Municipal incorporation can have profound impacts on the urban and political geography of the regions in which they incorporate. These impacts and declines in the rate of municipal formation lead to the question of why municipalities incorporate. The authors synthesize an overview and analysis of the historical literature with a media literature review to construct a comprehensive classification system of theories that explain municipal incorporations. Twelve new micromotives such as eligibility for government grants and economic development are identified. Moreover, the review surprisingly reveals that spatial motives, in contrast to service motives, play the largest role in new municipal incorporations.
Advocate. 2000. “Lawsuit Filed to Block New Grant Parish Town.”Advocate, December 5, 2000, 9–C.
2.
AikenCharles. 1987. “Race as a Factor in Municipal Underbounding.”Annals of the Association of American Geographers77 (4): 564–79.
3.
AlesinaAlbertoBaqirRezaHoxbyCaroline. 2004. “Political Jurisdictions in Heterogeneous Communities.”Journal of Political Economy112 (2): 348–96.
4.
Anchorage Daily News. 2004. Gustavus Faces Big Challenges—Rotting Dock: With State Budget Cuts, Small Cities May Cease to Exist. August 23, 2004.
5.
AndersonMichelle Wilde. 2008. “Cities Inside Out: Race, Poverty, and Exclusion at the Urban Fringe.”UCLA Law Review55 (5): 1095–160.
6.
BecheKenneth G.1963. Incorporation Laws: One Aspect of the Urban Problem. Boulder: Bureau of Governmental Research and Service, University of Colorado.
7.
BennettD. L. 2006. “Georgia 2006: New Cities set to take control on Northside.”The Atlanta Journal Constitution, July 20.
8.
BerryBrian J. L.1973. The Human Consequences of Urbanization. New York: St. Martin's Press.
9.
BickersKenneth, N.SteinRobert M. 1998. “The Microfoundations of the Tiebout Model.”Urban Affairs Review34 (1): 76–93.
10.
BlakelyEdward J.SnyderMary Gail. 1997. Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
11.
BuchananJames M.1971. Principles of Urban Fiscal Strategy. Public Choice11 (1): 1–16.
12.
BurnsNancy. 1994. The Formation of American Local Governments: Private Values in Public Institutions. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
ByunPillsungEsparzaAdrian. 2005. “A Revisionist Model of Suburbanization and Sprawl: The Role of Political Fragmentation, Growth Control, and Spillovers.”Journal of Planning Education and Research24 (3): 252–64.
14.
CampbellAlan K.MerantoPhilip. “The Metropolitan Education Dilemma: Matching Resources to Needs.”Urban Affairs Review 2, no. 1 (1966): 42–63.
15.
CarruthersJohn. 2003. “Growth at the Fringe: The Influence of Political Fragmentation in United States Metropolitan Areas.”Papers in Regional Science82 (4): 475–99.
16.
CarruthersJohn I.UlfarssonGudmundur F.. 2002. “Fragmentation and Sprawl: Evidence from Interregional Analysis.”Growth and Change33 (3): 312–40.
17.
CoxKevin R.JonasAndrew E. G.. 1993. “Urban Development, Collective Consumption and the Politics of Metropolitan Fragmentation.”Political Geography Political Geography12 (1): 8–37.
18.
DanielsonMichael N.1976. The Politics of Exclusion. New York: Columbia University Press.
19.
DowdingKeithJohnPeterBiggsStephen. 1994. “Tiebout: A Survey of the Empirical Literature.”Urban Studies31(4/5): 767–97.
20.
DownsA.1973. Opening up the Suburbs. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
EdwardsM.2008. “Understanding the Complexities of Annexation.”Journal of Planning Liteature23 (2): 119–35.
22.
FacerRexII. 2006. “Annexation Activity and State Law in the United States.”Urban Affairs Review41 (5): 697–709.
23.
FarleyReyonds. 1976. “Components of Suburban Population Growth.” In The Changing Face of the Suburbs, edited by SchwartzBarry3–38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
FischelWilliam. 2001. “Homevoters, Municipal Corporate Governance, and the Benefit View of the Property Tax.”National Tax Journal54 (1): 157–74.
26.
