This article compares the assumptions of welfare reform with the way the program is actually implemented to show the underlying contradictions in the way policy is politically justified and implemented. The results of focus group discussions with women on welfare in four rural Appalachian Ohio counties demonstrate the disparities between the top-down goals of welfare policy and the bottom-up perceptions of their outcomes.
References
1.
Abramovitz, M. (1988). Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the present. Boston: South End Press.
2.
Bane, M. J.,& Ellwood, D. (1994). Welfare realities: From rhetoric to reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Brown, C. (1981). Mothers, fathers and children: From private to public patriarchy. In L. Sargent (Ed.), Women and revolution(pp. 239-267). Boston: South End Press.
4.
Epstein, W. M. (1997). Welfare in America: How social science fails the poor. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
5.
Ferguson, K. E. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
6.
Fraser, N. (1990). Struggle over needs: Outline of a socialist-feminist critical theory of late-capitalist political culture. In L. Gordon (Ed.), Women, the state and welfare(pp. 199-225). Madison: University ofWisconsin Press.
7.
Fraser, N., & Gordon, L. (1994). A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state. Signs, 19, 328-329.
8.
Gilder, G. (1981). Wealth and poverty. New York: Basic Books.
9.
Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Gilliom, J. (March 1998). Welfare surveillance, rights, and the politics of care: Acase study of (non)legal (non)mobilization. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Los Angeles.
11.
Gingrich, N. (1994). Contract with America. New York: Republican National Committee.
12.
Gordon, L. (Ed.). (1990). Women, the state and welfare. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
13.
Green, D. P.,& Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory: Acritique of applications in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
Katz, M. B. (1989). The undeserving poor: From the war on poverty to the war on welfare. New York: Pantheon.
15.
Katz, M. B. (1996). In the shadow of the poorhouse: A social history of welfare in America(rev. ed.). New York: Basic Books.
16.
Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy 1950-1980. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Schram, S. (1995). Words of welfare: The poverty of social science and the social science of poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
Sevenhuijsen, S. (1998). Citizenship and the ethic of care: Feminist considerations on justice, morality and politics. New York: Routledge.
20.
Tickamyer, A. R. (1996). Public policy and private lives: Social and spatial dimensions of women's poverty and welfare policy in the United States. Kentucky Law Journal, 84, 721-744.
21.
Transit Cooperative Research Program. (1998). TCRP report 34: Assessment of the economic impact of rural public transportation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22.
Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
