Urban and rural geographies should be further included in feminist intersectional research on intimate partner violence (IPV). The article reviews existing research on the challenges facing rural victims of IPV. This research makes visible the specific problems rurality imposes on victims of IPV. However, research on rural IPV risks being misused and subsequently reinforcing othering and stereotypes of rurality and rural inhabitants. The article suggests that researchers alternate between intra- and anti-categorical approaches. On the one hand, rural victims of IPV should be analyzed as a neglected point of intersection, and on the other the diversity of ruralities should be acknowledged.
BachmanR. (1994). Violence against women: A national crime victimization survey report. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
5.
BachmanR.SaltzmanL. (1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned survey(NCJ-154348). Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
6.
BasileK. C.BlackM. (2011). Intimate partner violence against women. In RenzettiC. M.EdlesonJ. L.Kennedy BergenR. (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (2nd ed., pp. 111–132). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
7.
BogradM. (1999). Strengthening domestic violence theories: Intersections of race, class, sexual orientation and gender. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25, 275–289.
8.
BoschK.BergenB. (2006). The influence of supportive and nonsupportive persons in helping rural women in abusive partner relationships become free from abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 311–320.
9.
BredströmA. (2002). Maskulinitet och kamp om nationella arenor: reflektioner kring bilden av “invandrarkillar” i svensk media. In de los ReyesP.MulinariD.MolinaI. (Eds.), Maktens (o)lika förklädnader: kön, klass & etnicitet i det postkoloniala Sverige (pp. 182–206). Stockholm, Sweden: Atlas.
10.
BrownridgeD. A. (2009). Violence against women: Vulnerable populations. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
CarringtonK.ScottJ. (2008). Masculinity, rurality and violence. British Journal of Criminology, 48, 641–666.
12.
CrenshawK. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
13.
DahlU. (2004). Progressive women, traditional men: The politics of “knowledge” and gendered stories of “development” in the northern periphery of the EU(Dissertation). University of California, Santa Cruz, CA.
DavisK.TaylorB.FurnissD. (2001). Narrative accounts of tracking the rural domestic violence survivors journey: A feminist approach. Health Care for Women International, 22, 333–347.
16.
DeKeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D. (2009). Dangerous exits. Escaping abusive relationships in rural America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
17.
de Los ReyesP. (2003). Patriarkala enklaver eller Ingemansland? Våld hot och kontroll mot unga kvinnor i Sverige (Integrationsverkets skriftserie IV). Integrationsverket, Norrköping, Sweden.
18.
EastmanB. J.BunchS. G. (2007). Providing services to survivors of domestic violence: A comparison of rural and urban service provider perceptions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 465–473.
19.
EastmanB. J.BunchS. G.WilliamsA. H.CarawanL. W. (2007). Exploring the perceptions of domestic violence service providers in rural localities. Violence Against Women, 13, 700–716.
20.
EkströmV. (2013) Samhällets stöd till våldsutsatta kvinnor: en intersektionell analys av hur det offentliga trycket behandlar kön, klass och etnicitet. Retfaerd, 35, 51–68.
21.
ErikssonM. (2008). (Re)producing a “peripheral” region—Northern Sweden in the news. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 90, 369–388.
22.
ErikssonM. (2010). “People in Stockholm are smarter than countryside folks”—Reproducing urban and rural imaginaries in film and life. Journal of Rural Studies, 26, 95–104.
23.
Gallup-BlackA. (2005). Twenty years of rural and urban trends in family and intimate partner homicide: Does place matter?Homicide Studies, 9, 149–173.
24.
GramaJ. I. (2000). Women forgotten: Difficulties faced by rural victims of domestic violence. American Journal of Family Law, 14, 173–189.
25.
GrossmanS.HinkleyS.KawalskiA.MargraveC. (2005). Rural versus urban victims of violence: The interplay of race and region. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 71–81.
26.
Gunnerud BergN.ForsbergG. (2003). Rural geography and feminist geography: Discourses on rurality and gender in Britain and Scandinavia. In SimonsenK.ÖhmanJ. (Eds.), Voices from the North: New trends in Nordic human geography (pp. 173–190). Ashgate, England: Aldershot.
27.
HearnJ.NordbergM.AnderssonK.BalkmarD.GottzénL.KlinthR.PringleK.SandbergL. (2012). Hegemonic masculinity and beyond: 40 years of research in Sweden. Men and Masculinities, 15, 31–55.
28.
HoggR.CarringtonK. (2003). Violence, spatiality and other rurals. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 36, 293–319.
29.
