Sexual Assault Supportive Attitudes: Rape Myth Acceptance and Token Resistance in Greek and Non-Greek College Students From Two University Samples in the United States

Abstract

Colleges are rape-prone cultures with high rates of sexual victimization. Fraternities’ and sororities’ relationships with sexual assault are consistent themes in literature focusing on sexual violence among college students. Previous research suggests that fraternity men are more likely to endorse rape-supportive attitudes compared with non-Greek men or sorority women. The present study examines rape-supportive attitudes as well as rape and sexual assault victimization in college students with a focus on gender and Greek-life (i.e., involvement in fraternities or sororities) status variables. College students (N = 1,002) completed a survey including the Token Resistance to Sex Scale (TRSS), Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale–Short Form (IRMA-S), and items related to past experiences of nonconsensual sex. Two regression models tested predictors of token resistance and rape myth acceptance. Chi-square analyses tested between-group differences of experiencing rape and sexual assault. Gender (p < .001), Greek status (p < .001), and race/ethnicity (p < .001) were predictors for TRSS scores. For IRMA scores, gender (p < .001), Greek status (p < .001), and race/ethnicity variables (p < .001) were also significant. Interaction terms revealed that Greek men had higher token resistance and rape myth acceptance than any other group. Chi-square analyses indicate women more frequently report experiences of rape (χ² = 25.57, df = 1, p < .001) and sexual assault (χ² = 31.75, df = 1, p < .001). Men report high rates (40.8%) of experiencing sexual assault “because refusing was useless.” No differences of victimization rates were found between Greeks and non-Greeks. Gender and sexual scripting theory can help explain gender differences in attitudes and experiences. Greater endorsement of rape myth acceptance and token resistance by Greeks, who influence college party culture, could be contributing to a culture conducive to rape. Findings demonstrate a continued need for interventions focused on shifting sociocultural dynamics (e.g., traditional roles and sexual scripting) on college campuses.

Keywords

sexual assault rape myth acceptance token resistance college students fraternities and sororities gender

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acierno

(1997). Health impacts of interpersonal violence 1: Prevalence rates, case identification, and risk factors for sexual assault, physical assault, and domestic violence in men and women. Behavior Medicine, 23, 53-64.

Armstrong

E. A.

Hamilton

Sweeney

(2006). Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape. Social Problems, 53, 483-499.

Bannon

R. S.

Brosi

M. W.

Foubert

J. D.

(2013). Sorority women’s and fraternity men’s rape myth acceptance and bystander intervention attitudes. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 50, 72-87. doi:10.1515/jsarp-2013-0005

Banyard

V. L.

Plante

E. G.

Moynihan

M. M.

(2005). Rape prevention through bystander education (Final report to NIJ for grant 2002-WD-BX-0009). Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/208701.pdf

Barry

D. M.

Cell

P. M.

(2009). Campus sexual assault response teams: Program development and operational management. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.

Bartolucci

A. D.

Zeichner

Miller

J. D.

(2009). Alcohol consumption and perceived sexual coercion: Effects of gender and personality determinants. Substance Use & Misuse, 44, 1399-1414. doi:10.1080/10826080902961583

Bleecker

Murnen

S. K.

(2005). Fraternity membership, the display of degrading sexual images of women, and rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 53, 487-493. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-7136-6

Boeringer

S. B.

(1999). Associations of rape-supportive attitudes with fraternal and athletic participation. Violence Against Women, 5, 81-90. doi:10.1177/10778019922181167

Briere

Elliott

(2003). Prevalence and psychological sequelae of self-reported childhood physical and sexual abuse in a general population sample of men and women. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 1205-1222.

10.

Burkett

Hamilton

(2012). Postfeminist sexual agency: Young women’s negotiations of sexual consent. Sexualities, 15, 815-833.

11.

Burnett

Mattern

J. L.

Herakova

L. L.

Kahl

D. H.

Tobola

Bornsen

S. E.

(2009). Communicating/muting date rape: A co-cultural theoretical analysis of communication factors related to rape culture on a college campus. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 465-485. doi:10.1080/00909880903233150

12.

Burris

(2014, November 7). Johns Hopkins bans social events at fraternities. The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved from http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-hopkins-fraternities-parties-20141107-story.html

13.

Burt

(1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.

14.

Cantor

Fisher

Chibnall

Townsend

Lee

Bruce

Thomas

(2015). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct. Retrieved from https://www.aau.edu/uploadedFiles/AAU_Publications/AAU_Reports/Sexual_Assault_Campus_Survey/AAU_Campus_Climate_Survey_12_14_15.pdf.

