This paper examines equity planning in the face of growing adversity in cities of the Global South. The literature broadly addresses this question from the perspective of empowered social movements and/or insurgent citizenship practice. The actual experience of how equity practitioners interface with grass-roots efforts, however, remains understudied. Using case study data from urban upgrading programs in Medellín and Bangkok, we show that equity planners can be effective advocates to marginalized communities as they become embedded in local systems of trust. The paper also evinces the limitations and dilemmas planners confront in two extremely complex institutional and political settings.
Alcaldía de Medellín and IDB. 2008. Medellín: La transformación de una ciudad. Medellín and Inter-American Development Bank. Medellín: Alcaldía de Medellín.
AskewMark. 2010. Legitimacy Crisis in Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Silkworm Books.
4.
BaiocchiG.Checa.S.2009. “Cities as New Spaces for Citizenship Claims: Globalization, Urban Politics, and Civil Society in Brazil, Mexico and South Africa in the 1990s.” In Democracy, States, and the Struggle for Social Justice, edited by GautneyH. D.SmithN.DahbourO.DawsonA.131–51. New York: Routledge.
5.
BaiocchiG.HellerP.SilvaM. K.Silva.M.2011. Bootstrapping Democracy: Transforming Local Governance and Civil Society in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
6.
BayatAsef. 2000. “From Dangerous Classes’ to Quiet Rebels’ Politics of the Urban Subaltern in the Global South.” International Sociology15 (3): 533–57.
7.
BeardVictoria A.2003. “Learning Radical Planning: The Power of Collective Action.” Planning Theory2 (1): 13–35.
8.
BenjaminSolomon. 2008. “Occupancy Urbanism: Radicalizing Politics and Economy beyond Policy and Programs.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32 (3): 719–29.
9.
BergquistCharles. 2014. “Violencia pública en Colombia, 1958–2010.” Hispanic American Historical Review94 (4): 722–24.
10.
BerquistM.DaniereA.Drummond.L.2014. “Planning for Global Environmental Change in Bangkok’s Informal Settlements.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management12:1–20.
BoonyabanchaSomsook. 2004. “The Urban Community Development Office: Increasing Community Options through a National Government Development Programme in Thailand.” In Empowering Squatter Citizen: Local Government, Civil Society and Urban Poverty Reduction, edited by MitlinDianaSatterthwaiteDavid, 25–53. London: Earthscan.
13.
BoonyabanchaSomsook. 2005. “Baan Mankong: Going to Scale with ‘Slum’ and Squatter Upgrading in Thailand.” Environment and Urbanization17 (1): 21–46.
14.
BoonyabanchaSomsook. 2009. “Land for Housing the Poor by the Poor: Experiences from the Baan Mankong Nationwide Slum Upgrading Programme in Thailand.” Environment and Urbanization21:309–29.
15.
BowornwathanaB.2010. “Bureaucrats, Politicians, and the Transfer of Administrative Reform into Thailand.” In Comparative Administrative Change and Reform: Lessons Learned, edited by PierreJ.IngrahamP. W., 207–32. Montreal, Québec, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
16.
BrandPeter. 2013. “Governing Inequality in the South through the Barcelona Model: ‘Social Urbanism’ in Medellin, Colombia.” Paper presented at Governance, Contestation, Critique. De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom. http://www.dmu.ac.uk/documents/business-and-law-documents/research/lgru/peterbrand.pdf (accessed November 29, 2014).
17.
BrandPeterDávilaJulio. 2011. “Mobility Innovation at the Urban Margins.” City15 (6): 647–61.
18.
BrooksMichael P.2002. Planning Theory for Practitioners. Lanham, MD: American Planning Association.
19.
ButcherS.Apsan Frediani.A.2014. “Insurgent Citizenship Practices: The Case of Muungano wa Wanavijijiin Nairobi, Kenya.” City18 (2): 119–33.
CoffeyA. E.2015. “Negotiating Neighborhood Priorities: The Politics of Risk & Development in Medellin’s Comuna 8.” Unpublished master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
22.
DávilaJulio. 2009. “Being a Mayor: The View from Four Colombian Cities.” Environment and Urbanization21 (1): 37–57.
23.
DávilaJulio. 2016. “Cities as Innovation: Towards a New Understanding of Population Growth, Social Inequality and Urban Sustainability.” In Cities in the 21st Century, edited by Nel-loOriolMeleRenata, 26–34. London: Routledge.
24.
De SouzaMarcelo L.2006. “Social Movements as ‘Critical Urban Planning’ Agents.” City10 (3): 327–42.
25.
DoyleC.2016. “Explaining Patterns of Urban Violence in Medellin, Colombia.” Laws5 (1): 3.
