Scholars often portray newly incorporated municipalities as white, wealthy suburbs. Yet this study reveals that 10 percent of new cities (forty-four cities) formed between 1990 and 2010 are black, Hispanic, Asian, and/or Native American majority cities. A careful examination of the data reveals not just racial differences but significant socioeconomic differences between new cities of color (CoCs) and majority white cities. By employing a probit model of statistical analysis, this research reveals that CoCs differ socioeconomically from majority white incorporating communities on variables such as median family income, average household size, and more.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1987. The organization of local public economies. In Rethinking local self government in a federal system, ed. OakersonR., 1–56. Washington, DC: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
2.
AikenCharles S.1987. Race as a factor in municipal underbounding. Annals of the Association of American Geographers77:564–79.
3.
AikenCharles S.1990. A new type of black ghetto in the plantation South. Annals of the Association of American Geographers80:223–46.
4.
AlesinaAlbertoBaqirRezaHoxbyCaroline. 2004. Political jurisdictions in heterogeneous communities. Journal of Political Economy112:348–96.
AndersonMichelle W.2008. Cities inside out: Race, poverty, and exclusion at the urban fringe. UCLA Law Review1–55.
7.
BurnsNancy. 1994. The formation of American local governments: Private values in public institutions. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
ByunPillsungEsparzaAdrian. 2005. A revisionist model of suburbanization and sprawl: The role of political fragmentation, growth control, and spillovers. Journal of Planning Education and Research24:252–64.
9.
CamarilloAlbert M.2007. Cities of color: The new racial frontier in California’s minority-majority cities. Pacific Historical Review76:1–28.
10.
DanielsonMichael N.1976. The politics of exclusion. New York: Columbia University Press.
11.
DeHoogRuth H.LoweryDavidLyonsWilliam E.. 1991. Metropolitan fragmentation and suburban ghettos: Some empirical observations on institutional racism. Journal of Urban Affairs13:479–93.
12.
DownsAnthony. 1994. New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
13.
FeiockRichard C.1991. The effects of economic development policy on local economic growth. American Journal of Political Science35:643–55.
14.
FischelWilliam. 2001. Homevoters, municipal corporate governance, and the benefit view of the property tax. National Tax Journal54:157–74.
15.
FogelsonRobert M.1967. The fragmented metropolis: Los Angeles from 1850 to 1930. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
FosterKathryn A.1997. The political economy of special-purpose government. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
HochCharles. 1984. City limits: Municipal boundary formation and class segregation. In Marxism and the metropolis: New perspectives in urban political economy, 2nd ed., ed. TabbW. K.SawersL., 101–19. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
HochCharles. 1985. Municipal contracting in California: Privatizing with class. Urban Affairs Quarterly20:303–23.
20.
IngallsGeraldRasselGary. 2005. Political fragmentation, municipal incorporation and annexation in a high growth urban area: The case of Charlotte, North Carolina. The North Carolina Geographer13:17–30.
21.
Leon-MoretaAgustin. 2015. Municipal incorporation in the United States. Urban Studies52:3160–80.
22.
Leon-MoretaAgustin. 2016. Municipal incorporation: Socioeconomic and policy factors of influence. State and Local Government Review47:255–70.
23.
LichterDaniel T.ParisiDomenicoGriceSteven MichaelTaquinoMichael. 2007. Municipal underbounding: Annexation and racial exclusion in small Southern towns. Rural Sociology72:47–68.
24.
LinerGaines H.McGregorRob Roy. 1996. Institutions and the market for annexable land. Growth and Change27:55–74.
25.
LowSetha M.2008. Incorporation and gated communities in the greater metro-Los Angeles region as a model of privatization of residential communities. Home Cultures5:85–108.
26.
LoweryDavidLyonsWilliam E.. 1989. The impact of jurisdictional boundaries: An individual-level test of the Tiebout model. The Journal of Politics51:73–97.
MarandoVincent L.1979. City-county consolidations: Reform, regionalism, referenda and requiem. The Western Political Quarterly32:409–21.
29.
MartinDolores T.WagnerRichard E.. 1978. The institutional framework for municipal incorporation: An economic analysis of local agency formation commissions in california. Journal of Law and Economics21:409–25.
