The purpose of this article is to describe a model for fostering the self-determination of adolescents with disabilities during the transition process. There are three phases of the model: (1) assessment, (2) planning, and (3) strategy implementation. During each phase, factors relating to individuals and the systems within which they interact are evaluated as either enhancing or preventing self-determination. Issues emerging from the use of this model are also discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abery, B.H. (1994). A conceptual framework for enhancing self-determination . In M.F. Hayden & B.H. Abery (Eds.). Challenges for a service system in transition (pp. 345-380). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
2.
Agosta, J. (1989). Using cash assistance to support family efforts . In G.H.S. Singer & L.K. Irvin (Eds.). Support for caregiving families (pp. 189-204). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
3.
Agosta, J., & Melda, K. (1995). Supporting families who provide care at home for children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 62, 271-282.
4.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Pub. L. 101-336, & 42 US Code, Sec. 12101.
5.
Banning, J.H. (1980). The campus ecology manager role. In V. Delworth & G. Hanson (Eds.). Student services: A handbook for the profession (pp. 209-227). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
6.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723-742.
7.
Brown, F. (1991). Creative daily scheduling: A nonintrusive approach to challenging behaviors in community residents. journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 16, 75-84.
8.
Education of the Handicapped Act Amendments of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400.
9.
Fawcett, S.B., White, G.W., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Mathews, T.M., Paine-Andrews, A., Seekins, T., & Smith, J.F. (1994). A contextual-behavioral model of empowerment: Case studies involving people with physical disabilities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 471-496.
10.
Fay, F.A., & Minch, J. (n.d.). Access to recretetion: A report on the national hearing on recreation for handicapped persons. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.
11.
Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (1994). Development of a model for self-determination . Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17, 159-169.
12.
Greene, A.L., & Boxer, A.M. (1986). Daughters and sons as young adults: Restructuring ties that bind. In N. Datan, A.L. Greene, & H.W. Reese (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Intergenerational relations. 125-150. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Katz, A.H. (1967). Self-help in rehabilitation: Some theoretical aspects. Rehabilitation Literature, 28(1), 10-12.
15.
Lehmann, J.P. (1992). Factors associated with mother's expectations for their adolescent children: A comparison between families with disabled adolescents and families with non-labeled adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO.
16.
Mahoney, M.J., & Mahoney, K. (1976). Self-control techniques with the mentally retarded . Exceptional Children, 42(6), 338-339.
17.
National Transition Network (1993, Spring). New Requirements for Transition: 1992 Rehabilitation Act Amendments . Minneapolis: NTN, Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota.
18.
O'Brien, J., & Lovett, H. (1992). Finding a way toward everyday lives: The contribution of person centered planning. Unpublished manuscript.
19.
Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology , 9, 1-25.
20.
Sample, P.L. (1995). Postschool outcomes following receipt of transition best practices for students with significant emotional disturbances. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
21.
Skinner, B.F. (1972). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
22.
Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1992). Curriculum considerations in inclusive classrooms: Facilitating learning for all students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
23.
Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1989). On accepting relationships between people with mental retardation and nondisabled people: Towards an understanding of acceptance . Disability, Handicap, & Society, 4(1), 21-36.
24.
Thursz, D. (1969). Consumer involvement in rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Record, 1-6.
25.
Turnbull, A.P., & Turnbull, H.R. (1990). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: A special partnership (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.
26.
Uditsky, B. (1993). Natural pathways to friendships. In A.N. Amado (Ed.) Friendships and community connections between people with and without developmental disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
27.
Ward, M.J. (1988). The many facets of self-determination. NICHCY Transition Summary: National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities, 5(1), 2-3.
Ward, M.J. (1992, Spring). OSERS initiation on self-determination . Interchange, 12(1). Urbana-Campaign: Transition Research Institute at Illinois.
30.
Wehman, P. (1992). Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
31.
Wehmeyer, M.L. (1992). Self-determination: Critical skills for outcome-oriented transition services, steps in transition that lead to self-determination. The Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 15(1), 3-7.
32.
Wehmeyer, M.L. (1993c). Perceptual and psychological factors in career decision-making of adolescents with and without cognitive disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 16(2), 135-146.
33.
Williams, P., & Shoulz, B. (1982). We can speak for ourselves. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
34.
Wolfensberger, W. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services . Toronto, Canada: National Institute on Mental Retardation, York University Campus.
