Most existing reviews on spatial mismatch have focused on its causes and consequences rather than the successes and failures of planning practices for addressing this problem. This review article contributes to the literature by classifying spatial mismatch mitigation strategies into four groups and evaluating the successes and failures of each strategy group. The evaluation finds that empirical evidence on most strategies is inconsistent and the effectiveness of those strategies remains unclear, yet research examining car ownership programs consistently shows positive effects. The article concludes by recommending planners to expand their support for car ownership programs, test the effectiveness of the more recent, coordinated policy programs, and pay attention to nonspatially related employment barriers such as discrimination, social support, and human capital factors.
AllardS. W.DanzigerS.. 2002. “Proximity and Opportunity: How Residence and Race Affect the Employment of Welfare Recipients.”Housing Policy Debate13: 675–700.
2.
AllenG. E.FittsJ. J.1981E. S. Glatt.. “The Experimental Housing Allowance Program.” In Do Housing Allowances Work? edited by BradburyK. L.DownsA., 1–6. Washington, DC: Brookings.
3.
AlwittL. F.DonleyT.. 1996. The Low-Income Consumer: Adjusting the Balance of Exchange. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
BaniaN.LeeteL.CoultonC.. 2008. “Job Access, Employment and Earnings: Outcomes for Welfare Leavers in a US Urban Labour Market.”Urban Studies45: 2179–202.
5.
BansakC.MattsonH.RiceL.. 2010. “Cars, Employment, and Single Mothers: The Effect of Welfare Asset Restrictions.”Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society49: 321–45.
6.
BaumC. L.2009. “The Effects of Vehicle Ownership on Employment.”Journal of Urban Economics66: 151–63.
7.
BaxamusaM. H.2008. “Empowering Communities through Deliberation the Model of Community Benefits Agreements.”Journal of Planning Education and Research27: 261–76.
8.
BerkeP.KaiserE. J.. 2006. Urban Land Use Planning. 5th ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
9.
BlumenbergE.2004. “En-Gendering Effective Planning: Spatial Mismatch, Low-Income Women, and Transportation Policy.”Journal of the American Planning Association70: 269–81.
10.
BlumenbergE.HaasP.. 2002. “The Travel Behavior and Needs of the Poor: A Study of Welfare Recipients in Fresno County, California.”San Jose, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute.
11.
BlumenbergE.ManvilleM.. 2004. “Beyond the Spatial Mismatch: Welfare Recipients and Transportation Policy.”Journal of Planning Literature19: 182–205.
12.
BlumenbergE.OngP.MondscheinA.. 2002. Uneven Access to Opportunities: Welfare Recipients, Jobs, and Employment Support Services in Los Angeles(No. UCTC No 545). Berkeley, CA: The University of California Transportation Center.
13.
BoarnetM. G.2001. “Enterprise Zones and Job Creation: Linking Evaluation and Practice.”Economic Development Quarterly15: 242–54.
14.
BoarnetM. G.BogartW. T.. 1996. “Enterprise Zones and Employment: Evidence from New Jersey.”Journal of Urban Economics40: 198–215.
15.
BoarnetM. G.CraneR.. 2001. Travel by Design: The Influence of Urban form on Travel. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
BondonioD.GreenbaumR. T.. 2007. “Do Local Tax Incentives Affect Economic Growth? What Mean Impacts Miss in the Analysis of Enterprise Zone Policies.”Regional Science and Urban Economics37: 121–36.
17.
BriggsX. D. S.1997. “Moving up versus Moving out: Neighborhood Effects in Housing Mobility Programs.”Housing Policy Debate8: 195–234.
18.
CerveroR.SandovalO.LandisJ.. 2002. “Transportation as a Stimulus of Welfare-to-Work: Private versus Public Mobility.”Journal of Planning Education and Research22: 50–63.
19.
CerveroR.TsaiY. H. (2003). Job access and reverse commuting initiatives in California - Review and assessment. Sustainability and Environmental Concerns in Transportation 2003, (1859), pp. 79–86.
20.
ChappleK.2001. “Time To Work: Job Search Strategies and Commute Time for Women on Welfare in San Francisco.”Journal of Urban Affairs23: 155–73.
21.
ChappleK.2006. “Overcoming Mismatch: Beyond Dispersal, Mobility, and Development Strategies.”Journal of the American Planning Association72: 322–36.
22.
CliftonK. J.2004. “Mobility Strategies and Food Shopping for Low-Income Families.”Journal of Planning Education and Research23: 402–13.
23.
