History survey courses, often required in teacher preparation programs, potentially provide prospective teachers a place to learn historical content, epistemology, and pedagogy. This study examines one history survey course as a site of teacher preparation. Through analysis of instruction, student writing, and semi-structured interviews, it reports how the historian taught, the development of students’ disciplinary knowledge, and what prospective teachers noticed of the historian’s pedagogy. The study analyses how the historian’s pedagogical practices, including weekly written interpretations of primary sources, scaffolded writing prompts, and in-class modeling sessions, reinforced the epistemology of history. Over the course of the semester, focal students demonstrated improved understanding of historical content and epistemology through descriptions of history and evidence-based interpretive writing. However, prospective teachers did not fully notice the course’s pedagogical practices as appropriate for their own teaching practice. This study highlights the support prospective teachers need to learn historical pedagogy within history survey courses.
BainR. B. (2000). Into the breach: Using research and theory to shape history instruction. In StearnsP. N.SeixasP.WineburgS. (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history (pp. 331–352). New York University Press.
2.
BainR. B. (2005). “They thought the world was flat?”: Applying principles of how people learn in teaching high school history. In BransfordJ.DonovanS. (Eds.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 179–214). National Academies Press.
3.
BainR. B. (2006). Rounding up unusual suspects: Facing the authority hidden in the history classroom. Teachers College Record, 108(10), 2080–2114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00775.x
4.
BainR. B.MirelJ. (2006). Setting up camp at the great instructional divide: Educating beginning history teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285892
5.
BartonK. C.AveryP. G. (2016). Research on social studies education: Diverse students, settings, and methods. In GitomerD. H.BellC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 985–1038). American Educational Research Association.
6.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
7.
BrushT.SayeJ. W. (2009). Strategies for preparing preservice social studies teachers to integrate technology effectively: Models and practices. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 46–59.
8.
CalderL. (2006). Uncoverage: Toward a signature pedagogy for the history survey. Journal of American History, 92(4), 1358–1370. https://doi.org/10.2307/4485896
9.
CalderL.CutlerW. W.KellyT. M. (2002). History lessons: Historians and the scholarship of teaching and learning. In HuberM. T.MorrealeS. P. (Eds.), Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground (pp. 45–67). Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
10.
CarrE. H. (1961). What is history?Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
12.
ChiM. T. H.GlaserR.FarrM. J. (1988) The nature of expertise. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
CollingwoodR. G. (1946). The idea of history. Clarendon Press.
14.
CollinsA.BrownJ. S.HolumA. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6–11.
15.
CoventryM.FeltenP.JaffeeD.O’LearyT. W.McGowanS. (2006). Ways of seeing: Evidence and learning in the history classroom. Journal of American History, 92(4), 1371–1402. https://doi.org/10.2307/4485897
16.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
17.
EreksonK. A. (2013). The history survey project: Improving introductory history courses. OAH Magazine of History, 27(3), 41–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/oahmag/oat019
18.
FallaceT. D. (2009). Historiography and teacher education: Reflections on an experimental course. The History Teacher, 42(2), 205–222. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40543674
FordB.ChiltonK.EndyC.HendersonM.JonesB. A.SonJ. Y. (2020). Beyond big data: Teaching introductory US history in the age of student success. Journal of American History, 106(4), 989–1011. https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jaz679
22.
FragnoliK. (2005). Historical inquiry in a methods classroom: Examining our beliefs and shedding our old ways. Social Studies, 96(6), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.3200/TSSS.96.6.24-252
23.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.
24.
GoodwinC. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
25.
GrossmanP.ComptonC.IgraD.RonfeldtM.ShahanE.WilliamsonP. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100905
26.
GrossmanP. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Teachers College Press.
27.
HareJ. L.WellsJ. (2015). Promising the world: Surveys, curricula, and the challenge of global history. The History Teacher, 48(2): 371–388. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43264409
28.
HarrisL. M.BainR. B. (2011). Pedagogical content knowledge for world history teachers: What is it? How might prospective teachers develop it?Social Studies, 102(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2011.532724
29.
HirschE. D. (1983). Cultural literacy. American Scholar, 52(2), 159–169.
30.
JohnsonM. P. (Ed.). (2012). Reading the American past: Selected historical documents. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
31.
KochA. K. (2017). Many thousands failed: A wakeup call to history educators. Perspectives on History, 55(5), 19–20.
32.