26.
EcheverriAlejandroFranciscoOrsini. 2010. “Informalidad y urbanismo social en Medellín.” In Medellín: Medio ambiente, urbanismo, sociedad, edited by Hermelin-ArbauxM.EcheverriA.Giraldo.J.Medellín: Centro de Estudios Urbanos y Ambientales, Universidad EAFIT.
27.
ElinoffEli. 2013. “Architectures of Citizenship: Democracy, Development, and the Politics of Participation in Thailand’s Railway Communities.” PhD diss., Department of Anthropology, University of California, San Diego.
28.
ElinoffEli. 2014. “Sufficient Citizens: Moderation and the Politics of Sustainable Development in Thailand.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review37 (1): 89–108.
FurlongK.2013. “The Dialectics of Equity: Consumer Citizenship and the Extension of Water Supply in Medellín, Colombia.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers103 (5).
35.
GuerreroA.2011. “Rebuilding Trust in Government via Service Delivery: The Case of Medellín, Colombia” (pp. 1–28). Washington, DC: World Bank.
36.
HarveyDavid. 2008. “The Right to the City.” New Left Review53:23–51.
37.
HealeyPatsy. 2010. “Introduction: The Transnational Flow of Knowledge and Expertise in the Planning Field.” In Crossing Crossing Borders: International Exchange And Planning Practices, edited by HealeyPatsyUptonRobert, 1–26. London: Routledge.
38.
HermelinM.2013. “City Development, Natural Resources and Human Impact: The Case of Medellin, Colombia.” Natural Resources4 (8): 473–82.
39.
HolstonJames. 2008. Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
HolstonJames. 2009. “Insurgent Citizenship in an Era of Global Urban Peripheries.”City & Society21 (2): 245–67.
KameteAmin Y.2009. “In the Service of Tyranny: Debating the Role of Planning in Zimbabwe’s Urban ‘Clean-up’ Operation.” Urban Studies46 (4): 897–922.
43.
KooningsKeesKruijtDirk, eds. 2007. “Fractured Cities, Second-Class Citizenship and Urban Violence.” In Fractured Cities: Social Exclusion, Urban Violence and Contested Spaces in Latin America, 4–21. London: Zed Books.
44.
KrumholzNormanForesterJohn. 1990. Making Equity Planning Work. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
45.
LiTania Murray. 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Raleigh, NC: Duke University Press.
46.
MarcusePeter. 2009. “From Critical Urban Theory to the Right to the City.” City13 (2/3): 185–97.
MiraftabFaranak. 2009. “Insurgent Planning: Situating Radical Planning in the Global South.” Planning Theory8 (1): 32–50.
49.
MiraftabFaranakWillsS.2005. “Insurgency and Spaces of Active Citizenship: The Story of Western Cape Anti-eviction Campaign in South Africa.” Journal of Planning Education and Research25 (2): 200–17.
50.
MitlinDianaSatterthwaiteDavid, eds. 2013. Empowering Squatter Citizen: Local Government, Civil Society and Urban Poverty Reduction. London: Earthscan.
51.
MontesanoMichael. 2010. “Four Thai Pathologies, Late 2009.” In Legitimacy Crisis in Thailand, edited by AskewM., 273–302. Bangkok, Thailand: Silkworm Books.
52.
MoserCaroline. 2010. Ordinary Families, Extraordinary Lives: Assets and Poverty Reduction in Guayaquil, 1978-2004. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
53.
MurilloG.Gómez.V.2005. “Institutions and Citizens in Colombia: The Changing Nature of a Difficult Relationship.” Social Forces84 (1).
54.
NSO (National Statistical Office). 2013. “Table 1 Population by Sex, Household Type and Household by Type, Average Size of Private Household by Region and Area: 2010.” Statistical table, National Statistical Office website, Office of the Prime Minister. Bangkok, Thailand. Accessed December 4, 2013.
55.
PapelerasRubyBagotloOfesliaBoonyabanchaSomsook. 2012. “A Conversation about Change-Making by Communities: Some Experiences from ACCA.” Environment & Urbanization24 (2): 463–80.
56.
PérezFederico. 2011. “The Praxis of Socio-spatial Justice: Contemporary Policymaking and Planning in Bogotá (Colombia).” Paper presented at the Research Committee 21, Amsterdam, Netherlands, July.
57.
PickvanceC.1986. “Comparative Urban Analysis and Assumptions about Causality.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research10 (2): 162–84.
58.
