Domestic violence advocacy: Complex lives/difficult choices (Vol. 7). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

10.

Dillon

Hussain

Loxton

Rahman

(2013). Mental and physical health and intimate partner violence against women: A review of the literature. International Journal of Family Medicine, 2013, Article 313909.

11.

Dunn

J. L.

Powell-Williams

(2007). “Everybody makes choices”: Victim advocates and the social construction of battered women’s victimization and agency. Violence Against Women, 13, 977-1001.

12.

Ellsberg

M. C.

Winkvist

Peña

Stenlund

(2001). Women’s strategic responses to violence in Nicaragua. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 55, 547-555.

13.

Few

A. L.

(2005). The voices of Black and White rural battered women in domestic violence shelters. Family Relations, 54, 488-500.

14.

Fugate

Landis

Riordan

Naureckas

Engel

(2005). Barriers to domestic violence help seeking implications for intervention. Violence Against Women, 11, 290-310.

15.

George

Grossman

Lundy

Rumpf

Crabtree-Nelson

(2010). Analysis of shelter utilization by victims of domestic violence: Quantitative analysis. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.

16.

Grossman

S. F.

Lundy

(2011). Characteristics of women who do and do not receive onsite shelter services from domestic violence programs. Violence Against Women, 17, 1024-1045.

17.

Hage

S. M.

(2006). Profiles of women survivors: The development of agency in abusive, relationships. Journal of Counseling & Development, 84, 83-94.

18.

Haj-Yahia

M. M.

Cohen

H. C.

(2009). On the lived experience of battered women residing in shelter. Journal of Family Violence, 29, 95-109.

19.

Hammersley

(1995). Theory and evidence in qualitative research. Quality & Quantity, 29(1), 55-66.

20.

Institute for Children and Poverty. (2002). The hidden migration: Why New York City shelters are overflowing with families. New York, NY: Author.

21.

Jasinski

J. L.

Wesely

J. K.

Mustaine

Wright

J. D.

(2002). The experience of violence in the lives of homeless women: A research project (NCJRS 211976). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

22.

Levin

McKean

Raphael

(2004). Pathways to and from homelessness: Women and children in Chicago shelters. Chicago, IL: Center for Impact Research.

23.

Liang

Goodman

Tummala-Narra

Weintraub

(2005). A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 71-84.

24.

Lyon

Lane

Menard

(2008). Domestic violence shelters: Survivors’ experiences (Award No. 2007-IJ-CX-K022). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

25.

Moe

A. M.

Bell

M. P.

(2004). Abject economics: The effects of battering and violence on women’s work and employability. Violence Against Women, 10, 29-55.

26.

National Network to End Domestic Violence. (2014). Domestic violence counts 2014. Retrieved from http://nnedv.org/downloads/Census/DVCounts2014/DVCounts14_NatlReport_web.pdf

27.

Nichols

A. J.

(2013). Feminist advocacy: Gendered organizations in community-based responses to domestic violence. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

28.

Orava

T. A.

McLeod

P. J.

Sharpe

(1996). Perceptions of control, depressive symptomatology, and self-esteem of women in transition from abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 167-186.

29.

Panchanadeswaran

McCloskey

L. A.

(2007). Predicting the timing of women’s departure from abusive relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 50-65.

30.

Peled

Eisikovits

Enosh

Winstok

(2000). Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay: Toward a constructivist model. Social Work, 45, 9-25.

31.

Postmus

J. L.

Plummer

S. B.

McMahon

Murshid

N. S.

Kim

M. S.

(2012). Understanding economic abuse in the lives of survivors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 411-430.

32.

Strauss

A. L.

Corbin

J. M.

(1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

33.

Stylianou

A. M.

Postmus

J. L.

McMahon

(2013). Measuring abusive behaviors: Is economic abuse a unique form of abuse? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 3186-3204.

34.

Tutty

L. M.

Weaver

Rothery

M. A.

(1999). Residents’ views of the efficacy of shelter services for assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 5, 898-925.

35.

Walker

(2000). The battered woman syndrome. New York, NY: Springer.