Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article presents a feminist model for collaboration by researchers, practitioners, and survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault that focuses on balancing power and building community. Thirty-eight university researchers, survivors, and practitioners met to define and prioritize a research agenda on domestic violence and sexual assault, plan for continued collaboration, and evaluate the community-building process. This article presents data from focus groups, written evaluations, and researcher-participant observations that indicated the research topics that the participants ranked as the most important or useful to them and outlines the participants’ concerns about and suggestions for ongoing collaboration.

Keywords

collaboration domestic violence research sexual assault

References

Berg, B. (1995). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Bickel, W. E. , & Hattrup, R. A. (1995). Teachers and researchers in collaboration: Reflections on the process. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 35-62.

Campbell, J. , Dienemann, J. , Kub, J. , Wurmser, T. , & Loy, E. (1999). Collaboration as a partnership. Violence Against Women, 5, 1140-1157.

Edleson, J. L. , & Bible, A. L. (2001). Collaborating for women’s safety: Partnerships between research and practice. In C. H. Renzetti , J. L. Edleson , & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 73-95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gondolf, E. W. , & Fisher, E. R. (1988). Battered women as survivors: An alternative to treating learned helplessness. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Gondolf, E. W. , Yllo, K. , & Campbell, J. (1997). Collaborations between researchers and advocates. In G. K. Kantor & J. L. Jasinski (Eds.), Out of the darkness: Contemporary perspectives on family violence (pp. 255-267). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hamberger, L. K. , & Ambuel, B. (2000). Community collaboration to develop research programs in partner violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 4, 239-272.

Harper, G. , & Salina, D. (2000). Building collaborative partnerships to improve community-based HIV prevention research: The university-CBO collaborative partnership model. Journal of Prevention in the Community, 19, 1-20.

Lundy, M. , Massat, C. R. , Smith, J. , & Bhasin, S. (1996). Constructing the research enterprise: Building research bridges between private agencies, public agencies and universities. Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 20, 169-176.

10.

National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center . (2001, May). Fostering collaborations to prevent violence against women: Integrating findings from practitioner and researcher focus groups. Charleston, SC: Author. Retrieved from www.vawprevention.org/research/focusgrprpt.shtml

11.

Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

12.

Reed, G. M. , & Collins, B. E. (1994). Mental health research and service delivery: A three-communities model. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 17(4), 69-81.

13.

Riger, S. (1999). Working together: Collaborative research on violence against women. Violence Against Women, 5, 1099-1117.

14.

Riger, S. , Bennet, L. , Wasco, S. , Schewe, P. , Frohmann, L. , Camacho, J. , et al. (2002). Evaluating services for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

15.

Rotheram-Borus, M. J. , Rebchook, G. M. , Kelly, J. A. , Adams, J. , & Neumann, M. S. (2000). Bridging research and practice: Community-researcher partnerships for replicating effective interventions. AIDS Education and Prevention, 12(Suppl. A), 49-61.

16.

Strauss, A. , & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Balancing Power Through Community Building: Setting the Research Agenda on Violence Against Women

Abstract

Keywords

References