The informal provision of benefits to the poor in exchange for political support, known as clientelism, often provides access to land and services for the urban poor in informal settlements in developing democracies. This review of multidisciplinary literature finds that while clientelism provides the urban poor with some access to the state, its benefits are often inadequate and inequitable. This kind of informal provision also disincentivizes or interferes with the implementation of formal plans. The literature provides some examples of transitions away from clientelism, but lessons for planners in facilitating such transitions are elusive.
AdamAbdul-Wahid. 2013. “Perceptions of Slum Dwellers and Municipal Officials on Factors Impacting the Provision of Basic Slum Services in Accra, Ghana.” Master’s Thesis, Erasmus University, International Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, the Netherlands.
2.
AlSayyadNezar. 2004. “Urban Informality as a ‘New’ Way of Life.” In Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia, edited by RoyAnanyaAlSayyadNezar. Vol. Transnational perspectives on space and place, 7–32. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
3.
Álvarez-RivadullaMaría José. 2017. Squatters and the Politics of Marginality in Uruguay. Latin American Political Economy. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
AuerbachAdam. 2016. “Clients and Communities.” World Politics68 (01): 111–48. doi:10.1017/S0043887115000313.
6.
AuerbachAdamBussellJenniferChauchardSimonJenseniusFrancescaNellisGarethSchneiderMarkSircarNeelanjan, et al.2017. “Rethinking Electoral Politics in India (Draft).” Rethinking Electoral Politics in India’ hosted by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace on September 30, 2016.
BanksNicola. 2016. “Livelihoods Limitations: The Political Economy of Urban Poverty in Dhaka, Bangladesh.” Development and Change47 (2): 266–92. doi:10.1111/dech.12219.
11.
Bénit-GbaffouClaire. 2012. “Party Politics, Civil Society and Local Democracy—Reflections from Johannesburg.”Geoforum43 (2): 178–89. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.08.006.
12.
Bénit-GbaffouClaireOldfieldSophie. 2014. “Claiming ‘Rights’ in the African City.” In The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South, edited by ParnellSueOldfieldSophie, 281–295.New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
13.
BenjaminSolomon. 2005. “Touts, Pirates and Ghosts.” Sarai Reader5:242–54.
14.
BenjaminSolomon. 2008. “Occupancy Urbanism: Radicalizing Politics and Economy beyond Policy and Programs.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32 (3): 719–29.
15.
BhanGautam. 2016. In the Public’s Interest: Evictions, Citizenship, and Inequality in Contemporary Delhi. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
16.
BirchEugenie L. 2017. “Urban Informality as a Way of Life.” December. Accessed January 12, 2018. https://youtu.be/G4yh6jwmVFw.
17.
BjörkmanLisa. 2014a. “‘You Can’t Buy a Vote’: Meanings of Money in a Mumbai Election.” American Ethnologist41 (4): 617–34.
18.
BjörkmanLisa. 2014b. “Becoming a Slum: From Municipal Colony to Illegal Settlement in Liberalization-era Mumbai.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38 (1): 36–59.
19.
BruscoValeriaNazarenoMarceloStokesSusan C.2004. “Vote Buying in Argentina.” Latin American Research Review39 (2): 66–88.
20.
BurgwalGerrit. 1995. Struggle of the Poor: Neighborhood Organization and Clientelist Practice in a Quito Squatter Settlement. Latin America Studies 74. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: CEDLA.
21.
ChalanaManishHouJeffrey, eds. 2016. Messy Urbanism Understanding the “Other” Cities of Asia. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
DattaAyona. 2012. The Illegal City: Space, Law and Gender in a Delhi Squatter Settlement. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
24.
DavidoffPaul. 1965. “Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners31 (4): 331–38.
25.
DavisDiane E. 2014. “Modernist Planning and the Foundations of Urban Violence in Latin America.” Built Environment40 (3): 376–93. doi:10.2148/benv.40.3.376.
26.