FischerClaude S.StockmayerGretchenStilesJonHoutMichael. 2004. “Distinguishing the Geographic Levels and Social Dimensions of U.S. Metropolitan Segregation 1960-2000.”Demography41 (1): 37–59.
27.
FleischmannA.1986. “The Goals and Strategies of Local Boundary Changes: Government Organization or Private Gain?”The Journal of Urban Affairs8 (4): 63–75.
28.
FosterKathryn Ann. 1997. The Political Economy of Special-purpose Government. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
29.
FrantzKlaus. 2006. “Private Gated Neighborhoods: A Progressive Trend in U.S. Urban Development.” In Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives, edited by GlaszeGeorgWebsterChristopher J.FrantzKlaus, 64–75. London: Routledge.
30.
FreedbergLouis. 2003. “The New California.”San Francisco Chronicle, July 7.
31.
GallowayThomas D.LandisJohn D.. 1986. “How Cities Expand: Does State Law Make a Difference?”Growth and Change17 (4): 25–45.
32.
GlassnerMartin IraFahrerChuck. 2004. Political Geography. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
33.
GlaszeGeorgWebsterChristopherFrantzKlaus J.. 2006. Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives. London, England: Routledge.
34.
HamiltonBruce. 1975. “Property Taxes and the Tiebout Hypothesis: Some Empirical Evidence.” In Fiscal Zoning and Land Use Controls, edited by MillsE.S.OatesW.E., 13–31. Lexington, MA, USA.
HensleyLaura. 2007. “Iola Residents Consider Incorporation.”Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, March 15.
37.
HillMelvin B.1978. State Laws Governing Local Government Structure and Administration. Athens: University of Georgia, Institute of Government.
38.
HillRichard Child. 1974. “Separate and Unequal: Governmental Inequality in the Metropolis.”American Political Science Review68 (4): 1557–68.
39.
Hogen-EschTom. 2001. “Urban Succession and the Politics of Growth: The Case of Los Angeles.”Urban Affairs Review36 (6): 783–809.
40.
IngallsG.RasselG.. 2005. “Political Fragmentation, Municipal Incorporation and Annexation in a High Growth Urba Area: The Case of Charlotte, North Carolina.”The North Carolina Geographer13:17–30.
41.
JuddDennis R.1979. The Politics of American Cities: Private Power and Public Policy. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.
42.
KennedyDavid J.1995. “Residential Associations as State Actors: Regulating the Impact of Gated Communities on Nonmembers.”Yale Law Journal105 (3): 761–93.
43.
KollinJoe. 2001. “Birth of a Town after Incorporating: Southwest Ranches Strives to Keep City Life at Bay.”South Florida Sun-Sentinel, January 14.
44.
LeGoix, Renaud. 2006. “Gated Communities as Predators of Public Resources: The Outcomes of Fading Boundaries between Private Management and Public Authorities in Southern California.” In Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives, edited by GlaszeGeorgWebsterChristopher J.FrantzKlaus, 76–91. London: Routledge.
45.
LeeBarrett A.FirebaughGlennMatthewsStephen A.ReardonSean F.FarrellChad R.O'SullivanDavid. 2008. “Beyond the Census Tract: Patterns and Determinants of Racial Segregation at Multiple Geographic Scales.”American Sociological Review73 (5): 766–91.
46.
LinerGaines H.McGregorRob Roy. 1996. “Institutions and the Market for Annexable Land.”Growth and Change27 (1): 55–74.
47.
LoganJohn R.StultsBrian J.FarleyReynolds. 2004. “Segregation of Minorities in the Metropolis: Two Decades of Change.”Demography41 (1): 1–22.
48.
LoweryDavidLyonsWilliam E.. 1989. “The Impact of Jurisdictional Boundaries: An Individual-Level Test of the Tiebout Model.”The Journal of Politics51 (1): 73–97.
49.
LyonsWilliam ELoweryDavidDeHoogRuth H.. 1992. The Politics of Dissatisfaction. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharp.
50.
MannionAnnemarie. 2001. “Residents Help Out Fledgling Village.”Chicago Tribune, December 9.
51.
MarandoVincent L.1974. “The Politics of Metropolitan Reform.”Administration & Society6 (2): 229–62.
52.
MarandoVincent. 1979. “City-County Consolidations: Reform, Regionalism, Referenda and Requiem.”The Western Political Quarterly32 (4): 409–21.
