This study identifies the technology barriers and facilitators as students with disabilities transition from secondary and post-secondary settings to adult life. Twenty-seven disability technology specialists from across the United States participated in a three round modified Delphi study. These specialists identified four top ten technology lists related to secondary and post-secondary transition issues including (a) facilitators when moving from secondary education to post-secondary settings, (b) barriers when moving from secondary education to post-secondary settings, (c) facilitators when moving from post-secondary settings to adult life, and (d) barriers when moving from post-secondary settings to adult life. Common themes include increasing professional knowledge, improving student self-determination, using best transition practices when using assistive technology, and establishing a technology infrastructure to support transition from school to post-secondary and adulthood settings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990). P.L. 101-336. 42 U.S.C. '12101 et seq.
2.
Blackhurst, A.E., Lahm, E.A., Harrison, E.M., & Chandler, W.G. (1999). A framework for aligning technology with transition competencies. Career Development For Exceptional Individuals,22, (2), 153-183.
3.
Brand, C. (1997). Meeting the needs of people with disabilities through federal technology transfer. Testimony before the House Committee on Science, July 15. Washington, D.C.
4.
Bryant, D., Bryant, B., & Raskind, M. (1998). Using assistive technology to enhance the skills of students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic,34, (1), 53-58.
5.
Bryant, B., & O'Connell, M. (1998). The impact of collaboration among Tech Act projects and protection and advocacy systems. Interventions in School and Clinic,33, (5), 309-12.
6.
Bryant, B., & Seay, P. (1998). The Technology-Related Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities Act: Relevance to individuals with learning disabilities and their advocates. Journal of Learning Disabilities,31, (1), 4-15.
7.
Carr, T. (1994, Fall). Assistive technology: Enhancement for daily life. HKNC-TAC News, 7,2, 1-10.
8.
Dalkey, N. (1969). The Delphi Method: An experimental study of group interaction [Rand memorandum 588-PR], Santa Monica, CA : Rand Corporation.
9.
Derer, K., Polsgrover, L., & Rieth, H. (1996). A survey of assistive technology applications in schools and recommendations for practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 62-80.
10.
Doll, B., Sands, DJ, Wehmeyer, M.L., & Palmer, S. (1996). Promoting the development and acquisition of self-determined behavior. In D. J. Sands & M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities , (pp. 63-88). Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.
11.
Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (1994). Development of a model for self-determination . Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17, (2), 159-169.
12.
Field, S., Martin, J., Miller, B., Ward, M., & Wehmeyer, ( 1997). A practical guide for teaching self-determination. Washington, DC: Council for Exceptional Children.
13.
Fein, J. (1996). A history of legislative support for assistive technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 1-3.
14.
Fisher, S.K. (1999). Assistive Technology. In S. deFur & J. Patton (eds.) Transition and school-based services: Interdisciplinary perspectives for enhancing the transition process. (pp. 309-385). Austin: PRO-ED.
15.
Fisher, S.K., & Gardner, J.E. (1999). Introduction to technology in transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 22, (2), 131-151.
16.
Fitzgerald, G., & Koury, K. (1996). Empirical advances in technology-assisted instruction for students with mild and moderate disabilities. Journal of Research on Computing in Education,28, (4), 526-553.
17.
Fitzgerald, G., Fick, L., & Milich, R. (1986). Computer-assisted instruction for students with attentional difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 19, 376-379.
18.
Flynn, C., & Clark, C. (1995). Rehabilitation technology assessment practices in Vocational Rehabilitation agencies. Assistive Technology ,7, (2), 111-18.
19.
Franklin, K.S. (1991). Supported employment and assistive technology: A powerful partnership. In S. L. Griffin & W.G. Revell (Eds.), Rehabilitation counselor desktop guide to supported employment. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Supported Employment.
20.
Galvin, J.C., & Scherer, M.J. (1996). Evaluating, selecting, and using appropriate AT . Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
21.
Galvin, J.C., & Wodshall, R.A. (1996). AT-related legislation and policies. In Galvin, J.C., & Scherer, MJ. (Eds). Evaluating, selecting, and using appropriate AT (pp. 315-344). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
22.
Hancock, V., & Betts, F. (1994). From the lagging to the leading edge. Educational Leadership,51, (7), 24-29.
23.
Hughes, C., Hwang, B., Kim, J., Killian, M., Harmer, M., & Alcantara, P. (1997). A preliminary validation on strategies that support the transition from school to adult life. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,20, (1), 1-14.
