In 1988, Israel changed its rape laws, inflicting harsher penalties on convicted rapists. Using quantitative and qualitative methods, this study compared punishment meted out before and after the reform and content analyzed the judicial discourse created in the courts in both periods. The findings revealed little change in the severity of sentencing and in judges' attitudes toward rapists, victims, and the crime. The mechanism of normalization allowed judicial authorities to make concessions to rapists, reducing the severity of the offense, while continuing to ignore the plight of the victims.
References
1.
Agar, M.,& Hobbs, J. R. (1982). Interpreting discourse: Cohering and the analysis of ethnographic interviews. Discourse Processes, 5, 1-32.
2.
Ajzenstadt, M. (1999). Women, violence against. In L. Kurz (Ed.), Encyclopedia of violence, peace and conflict (pp. 813-826). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3.
Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1998). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. K. Denzin& Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 110-136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Azmon, A.,& Izraeli, D. (1993). Introduction: Women in Israel: Asociological overview. In Y. Azmon & D. Izraeli (Eds.), Women in Israel: Studies of Israeli society (pp. 1-2). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
5.
Brants, C., & Kok, E. (1986). Penal sanctions as a feminist strategy: Acontradiction in terms? Pornography and criminal law in Netherlands. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 14, 269-286.
6.
Brereton, D. (1997). How different are rape trials?British Journal of Criminology, 37, 242-261.
7.
Bryden, D. P., & Lengnick, S. (1997). Rape in the criminal justice system. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 87, 1194-1384.
8.
Caringella-MacDonald, S. (1985). The comparability in sexual and nonsexual assault case treatment: Did statute meet the objective?Crime and Delinquency, 31, 206-222.
9.
Chunn, D. (1997, June). Secrets and lies: The criminalization of incest and the (re)formation of the “private” in British Columbia, Canada, 1890-1940. Paper presented at a joint session of the Canadian Law and Society Association and the Society for Socialist Studies, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
10.
Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control: Crime, punishment and classification. Oxford, UK: Polity.
12.
Cromack, V. (1989). The policing of domestic violence: An empirical study. Policing and Society, 5, 185-199.
13.
Davis, L. V. (1987). Battered women: The transformation of a social problem. Social Work, 32, 306-311.
14.
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1992). Women, violence and social change. London: Routledge.
15.
Edwards, S. (1990). Violence against women: Feminism and the law. In L. Gelsthorpe & A. Morris (Eds.), Feminist perspectives in criminology (pp. 145-159). Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
16.
Eillam, E. (1994). Rape survivors, rape crimes and the authorities. Jerusalem: Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies. (In Hebrew)
17.
Ferraro, K. J. (1989). The legal response to woman battering in the United States. In J. Hammer, J. Radford,& E. A. Stanko (Eds.), Women, policing, and male violence: International perspectives (pp. 155-184). London: Routledge.
18.
Ferraro, K. J., & Johnson, J. M. (1983). How women experience battering: The process of victimization. Social Problems, 30, 325-339.
19.
Freedman, M. (1990). Exile in the promised land. Ithaca, NY: Firebrand.
20.
Goldberg-Ambrose, C. (1992). Unfinished business in rape law reform. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 173-185.
21.
Gregory, J.,& Lees, S. (1996). Attrition in rape and sexual assault cases. British Journal of Criminology, 36, 1-17.
22.
Grinnell, R. M. (1997). Social work research and evaluation: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Itasca, IL: F E. Peacock..
23.
Haliday, M.A.K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.
24.
Hammer, J. (1989). Womenand policing in Britain. In J. Hammer, J. Radford,& E. A. Stanko (Eds.), Women, policing, and male violence: International perspectives (pp. 90-124). London: Routledge.
25.
Hauftman, Z. (1995). Rape: The principle of consent and rules of evidence. In F. Radai, C. Shalev, & M. Leeben-Kubi (Eds.), Woman's status in society and in the court (pp. 189-234). Jerusalem: Shocken. (In Hebrew)
26.