15.

Copenhaver

Grauerholz

(1991). Sexual victimization among sorority women: Exploring the link between sexual violence and institutional practices. Sex Roles, 24, 31-41. doi:10.1007/BF00288701

16.

Daigle

L. E.

Fisher

B. S.

Cullen

F. T.

(2008). The violent and sexual victimization of college women: Is repeat victimization a problem? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1296-1313. doi:10.1177/0886260508314293

17.

DeCarlo

A. L.

(2014). The relationship between traditional gender roles and negative attitudes towards lesbians and gay men in Greek-affiliated and independent male college students (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://preserve.lehigh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2469&context=etd. (Paper 1469)

18.

DeSantis

A. D.

(2007). Inside Greek U.: Fraternities, sororities, and the pursuit of pleasure, power, and prestige. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.

19.

Donat

P. L. N.

White

J. W.

(2000). Re-examining the issue of non-consent in acquaintance rape. In Travis

C. B.

White

J. W.

(Eds.), Sexuality, society, & feminism (pp. 355-376). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

20.

Douglas

K. A.

Collins

J. L.

Warren

Kann

Gold

Clayton

. . .Kolbe

L. J.

(1997). Results from the 1995 nation college health risk behavior survey. Journal of American College Health, 46, 55-66. doi:10.1080/07448489709595589

21.

Dube

Anda

Whitfield

Brown

Felitti

Dong

Giles

(2005). Long-term consequences of childhood sexual abuse by gender of victim. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 430-438.

22.

Edwards

K. E.

(2009). Effectiveness of a social change approach to sexual assault prevention. College Student Affairs Journal, 28(1), 22-37.

23.

Fisher

B. S.

Cullen

F. T.

Turner

M. G.

(2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/182369.pdf

24.

Foubert

J. D.

Brosi

M. W.

Bannon

R. S.

(2011). Pornography viewing among fraternity men: Effects on bystander intervention, rape myth acceptance, and behavioral intent to commit sexual assault. Sexual Addition & Compulsivity, 18, 212-231. doi:10.1080/10720162.2011.625552

25.

Foubert

J. D.

Cowell

E. A.

(2004). Perceptions of rape prevention programs by fraternity men and male student athletes: Powerful effects and implications for changing behavior. NASPA Journal, 42, 1-20.

26.

Foubert

J. D.

Garner

D. N.

Thaxter

P. J.

(2006). An exploration of fraternity culture: Implications for programs to address alcohol-related sexual assault. College Student Journal, 40, 361-373.

27.

Graham

Bernards

Osgood

D. W.

Abbey

Parks

Flynn

. . .Wells

(2014). “Blurred lines?” Sexual aggression and barroom culture. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 38, 1416-1424. doi:10.1111/acer.12356

28.

Hines

D. A.

Armstrong

J. L.

Reed

Cameron

A. Y.

(2012). Gender differences in sexual assault victimization among college students. Violence & Victims, 27, 922-940. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.27.6.922

29.

Humphrey

S. E.

(2000). Fraternities, athletic teams, and rape: The importance of identification with a risky group. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1313-1322.

30.

Jozkowski

K. N.

(2015). Beyond the dyad: An assessment of sexual assault prevention education focused on social determinants of sexual assault among college students. Violence Against Women, 21,848-874. doi:10.1177/1077801215584069

31.

Kalof

(1993). Rape-supportive attitudes and sexual victimization experiences of sorority and nonsorority women. Sex Roles, 29, 767-780.

32.

Kalof

(2000). Vulnerability to sexual coercion among college women: A longitudinal study (Cover story). Gender Issues, 18(4), 47-58.

33.

Kaminer

(2014, September 7). Fraternities at Wesleyan are ordered to become coed. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-hopkins-fraternities-parties-20141107-story.html

34.

Koss

M. P.

Abbey

Campbell

Cook

Norris

Testa

Ullman

(2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 357-370.

35.

Lisak

Gardinier

Nicksa

S. C.

Cote

A. M.

(2010). False allegations of sexual assault: An analysis of ten years of reported cases. Violence Against Women, 16, 1318-1334. doi:10.1177/1077801210387747

36.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.

37.

Malamuth

N. M.

(1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 138-157.

38.

Marshall University. (n.d.). Rape culture. Retrieved from http://www.marshall.edu/wpmu/wcenter/sexual-assault/rape-culture/

39.

McMahon

(2010). Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. Journal of American College Health, 59, 3-11.

40.