DeIndranilNagTirthankar. 2016. “Dangers of Decentralisation in Urban Slums: A Comparative Study of Water Supply and Drainage Service Delivery in Kolkata, India.” Development Policy Review34 (2): 253–76. doi:10.1111/dpr.12149.
27.
ElyacharJulia. 2005. Markets of Dispossession: NGOs, Economic Development, and the State in Cairo. Politics, History, and Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
28.
FergussonLeopoldoLarreguyHoracioRiañoJuan Felipe. 2018. “Political Competition and State Capacity: Evidence from a Land Allocation Program in Mexico.” No. 016517. Documentos de Trabajo LACEA. The Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association - LACEA. Accessed March 29, 2019. https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000518/016517.html.
29.
FollmannAlexander. 2015. “Urban Mega-projects for a ‘World-Class’ Riverfront—The Interplay of Informality, Flexibility and Exceptionality along the Yamuna in Delhi, India.” Habitat International45 (January): 213–22. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.02.007.
30.
FoxSean. 2014. “The Political Economy of Slums: Theory and Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa.” World Development54:191–203. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.08.005.
31.
GandhiAjay. 2012. “‘Informal Moral Economies’ and Urban Governance in India.” In Urban Informalities: Reflections on the Formal and Informal, edited by McFarlaneColinWaibelMichael, 51–66. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
32.
GandyMatthew. 2006. “Planning, Anti-Planning and the Infrastructure Crisis Facing Metropolitan Lagos.” Urban Studies43 (2): 371–96. doi:10.1080/00420980500406751.
33.
GayRobert. 1998. “Rethinking Clientelism: Demands, Discourses and Practices in Contemporary Brazil.” Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y Del Caribe [European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies]65:7–24.
34.
GayRobert. 2006. “The Even More Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Brazil.” In Out of the Shadows: Political Action and the Informal Economy in Latin America, edited by Fernandez-KellyPatriciaShefnerJon, 195–218. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
35.
GillespieTom. 2017. “From Quiet to Bold Encroachment: Contesting Dispossession in Accra’s Informal Sector.” Urban Geography38 (7): 974–92. doi:10.1080/02723638.2016.1191792.
36.
GoodfellowTom. 2012. State Effectiveness and the Politics of Urban Development in East Africa: A Puzzle of Two Cities, 2000-2010. London, UK: The London School of Economics and Political Science.
GrayObika. 2004. Demeaned but Empowered: The Social Power of the Urban Poor in Jamaica. Kingston, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press.
39.
HackenbrochKirstenHossainShahadat. 2012. “‘The Organised Encroachment of the Powerful’—Everyday Practices of Public Space and Water Supply in Dhaka, Bangladesh.” Planning Theory & Practice13 (3): 397–420. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.694265.
40.
HaysSamuel P. 1974. “The Changing Political Structure of the City in Industrial America.” Journal of Urban History1 (1): 6–38. doi:10.1177/009614427400100102.
41.
HerreraVeronica Maria Sol. 2017. Water and Politics: Clientelism and Reform in Urban Mexico. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
42.
HollandAlisha. 2017. Forbearance as Redistribution: The Politics of Informal Welfare in Latin America. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
HuchzermeyerMarie. 2011. Cities with “Slums”: From Informal Settlement Eradication to a Right to the City in Africa. Claremont, South Africa: UCT Press.
44.
HutchisonJane. 2007. “The ‘Disallowed’ Political Participation of Manila’s Urban Poor.” Democratization14 (5): 853–72. doi:10.1080/13510340701635696.
45.
InskeepSteve. 2011. Instant City: Life and Death in Karachi. New York: Penguin Press.
46.
JhaSaumitraRaoVijayendraWoolcockMichael. 2005. Governance in the Gullies: Democratic Responsiveness and Leadership in Delhi’s Slums. 3694. Policy Research Working Paper Series. Washington, DC: World Bank.
