Postmodern perspectives can constructively interrupt conventional views as long as social workers remain linked to feminist and other intersecting emancipatory movements. This article deconstructs the dichotomy between science and practice and presents a class exercise to illustrate how an analysis of feminist links–postmodern interruptions can promote a self-critical and proactive education in foundation courses for largely female students in historically marginalized regions of Canada and the United States.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alary, J.
, Beausoleil, J., Guédon, M-C., Larivière, C.,& Mazer, R.(Eds.). (1990). Community care and participatory research(S. Usher, Trans.). Montreal: Nu-Age Editions.
2.
Asamoah, Y.
, Healy, L. M., & Mayadas, N. (1997). Ending the internationaldomestic dichotomy: New approaches to a global curriculum for the millennium. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 389-401.
3.
Austin, D. M.
(1983). The Flexner myth and the history of social work. Social Service Review, 57, 357-377.
4.
Baines, C. T.
(1991). The professions and an ethic of care. In C. T. Baines, P. M. Evans, & S. M. Neysmith (Eds.), Women's caring: Feminist perspectives on social welfare(pp. 36-72). Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
5.
Boles, J. B.
(1995). The South through time: Ahistory of an American region. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
Bricker-Jenkins, M.
, & Hooyman, N. R. (Eds.). (1986). Not for women only: Social work practice for a feminist future. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.
7.
Brown, C.
(1994). Feminist postmodernism and the challenge of diversity. In A. S. Chambon & A. Irving (Eds.), Essays on postmodernism and social work (pp. 32-44). Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.
8.
Brown, E. B.
(1990). Womanist consciousness: Maggie Lena Walker and the Independent Order of Saint Luke. In E. Du Bois & V. Ruiz (Eds.), Unequal sisters(pp. 208-233). New York: Routledge.
9.
Burden, D. S.
, & Gottlieb, N. (1987). Human behavior in the social environment: The knowledge base for practice. In D. S. Burden & N. Gottlieb (eds.), The woman client: Providing human services in a changing world(pp. 41-52). New York: Tavistock.
10.
Burford, G.
(Ed.). (1997). Ties that bind: An anthology of social work and social welfare in Newfoundland and Labrador. St. John's, Newfoundland: Jesperson.
11.
Callahan, M.
(1993). The administrative and practice context: Perspectives from the front line. In B. Wharf (Ed.), Rethinking child welfare in Canada (pp. 64-97). Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
12.
Canadian Association of Schools of Social Work
. (1991, May). Social work education at the crossroads: The challenge of diversity. (Report of the Task Force on Multicultural and Multiracial Issues in Social Work Education). Ottawa, Canada: Author.
13.
Cash, W. J.
(1941). The mind of the South. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
14.
Chan, K. L.
, & Dilworth, K. C. (1995). Student reflections on the future of social work education. In P. Taylor & C. Daly (Eds.), Gender dilemmas in social work: Issues affecting women in the profession(pp. 125-140). Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.
15.
Charter, A. (1996). Aboriginal children, their right to advocacy, belonging and continuity. Unpublished talking circle at the ABC's of Child Protection: Advocacy, Belonging and Continuity, Third Chair in Child Protection Annual Symposium, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland.
16.
Collins, P. H.
(1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
17.
Congress, E. P.
(1994). The use of culturagrams to assess and empower culturally diverse families. Families in Society, 75, 531-540.
18.
Culler, J.
(1982). On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
19.
Davis, L. V. (Ed.). (1994). Building on women's strengths: A social work agenda for the twenty-first century. New York: Haworth.
20.
Derrida, J.
(1981). Positions(Alan Bass, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Di Stefano, C.
(1990). Dilemmas of difference: Feminism, modernity, and postmodernism. In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism(pp. 63-82). New York: Routledge.
22.
Dinerman, M.
, & Geismar, L. L. (Eds.). (1984). A quarter-century of social work education. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers & Council on Social Work Education.
23.
Elam, D.
(1994). Feminism and deconstruction. New York: Routledge.
24.
Etzioni, A.
(Ed.). (1969). The semi-professions and their organization. New York: Free Press.
25.
Fairley, B.
, Leys, C., & Sacouman, J. (Eds.). (1990). Restructuring and resistance from Atlantic Canada. Toronto: Garamond Press.
26.
Fine, M.
(1992). Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
27.
Flexner, A.
(1915). Is social work a profession? In Proceedings of the National Conference on Charities and Correction, 1915(pp. 576-590). New York: National Conference of Charities and Correction.
28.
Foucault, M.
(1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977(C. Gordon, Ed.). New York: Pantheon.
29.
Freire, P.
(1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed(M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
30.
Friedmann, J.
(1987). Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Frumkin, M.
, & Lloyd, G. A. (1995). Social work education. In R. L. Edwards (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social work(19th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 2238-2247). Washington DC: NASW Press.
32.
Green, J. W.
(1982). Cultural awareness in the human services. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33.
Gripton, J.
, Nutter, R., Irving, A., & Murphy, M. A. (1995). A study of the stateofthe-art of social work research in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Association of Social Workers and Canadian Association of Schools of Social Work.
34.
Gutiérrez, L. M.
, Parsons, R. J.,& Cox, E. O. (1998). Empowerment in social work practice: A sourcebook. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
35.
Habermas, J.
(1970). Toward a rational society: Student protest, science, and politics(J. J. Shapiro, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
36.
Harding, S.
(1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
37.
Hartsock, N.
(1990). Foucault on power: A theory for women. In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism(pp. 157-175). New York: Routledge.
38.
Haynes, K. S.
