A central contributor to the current dissatisfaction with social work research, the author argues, is that most of the research produced for the profession uses a male model of knowledge development that is alien to women, who constitute the majority of those whose task it is to put the knowledge into action. This article analyzes female and male methodologies in terms of their respective themes of connection and separation and explores the ways in which female methodologies can be incorporated into social work research.
References
1.
Bakan, D.The Duality of Human Existence. Boston: Beacon Press, 1966.
2.
Bem, S.L. "Sex-Role Adaptability: One Consequence of Psychological Androgyny ." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology31 (April 1975), pp. 634-43.
3.
Bem, S.L., and Lenney, E. "Sex-Typing and the Avoidance of Cross-Sex Behavior." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology33 (January 1976), pp. 48-54.
4.
Berlin, S.B. "Single-Case Evaluation: Another Version." Social Work Research and Abstracts19 (Spring 1983), pp. 3-11.
5.
Bronfenbrenner, U. "Toward an Experimental Ecology of Human Development." American Psychologist34 (February 1979), pp. 127-40.
6.
Carlson, R. "Understanding Women: Implications for Personality Theory and Research ." Journal of Social Issues28 (Spring 1972), pp. 17-32.
7.
Chodorow, N.The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
8.
Davis, L.V. "Female and Male Voices in Social Work." Social Work30 (March-April 1985), pp. 106-15.
9.
Davis, L.V., and Carlson, B.E. "Attitudes of Service Providers Toward Domestic Violence." Social Work Research and Abstracts17 (Winter 1981), pp. 34-39.
10.
Dweck, C.S., Goetz, T.E., and Straus, N.L. "Sex Differences in Learned Helplessness: IV. An Experimental Naturalistic Study of Failure Generalization and its Mediators." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology38 (March 1980), pp. 441-52.
11.
Elig, T.W., and Frieze, I.H. "A Multidimensional Scheme for Coding and Interpreting Perceived Causality for Success and Failure Events: The CSPC." JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology5, no. 1069 (1975).
12.
Fischer, J. "Revolution, Schmevolution: Is Social Work Changing or Not?" Social Work29 (January-February 1984), pp. 71-74.
13.
_. " The Social Work Revolution" Social Work26 (May 1981), pp. 199-207.
14.
Frieze, I.H. "Causal Attributions and Information Seeking to Explain Success and Failure." Journal of Research in Personality10 (1976), pp. 293-305.
15.
Gadlin, H., and Ingle, G. "Through the One-Way Mirror: The Limits of Self-Perception." American Psychologist30 (October 1975), pp. 1003-9.
16.
Geismar, L., and Wood, K.M. "Evaluating Practice: Science as Faith." Social Casework63 (May 1982), pp. 266-72.
17.
Gibbs, J.C. "The Meaning of Ecologically Oriented Inquiry in Contemporary Psychology ." American Psychologist34 (February 1979), pp. 127-40.
18.
Gilligan, C.In a Different Voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1982.
19.
Glaser, B.G., and Strauss, A.L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research . New York: Aldine Publishing Co. , 1967.
20.
Gordon, W.E. "Gordon Replies: Making Social Work a Science-Based Profession." Social Work29 (January-February 1984), pp. 74-75.
21.
_. " Social Work: Revolution or Evolution?" Social Work28 (May-June 1983), pp. 181-85.
22.
Heineman, M.B. "The Obsolete Scientific Imperative in Social Work Research." Social Service Review55 (September 1981), pp. 371-97.
23.
Hudson, W.H. "Scientific Imperatives in Social Work Research and Practice." Social Service Review56 (June 1982), pp. 246-58.
24.
Imre, R.W.Knowing and Caring: Philosophical Issues in Social Work. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, 1982.
25.
_. " The Nature of Knowledge in Social Work." Social Work29 (January-February 1984), pp. 41-45.
26.
Jones, E.E., et al. Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press, 1971.
27.
Kaplan, A.G., and Bean, J. P. BeyondSex-Role Stereotyping: Readings toward a Psychology of Androgyny. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1976.
28.
La Pierre, H. 'Attitude vs. Actions." Social Forces13 (1934), pp. 230-37.
29.
Maccoby, E.E., and Jacklin, C.N.The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974.
30.
Manis, M. "Cognitive Social Psychology."Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin3 (1977), pp. 550-66.
31.
Mies, M.Toward a Methodology for Feminist Research. Occasional Paper of The Hague, 1979.
32.
Milgram, S.Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. New York : Harper & Row, 1974 .
33.
Mishler, E. "Meaning in Context: Is There Any Other Kind?" Harvard Educational Review49 (February 1979), pp. 1-19.
34.
Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. L., eds. Artifact in Behavior Research. New York: Academic Press, 1969.
35.
Rubin, L.B.Intimate Strangers: Men and Women Together. New York: Harper Colophon Books, 1983 .
36.
_. Worlds of Pain: Life in the Working-Class Family. New York : Basic Books, 1976.
37.
Ruckdeschel, R.A., and Farris, B.E. "Assessing Practice: A Critical Look at the Single Case Design." Social Casework62 (September 1981 ), pp. 413-19.
38.
_. " Science: Critical Faith or Dogmatic Ritual?" Social Casework63 (May 1982), pp. 272-75.
39.
Sanford, N. "Social Psychology: Its Place in Personology." American Psychologist37 (August 1982), pp. 896-903.
40.
Sargent, A.G.Beyond Sex Roles. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co., 1976.
41.
Schatzman, L., and Strauss, A. L. FieldResearch: Strategies for a Natural Sociology . Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall , 1973.
42.
Shaw, M. E., and Costanzo, P. R.Theories of Social Psychology. 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1982.
43.
Smith, E.R. "On the Concept of Measurement of Cause in Studies of Causal Attribution ." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1977.
44.
Snyder, M. "Attribution and Behavior: Social Perception and Social Causation." In New Directions in Attribution Research, edited by J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes , and R. F. Kidd, vol. 1, pp. 53-72. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1976.
45.
Wallston, B.S. "What Are the Questions in the Psychology of Women? A Feminist Approach to Research." Psychology of Women Quarterly5 (Summer 1981), pp. 597-617.
46.
Watts, T.D. "Ethnomethodology." In Social Work Research and Evaluation , edited by R. M. Grinnell, pp.361-72. Itasca, Ill.: F. E. Peacock Publishers, 1981.
47.
Wilkinson, S. "Personal Constructs and Private Explanations." In The Psychology of Ordinary Explanations of Social Behaviour, edited by C. Antaki, pp. 205-19. London: Academic Press, 1981.
48.
Wortman, C.B. "Causal Attributions and Personal Control." In New Directions in Attribution Research, edited by J. H. Harvey , W. J. Ickes, and R. F. Kidd, vol.1, pp. 23-52. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1976.