KitscheltHerbertWilkinsonSteven I.2007. “Citizen-politician Linkages: An Introduction.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, edited byKitscheltHerbertWilkinsonSteven I., 1–49. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
KloppJacqueline M. 2012. “Towards a Political Economy of Transportation Policy and Practice in Nairobi.” Urban Forum23 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1007/s12132-011-9116-y.
50.
KramonEric. 2016. “Electoral Handouts as Information.” World Politics68 (3): 454–98.
51.
LallSomik V.2013. Planning, Connecting, and Financing Cities–Now: Priorities for City Leaders. Washington, DC: World Bank.
52.
LallSomik V.Vernon HendersonJ.VenablesAnthony J.2017. Africa’s Cities: Opening Doors to the World. Washington, DC: World Bank.
53.
LapomardaVincent A. 1970. “Maurice Joseph Tobin: The Decline of Bossism in Boston.” The New England Quarterly43 (3): 355–81. doi:10.2307/363303.
54.
LedenevaAlenaAnnaBaileySheelaghBarronCostanzaCurroElizabethTeague, eds. 2018. “Introduction: The Informal View of the World—Key Challenges and Main Findings of the Global Informality Project.” In The Global Encyclopaedia of Informality, Volume 1, edited by LedenevaAlena, 1–28Towards Understanding of Social and Cultural Complexity. UCL Press. Accessed January 19, 2018. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt20krxh9.8.
55.
LevensonZachary. 2017. “Precarious Welfare States: Urban Struggles over Housing Delivery in Post-Apartheid South Africa.” International Sociology32 (4): 474–92. doi:10.1177/0268580917701586.
56.
McFarlaneColinWaibelMichael. 2012. “Introduction: The Informal-formal Divide in Context.” In Urban Informalities: Reflections on the Formal and Informal, edited by McFarlaneColinWaibelMichael, 1–12. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
57.
MitlinDiana. 2008. “With and beyond the State—Co-production as a Route to Political Influence, Power and Transformation for Grassroots Organizations.” Environment and Urbanization20 (2): 339–60. doi:10.1177/0956247808096117.
58.
MitlinDiana. 2013. “A Class Act: Professional Support to People’s Organizations in Towns and Cities of the Global South.” Environment and Urbanization25 (2): 483–99. doi:10.1177/0956247813488862.
59.
MitlinDiana. 2014. “Politics, Informality and Clientelism—Exploring a pro-Poor Urban Politics.” ESID Working Paper No. 34.Manchester, UK: Effective States and Inclusive Development Research Centre (ESID).
60.
MitlinDiana. 2018. “Beyond Contention: Urban Social Movements and Their Multiple Approaches to Secure Transformation.” Environment and Urbanization30 (2): 557–74. doi:10.1177/0956247818791012.
61.
MitlinDianaMogaladiJan. 2013. “Social Movements and the Struggle for Shelter: A Case Study of EThekwini (Durban).” Progress in Planning84 (August): 1–39. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2012.12.001.
62.
MullerWolfgang C.2007. “Political Institutions and Linkage Strategies.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, edited byKitscheltHerbertWilkinsonSteven I., 251–75. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
63.
NahiduzzamanK. M.2006. Housing the Urban Poor: Planning, Business and Politics—A Case Study of Duaripara Slum, Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
64.
NathanNoah L. 2019. “Does Participation Reinforce Patronage? Policy Preferences, Turnout and Class in Urban Ghana.” British Journal of Political Science49 (1): 229–55. doi:10.1017/S0007123416000351.
PallerJeffrey W.2014. “Informal Institutions and Personal Rule in Urban Ghana.” African Studies Review57 (3): 123–42.
67.
PallerJeffrey W. 2016. Informal Practices of Accountability in Urban Africa. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/obo/9780199756223-0172.
68.
PallerJeffrey W.2017. “The Contentious Politics of African Urbanization.” Current History116 (790): 163–69.
69.