KornblithG.LasserC. (2001). Teaching the American history survey at the opening of the twenty-first century: A round table discussion. Journal of American History, 87(4), 1409–1441. https://doi.org/10.2307/2674735
33.
KornfeldE. (2020). Failing to teach, disrupted lessons, and resistance in the “history for teachers” classroom. History Teacher, 53(4), 635–674.
34.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
35.
LeeP.DickinsonA.AshbyR. (1998). Researching children’s ideas about history. In VossJ. F.CarreteroM. (Eds.), International review of history education (pp. 227–251). Woburn Press.
36.
LeeP.ShemiltD. (2003). A scaffold, not a cage: Progression and progression models in history. Teaching History, 113, 13–23.
37.
LeeP. J. (2005). Putting principles into practice: Understanding history. In BransfordJ.DonovanS. (Eds.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 29–78). National Academies Press.
38.
LévesqueS.ClarkP. (2018). Historical thinking: Definitions and educational applications. In MetzgerS. A.HarrisL. M. (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 119–148). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119100812.ch5
39.
LindemannM. (2020). An immodest proposal. Perspectives on History, 58(3), 5–6.
40.
LortieD. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.
41.
McDiarmidG. W. (1994). Understanding history for teaching: A study of the historical understanding of prospective teachers. In CarreteroM.VossJ. F. (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 159–186). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42.
MinkL. O. (1987). Historical understanding. Cornell University Press.
43.
Monte-SanoC. (2011a). Beyond reading comprehension and summary: Learning to read and write in history by focusing on evidence, perspective, and interpretation. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(2), 212–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2011.00547.x
44.
Monte-SanoC. (2011b). Learning to open up history for students: Preservice teachers’ emerging pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(3), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248711039784
45.
Monte-SanoC.BudanoC. (2013). Developing and enacting pedagogical content knowledge for teaching history: An exploration of two novice teachers’ growth over three years. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(2), 171–211. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42000244
46.
National Council for the Social Studies (2013). The college, career, and civic life (c3) framework for social studies standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K–12 civics, economics, geography, and history.
47.
RoarkJ. L.JohnsonM. P.CohenP. C.StageS.HartmannS. M. (2015). The American promise: A history of the United States. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
48.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
49.
SegallA.GaudelliW. (2007). Reflecting socially on social issues in a social studies methods course. Teaching Education, 18(1), 77–92.
50.
SeipT. L. (1999). “We shall gladly teach”: Preparing history graduate students for the classroom (p. 8). American Historical Association.
51.
SheddJ. A. (2010). Glimpsing at pedagogy while teaching history: A mixture of metacognition, bird-walking, and quick tips for future teachers. The History Teacher, 43(3), 449–454. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25740758
52.
SherinM. G. (2007). The development of teachers’ professional vision in video clubs. In GoldmanR.PeaR.BarronB.DerryS. J. (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 383–395). Lawrence Erlbaum.
SherinM. G.van EsE. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210601151599
55.
ShulmanL. S. (1983). Autonomy and obligation. In ShulmanL. S.SykesG. (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 484–504). Longman.
SipressJ. M.VoelkerD. J. (2011). The end of the history survey course: The rise and fall of the coverage model. Journal of American History, 97(4), 1050–1066. https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jaq035
58.
SlekarT. D. (1998). Epistemological entanglements. Preservice elementary school teachers’ “apprenticeship of observation” and the teaching of history. Theory & Research in Social Studies, 26(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1998.10505862
59.
SlekarT. D. (2006). Preaching history in a social studies methods course: A portrait of practice. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34(2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2006.10473306
60.
WallerR. A. (1975). The United States history survey course: Challenges and responses. History Teacher, 8(2), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/491523
61.
WaringS. M. (2010). The social studies methods course: What do teacher candidates know and want to know about teaching social studies?Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(5), 437–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2010.537473
62.
WeissR. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. The Free Press.
63.
WilsonS. M.WineburgS. S. (1988). Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in teaching history. Teachers College Record, 89(4), 525–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681880890040
64.
WineburgS. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Education Psychology, 83(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
65.
WynnC. T.OkieW. (2017). Problem-based learning and the training of secondary social studies teachers: A case study of candidate perceptions during their field experience. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 1–14.
66.
YeagerE. A.WilsonE. K. (1997). Teaching historical thinking in the social studies methods course: A case study. Social Studies, 88(3), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377999709603758
67.
YinR. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.