24.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, P.L. 105-17 (June 4, 1997). 20 U.S.C. '1400 et seq.
25.
Inge, K.J., & Shepherd, S. (1995). Assistive technology and school system personnel . In KF. Flippo, K.J. Inge, & J.M. Barcus (Eds.), Assistive technology: A resource for school, work, and community (pp. 133-166). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
26.
Inge, KJ, Wehman, P., Strobel, W., Powell, D., & Todd, J. (1998). Supported employment and assistive technology for persons with spinal cord injury: Three illustrations of successful work supports. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation,10, (2), 141-52.
27.
King, T. (1999). Assistive technology: Essential human factors . Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
28.
Kohler, P. (1994). Best practices in transition: Substantiated or implied? Career Development For Exceptional Individuals,16, (2), 107-122.
29.
Lahm, E., & Morrissette, S. (1994). Zap'em with assistive technology . Paper presented at the annual meeting of The Council for Exceptional Children, Denver, CO.
30.
Lahm, E., & Nickels, B. (1999). What do you know? Assistive technology competencies for special educators. TEACHING Exceptional Children,32, (1), 56-63.
31.
Lindsey, J. (Ed.) (2000). Technology and exceptional individuals (3rd ed.) Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
32.
Mann, W.C., & Lane, J.P. (1991). Assistive technology for persons with disabilities: The role of occupational therapy. Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
33.
McGregor, G., & Pachuski, P. (1996). Assistive technology in schools: Are teachers ready, able and supported? Journal of Special Education Technology , 13, 4-16.
34.
Mithaug, D. (1996). Equal opportunity theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
35.
Morgan, R. (1995). Training for Supported Employment Specialists and Their Supervisors: Identifying Important Training Topics. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities ,30, (4), 299-307.
36.
National Council on Disability. (1993). Study on the financing of assistive technology devices and services for individuals with disabilities. Washington, DC: Author.
37.
Orlich, D. (1978). Designing sensible surveys. Pleasantville, NY: Redgrave.
38.
Parette, H., & Hourcade, J. (1997). Family issues and assistive technology needs: A sampling of state practices. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 27-43.
39.
Peck, K.L., & Dorricott, D. (1994). Why use technology?Educational Research, 51, (7), 11-14.
40.
Pierangelo, R., & Crane, R. (1997). Complete guide to special education transition services: Ready to use help and materials for successful transitions from school to adulthood. Des Moines, IA: Simon & Schuster.
41.
Raskin, M., & Higgins, E. (1998). Assistive technology for post-secondary students with learning disabilities: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities,31, (1), 27-40.
42.
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504, 29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.
43.
Reid, J.E. (1994). All states survey of facilitating practices in special education. [Unpublished Manuscript], Reno, NV: Nevada AT. Collaborative.
44.
Singer, B.R. (1991). CAI and at-risk minority urban high school students . Journal of Research on Computing in Education,24, (2), 189-203.
45.
Sitlington, P.L., Neubert, D., Begun, W., Lombard, R., & LeConte, P. (1996). Assess for success. Reston , VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
46.
Smith, S., & Jones, E. (1999). The obligation to provide assistive technology: Enhancing the general curriculum access. Journal of Law and Education,28, (2), 247-65.
47.
Technology-Related Assistance of Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988, P.L. 100-407. (August 19, 1988). Title 29, U.S.C. 2201 et seq
48.
Technology-Related Assistance of Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988, P.L. 100-407. (August 19, 1988). Title 29, 20 U.S.C. § 140 (25).
49.
Technology-Related Assistance of Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988, P.L. 100-407. (August 19, 1988). Title 29, 20 U.S.C. § 140 (26).
50.
Technology-Related Assistance of Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988, P.L. 100-407. (August 19, 1988). Title 29, U.S.C. 2201 et seq: U.S. Statutes at Large, 102, 1044-1065.
51.
Todis, B. (1996). Tools for the task? Perspectives on assistive technology in educational settings. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 49-61.
52.
Wehmeyer, M. (1992). Self-determination: Critical skills for outcome-oriented transition services. Journal of Vocational Special Needs Education , 15 (1). 3-7.
53.
Wehmeyer, M. (1999). Assistive technology and students with mental retardation: Utilization and barriers. Journal of Special Education Technology,14, (1), 48-58.
54.
Woudenberg, F. (1991) An evaluation of the Delphi. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 40, 131-150.