Minow

J. C.

Einolf

C. J.

(2009). Sorority participation and sexual assault risk. Violence Against Women, 15, 835-851. doi:10.1177/1077801209334472

41.

Mohler-Kuo

Dowdall

G. W.

Koss

M. P.

Wechsler

(2004). Correlates of rape while intoxicated in a national sample of college women. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 65, 37-45.

42.

Muehlenhard

C. L.

Friedman

D. E.

Thomas

C. M.

(1985). Is date rape justifiable? The effects of dating activity, who initiated, who paid, and men’s attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 297-310.

43.

Muehlenhard

C. L.

Linton

(1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186-196.

44.

Muehlenhard

C. L.

Rodgers

C. S.

(1998). Token resistance to sex. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 443-463. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00167.x

45.

Murnen

S. K.

Kohlman

M. H.

(2007). Athletic participation, fraternity membership, and sexual aggression among college men: A meta-analytic review. Sex Roles, 57, 145-157. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9225-1

46.

Murnen

S. K.

Wright

Kaluzny

(2002). If “boys will be boys,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359-375.

47.

Obama

(2014, January 25). Weekly address: Taking action to end sexual assault [Web log comment]. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/01/25/weekly-address-taking-action-end-sexual-assault

48.

O’Byrne

Rapley

Hansen

(2006). “You couldn’t say ‘no,’ could you?” Young men’s understandings of sexual refusal. Feminism & Psychology, 16, 133-154. doi:10.1177/0959-353506062970

49.

Osman

S. L.

(1998). The Token Resistance to Sex Scale. In Davis

C. M.

Yarber

W. L.

Bauserman

Shreer

Davis

S. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures Sex Roles (pp. 567-568). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

50.

Osman

S. L.

(2003). Predicting men’s rape perceptions based on the belief that “no” really means “yes.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 683-692.

51.

Osman

S. L.

(2004). Victim resistance: Theory and data on understanding perceptions of sexual harrassment. Sex Roles, 50(3/4), 267-275.

52.

Osman

S. L.

(2007). Predicting perceptions of sexual harassment based on type of resistance and belief in token resistance. The Journal of Sex Research, 44, 340-346.

53.

O’Sullivan

C. S.

(1991). Acquaintance gang rape on campus. In Parrot

Bechhofer

(Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 140-156). New York, NY: John Wiley.

54.

Park

J. J.

(2014). Clubs and the campus racial climate: Student organizations and interracial friendship in college. Journal of College Student Development, 55, 641-660.

55.

Payne

D. L.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerld

L. F.

(1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68.

56.

Sanday

P. R.

(1996). Rape-prone versus rape-free campus cultures. Violence Against Women, 2, 191-208. doi:10.1177/1077801296002002006

57.

Schewe

P. A.

(2006). Interventions to prevent sexual violence. In Schewe

P. A.

(Ed.), Preventing violence in relationships: Interventions across the life span (pp. 223-239). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

58.

Schwartz

M. D.

Nogrady

C. A.

(1996). Fraternity membership, rape myths, and sexual aggression on a college campus. Violence Against Women, 2, 148-162. doi:10.1177/1077801296002002003

59.

Sinha

(2013, February 25). Measuring violence against women: Statistical trends (Juristat, Catalogue no. 85-002-X). Statistics Canada. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2013001/article/11766-eng.pdf.

60.

Steffensmeier

Zhong

Ackerman

Schwartz

Agha

(2006). Gender gap trends for violent crimes, 1980 to 2003: A UCR-NCVS comparison. Feminist Criminology, 1, 72-98. doi:10.1177/1557085105283953

61.

Suarez

Gadalla

T. M.

(2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 2010-2035. doi:10.1177/0886260509354503

62.

Tjaden

Thoennes

(2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Finding from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/210346.pdf

63.

Ullman

S. E.

Najdowski

C. J.

(2011). Prospective changes in attributions of self-blame and social reactions to women’s disclosures of adult sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1934-1962.

64.

Weiss

(2010). Male sexual victimization: Examining men’s experiences of rape and sexual assault. Men and Masculinities, 12, 275-298. doi:10.1177/1097184X08322632

65.

Wiederman

M. W.

(2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 13, 496-502. doi:10.1177/1066480705278729

66.

Wolitzky-Taylor

K. B.

Resnick

H. S.

McCauley

J. L.

Amstadter

A. B.

Kilpatrick

D. G.

Ruggiero

K. J.

(2011). Is reporting of rape on the rise? A comparison of women with reported versus unreported rape experiences in the National Women’s Study-Replication. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 807-832.