HoggR.CarringtonK. (2006). Policing the rural crisis. Sydney, Australia: Australia Federation Press.
30.
JanssonD. R. (2003). Internal orientalism in America: W. J. Cash’sThe Mind of the South and the spatial construction of American national identity. Political Geography, 22, 293–316.
31.
JanssonD. R. (2005). “A geography of racism”: Internal orientalism and the construction of American national identity in the film Mississippi Burning. National Identities, 7, 265–285.
32.
JohnsonC.ColemanA. (2012). The internal other: Exploring the dialectical relationship between regional exclusion and the construction of national identity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102, 863–880.
33.
LandströmC. (2001). Postkoloniala texter. Stockholm, Sweden: Federativ.
34.
LanierC.MaumeM. O. (2009). Intimate partner violence and social isolation across the rural/urban divide. Violence Against Women, 15, 1311–1330.
35.
LoganT. K.StevensonE.EvansL.LeukefeldC. (2004). Rural and urban women’s perceptions of barriers to health, mental health, and criminal justice services: Implications for victim services. Violence and Victims, 19, 37–62.
36.
LoganT. K.WalkerR.ColeJ.RatliffS.LeukefeldC. (2003). Qualitative differences among rural and urban intimate violence victimization experiences and consequences: A pilot study. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 83–92.
37.
LykkeN. (2010). Feminist studies: A guide to intersectional theory, methodology and writing. New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
MatsudaM. (1991). Beside my sister, facing the enemy: Legal theory out of coalition. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1183–1192.
39.
McCallL. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1771–1800.
40.
MehrotraG. (2010). Toward a continuum of intersectionality theorizing for feminist social work scholarship. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 25, 417–430.
41.
Minh-HaT. T. (1986/1987). Introduction: She, the inappropriate(d) other, Discourse, 8, 3–9
42.
MohantyC. (1984). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourse. Boundary 2, 12/13, 333–358.
43.
NordinL. (2007). Man ska ju vara två: män och kärlekslängtan i norrländsk glesbygd (Dissertation). Stockholms Universitet, Stockholm, Sweden.
44.
Peek-AsaC.WallisA.HarlandK.BeyerK.DickeyP.SaftlasA. (2011). Rural disparity in domestic violence prevalence and access to resources. Journal of Women’s Health, 20, 1743–1749.
45.
PruittL. R. (2007). Toward a feminist theory of the rural. Utah Law Review, 2, 421–488.
46.
PruittL. R. (2008). Place matters: Domestic violence and rural difference. Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society, 23, 347–414.
47.
RothmanE.ButchartA.CerdáM. (2003). Intervening with perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A global perspective. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation.
48.
SaidE. W. (1993 [1978]). Orientalism. Stockholm, Sweden: Ordfront.
49.
ShannonL.LoganT.K.ColeJ.MedleyK. (2006). Help-seeking and coping strategies for intimate partner violence in rural and urban women, Violence and Victims, 21, 167–181.
50.
ShepherdJ. (2001). Where do you go when it's 40 below? Domestic violence among rural Alaska native women, Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 16, 488–510.
51.
SokoloffN. J.DupontI. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11, 38–64.
52.
SpivakG. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In NelsonC.GrossbergL. (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
53.
StenbackaS. (2011). Othering the rural: About the construction of rural masculinities and the unspoken urban hegemonic ideal in Swedish media. Journal of Rural Studies, 27, 235–244.
54.
SudderthL. (2006). An uneasy alliance: Law enforcement and domestic violence victim advocates in a rural area. Feminist Criminology, 1, 329–353.
WebsdaleN. (1998). Rural women battering and the justice system—An ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
WebsdaleN.JohnsonB. (1997). The policing of domestic violence in rural and urban areas: The voices of battered women in Kentucky. Policing & Society, 297, 297–317.
58.
WeisheitR.FalconeD. N.WellsL. E. (2006). Crime and policing in rural and small-town America (3rd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press (cited in Pruitt, 2008).
59.
Wendt HöjerM. (2002). Rädslans politik: våld och sexualitet i den svenska demokratin (Dissertation). Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
60.
WendtS. (2009). Constructions of local culture and impacts on domestic violence in an Australian rural community. Journal of Rural Studies, 25, 175–184.
61.
WendtS. (2010). Building and sustaining local co-ordination: An Australian rural community responds to domestic and family violence. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 44–62.
62.
YllöK. A. (2005). Through a feminist lens: Gender, diversity and violence—Extending the feminist framework. In LosekeD. R.GellesR. J.CavanauaghM. M. (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