53.
MartinDolores TremewanWagnerRichard E.. 1978. “The Institutional Framework for Municipal Incorporation: An Economic Analysis of Local Agency Formation Commissions in California.”Journal of Law and Economics21 (2): 409–25.
54.
MartinRoscoe C.1957. Grass Roots. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
MeligranaJohn. 2004. Redrawing Local Government Boundaries: An International Study of Politics, Procedures and Decisions. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.
57.
MillerGary. 1981. Cities by Contract: The Politics of Municipal Incorporation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58.
Morning Star. 1999. “The State Answer to Annexation: 6 Communities Petition for OK to Become Towns.”January 30, 1999, 4B.
59.
MossM. C.2004. Incorporation, Annexation and Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction: A Double Standard? Predominantly-Minority Towns Struggle. Mebane, NC: Cedar Grove Institute for Sustainable Communities.
60.
MumphreyAnthony J.WildgenJohn K.WilliamsLouise. 1990. Annexation and Incorporation: Alternative Strategies for Municipal Development. New Orleans, LA: Division of Urban Research and Policy Studies, College of Urban and Public Affairs, University of New Orleans.
61.
MussoJuliet Ann. 2001. “The Political Economy of City Formation in California: Limits to Tiebout Sorting.”Social Science Quarterly82 (1): 139–53.
OakersonR. J.ParksR. B.. 2011. “The Study of Local Public Economies: Multi-organizational, Multi-level Institutional Analysis and Development.”Policy Studies Journal39 (1): 147–67.
64.
Omaha World Herald. 1999. “Tiny Town Seeks Incorporation to Pass Rules for Hog Facility.”May 19, 1999.
65.
OrfieldGary. “Federal Policy, Local Power, and Metropolitan Segregation.”Political Science Quarterly89, no. 4 (1974): 777–802.
66.
OstromVincentTieboutCharles M.WarrenRobert. 1961. “The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry.”American Political Science Review55 (4): 831–42.
67.
PetersDavid. 2012. “Income Inequality across Micro and Meso Geographic Scales in the Midwestern United States, 1979-2009.”Rural Sociology77 (2): 171–202.
68.
PetersonPaul. 1981. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69.
PorterKirk. 1922. County and Township Government in the United States. New York: MacMillan.
70.
RazinEranRosentraubMark. 2000. “Are Fragmentation and Sprawl Interlinked? North American Evidence.”Urban Affairs Review35 (6): 821–36.
71.
RiderMark William. 1992. The Political Economy of Metropolitan Fragmentation in an Economy with Tastes for Association. Atlanta: Georgia State University.
72.
RigosPlaton N.SpindlerCharles J.. 1991. “Municipal Incorporation and State Statutes: A State-Level Analysis.”State & Local Government Review23 (2): 76–81.
73.
RogersWilliam H.2010. “The Housing Price Impact of Covenant Restrictions and Other Subdivision Characteristics.”Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics40 (2): 203–20.
74.
SantosFernanda. 2006. “Jewish Village Finds No Room for Growth: Neighbors Try to Prevent Expansion.”South Florida Sun Sentinel, September 3, 2006.
75.
SchmandtHenry J.1961. The Municipal Incorporation Trend, 1950-1960. Madison: Bureau of Government Research and Advisory Service, University Extension Division, University of Wisconsin.
76.
SchneiderMarkTeskePaul. 1992. “Toward a Theory of the Political Entrepreneur: Evidence from Local Government.”American Political Science86 (3): 737–47.
77.
SchneiderMarkTeskePaul. 1993a. “The Antigrowth Entrepreneur: Challenging the Equilibrium of the Growth Machine.”Journal of Politics55 (3): 720–36.
78.
SchneiderMarkTeskePaul. 1993b. “The Progrowth Entrepreneur in Local Government.”Urban Affairs Quarterly29 (2): 316–27.
79.
SclarE.HookW.. 1993. “The Importance of Cities to the National Economy.” In Interwoven Destinies: Cities and the Nation, edited by CisnerosHenry48–80. New York: W.W.
80.
ScottStanleyCorzineJohn. 1971. “Special Districts in the San Francisco Bay Area.” In Metropolitan Politics, edited by DanielsonMichael N.246–71. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
81.
