This article examines agreement on reports of male-to-female and female-to-male psychological, physical, and sexual violence among White, Black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. Using a probability sample, separate face-to-face interviews were conducted in respondents' homes with both members of 1,025 intact couples living in the 48 contiguous states. The overall survey response rate was 72%. Results indicate that agreement on each of the three types of violence is low, independent of perpetrator's gender and ethnicity. Kappa coefficients of agreement range from .07 to .48. Higher agreement is obtained for psychological violence, followed by physical and sexual violence. Depending on the type of violence, between 30% (psychological aggression) and 90% (sexual coercion) of events would not have been identified if identification required agreement between partners. Logistic analysis shows that the severity of violence is the only variable that increases the likelihood of agreement across the three types of violence.
Alksnis, C., Desmarais, S., Senn, C., & Hunter, N. (2000). Methodologic concerns regarding estimates of physical violence in sexual coercion: Overstatement or understatement? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 323-334.
2.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680.
3.
Caetano, R., Field, C.A., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., & McGrath, C. (2005). The 5-year course of intimate partner violence among White, Black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1039-1057.
4.
Caetano, R., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., & McGrath, C. (2003). Characteristics of non-respondents in a U.S. national longitudinal survey on drinking and intimate partner violence. Addiction, 98, 791-797.
5.
Caetano, R., Schafer, J., Clark, C.L., Cunradi, C.B., & Raspberry, K. (2000). Intimate partner violence, acculturation, and alcohol consumption among Hispanic couples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 30-45.
6.
Caetano, R., Schafer, J., Field, C.A., & Nelson, S. (2002). Agreement on reports of intimate partner violence among White, Black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 1308-1322.
7.
Cazenave, N.A., & Straus, M.A. (1990). Race, class, network embeddedness, and family violence: A search for potent support systems. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 Families (pp. 321-339). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
8.
Coker, A.L., Davis, K.E., Arias, I., Desai, S., Sanderson, M., Brandt, H.M., et al. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23, 260-268.
9.
Coker, A.L., Derrick, C., Lumpkin, J.L., Aldrich, T.E., & Oldendick, R. (2000). Help-seeking for intimate partner violence and forced sex in South Carolina. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19, 316-320.
10.
Fekete, J. (1994). Moral panic: Biopolitics rising. Montreal, Canada: Robert Davies.
11.
Heyman, R.E., & Schlee, K.A. (1997). Toward a better estimate of the prevalence of partner abuse: Adjusting rates based on the sensitivity of the Conflict Tactics Scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 332-338.
12.
Marshall, A.D., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2002). Varying forms of husband sexual aggression: Predictors and subgroup differences. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 286-296.
13.
Meyer, S.-L., Vivian, D., & O'Leary, K.D. (1998). Men's sexual aggression in marriage: Couples' reports. Violence Against Women, 4, 415-435.
14.
O'Leary, K.D. (2000). Are women really more aggressive than men in intimate relationships? Comment on Archer (2000). Psychological Bulletin , 126, 685-689.
15.
Pearson, P. (1997). When she was bad: Violent women and the myth of innocence. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Random House.
16.
Schafer, J., Caetano, R., & Clark, C.L. (1998). Rates of intimate partner violence in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1702-1704.
17.
Smith, P.H., Thornton, G.E., Devellis, R., Earp, J., & Coker, A.L. (2002). A population-based study of the prevalence and distinctiveness of battering, physical assault, and sexual assault in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 1208-1232.
18.
Stets, J.E., & Straus, M.A. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 151-165). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
19.
Straus, M., & Gelles, R. (1990a). How violent are American families? Estimates from the national family violence resurvey and other studies. In M. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 95-112). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
20.
Straus, M., & Gelles, R. (Eds.). (1990b). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
21.
Straus, M.A., Gelles, R., & Steinmetz, S.K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. New York: Doubleday/Anchor .
22.
Straus, M.A., & Smith, C. (1990). Violence in Hispanic families in the United States: Incidence rates and structural interpretations. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 341-367). New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions.
23.
Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N.M. (1982). Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Szinovacz, M.E., & Egley, L.C. (1995). Comparing one-partner and couple data on sensitive marital behaviors: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 995-1010.
25.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
26.
Tourangeau, R. (1984). Cognitive science and survey methods. In T. B. Jabine, M. L. Straf, J. M. Tanur, & R. Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines-Report of the advanced research seminar on cognitive aspects of survey methodology (pp. 73-100). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
