This article draws on data for Los Angeles to argue that effective transportation programs for welfare recipients must consider both the distinctive characteristics and patterns of employed women and the constraining burdens of children and other household responsibilities. The failure to do so will limit the effectiveness of these programs and greatly increase the likelihood that recipients will remain poor.
References
1.
Abramovitz, M.
(1996). Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the present. Boston: South End Press.
2.
Al-Kazily, J.
, Barnes, C., & Coontz, N. (1994). Household structure and travel behavior(NPTS Demographic Special Report). Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
3.
Bailey, E.
(1997, October 6). From welfare lines to commuting crush; Labor: Many reentering work force live far from jobs. Experts fear transit woes may slow reform. Los Angeles Times, p. A1-A1.
4.
Bell, D., Jr.
(1974). Residential location, economic performance, and public employment. In G. M. Von Furstenberg, B. Harrison, & A. R. Horowitz (Eds.), Patterns of racial discrimination(Vol. 1, pp. 55-76). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
5.
Blumenberg, E.
(1998). Gender equity planning: Inserting women into local economic development. Journal of Planning Literature, 13, 131-146.
6.
Blumenberg, E.
, Ong, P., & Mondschein, A. (1999, November). Uneven access to opportunities: Welfare recipients, jobs, and employment support services in Los Angeles. Paper presented at the annual fall research conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC.
7.
California Department of Social Services (DSS)
. (1996). Job readiness survey: Study months of May, June or July 1996, Aid to Families With Dependent Children. Sacramento.
8.
Cervero, R.
, Sandoval, O., & Landis, J. (2000, January). The value of transportation in stimulating welfare-to-work transitions: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
9.
Coulton, C.
, Leete, L., & Bania, N. (1997, July 22). Housing, transportation and access to suburban jobs by welfare recipients in the Cleveland Area. Paper prepared for the Fannie Mae Foundation Policy Research Roundtable, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
10.
Danziger, S.
, Corcoran, M., Danziger, S., Heflin, C., Kalil, A., Levine, J., Rosen, D., Seefeldt, K., Siefert, K.,& Tolman, R. (1999, April). Barriers to the employment of recipients. Ann Arbor: Poverty Research and Training Center, School of Social Work, University of Michigan.
11.
Elliott, M.
, Palubinsky, B.,& Tierney, J. (1999). Overcoming roadblocks on the way to work: Bridges to Work field report. (Available from Public/Private Ventures, 122 East 42nd Street, New York, NY 10068)
12.
Erickson, J. A.
(1977). An analysis of the journey to work for women. Social Problems, 24, 428-435.
13.
Federal Transit Administration
. (1998). Fact sheet, TEA-21: Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century. Moving Americans into the 21st century[Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tea21/factsheets/jobaccs.htm
14.
Fisher, P.
, & Jacobs, J. (1997, December 7). Sick kids, broken down cars... it's more than just getting a job. San Jose Mercury News[Online]. Available: http://newslibrary.krmediastream.com/cgi_bin/search.si
15.
Garcia, R.
(n.d.). Transportation equity in Los Angeles: The MTA and beyond[Online]. Available: http://www.edf.org/programs/transportation/equity/b_justice.html
16.
Garrett, M.
, & Taylor, B. (1999). Reconsidering social equity in public transit. Berkeley Planning Journal, 13, 6-27.
17.
Goldin, C.
(1990). Understanding the gender gap: An Economic history of American women. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Handy, S.
(1996). Non-work travel of women. In Women's travel issues: Proceedings from the second national conference (pp. 317-334). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Highway Information Management.
19.
Hanson, S.
, & Johnston, I. (1985). Gender differences in work-trip length: Explanations and implications. Urban Geography, 6, 193-219.
20.
Hanson, S.
, & Pratt, G. (1992). Dynamic dependencies: A geographic investigation of local labor markets. Economic Geography, 68, 373-405.
21.
Holzer, H. J.
(1991). The spatial mismatch hypothesis: What has the evidence shown?Urban Studies, 28, 105-122.
22.
Holzer, H. J.
, Ihlanfeldt, K. R.,& Sjoquist, D. L. (1994). Work, search, and travel among White and Black youth. Journal of Urban Economics, 35, 320-345.
23.
Ihlanfeldt, K. R.
, & Sjoquist, D. L. (1998). The spatial mismatch hypothesis: A review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 849-892.
24.
Johnston-Anumonwo, I.
(1989). Journey to work: A comparison of characteristics of single and married parents. Journal of Specialized Transportation Planning and Practice, 3, 219-246.
25.
Kain, J. F.
(1992). The spatial mismatch hypothesis: Three decades later. Housing Policy Debate, 3, 371-460.
26.
Lacombe, A.
(1998, January). Welfare reform and access to jobs in Boston. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics.
27.