30.
MillerGary J.1981. Cities by contract: The politics of municipal incorporation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
MillerJoel. 1988. Annexations and boundary change. Municipal year book. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
32.
MillerDavidMirandaRowanRoqueRobertWilfCharles. 1995. The fiscal organization of metropolitan areas: The Allegheny County case reconsidered. Publius25:19–35.
33.
MumphreyAnthony J.WildgenJohn K.WilliamsLouise. 1990. Annexation and incorporation: Alternative strategies for municipal development. New Orleans, LA: University of New Orleans, Division of Urban Research and Policy Studies.
34.
MussoJuliet A.2001. The political economy of city formation in California: Limits to Tiebout sorting. Social Science Quarterly82:139–53.
35.
NelsonMichael A.1990. Decentralization of sub-national public sector: An empirical analysis of the determinants of local government structure in metropolitan areas of the U.S. Southern Economic Journal57:443–57.
36.
OakersonRonald J.ParksRoger B.. 2011. The study of local public economies: Multi-organizational, multi-level institutional analysis and development. Policy Studies Journal39:147–67.
37.
OrfieldMyron. 1997. Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC; Cambridge, MA: Brookings Institution Press; Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
38.
OstromVincentTieboutCharles M.WarrenRobert. 1961. The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review55:831–42.
39.
PulidoLaura. 2000. Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in Southern California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers90:12–40.
40.
PulidoLaura. 2006. Black, brown, yellow, and left: Radical activism in Los Angeles. Berkeley: University of California Press
41.
PurcellMark. 2001. Metropolitan political reorganization as a politics of urban growth: The case of San Fernando Valley secession. Political Geography20:613–33.
42.
RiceKathrynWaldnerLeoraSmithRussell M.. 2014. Why new cities form: An examination into municipal incorporation in the United States, 1950–2010. Journal of Planning Literature29:140–54.
43.
RiderMark W.1992. The political economy of metropolitan fragmentation in an economy with tastes for association. Atlanta: Georgia State University.
44.
RigosPlaton N.SpindlerChaarles J.. 1991. Municipal incorporation and state statutes: A state-level analysis. State & Local Government Review23:76–81.
45.
RuskDavid. 2003. Cities without suburbs. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press.
46.
SchmandtHenry J.1961. The municipal incorporation trend, 1950-1960. Madison: Bureau of Government Research and Advisory Service, University Extension Division, University of Wisconsin.
SmithRussell M.2011. City limits? The impact of annexation on the frequency of municipal incorporation in North Carolina. Southeastern Geographer51:422–42.
49.
SmithRussell M.DebbageKeith G.. 2006. Where are the geographers? Newly incorporated municipalities (NIMs) in the southeast. Geographical Bulletin48:109–21.
50.
SmithRussell M.DebbageKeith G.. 2011. Spatial distribution of newly incorporated municipalities (NIMs) and related socio-economic characteristics: A national comparison to cohort cities. Urban Geography32:568–88.
51.
StauberRichard L.1965. New cities in America; a census of municipal incorporations in the United States, 1950-1960. Lawrence: Governmental Research Center, University of Kansas.
52.
St. JohnCraigClymerRobert. 2000. Racial residential segregation by level of socioeconomic status. Social Science Quarterly81:701–715.
53.
TeafordJon C.1979. City and suburb: The political fragmentation of metropolitan America, 1850-1970. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
54.
TeafordJon C.1997. Post-suburbia: Government and politics in the edge cities. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
55.
TieboutCharles M.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy64:416–24.
56.
TkachevaOlesya. 2008. New cities, local officials, and municipal incorporation laws: A supply-side model of city formation. Journal of Urban Affairs30:155–74.
WaldnerLeoraSmithRussell M.. 2015. The great defection: How new city clusters form to escape county governance. Public Administration Quarterly39:171–219.
61.
WeiherGregory R.1991. The fractured metropolis: Political fragmentation and metropolitan segregation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
62.
WoodRandall B.1983. Integration, exclusion, or segregation? The “color line” in Kansas, 1878-1900. The Western Historical Quarterly14:181–98.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