Intermediate conclusions of the Combined Committee for Changes in Rape Cases. (1978, February 9). Jerusalem: Knesset Parliamentary Committees.
27.
Jacob, N., Chayet, E.,& Merra, C. (1986). Bang the gavel slowly. New York: City University of New York, John Jay College.
28.
Karp, J. (1989). Report of the Commission on Investigation, Prosecution and Sentencing Policy in Matters of Family Violence. Jerusalem: Ministry of Justice. (In Hebrew)
29.
The Knesset protocols. (1988). Jerusalem: Knesset.
30.
Labov, W. (1982). Speech actions and reactions in personal narratives. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 219-247). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
31.
Liebes-Plesner, T. (1994). Rhetoric in the service of justice: The sociolinguistic construction of stereotypes in an Israeli rape trial. Text, 4(1-3), 173-192.
32.
Los, M. (1994). The struggle to redefine rape in the early 1980s. In J. V. Roberts& R. M. Mohr (Eds.), Confronting sexual assault: A decade of legal and social change (pp. 268-292). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
33.
MacKinnon, C. (1982). Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: Anagenda for theory. Signs, 7, 515-544.
34.
Matoesian, G. M. (1997). “You were interested in him as a person?” Rhythms of domination in the Kennedy Smith trial. Law and Social Inquiry, 22, 55-93.
35.
Matthews, N. A. (1994). Confronting rape: The feminist anti-rape movement and the state. London: Routledge.
36.
McAllister, W., Atchinson, J., & Jacobs, N. (1991). Asimulation model of pretrial case processing: A queuing system analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 7, 291-314.
37.
Morgan, P. A. (1985). Constructing images of deviance: Alook at state intervention into the problem of wife battery. In N. Johnson (Ed.), Marital violence (pp. 60-76). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
38.
Protocol No. 12 of the Combined Committee of the Legislation and Law Committee and the Internal Affairs and Environment Committee. (1978, February 2).Jerusalem: Knesset Parliamentary Committees.
39.
Protocol No. 19 of the Combined Committee of the Legislation and Law Committee and the Internal Affairs and Environment Committee. (1978, June 6). Jerusalem: Knesset Parliamentary Committees.
40.
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
Ronald, J., Berger, R. J., Searles, P.,& Newman, W. L. (1995). Rape-law reform: Its nature, origins and impact. In P. Searles & R. J. Berger (Eds.), Rape and society: Readings on the problem of sexual assault (pp. 223-232). Boulder, CO: Westview.
42.
Rose, V. M., & Randall, S. C. (1982). The impact of investigator perceptions of victim legitimacy on the processing of rape/sexual assault cases. Symbolic Interaction, 5, 23-36.
43.
Schissel, B. (1996). Law reform and social change: A time-series analysis of sexual assault in Canada. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 122-138.
44.
Searles, P.,& Berger, R. J. (Eds.). (1995). Rape and society: Readings on the problem of sexual assault. Boulder, CO: Westview.
45.
Sebba, L. (1983). The repeal of the requirement of corroboration in sex offenses. Israeli Law Review, 18, 135-149.
46.
Smart, C. (1989). Feminism and the power of law. London: Routledge.
47.
Snider, L. (1994). Feminism, punishment and the potential of empowerment. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 9, 75-104.
48.
Snider, L. (1998). Towards safer societies: Punishment, masculinities and violence against women. British Journal of Criminology, 38, 1-39.
49.
Spohn, C., & Horney, J. (1992). Rape law reform: A grassroots revolution and its impact. New York: Plenum.
50.
Spohn, C., & Horney, J. (1996). The impact of rape law reform on the processing of simple and aggravated rape cases. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 861-884.
51.
Summary of the discussions and findings of the subcommittee, submitted to the Committee for the Study of the Status ofWomen in Israel. (1978). Jerusalem: Prime Minister's Office.
52.
Tang, K. -l. (1998). Rape law reform in Canada: The success and limits of legislation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42,258-270.
