Employment is an important postschool goal for students with mild intellectual disability; yet, results for this particular population are often not disaggregated from other disability categories. In this study, data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) were used to explore the extent to which students with mild intellectual disability participated in employment-related transition activities, the relationship between participation in these activities and school demographic variables, and the relationship between these activities and postschool employment outcomes. The results revealed three main findings: (a) the majority of students with mild intellectual disability participated in employment-related transition activities, (b) participation in employment-related transition activities differed by school demographics, and (c) postschool employment status was related to participation in employment-related transition activities while in school.
AlversonC. Y.NaranjoJ. M.YamamotoS.UnruhD. K. (2010). Methods for collecting postschool outcomes data on young adults with disabilities: A literature synthesis. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33, 155–164. doi:10.1177/088572881037868010.1177/0885728810378680
2.
BaerR. M.FlexerR. W.BeckS.AmstutzN.HoffmanL.BrothersJ.. . . ZechmanC. (2003). A collaborative follow-up study on transition service utilization and post-school outcomes. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 7–25.
3.
BenzM. R.LindstromL.YovanoffP. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66, 509–529.
4.
BenzM. R.YovanoffP.DorenB. (1997). School-to-work components that predict postschool success for students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 151–165.
5.
BlackorbyJ.WagnerM. (1996). Longitudinal post school outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the national longitudinal transition study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–413.
6.
BouckE. C. (2004). Exploring secondary special education for mild mental impairment: A program in search of its place. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 367–382.
7.
BouckE. C. (2009). No Child Left Behind, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and functional curricula: A conflict of interest?Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 3–13.
8.
BrownK. M.AnfaraV. A.RoneyK. (2004). Student achievement in high performing, suburban middle schools and low performing, urban middle school: Plausible explanations for differences. Education and Urban Society, 36, 428–456.
9.
BucholzJ. L.BradyM. P.DuffyM. L.ScottJ.KontoshL. G. (2008). Using literacy-based behavioral interventions and social stories to improve work behavior in employees with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 486–501.
10.
CapellaM. E.RoesslerR. T.HemmerlaK. M. (2002). Work-related skills awareness in high-school students with disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 33, 17–23.
11.
CobbR. B.NeubertD. A. (1992). Vocational education models. In RuschF. R.DeStefanoL.Chadsey-RuschJ.PhelpsL. A.SzymanskiE. (Eds.), Transition from school to adult life: Models, linkages, and policy (pp. 93–113). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Press.
12.
CobbR. B.NeubertD. A. (1998). Vocational education. In RuschF. R.ChadseyJ. G. (Eds.), Beyond high school: Transition from school to work (pp. 101–126). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
13.
EggletonI.RobertsonS.RyanJ.KoberR. (1999). The impact of employment on the quality of life of people with an intellectual disability. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 13, 95–107.
14.
HasaziS. B.GordonL. R.RoeC. A. (1985). Factors associated with the employment status of handicapped youth exiting high school from 1979 to 1983. Exceptional Children, 51, 455–469.
15.
JonesC. J. (1996). An introduction to the nature and needs of students with mild disabilities. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
16.
KnightD.AucoinL. (1999). Assessing job-readiness skills: How students, teachers, and employers can work together to enhance on-the-job training. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31, 10–17.
17.
LandmarkL. J.JuS.ZhangD. (2010). Substantiated best practices in transition: Fifteen plus years later. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33, 165–176. doi:10.1177/088572881037641010.1177/0885728810376410
18.
McConkeyR.MezzaF. (2001). Employment aspirations of people with learning disabilities attending day centers. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 5, 309–318.
19.
MooreC. L.HarleyD. A.GambleD. (2004). Ex-Post-Facto analysis of competitive employment outcomes for individuals with mental retardation: National perspective. Mental Retardation, 42, 253–262.
20.
MorganR. L.AlexanderM. (2005). The employer’s perception: Employment of students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 23, 39–49.
21.
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA. M. (2009). The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2; NCSER 2009-3017). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2009_04/nlts2_report_2009_04_complete.pdf
22.
OlsonD.CioffiA.YovanoffP.MankD. (2001). Employers’ perceptions of employees with mental retardation. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16, 125–133.
23.
PattonJ. R.SmithT. E. C.ClarkG. M.PollowayE. A.EdgarE.LeeS. (1996). Individuals with mild mental retardation: Post-secondary outcomes and implications for educational policy. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 75–85.
24.
PollowayE. A.PattonJ. R.SmithT. E. C.BuckG. H. (1997). Mental retardation and learning disabilities: Conceptual and applied issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 297–308, 345.
25.
RabrenK.DunnC.ChambersD. (2002). Predictors of post-high school employment among young adults with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 25, 25–40.
26.
RosenbaumJ. E.DeLucaS.MillerS. R.RoyK. (1999). Pathways into work: Short- and long-term effects of personal and institutional ties. Sociology of Education, 72, 179–196.
27.
SheeheyP. H.BlackR. S. (2003). Transition outcomes of young adults with disabilities in rural areas: A research synthesis. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 22, 3–14.
28.
SitlingtonP. L.ClarkG. M. (Eds.). (2006). Transition education and services for students with disabilities. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
SteereD. E.RoseE.CavaiuoloD. (2007). Growing up: Transition for adult life for students with disabilities. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
34.
StormsJ.O’LearyE.WilliamsJ. (2000). Transition requirements: A guide for states, districts, schools, universities, and families. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration.
35.
TestD. W.AspelN. P.EversonJ. M. (2006). Transition methods for youth with disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
36.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181. doi:10.1177/088572880934696010.1177/0885728809346960
37.
WagnerM. M.BlackorbyJ. (1996). Transition from high school to work or college: How special education students fare. The Future of Children, 6, 103–120.
38.
WagnerM. M.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP. (2005). Changes over time in the early postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. A Report of Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2005_06/nlts2_report_2005_06_complete.pdf
