This article presents feminist standpoint theory as an alternative
epistemology for social work research—an alternative theory of what
makes knowledge possible and how to get it—and discusses the outcomes and consequences of a research so transformed. Three issues
raised by standpoint theory are used to refocus the questions of social work research: What is the base of the research? What is the purpose of the research? How does this project incorporate researchers'
ref lexivity?
References
1.
Collins, P.H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thoughtSocial Problems , 33, 514-523.
2.
Collins, P.H. (1989). The social construction of black feminist thoughtSigns: Journal of Women in Culture, 14, 745-773.
3.
Collins, P.H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment.London: HarperCollins.
4.
Cook, J.A., & Fonow, M.M. (1990). Knowledge and women's interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociology and research In J. M. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods: Exemplary readings in the social sciences (pp. 69-93). Boulder, CO: Westview .
5.
Cummerton, J.M. (1986). A feminist perspective on research: What does it help us to see? In N. Van Den Bergh & L. B. Cooper (Eds.), Feminist visions for social work (pp. 80-100). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.
6.
Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and methodology.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
7.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8.
Hartsock, N.C.M. (1987). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 157-180). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
hooks, b. (1984). From margin to center.Boston: South End Press.
10.
Kagle, J.D., & Cowger, C.D. (1984). Blaming the client: Implicit agenda in practice researchSocial Work, 29, 347-351.
11.
Keller, E.F. (1990). Gender and science In J. M. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods: Exemplary readings in the social sciences (pp. 42-54). Boulder, CO: Westview.
12.
Ladner, J.A. (1987). Introduction to Tomorrow's Tomorrow: The black woman In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 157-180). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
13.
Meyer, J. (1988). Feminist thought and social psychology In M. M. Gergen (Ed.), Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge (pp. 108-120). New York: New York University Press.
14.
Morawski, J. (1988). Impasse in feminist thought In M. M. Gergen (Ed.), Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge (pp. 184-191). New York: New York University Press.
15.
Morell, C. (1987). Cause is function: Towards a feminist model of integration for social workSocial Service Review , 61, 144-155.
16.
Nes, J.A., & Iadicola, P. (1989). Toward a definition of feminist social work: A comparison of liberal, radical and socialist modelsSocial Work, 34,12-21.
17.
Nielsen, J. M. (Ed.). (1990). Feminist research methods: Exemplary readings in the social sciences.Boulder, CO: Westview.
18.
Rose, H. (1983). Hand, brain, and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciencesSigns: Journal of Women and Culture , 9, 73-90.
19.
Smith, D.E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology.Boston: Northeastern University Press.
20.
Westkott, M. (1990). Feminist criticism of the social sciences In J. M. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods: Exemplary readings in the social sciences (pp. 59-65). Boulder, CO: Westview.
21.
Wetzel, J.W. (1986). A feminist world view conceptual frameworkSocial Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work , 67, 166-173.
