This article examines whether social work feminist researchers have
reached a consensus about the "best" method for upholding feminist
principles by reviewing the research literature for the application of
those principles, especially in methodology. The author concludes that
no one method seems to take precedence and suggests how social
workers can further the use of feminist principles in their research.
References
1.
Acker, J., Barry, K., & Esseveld, J. (1983). Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. Women's Studies: International Forum, 6, 423-435.
2.
Allen, K. R., & Baber, K. M. (1992). Ethical and epistemological tensions in applying a postmodern perspective to feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 1-15.
3.
Benda, B. B., & Dattalo, P. (1990). Homeless women and men: Their problems and use of services. Affilia, 5(3), 50-82.
4.
Bennett, L. (1990). Predictors of women abuse by male substance abusers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois atChicago.
5.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977, July). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-529.
6.
Cannon, L. W., Higginbotham, E., & Leung, M.L.A. ( 1991). Race and class bias in qualitative research on women . In M. M. Fonow & J. A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 107-118). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
7.
Cook, J. A., & Fonow, M. M. (1990). Knowledge and women's interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research . In J. Neilsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods: Exemplary readings in the social sciences (pp. 69-93). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
8.
Cummerton, J. M. (1986). A feminist perspective on research: What does it help us see? In N. Van Den Bergh & L. B. Cooper (Eds.), Feminist visions for social work (pp. 80-100). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers .
9.
Davis, L. V (1986). A feminist approach to social work research. Affilia,1(1), 32-46.
10.
Davis, L. V, & Carlson, B. C. (1981). Attitudes of service providers toward domestic violence. Social Work Research and Abstracts,17, 34-39.
11.
Du Bois, B. (1983). Passionate scholarship: Notes on values, knowing and method in feminist social science . In G. Bowles & R. Duelli-Klein (Eds.), Theories of Women's Studies (pp.105-116). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
12.
Duelli-Klein, R. D. (1983). How to do what we want to do: Thoughts about feminist methodology. In G. Bowles & R. Duelli-Klein (Eds.), Theories of Women's Studies (pp. 88-104). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13.
Eichler, M. (1988). Nonsexist research methods. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
14.
Fiene, J. I. (1991). The construction of self by rural low-status Appalachian women. Affilia, 6(2), 45-60.
15.
Gergen, M. (1988). Toward a feminist metatheory and methodology in the social sciences. In M. M. Gergen (Ed.), Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge (pp. 87-104). New York: New York University Press.
16.
Gottlieb, N., & Bombyk, M. (1987). Strategies for strengthening feminist research. Affilia, 2(2), 23-35.
17.
Grella, C. E. (1988). Strategies for surviving divorce: The contradictions of welfare. Affilia , 3(4), 24-37.
18.
Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and methodology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
19.
Heineman, M. B. (1981). The obsolete scientific imperative in social work research. Social Service Review, 55, 371-397.
20.
Jayaratne, T. E. (1983). The value of quantitative methodology for feminist research. In G. Bowles & R. Duelli-Klein (Eds.), Theories of women's studies (pp. 140-161). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
21.
Jayaratne, T. E., & Stewart, A. J. (1991). Quantitative and qualitative methods in the social sciences: Current feminist issues and practical strategies . In M. M. Fonow & J. A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 85-106). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
22.
Jones, J. (1994). Embodied meaning: Menopause and the change of life. Social Work in Health Care , 19(3-4), 43-65.
23.
Lather, P. (1988). Feminist perspectives on empowering research methodologies. Women's Studies International Forum, 11, 569-581.
24.
Lundy, M., & Mason, S. (1994). Women's health care centers: Multiple definitions. Social Work in Health Care, 19(3-4), 109-122.
25.
MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Mies, M. (1983). Towards a methodology for feminist research. In G. Bowles & R. Duelli-Klein (Eds.), Theories of women's studies (pp. 117-139). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
27.
Mies. M. (1991). Women's research or feminist research? The debate surrounding feminist science and methodology . In M. M. Fonow & J. A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 60-84). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
28.
Millman, M., & Kanter, R. M. (Eds.). (1975). Another voice: Feminist perspectives of social life and social sciences (pp. vii-xvii). Garden City, NY: Doubleday- Anchor Books.
29.
Norman, E. (1986). A new look at salary equity for male and female faculty in schools of social work. Affilia, 1(4), 39-48.
30.
Osmond, M. W., Wambach, K. B., Harrison, D. F., Levine, P., Imershein, A. , Quadagno, D. M., & Byers, J. (1993). The multiple jeopardy of race, class, and gender for AIDS risk among women. Gender and Society, 7, 99-120.
31.
Peplau, L. A., & Conrad, E. (1989). Beyond nonsexist research: The perils of feminist methods in psychology Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 379-400.
32.
Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
Riessman, C. K. (1989). From victim to survivor: A woman's narrative reconstruction of marital sexual abuse . Smith College Studies in Social Work, 60, 232-249.
34.
Riger, S. (1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices: Science, social values, and the study of women. American Psychologist,47, 730-740.
35.
Roth, D., Toomey, B. G., & First, R. J. (1987). Homeless women: Characteristics and needs. Affilia , 2(4), 6-19.
36.
Rubin, A. (1981). Reexamining the impact of sex on salary: The limits of statistical significance. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 17, 19-24.
37.
Rubin, A. (1982). Why do women occupy lower academic ranks: Discrimination or progress? Social Work Research and Abstracts, 18, 19-23.
38.
Rubin, A. (1988). Gender and salary in graduate schools of social work: An outworn issue? Affilia, 3(3), 63-82.
39.
Schilit, R. C., Clark, W. M., & Shallenberger, E. A. (1988). Social supports and lesbian alcoholics. Affilia, 3(2), 27-40.
40.
See, L.A.L. (1989). Tensions between black women and white women: A study. Affilia, 4(2), 31-45.
41.
Spakes, P, & Nichols- Casebolt, A. (1994). Perspectives of women on family and social policy Affilia, 9(4), 360-381.
42.
Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
43.
Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1991). Feminist research, feminist consciousness, and experiences of sexism. In M. M. Fonow & J. A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 265-283). Bloomington : Indiana University Press .
44.
Stout, K. D. (1989). "Intimate femicide": Effect of legislation and social services. Affilia , 42, 21-30.
45.
Stout, K. D. (1991). Women who kill: Offenders or defenders? Affilia, 6(4), 8-22.
46.
Tice, K. W. (1990). A case study of battered women's shelters in Appalachia. Affilia, 5(3), 83-100.
47.
Unger, R. K. (1983). Through the looking glass: No wonderland yet! (The reciprocal relationship between methodology and models of reality. Psychology of Women Quarterly , 8(1), 9-32.
48.
Van DenBergh, N., & Cooper, L. B. (1986). Introduction. In N. Van Den Bergh & L. B. Cooper (Eds.), Feminist visions for social work (pp. 1-28). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.
49.
Westkott, M. (1990). Feminist criticism of the social sciences. In J. Neilsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods: Exemplary readings in the social sciences (pp. 58-67). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