(1998). The one hundred-year debate: Social reform versus individual treatment. Social Work, 43, 501-509.
39.
Hekman, S. T.
(1990). Gender and knowledge: Elements of a postmodern feminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
40.
Humphreys, N.
, Nol, J.,& Laird, J. (1997). Can a feminist perspective in HBSE exist without “blaming the aggressor”? In M. Bloom & W. C. Klein (Eds.), Controversial issues in human behavior in the social environment(pp. 271-285). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
41.
Irving, A.
(1992). The scientific imperative in Canadian social work: Social work and social welfare research in Canada, 1897-1945. Canadian Social Work Review, 9, 9-27.
42.
Lather, P.
(1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
43.
Leonard, P.
(1994). Knowledge/power and postmodernism: Implications for the practice of a critical social work education. Canadian Social Work Review, 11, 11-26.
44.
Luke, C.
, & Gore, J. (Eds.). (1992). Feminisms and critical pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
45.
Lum, D.
(1986). Social work practice and people of color: A process-stage approach. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
46.
Lyotard, J. F.
(1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
47.
McKnight, J. L.
(1987). Regenerating community. Social Policy, 17(3), 54-58.
48.
Mondros, J. B.
, & Wilson, S. M. (1994). Organizing for power and empowerment. New York: Columbia University Press.
49.
Morrissette, V.
, McKenzie, B., & Morrissette, L. (1993). Toward an aboriginal model of social work practice: Cultural knowledge and traditional practices. Canadian Social Work Review, 10, 91-108.
50.
Munson, C. E.
(1994). Characteristics of excellence in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 42-53.
51.
Pace, J. M.
, & Smith, A. F. (1990). Native social work education: Struggling to meet the need. Canadian Social Work Review, 7, 109-119.
52.
Payne, M.
(1991). Modern social work theory: A critical introduction. Chicago: Lyceum.
53.
Pennell, J.
, Flaherty, M., Gravel, N., Milliken, E., & Neuman, M. (1993). Feminist social work education in mainstream and nonmainstream classrooms. Affilia, 8, 317-338.
54.
Phelan, S.
(1993). (Be)Coming out: Lesbian identity and politics. Signs, 18, 765-790.
55.
Rappaport, J.
(1990). Research methods and the empowerment social agenda. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (Eds.), Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods(pp. 51-63). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
56.
Reamer, F. G.
(1993). The philosophical foundations of social work. New York: Columbia University Press.
57.
Ristock, J. L.
,& Pennell, J. (1996). Community research as empowerment: Feminist links, postmodern interruptions. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
58.
Ristock, J. L.
, & Taylor, C. G. (1998). Inside the academy and out: Lesbian, gay, queer studies and social action. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
59.
Rossiter, A. B.
(1993). Teaching from a critical perspective: Towards empowerment in social work education. Canadian Social Work Review, 10, 76-90.
60.
Saleebey, D.
(Ed.). (1997). The strengths perspective in social work practice(2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
61.
Saulnier, C. F.
(1996). Feminist theories and social work: Approaches and applications. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
62.
Schriver, J. M.
(1998). Human behavior and the social environment: Shifting paradigms in essential knowledge for social work practice(2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn& Bacon.
63.
Scott, J.
(1992). Experience. In J. Butler & J. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political. New York: Routledge.
64.
Simon, B. L.
(1994a). Building on the romance of women's innate strengths: Social feminism and its influence at the Henry Street Settlement, 1893-1993. In L. V. Davis (Ed.), Building on women's strengths: A social work agenda for the twenty-first century(pp. 247-269). New York: Haworth.
65.
Simon, B. L.
(1994b). The empowerment tradition in American social work: A history. New York: Columbia University Press.
66.
Solomon, B.
(1976). Black empowerment: Social work in oppressed communities. New York: Columbia University Press.
67.
Spanos, W.
(1987). Repetitions: The postmodern occasion in literature and culture. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
68.
Spivak, G. C.
(1990). The post-colonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues(S. Harasym, Ed.). New York: Routledge.
69.
Struthers, J.
(1987). “Lord give us men”: Women and social work in English Canada, 1918-1953. In A. Moscovitch & J. Albert (Eds.), The “benevolent state”: The growth of welfare in Canada(pp. 126-143). Toronto: Garamond Press.
70.
Swift, K.
, Allen, H., & Naidoo, Y. (1996). The “effective” cross-cultural social worker: Research on knowledge and practice. Paper presented at the Canadian Association of Schools of Social Work Learned Societies Conference, Brock University, St. Catherines, Ontario.
71.
Toren, N.
(1969). Semi-professionalism and social work: A theoretical perspective. In A. Etzioni (Ed.), The semi-professions and their organization (pp. 141-195). New York: Free Press.
72.
Trattner, W. I.
(1984). From poor law to welfare state: A history of social welfare in America(3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
73.
Valentich, M.
(1996). Educating for feminist social work practice. Paper presented at Canadian Association of Schools of Social Work Learned Societies Conference, Brock University, St. Catherines, Ontario.
74.
Valverde, M.
(1991). The age of light, soap, and water: Moral reform in English Canada, 1885-1925. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
75.
Van Den Bergh, N.
(1995). Feminist social work practice: Where have we been... where arewegoing? In N. Van Den Bergh (Ed.), Feminist practice in the 21st century(pp. xi-xxxix). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
76.
Warren, R.
,& Lyon, L. (1988). New perspectives on the American community(5th ed.). Chicago: Dorsey Press.
77.
Whyte, W. F.
(1991). Participatory action research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
78.
Zimbalist, S. E.
(1977). Historic themes and landmarks in social welfare research. New York: Harper & Row.
