Students with intellectual disability are often served in community-based services to promote effective adult outcomes in employment, community inclusion, and independent living (Gaumer, Morningstar & Clark (2004). Beyond High School (Wehmeyer, Garner, Lawrence, Yeager, & Davis, 2006), a multi-stage model to promote student involvement in educational planning, was effectively used by 109 students with mild and moderate levels of intellectual disability between 17.8 and 21 years of age to increase student abilities. Results are discussed in regard to improved transition opportunities for individuals with intellectual disability such as those afforded through post-secondary education.
BurgstahlerS. (2001). A collaborative model to promote career success for students with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16, 209–215.
3.
CobbB.LehmannJ.Newman-GoncharR.AlwellM. (2009). Self-determination for students with disabilities: A narrative metasynthesis. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 108–114.
4.
EisenmanL.T. (2001). Conceptualizing the contribution of career-oriented schooling to self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 3-17.
5.
EisenmanL. T.TanverdiA.PerringtonC.GeimanA. (2009). Secondary and postsecondary community activities of youth with significant intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 168–176.
6.
FieldS.SarverM. D.ShawS. F. (2003). Self-determination: A key to success in postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 339-349.
7.
GaumerA. S.MorningstarM. E.ClarkG. M. (2004). Status of community-based transition programs: A national database. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 27, 131–149.
8.
GrigalM.DwyreA.DavisH. (2006). Transition services for students aged 18–21 with intellectual disabilities in college and community settings: Models and implications of success. National Center on Secondary Education and Transition Information Brief, 5, 1–5.
9.
GrigalM.HartD. (2010). Think College: Postsecondary education options for students with intellectual disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
10.
HartD.GrigalM.SaxC.MartinezD.WillM. (2006). Postsecondary education options for students with intellectual disabilities (Research to Practice Issue No. 45). Boston, MA: Institute for Community Inclusion.
11.
HartD.GrigalM.WeirC. (2010). Expanding the paradigm: Postsecondary education options for individuals with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25, 134–150.
12.
HartD.ZimbrichK.GhiloniC. (2001). Interagency partnerships and funding: Individual supports for youth with significant disabilities as they move into postsecondary education and employment options. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16, 145–154.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. (2004). 20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(B).
15.
LeeS. S. (2009). Overview of the federal Higher Education Opportunities Act reauthorization (Institute on Community Inclusion Think College!). Policy Brief, 1, 1–2.
16.
LeeS. S.WillM. (2010). The role of legislation, advocacy, and systems change in promoting post-secondary opportunities for students with intellectual disabilities. In GrigalM.HartD. (Eds.), Think College: Postsecondary education options for students with intellectual disabilities (pp. 29–48). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
17.
NeubertD. A.MoonM. S.GrigalM.ReddV. (2001). Postsecondary educational practices for individuals with mental retardation and other significant disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16, 155–168.
18.
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA.-M.ShaverD. (2010). Comparisons across time of the outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 Years after high school. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2010-3008). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
PapayC. K.BambaraL. M. (2011). Postsecondary education for transition-age students with intellectual and other developmental disabilities: A national survey. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 78–93.
ShogrenK. A.LopezS. J.WehmeyerM. L.LittleT. D.PressgroveC. L. (2006). The role of positive psychology constructs in predicting life satisfaction in adolescents with and without cognitive disabilities: An exploratory study. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 37–52.
23.
ShogrenK. A.PalmerS.WehmeyerM. L.Williams-DiehmK.LittleT. (in press). Effect of intervention with the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on access and goal attainment. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online prepublication. doi:10.1177/07419352511410072
24.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.LittleT.GarnerN.LawrenceM. (2008). Understanding the construct of self-determination: Examining the relationship between The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale and the American Institute for Research Self-Determination Scale. Assessment for Effective Instruction, 33, 94–107.
25.
StoddenR. A.GallowayL. M.StoddenN. J. (2003). Secondary school curricula issues: Impact on postsecondary students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 70, 9–25.
26.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KotteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181.
27.
ThomaC. A.GetzelE. E. (2005). “Self-determination is what it’s all about”: What post secondary students with disabilities tell us are important considerations for success. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 234–242.
28.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996). Student self-report measure of self-determination for students with cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 282–293.
29.
WehmeyerM. L. (1999). A functional model of self-determination: Describing development and implementing instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 53–61.
30.
WehmeyerM. L.GarnerN.LawrenceM.YeagerD.DavisA. K. (2006). Infusing self-determination into 18–21 services for students with intellectual or developmental disabilities: A multi-stage, multiple component model. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 3–13.
31.
WehmeyerM. L.KelchnerK. (1995). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale. Arlington, TX: The Arc National Headquarters.
32.
WehmeyerM. L.KelchnerK.RichardsS. (1996). Essential characteristics of self-determined behavior of individuals with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 632–642.
33.
WehmeyerM. L.LawrenceM. (1995). Whose Future Is It Anyway? Promoting student involvement in transition planning with a student-directed process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 18, 69–83.
34.
WehmeyerM. L.SchwartzM. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245–255.
35.
WehmeyerM. L. (2003). A functional theory of self-determination: Definition and categorization. In WehmeyerM. L.AberyB. H.MithaugD. E.StancliffeR. J. (Eds). Theory in Self-Determination: Foundations for Educational Practice (pp. 174–181). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
36.
WehmeyerM. L.LawrenceM.KelchnerK.PalmerS.GarnerN.SoukupJ. (2004). Whose Future Is It Anyway? A student-directed transition planning process (2nd ed.). Lawrence, KS: Beach Center on Disability.
37.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.
38.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.AgranM.MithaugD.MartinJ. (2000). Promoting causal agency: The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Exceptional Children, 66, 439–453.
39.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.LeeY.Williams-DiehmK.ShogrenK. A. (2011). A randomized-trial evaluation of the effect of Whose Future Is It Anyway? on self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 45–56.
40.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.ShogrenK.Williams-DiehmK.SoukupJ. (in press). Establishing a causal relationship between interventions to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. Journal of Special Education. PrepublishedDecember10, 2010, doi: 10.1177/0022466910392377.
41.
WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK.PalmerS. B.Williams-DiehmK.LittleT.BoultonA. (2012). Impact of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on student self-determination: A randomized-trial placebo control group study. Exceptional Children, 78, 135-153.
42.
WillM. (2010). Foreword. In GrigalM.HartD. (Eds.), Think College: Postsecondary education options for students with intellectual disabilities (p. xii). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
43.
Williams-DiehmK.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS.SoukupJ. H.GarnerN. (2008). Self-determination and student involvement in transition planning: A multivariate analysis. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 14, 25–36.
