Exclusionary work policies, known as fetal-protection policies, have a
rationale and focus on women that is similar to those of the outlawed
protective labor laws. These policies are prominent in male-dominated
industries, such as chemical refineries, paint-manufacturing plants,
and the auto industry. This article explores the relationship between
these policies and the outlawed labor laws, examines the effects of these
policies on the economic well-being of women, and suggests how
occupational social workers and policymakers can broaden their focus
to make the workplace safer for all workers.
References
1.
Baer, J. A. (1978). The chains of protection. Westport, CT: Greenwood .
2.
Bakalinsky, R. (1980). People vs. profits: Social work in industry. Social Work, 25,471-475.
3.
Baron, A. (1981). Protective labor legislation and the cult of domesticity. Journal of Family Issues, 2, 25-38.
4.
Becker, M. E. (1986). From Muller v. Oregon to fetal vulnerability policies. University of Chicago Law Review, 53, 1219-1273.
5.
Bergmann, B. (1986). The economic emergence of women. New York: Basic Books.
6.
Bor, V. L. (1978). Exclusionary practices in hazardous industries: Protection or discrimination? Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 5, 97-155.
7.
Buss, E. (1986). Getting beyond discrimination: A regulatory solution to problems of fetal hazards in the workplace. Yale Law Journal, 95, 577-598.
8.
Chavkin, W. (Ed.). (1984). Double exposure: Women's health hazards on the job and at home. New York: Monthly Review Press.
9.
Dye, N. S. (1980). As equals and as sisters: Feminism, unionism, and the women's trade union league of New York. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
10.
Finley, L. M. (1986). Transcending equality theory: A way out of the maternity and workplace debate. Columbia Law Review, 86, 1118-1182.
11.
Frankel, O. (1971). The supreme court and civil liberties. New York: Oceana.
12.
Gettman, D., & Pena, D. G. (1986). Women, mental health, and the workplace in a transnational setting. Social Work, 31, 5-11.
13.
Googins, B., & Godfrey, J. (1985). The evolution of occupational social work. Social Work, 30, 396-402.
14.
Hartmann, H. (1976). Capitalism, patriarchy and job segregation by sex. Signs, 1, 137-169.
15.
Hembacher, B. (1989). Fetal protection policies: Reasonable protection or unreasonable limitation on female employees ? Industrial Relations Law Journal, 11, 32-44.
16.
Kessler-Harris, A. (1982). Out to work. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).
18.
Malvern, M. (1980). The "offer of judgement" rule in employment discrimination actions: A fundamental incompatibility . Golden Gate University Law Review, 10, 963-1006.
19.
Mama, R. S. (1984). Reproductive hazards in the toxic workplace: The American Cyanamid case. Unpublished master's thesis, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA.
20.
McCloud, S. G. (1983). Pink collar blues: Potential hazards of video display terminal radiation. Southern California Law Review, 57, 139-171.
21.
Mellor, E. G. (1987). Weekly earnings in 1986: A look at more than 200 occupations. Monthly Labor Review, 110, 41-46.
22.
Miller, A. S. (1968). The Supreme Court and American capitalism. New York: Free Press.
23.
Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908).
24.
Nuccio, K. E. (1987). The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1964-1984: A life cycle model analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA.
25.
Platt, R. (1987). Settle or else—Federal Rule 68 makes civil rights litigation a risky business: Marek v. Chesney . University of San Francisco Law Review, 21, 535-553.
26.
Rytina, N. F. (1982). Earnings of men and women: A look at specific occupations. Monthly Labor Review, 105, 25-31.
27.
Schaefer, C. S. (1986). Marek v. Chesney: The inherent incompatibility of "offers of judgement" and the civil rights laws. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution , 2, 153-167.
28.
Schlei, B. L., & Grossman, P. (1976). Employment discrimination law. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs .
29.
Shanker, R. (1983). Occupational disease, workers' compensation, and the social work advocate. Social Work, 28, 24-27.
30.
Treiman, D., & Hartmann, H. (1981). Women, work, and wages: Equal pay for jobs of equal value. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. ( 1972). Guidelines on discrimination because of sex, Title 29, Labor Chapter XIV, Part 1604, as amended, 1604.2(b)(1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
32.
U.S. Senate. (1970). Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (Report No. 91-1282, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
33.
Vanderwaerdt, L. (1983). Resolving the conflict between hazardous substances in the workplace and equal employment opportunity. American Business Law Journal, 21, 157-184.