PasottiEleonora. 2010. Political Branding in Cities: The Decline of Machine Politics in Bogotá, Naples, and Chicago. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
PatelSheelaArputhamJockinBartlettSheridan. 2016. “‘We Beat the Path by Walking’: How the Women of Mahila Milan in India Learned to Plan, Design, Finance and Build Housing.” Environment and Urbanization28 (1): 223–40. doi:10.1177/0956247815617440.
72.
PerlmanJanice E.1976. The Myth of Marginality: Urban Poverty and Politics in Rio de Janeiro. Berkeley: University of California Press.
73.
PetheAbhayNallathigaRamakrishnaGandhiSahilTandelVaidehi. 2014. “Re-thinking Urban Planning in India: Learning from the Wedge between the de Jure and de Facto Development in Mumbai.” Cities39:120–32.
74.
PiliavskyAnastasia, ed. 2014. Patronage as Politics in South Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
75.
RajackRobinPetheAbhayNgauPeterBarhateShrikant. 2013. “The Political Economy of Urban Land Management: Evidence from Mumbai and Nairobi.” Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, 8–11. Washington, DC.
76.
RobinsSteven L.2008. From Revolution to Rights in South Africa: Social Movements, NGOs & Popular Politics after Apartheid. Woodbridge, UK: James Currey.
RoyAnanya. 2012. “Urban Informality: The Production of Space and Practice of Planning.” In The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning, edited byWeberRachelCraneRandall, 691–705. New York: Oxford University Press.
SatterthwaiteDavidMitlinDiana. 2013. Reducing Urban Poverty in the Global South. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.
81.
ScheinerEthan. 2007. “Clientelism in Japan: The Importance and Limits of Institutional Explanations.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, edited byKitscheltHerbertWilkinsonSteven I., 276–97. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82.
ShamiMahvishMajidHadia. 2014. “The Political Economy of Public Goods Provision in Slums: Preliminary Results from a Field Study in Urban Pakistan.” Working Paper, International Growth Centre, London.
ShefnerJon. 2006. “‘Do You Think Democracy Is a Magical Thing?’ From Basic Needs to Democratization in Informal Politics.” In Out of the Shadows: Political Action and the Informal Economy in Latin America, edited by Fernandez-KellyPatriciaShefnerJon, 241–68.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
85.
SilvaRita de Cacia Oenning daShawKurt. 2012. “Hip-hop and Sociality in a Brazilian Favela.” In Urban Informalities: Reflections on the Formal and Informal, edited byMcFarlaneColinWaibelMichael, 129–48. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
86.
SyaggaP.MitullahW.Karirah-GitauS.2002. “A Rapid Economic Appraisal of Rents in Slums and Informal Settlements.” UN Habitat, Nairobi: Government of Kenya and UN-HABITAT Collaborative Nairobi Slum Upgrading Initiative.
87.
TomsaDirkUfenAndreas, eds. 2013. Party Politics in Southeast Asia: Clientelism and Electoral Competition in Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines. Routledge Contemporary Southeast Asia Series 55. New York: Routledge.
WatsonVanessa. 2009. “Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues.” Urban Studies46 (11): 2259–75. doi:10.1177/0042098009342598.
93.
WeinsteinLiza. 2014. The Durable Slum: Dharavi and the Right to Stay Put in Globalizing Mumbai. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
94.
Weitz-ShapiroRebecca. 2012. “What Wins Votes: Why Some Politicians Opt Out of Clientelism.” American Journal of Political Science56 (3): 568–83. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00578.x.
95.
WitJoop de.2017. Urban Poverty, Local Governance and Everyday Politics in Mumbai. First South Asia edition. Cities and the Urban Imperative. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
96.
WitJoop deBernerErhard. 2009. “Progressive Patronage? Municipalities, NGOs, CBOs and the Limits to Slum Dwellers’ Empowerment.” Development and Change40 (5): 948.
97.
World Bank. 2003. World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People. Washington, DC: World Bank.
98.
World Bank. 2017. World Development Report 2017: Governance and the Law. Washington, DC: World Bank.