PiedrahitaC.GonzálezJ.2010. El ordenamiento territorial como mecanismo de transformación social: Una mirada jurídica y política de la transformación urbana de la ciudad de Medellín. In Medellín: Medio ambiente, urbanismo, sociedad, edited by Hermelin- ArbauxM.EcheverriA.Giraldo- RamírezJ., 205–22. Medellín, Columbia: Centro de Estudios Urbanos y Ambientales, Universidad EAFIT.
59.
PitsuwanSurinCaballero-AnthonyMely. 2014. “Human Security in Southeast Asia: 20 Years in Review.” Asian Journal of Peacebuilding2 (2): 199–217.
PuertaD.2011. “Proyectos Urbanos Integrales -PUI-.” In Laboratorio Medellín: Catálogo de diez prácticas vivas, 70–83. Medellín, Columbia: Alcaldía de Medellín and Mesa Editores.
62.
RankinKatharine. 2010. “Reflexivity and Post-colonial Critique: Toward an Ethics of Accountability in Planning Praxis.” Planning Theory9 (3): 181–99.
63.
RichaniN.2013. Systems of Violence: The Political Economy of War and Peace in Colombia. Albany: State University of New York Press.
64.
RobinsonJennifer. 2002. Global and World Cities: A View From off the Map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26 (3): 531–54.
65.
RobinsonJennifer. 2011. Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35 (1): 1–23.
66.
RoldánMary. 2003. “Wounded Medellín: Narcotics Traffic against a Background of Industrial Decline.” In Wounded Cities: Destruction and Reconstruction in a Globalized World, edited by SchneiderJ.SusserI., 129–48. Oxford: Berg.
67.
RoyAnanya. 2006. “Praxis in the Time of Empire.” Planning Theory5 (1): 7–29.
68.
RoyAnanya. 2009. “The 21st-Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory.” Regional Studies43 (6): 819–30.
69.
RülandJürgen ed. 1996. The Dynamics of Metropolitan Management in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
70.
SaffordFrankPalaciosMarco. 2002. Colombia: Fragmented Land, Divided Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
71.
SandercockLeonie. 1998. “Framing Insurgent Historiographies for Planning.” In Making the Invisible Visible: A Multicultural Planning History, edited by SandercockLeonie, 1–36. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
72.
SanyalB.2010. “Similarities of Differences? What to Emphasize Now for Effective Planning Practice.” In Crossing Borders. International Exchange and Planning Practice, edited by HealeyPatsyRobertUpton, 329–50. New York: Routledge.
73.
ScottJames C.1998. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
74.
SenAmartya. 2001. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75.
SlettoB.2013. “Insurgent Planning and Its Interlocutors: Studio Pedagogy as Unsanctioned Practice in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.” Journal of Planning Education and Research33 (2): 228–40.
76.
SotomayorLuisa.2015a. “Planning through Spaces of Exception: Socio-spatial Inequality, Violence and the Emergence of Social Urbanism in Medellin (2004-2011).” PhD diss., University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
77.
SotomayorLuisa. 2015b. “Equitable Planning through Territories of Exception: The Contours of Medellin’s Urban Development Projects.” International Development Planning Review37 (4): 373–97.
78.
SotomayorLuisa. 2017. “Dealing with Dangerous Spaces: The Construction of Urban Policy in Medellín.” Latin American Perspectives44 (2): 71–90.
79.
StoreyDonovan. 2012. “Incompatible Partners? Urban Poor Communities and River Systems in Bangkok, Thailand.” International Development Planning Review34 (2): 109–28.
80.
SweetElizabethChakarsMelissa. 2010. “Identity, Culture, Land, and Language: Stories of Insurgent Planning in the Republic of Buryatia, Russia.” Journal of Planning Education and Research30 (2): 198–209.
81.
TendlerJ.1997. Good Government in the Tropics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
82.
ThoumiF. E.2002. “Illegal Drugs in Colombia: From Illegal Economic Boom to Social Crisis.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science582 (1): 102–16.
83.
UN-HABITAT. 2003. The Challenge of Slums, Global Report on Human Settlements 2003. London: Earthscan.
84.
UN-HABITAT. 2009. Planning Sustainable Cities. Global Report on Human Settlements 2009. London: Earthscan.
WatsonVanessa. 2009. “‘The Planned City Sweeps the Poor Away . . .’ : Urban Planning and 21st Century Urbanisation.” Progress in Planning72 (3): 151–93.
87.
WatsonVanessa. 2013. “Planning and the ‘Stubborn Realities’ of Global South-east Cities: Some Emerging Ideas.” Planning Theory12 (1): 81–100.
88.
YapKioe ShengDe WandelerKoen. 2010. “Self-Help Housing in Bangkok.” Habitat International34:332–41.
89.
YiftachelOren. 1998. “Planning and Social Control: Exploring the Dark Side.” Journal of Planning Literature12 (4): 395–406.