Los Angeles County Department of Public Social Services (DPSS)
. (1999). Welfare-to-work transportation plan[Online]. Available: http://dpss.co.la.ca.us/calworks.c/transportation_plan_menu.htm
28.
MacDonald, H. I.
(1998). Women's employment and commuting: explaining the links. Journal of Planning Literature, 13, 267-283.
29.
Madden, J. F.
(1981). Why women work closer to home. Urban Studies, 18, 181-194.
30.
Marshall, J.
(1997, January 10). Making welfarework—Welfare recipients face unreceptive job market. San Francisco Chronicle, p. A1-A1.
31.
Mauch, M.
,& Taylor, B. (1996). Gender, race, and travel behavior: An analysis of household-serving travel and commuting in the San Francisco Bay Area. In Women's travel issues: Proceedings from the second national conference (pp. 393-405). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Highway Information Management.
32.
McLafferty, S.
, & Preston, V. (1992). Spatial mismatch and labor market segmentation for African-American and Latina women. Economic Geography, 68, 406-431.
33.
Nelson, B. J.
(1990). The origins of the two-channel welfare state: Workmen's compensation and mothers' aid. In L. Gordon (Ed.), Women, the state, and welfare(pp. 123-151). Madison: University ofWisconsin Press.
34.
Nelson, K.
(1986). Labor demand, labor supply and the suburbanization of low-wage office work. In A. J. Scott & M. Storper (Eds.), Production, work, territory: The geographical anatomy of industrial capitalism(pp. 149-168). Boston: Allen & Unwin.
35.
Ong, P.
(1996). Work and automobile ownership among welfare recipients. Social Work Research, 30, 255-262.
36.
Ong, P.
, & Blumenberg, E. (1997). Job access, commute and travel burden among welfare recipients. Urban Studies, 35, 77-93.
37.
Rabin, J. L.
(1999, July 19). A look ahead: Can a judge be persuaded to overturn landmark rulings by the special master he appointed? Transit officials hope so as the MT Agoes on attack in $400-million fight with bus riders. Los Angeles Times, p. B1-B1.
38.
Reid, C. E.
(1985). The effect of residential location on the wages of Black women and White women. Journal of Urban Economics, 18, 350-363.
39.
Rose, N. E.
(1993). Gender, race, and the welfare state: Government work programs from the 1930s to the present. Feminist Studies, 2, 319-342.
40.
Rosenbaum, J. E.
(1995). Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: Lessons from the Gautreaux Program. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 231-269.
41.
Rosenbaum, J. E.
, & Popkin, S. J. (1991). Employment and earnings of lowincome Blacks who move to middle-class suburbs. In C. Jencks & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass(pp. 342-366). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
42.
Rosenbloom, S.
(1994). Travel by women(NPTS Demographic Special Report). Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
43.
Schulz, D.
, & Gilbert, S. (1996). Women and transit security: A new look at an old issue. In Women's travel issues: Proceedings from the second national conference (pp. 551-562). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Highway Information Management.
44.
Shen, Q.
(1999, June). A spatial analysis of job openings and access in a US metropolitan area(Project Report). Cambridge, MA: New England University Transportation Center.
45.
Singell, L. D.
,& Lilleydahl, J. H. (1986). An empirical analysis of the commute to work patterns of males and females in two-earner households. Urban Studies, 23, 119-129.
46.
Sorensen, E. J.
(1994). Comparable worth: Is it a worthy policy?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
Spain, D.
(1996). Run, don't walk: How transportation complicates women's balancing act. In Women's travel issues: Proceedings from the second national conference(pp. 271-280). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Highway Information Management.
48.
Strathman, J. G.
, & Dueker, K. J. (1994). Understanding trip chaining(NPTS Demographic Special Report). Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
49.
Thompson, M. A.
(1997). The impact of spatial mismatch on female labor force participation. Economic Development Quarterly, 11, 138-145.
50.
Urban Research Division
. (1999, August). Monitoring the implementation of Cal-WORKs: Welfare reform and welfare service provision in Los Angeles County, 1998. Los Angeles: Chief Administrative Office, County of Los Angeles.
51.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
. (1999, January). Employment and earnings[Online]. Available: http://www.bls.gov/pdf/cpsaat2.pdf
52.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
. (1998, August). Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program: First Annual Report to Congress[Online]. Available: http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/news/welfare/congress/tanfp7.htm
53.
U.S. Federal Highway Administration
, U.S. Department of Transportation. (1994, June). NPTS urban travel patterns: Nationwide personal transportation survey. Washington, DC: Author.
54.
Vrooman, J.
, & Greenfield, S. (1980). Are Blacks making it in the suburbs? Some new evidence on intrametropolitan spatial segmentation. Journal of Urban Economics, 7, 155-167.
55.
Wyly, E. K.
(1999). Local labor markets and occupational sex segregation in an American metropolis. Journal of Urban Affairs, 21, 1-33.