SellersLaurin. 2006. “Brevard Towns Hope Merger Sends Big Anti-growth Signal.”Knight Ridder Tribune Business News.
82.
SharpElaine B.1986. Citizen Demand-Making in the Urban Context. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
83.
SmirnovaOlgaIngallsJerry. 2007. “The Influence of State Annexation Laws on the Growth of Selected Southern Cities.”Southeastern Geographer47 (1): 71–85.
84.
SmithRussell M.2007. Newly Incorporated Municipalities (NIMs) in the United States 1990-2000: Socioeconomic Differences between NIMs and Cohort Cities. Dissertation, Department of Geography, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC.
85.
SmithRussell M.2008. “Municipal Incorporation Activity and the Clustering of New Municipalities in North Carolina: 1990-2008.”The North Carolina Geographer16: 24–35.
86.
SmithRussell M.2011. “City Limits? The Impact of Annexation on the Frequency of Municipal Incorporation in North Carolina.”Southeastern Geographer51 (3): 422–42.
87.
SmithR.DebbageK.. 2011. “Spatial Distributions of Newly Incorporated Municipalities (NIMs) and Related Socioeconomic Characteristics: A National Comparison to Cohort Cities.”Urban Geography32 (4): 568–88.
88.
SmithRussell M.DebbageKeith. 2006. “Where Are the Geographers? Newly Incorporated Municipalities (NIMS) in the Southeast.”Geographical Bulletin48 (2): 109–21.
89.
SokolowAlvin D.HanfordPriscillaHoganJoanMartinLinda. 1981. Choices for the Unincorporated Community: A Guide to Local Government Alternatives in California. Davis: Institute of Governmental Affairs, University of California.
90.
StauberRichard. 1965. New Cities in America; a Census of Municipal Incorporations in the United States, 1950-1960. Lawrence: Governmental Research Center, University of Kansas.
The Associated Press. “Residents Question Subdivision Silently Annexing Their Homes: Gated Community Was Trying to Defend against Commercial Development.”St. Louis Dispatch, July 24, 2005, D7.
93.
TeafordJon C.1979. City and Suburb: The Political Fragmentation of Metropolitan America, 1850-1970. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
94.
TeafordJon C.1986. The Twentieth-century American City: Problem, Promise and Reality. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
95.
TeskePaulSchneiderMarkMintromMichaelBestSamuel. 1993. “Establishing the Micro Foundations of a Macro Theory: Information, Movers, and the Competitive Local Market for Public Goods.”American Political Science Review87 (3): 702–13.
96.
ThomasGary. 2011. “A Typology for the Case Study in Social Science Following a Review of Definition, Discourse and Structure.”Qualitative Inquiry17 (6): 511–21.
97.
TieboutCharles M.1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.”The Journal of Political Economy64 (5): 416–24.
98.
TkachevaOlesya. 2008. “New Cities, Local Officials, and Municipal Incorporation Laws: A Supply-side Model of City Formation.”Journal of Urban Affairs30 (2): 155–74.
UlfarssonGudmundur F.CarruthersJohn I.. 2006. “The Cycle of Fragmentation and Sprawl: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Model.”Environment and Planning B33 (5): 767–88.
102.
WaldnerLeoraRiceKathrynSmithRuss. 2013. “Temporal and Spatial Dimensions of Newly Incorporated Municipalities in the United States.”The Geographical Review103 (1):59–79.
103.
WallisAllan D.1994. “The third Wave: Current Trends in Regional Governance.”National Civic Review83(Summer/Fall): 290–310.
104.
WebsterChristopher J.2002. “Property Rights and the Public Realm: Gates, Green belts, and Gemeinschaft.”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design29 (3):397–412.
105.
WeiherGregory R.1991. The Fractured Metropolis: Political Fragmentation and Metropolitan Segregation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
106.
WillonPhil. 1999. “Rancho Santa Margarita Opts for Cityhood.”Los Angeles Times, November 3.
107.
WoodRobert Coldwell. 1961. 1400 Governments; The Political Economy of the New York Metropolitan Region. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
108.
ZimmermanJoseph F.1994. “Single-Purpose Governments on the Increase.”National Civic Review83 (2): 209–10.
