This article reports on the ways in which feminism has led to and influenced the unfolding of our three separate doctoral research journeys. In writing about this choice, we suggest that the epistemology of feminism is compatible with qualitative methods, as well as with the social work discipline, within which we all practice. The article reports on the impact of feminism on this journey from the perspective of three different stages of doctoral research, beginning, middle, and ending.
AckerleyB.TrueJ. (2010). Back to the future: Feminist theory, activism, and doing feminist research in an age of globalization. Women’s Studies International Forum, 33, 464–472.
2.
Australian Association of Social Workers. (2010). Code of ethics. Canberra, Australia: Author.
3.
BazaleyP. (2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London, England: Sage.
4.
BelenkyM.ClinchyB.GoldbergerN.TaruleJ. (1997). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
5.
BlumerM.GreenM.MurpheyM.PalmanteerD. (2007). Creating a collaborative research team: Feminist reflections. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 19, 41–55.
6.
BrookfieldS. (2005). The power of critical theory for adult learning and teaching. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
7.
CampbellR.WascoS. (2000). Feminist approaches to social science: Epistemological and methodological tenets. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 773–791.
8.
CarrollK. (2009). Outsider, insider, alongsider: Examining reflexivity in hospital based video research. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 246–263.
9.
DalyA. (2010). Reflections on reflexivity and critical reflection as critical research practices. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 25, 68–82.
10.
DinnermanM. (2002). The art and power of the three Rs. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 17, 5–8.
11.
DuftyR. (2010). Reflecting on the power relationships in the ‘doing’ of rural cultural research. Cultural Studies Review, 16, 131–142.
12.
EllisC. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
13.
EllisC.BochnerA. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). California, CA: Sage.
14.
EzzyD. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
15.
FookJ. (1996). The reflective researcher. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
16.
FookJ. (2002). Social work: Critical theory and practice. London, England: Sage.
17.
GaitaR. (1999). Thinking about love and truth and justice. Melbourne, Australia: Text Publishing.
18.
GreenR.GregoryR.MasonR. (2009). Preparing for social work practice in diverse contexts: Integrating an integrated model for class discussion. Social Work Education, 28, 414–422.
19.
GringeriC.WahabS.Anderson-NatheB. (2010). What makes it Feminist?Mapping the landscape of Feminist social work research. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 25, 390–405.
20.
GoodmanL.LittwinA.BohligA.WeintraubS.GreenA.WalkerJ.RyanN. (2007). Applying feminist theory to community practice: A case example of a multi-level empowerment intervention for low-income women with depression. In AldarandoE. (Ed.), Promoting social justice through mental health practice (pp. 265–290). Florence, Italy: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
HeideggerM. (2000). Sein und zeit (Macquarrie J, Robinson E, Trans.). Oxford, MA: Blackwell.
22.
HeronJ.ReasonP. (2006). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research ‘with’ rather than ‘on’ people. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), Handbook of action research: The concise paperback edition(pp.144–155). London, England: Sage.
23.
Hesse-BiberS.LeavyL. (2007). Feminist research practice: An invitation to feminist research. Melbourne, Australia: Sage.
24.
HydeC. (2005). Feminist community practice. In ReischM.WeilM. (Eds.), The hand book of community practice (pp.360–372). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
KochT. (1999). An interpretive research process: Revisiting phenomenological and hermeneutical approaches. Nurse Researcher, 6, 20–34.
26.
La NauzeH. (1996). Conceptualising feminist community practice in a major rural centre (Unpublished MSW thesis). Faculty of Arts University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
27.
La NauzeH.WeeksW. (1999). Conceptualising feminist rural practice in a regional area. In BriskmanL.La NauzeH.LynnM. (Eds.), Challenging rural practice: Human services in Australia(pp.77–91). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
28.
LehmannJ. (2005). Human services management in rural contexts. British Journal of Social Work, 35, 355–371.
29.
LykesM.CoquillonE. (2007). Participatory action research and feminisms: Toward transformative praxis. In Hesse-BiberS. (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 297–326). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
MasonR. (2004). Australian rural women-specific services: Engendering social citizenship (Unpublished doctor of philosophy). University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
31.
MaynardM.PurvisJ. (1994). Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
32.
OpieA. (1992). Qualitative research, appropriation of the ‘other’ and empowerment. Feminist Review, 40, 52–69.
33.
PadgettD. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research: Challenges and rewards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
PascalJ. (2005). My story/their story of cancer survival: Reflections from inside the rural research fieldwork experience. Journal of Rural Social Work and Community Practice, 10, 10–18.
35.
PascalJ.BrownG. (2009). Ontology, epistemology, and methodology for teaching research methods. In GarnerM.WagnerC.KawulichB. (Eds.), Teaching research methods in the social sciences(pp.72–80). Surrey, England: Ashgate.
36.
ReinharzS. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. London, England: Oxford University Press.
37.
ReissA. (2011). Bringing my creative self to the fore. Creative Approaches to Research, 4, 2–18.
38.
RiceP.EzzyD. (1999). Qualitative research methods: A health focus. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
39.
SarantakosS. (2001). Social research (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: MacMillan.
40.
StanleyL. (1990). Recovering women in history from feminist deconstructionism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 13, 151–157.
41.
SteevesR. H. (2000). How to start fieldwork. In ZichiM.CohenD.KahnL.SteevesR. (Eds.), Hermeneutic phenomenological research: A practical guide for nurse researchers(pp.25–35). California, CA: Sage.
