This article discusses some findings of a qualitative evaluation of Salt Lake City’s Prostitution Diversion Project (conducted in 2003-2004) to expose some of the challenges and opportunities of mixed-theory projects. The findings focus specifically on project stakeholders’ recommendations for improving the program. Many of these recommendations are related to the tensions that manifested between the two major stakeholders: Criminal Justice Services and the Harm Reduction Project. The unlikely relationship between these stakeholders is what distinguished the Salt Lake City project from other prostitution-diversion programs in the United States and Canada.
Bernstein, R. J. (1992). The new constellation: The ethical-political horizons of modernity/postmodernity (4th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
Brocato, J., & Wagner, E. F. (2003). Harm reduction: A social work practice model and social justice agenda. Health and Social Work, 28, 117-125.
3.
Colonna, L. (2001, August 7). Prostitution Diversion Project program and process. Salt Lake City, UT: Harm Reduction Project.
4.
First Offenders Prostitution Program. (2004). About SAGE services. Retrieved from http://www.sageprojectinc.org/html/about_services_fopp.htm
5.
Fischer, B., Wortley, S., Webster, C., & Kirst, M. (2002). The socio-legal dynamics and implications of diversion: The case study of the Toronto “john school” for prostitution offenders. Criminal Justice, 2, 385-410.
6.
Greene, J. C. (2000). Understanding social programs through evaluation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 981-999). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Hill-Collins, P. (1990). Black feminist thought. New York: Routledge.
8.
Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2004). Impossibilities of reconciliation: Validity of mixed theory projects. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 601-621.
9.
Morrow, S. L., & Smith, M. L. (2000). Qualitative research for counseling psychology. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (3rd ed., pp. 199-230). New York: John Wiley.
10.
Nuffield, J. (1997). User report: Diversion programs for adults. Ottawa: Ministry of the Solicitor General of Canada.
11.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Wahab, S. (in press). Evaluating the usefulness of a prostitution diversion program. Qualitative Social Work.
14.
Wahab, S., & Davis, R. (2004). An evaluation of Salt Lake City’s Prostitution Diversion Project. Unpublished manuscript, College of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
15.
Wortley, S., Fischer, B., & Webster, C. (2002). Vice lessons: A survey of prostitution offenders enrolled in the Toronto John School Diversion Program. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 3, 227-248.
