The prevalence of mother-led families in public housing is widely recognized, yet the relationship between this form of social program and single motherhood has not received sufficient critical analysis. Exploring this relationship but departing from previous studies, this study focused on the management practices of public housing during its period of expansion in Ontario, Canada. The analysis uncovered and documented two contradictory tendencies: A variety of practices indirectly attracted mother-led families to public housing and facilitated their residence there, whereas explicit regulations excluded them from locating in public housing. These complex and conflicting tendencies, in interaction with social stereotypes and judgments, contributed to the formation of a highly public and visible image of both single motherhood and public housing.
References
1.
Asen, R.
(1996). Constructing objects of our discourse: The welfare wars, the orphanage and the silenced welfare mum. Political Communication, 13, 293-307.
2.
Bacher, J.
(1986). Canadian housing policy in perspective. Urban History Review, 15, 3-18.
3.
Bacher, J.
(1993). Keeping to the marketplace: The evolution of Canadian housing policy. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
4.
Bourne, L.
, & Ley, D. (Eds.). (1993). The changing social geography of Canadian cities. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
5.
Cohen-Schlanger, M.
, Fitzpatrick, A., Hulchanski, J. D., & Raphael, D. (1995). Housing as a factor in admissions of children to temporary care: Asurvey. Child Welfare, 74, 547-562.
6.
Comacchio, C.
(1999). The infinite bounds of family. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
7.
Davis, L.
, & Hagen, J. L. (1996). Stereotypes and stigma: What's changed for welfare mothers. Affilia, 11, 319-337.
8.
Dean, M.
(1994). Critical and effective histories: Foucault's methods and historical sociology. New York: Routledge.
9.
Fallis, G.
(1980). Housing programs and income distribution in Ontario. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Economic Council.
10.
Fallis, G.
, & Murray, A. (Eds). (1990). Housing the homeless and poor: New partnership among the private, public and third sectors. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
11.
Fraser, N.
, & Gordon, L. (1994). Genealogy of “dependency”: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state. Signs, 19, 309-336.
12.
Gordon, L.
(1990). The new feminist scholarship on the welfare state. In L. Gordon (Ed.), Women, the state, and welfare(pp. 9-35). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
13.
Gordon, L.
(1994). Pitied but not entitled: Single mothers and the history of welfare. New York: Free Press.
14.
Hansard Reporting and Interpretation Services
. (1971, July 13). Official report of debates, Legislative Assembly of Toronto. Toronto, Canada: Publications Toronto.
15.
Jones, A. E.
(1978). The beginning of the Canadian government housing policy, 1918-1924. Occasional Papers 1. Ottawa, Canada: Centre for Soci al Welfare Studies.
16.
Karn, V.
, & Henderson, J. (1983). Housing atypical households. In A. W. Franklin (Ed.), Family matters: Perspectives on family and social policy(pp. 71-86). New York: Pergamon.
17.
Klodawsky, F.
,& Mackenzie, S. (1987). Gender sensitive theory and the housing needs of mother-led families: Some concepts and some buildings. In Feminist perspectives. Ottawa: Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women.
18.
Klodawsky, F.
, Spector, A., & Rose, D. (1985). Single parent families and Canadian housing policies: How mothers lose. Ottawa: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp.
19.
Lessa, I. (1999). Restaging the welfare diva: Case studies of single motherhood and social policy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Canada.
20.
Little, M. H.
(1998). No car, no radio, no liquor permit: The moral regulation of single mothers in Ontario, 1920-1997. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
MacPherson, M.
,& Lipman, E. (1979). Tenant selection criteria for public housing: Adescription and analysis. Ottawa: Social Housing Division, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp.
22.
McClain, J.
, & Doyle, C. (1984). Women and housing. Toronto, Canada: James Lorimer.
23.
McMillan, S.
(1987). Forty years of social housing in Toronto. In Canadian social trends. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
24.
Miller, P.
,& Rose, N. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19, 1-31.
25.
Ministry of Community and Social Services
. (1973). Family benefit mothers in metropolitan Toronto.Toronto, Canada: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
26.
Miron, J. R.
(1988). Housing in postwar Canada. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
27.
Miron, J. R.
(Ed.). (1993). House, home and community: Progress in housing Canadians, 1945-1986. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
28.
Nelson, B.
(1990). The origins of the two-channel welfare state: Workmen's compensation and mothers' aid. In L. Gordon (Ed.), Women, the state and welfare(pp. 123-151). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
29.
O'Malley, P.
, Weir, L., & Shearing, C. (1997). Governmentality, criticism, politics. Economy and Society, 26, 501-517.
30.
Ontario Housing Corporation
. (1972). Notes on recommendations in Regent Park Community. Archives of Ontario, RG 44-1-2, Box 13.
31.
Ontario Housing Corporation
. (1973). Study of mother-led family housing units in metropolitan Toronto. Toronto, Canada: Author.
32.
Ontario Ministry of Housing
. 1987. Criteria for selecting tenants. Toronto, Canada: Author.
33.
Ontario Welfare Council
. (1973). Astudy of housing policies in Ontario. Toronto, Canada: Author.
34.
Roberts, M.
(1991). Living in a man-made world: Gender assumptions in modern housing design. New York: Routledge.
35.
Rose, A.
(1954). Adequate housing: Does it make better citizens? In Canadian Conference on Social Work, Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting(pp. 79-86). Ottawa: Canadian Conference on Social Work.
36.
Rose, A.
(1958). Regent Park: A study in slum clearance. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
37.
Rose, A.
(1980). Canadian housing policies, 1935-1980. Toronto, Canada: Butterworth.
38.
Rose, N.
(1993). Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society, 22, 283-299.
39.
Rose, N.
,& Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43, 173-205.
40.
Ross, D. P.
(1975). Canadian fact book on poverty. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Social Development.
41.
Rutherford, P.
(1974). Saving the Canadian city: The first phase 1880-1920. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
42.
Seccombe, K.
, James, D.,& Walters, K. B. (1998). “They think you ain'tmuchof nothing”: The social construction of the welfare mother. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 849-865.
43.
Skocpol, T.
(1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Spain, D.
(1995). Public housing and beguinage. In J. A. Garber& R. S. Turner (Eds.), Gender in urban research(pp. 256-270). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strong-Boag, V.
(1979).“Wages for housework”: Mothers' allowances and the beginnings of social security in Canada. Journal of Canadian Studies, 14, 24-34.
47.
Struthers, J.
(1994). The limits of affluence: Welfare in Ontario, 1920-1970. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
48.
Wade, J.
(1994). Houses for all: The struggle for social housing in Vancouver, 1919-50. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
49.
Watson, S.
(1988). Accommodating inequality: Gender and housing. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
50.
Wekerle, G.
, & Novac, S. (1991). Gender and housing in Toronto. Toronto, Canada: Equal Opportunity Division, City of Toronto.
51.
Wright, G.
(1981). Building the dream: Asocial history of housing in America. New York: Pantheon.
