This article discusses the growth in welfare reforms in the 1980s and
1990s, known as Bridefare, that have focused on forcing poor women
into traditional marriages to remain eligible for public assistance
benefits. It argues that Bridefare perpetuates discriminatory institu
tions and subjects poor women to dominance by and economic depen
dence on men.
References
1.
Abramovitz, M. (1988). Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the presentBoston: South End Press.
2.
Amott, T., & Matthaei, J. (1991). Race, gender, and work in the United StatesBoston: South End Press.
3.
Augustine, R. (1990-1991). Marriage: The safe haven for rapistsJournal of Family Law, 29 , 559-590.
4.
Bane, M.J. (1986). Household composition and poverty In S. H. Danziger & D. H. Weinberg (Eds.), Fighting poverty: What works and what doesn't (pp. 209-231). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Bernard, J. (1982). The future of marriageNew York: Dial Press.
6.
Block, F., Cloward, R.A., Ehrenreich, B., & Piven, F.F. (1987). The mean season: The attack on the welfare stateNew York: Pantheon.
7.
Broman, C. (1993). Race differences in marital well-beingJournal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 724-732
8.
. Brown, C. (1981). Mothers, fathers and children: From private to public patriarchy In L. Sargent (Ed.), Women and revolution (pp. 239-267). Boston: South End Press.
9.
Daly, M. (1989). Women and povertyDublin, CA : Attic Press.
10.
Duncan, G., & Hoffman, S.D. (1991). Teenage underclass behavior and subsequent poverty: Have the rules changed? In C. Jencks & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass (pp. 155-174). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
11.
Eisen, M. (1992, April 17). The war on poverty: Sometimes kids are the first victimsIsthmus (Madison, WI), p.10.
12.
Executive order 71 (n.d.). Madison, WI: Office of the Governor.
13.
Franklin, D. (1992). Feminization of poverty and African American families: Illusions and realitiesAffilia, 7,142-155.
14.
Fraser, N. (1987). Women, welfare and the politics of need interpretationHypatia, 2,103-121.
15.
Gilbert, C. (1987, August 2). Thompson's AFDC cut blazes a new trailMilwaukee Journal, Sec. A, p.13.
16.
Goldberg, G.S., & Kremen, E. (1990). The feminization of poverty: Only in America?Westport, CT: Greenwood.
17.
Goodin, R.E. (1988). Reasons for welfare: The political theory of the welfare statePrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
Gordon, L. (1988). What does welfare regulate?Social Research, 55, 609-630.
19.
Greenberg, M. (1992). Wisconsin's teen welfare waiver Unpublished manuscript, Center for Law and Social Policy, Washington, DC.
20.
Hernes, H.M. (1987). Welfare state and woman power: Essays in state feminismOslo: Norwegian University Press.
21.
Hoff, J. (1990). Law, gender, and injustice: A legal history of U.S. womenNew York: New York University Press.
22.
Hoffman, E.P. (1992, Summer). Racial differences in the feminization of povertyReview of Black Political Economy , pp.19-31.
23.
Jones, R.P. (1991, October 6). "Bridefare" creator seems a maze of contradictionsMilwaukee journal, Sec. B, p. 3
24.
. Kissman, K., & Allen, J.A. (1993). Single-parent familiesNewbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Kniesner, T.J., McElroy, M.B., & Wilcox, S.P. (1988). Getting into poverty without a husband, and getting out, with or withoutAmerican Economic Review , 78, 86-90.
26.
Lee, G. ( 1991). Marital status and personal happiness: An analysis of trend dataJournal of Marriage and the Family , 53, 839-844.
27.
Luker, K. (1991, Spring). Dubious conceptions: The controversy over teen pregnancyAmerican Prospect, pp. 73-83.
28.
Magyar, M. (1991, November-December). The welfare maze: Policy-makers and the poor search for a way outNew Jersey Reporter , pp.10-17
29.
. Miller, D.C. (1989). Women and social welfare: A feminist analysisNew York: Praeger.
30.
Morgan, L. (1991). After marriage ends: Economic consequences for midlife womenNewbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
National Organization for Women, Legal Defense and Education Fund. (1991). A legal analysis of "caps"on welfare benefits to families with teen mothers, as proposed in Wisconsin's Parental and Family Responsibility Initiative Unpublished manuscript.
32.
Pateman, C. (1988a). The patriarchal welfare state In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Democracy and the welfare state (pp. 231-260). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
Pateman, C. (1988b). The sexual contractStanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
34.
Picker, C. (1993). The intersection of domestic violence and child abuse: Ethical considerations and tort issues for attorneys who represent battered women with abused childrenSaint Louis University Public Law Review, 12, 69-112.
35.
Public hearing before Assembly Health and Human Services Committee (1991a, July 30). Trenton, NJ: Public Information Office, State House Annex.
36.
Public hearing before Assembly Health and Human Services Committee( 1991b, August 23). Trenton, NJ: Public Information Office, State House Annex.
37.
Public hearing before Assembly Health and Human Services Committee ( 1991c, October 22). Trenton, NJ: Public Information Office, State House Annex.
38.
Rank, M. (1989). Fertility among women on welfare: Incidence and determinantsAmerican Sociological Review , 54, 296-304.
39.
Ross, C. (1991). Marriage and the sense of controlJournal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 831-838.
40.
Rudd, N.M., McKenry, P.C., & Nah, M. (1990). Welfare receipt among black and white adolescent mothersJournal of Family Issues, 11, 334-352.
41.
Sands, R., & Nuccio, K. (1989). Mother-headed single-parent families: A feminist perspectiveAffilia, 4, 25-41.
42.
Scheer, R. (1992, October 28). Welfare debate driven by half-truths, distortionsLos Angeles Times, p. A1.
43.
Thomas, S.L. (1994). From the culture of poverty to the culture of single motherhood: The new poverty paradigmWomen & Politics,14(2), 65-97.
44.
Thompson, T. (1991). Issue paper: Welfare reformMadison, WI: Office of the Governor.
45.
Thompson, T. (1993, April). Wisconsin welfare reform: A summaryMadison, WI: Office of the Governor.