CorcoranM. E.HeflinC.. 2003. “Barriers to Work among Recipients of Housing Assistance.”Cityscape6: 73–87.
24.
CourchesneC.2004. “What Regional Agenda?: Reconciling Massachusetts's Affordable Housing Law and Environmental Protection.”Harvard Environmental Law Review28: 215–47.
25.
CoveE.TurnerM. A.BriggsX. d. S.DuarteC.. 2008. Can Escaping from Poor Neighborhoods Increase Employment and Earnings?Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
26.
DabneyD. Y.1991. “Do Enterprise Zone Incentives Affect Business Location Decisions?”Economic Development Quarterly5: 325–34.
27.
DawkinsC. J.2004. “Recent Evidence on the Continuing Causes of Black-White Residential Segregation.”Journal of Urban Affairs26: 379–400.
28.
DownsA.1999. “Some Realities about Sprawl and Urban Decline.”Housing Policy Debate10: 955–74.
29.
ElveryJ. A.2009. “The Impact of Enterprise Zones on Resident Employment: An Evaluation of the Enterprise Zone Programs of California and Florida.”Economic Development Quarterly23: 44–59.
30.
EricksonR. A.WasylenkoM.. 1980. “Firm Relocation and Site Selection in Suburban Municipalities.”Journal of Urban Economics8: 69–85.
31.
FanY.2010. “Reexamining Contemporary Urbanism in the United States: Convenient Mix of the Old and New.”Environment and Planning A42: 2897–913.
32.
FanY.KhattakA.. 2008. “Urban Form, Individual Spatial Footprints, and Travel: Examination of Space-Use Behavior.”Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2082: 98–106.
33.
FarleyR.FieldingE.KrysanM.. 1997. “The Residential Preferences of Blacks and Whites: A Four Metropolis Analysis.”Housing Policy Debate8: 763–800.
34.
FisherP. S.PetersA. H.. 1997. “Tax and Spending Incentives and Enterprise Zones.”New England Economic Review, March/April: 110–137.
35.
FletcherC.GaraskyS.NielsenR.. 2005. “Transportation Hardship: Are You Better off with a Car?”Journal of Family and Economic Issues26: 323–43.
36.
Foster-BeyJ. 2002. “Sprawl, Smart Growth and Economic Opportunity.” Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, http://www.urban.org/uploadedpdf/410536_sprawlandequity.pdf.
37.
FriedenB. J.SagalynL. B.. 1989. Downtown, Inc.: How America Rebuilds Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
GalsterG.1997. “Comparing Demand-Side and Supply-Side Housing Policies: Sub-Market and Spatial Perspectives.”Housing Studies12: 561–77.
39.
GalsterG.TatianP.SmithR.. 1999. “The Impact of Neighbors who Use Section 8 Certificates on Property Values.”Housing Policy Debate10: 879–917.
40.
GaraskyS.FletcherC. N.JensenH. H.. 2006. “Transiting to Work: The Role of Private Transportation for Low-Income Households.”Journal of Consumer Affairs40: 64–89.
41.
GarnettN. S.2001. “The Road from Welfare to Work: Informal Transportation and the Urban Poor.”Harvard Journal on Legislation38: 173–229.
42.
GlaeserE. L.HanushekE. A.QuigleyJ. M.. 2004. “Opportunities, Race, and Urban Location: The Influence of John Kain.”Journal of Urban Economics56: 70–79.
43.
GlaeserE. L.KahnM. E.. 2001. Decentralized Employment and the Transformation of the American City. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
44.
GlaeserE. L.KahnM. E.RappaportJ.. 2008. “Why do the Poor Live in Cities? The Role of Public Transportation.”Journal of Urban Economics63: 1–24.
45.
GobillonL.SelodH.ZenouY.. 2007. “The Mechanisms of Spatial Mismatch.”Urban Studies44: 2401–27.
46.
GoetzE. G.2002. “Forced Relocation vs. Voluntary Mobility: The Effects of Dispersal Programmes on Households.”Housing Studies17: 107–23.
47.
GoetzE. G.LamH. K.HeitlingerA.. 1996. There Goes the Neighborhood? The Impact of Subsidized Multifamily Housing on Urban Neighborhoods. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota.
48.
GoldbergH.2001. State and County Supported Car Ownership Programs can Help Low-income Families Secure and Keep Jobs. Washington DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
49.
GordonP.RichardsonH. W.. 1997. “Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal?”Journal of the American Planning Association63: 95–106.
50.
GreenbaumR. T.EngbergJ. B.. 2004. “The Impact of State Enterprise Zones on Urban Manufacturing Establishments.”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management23: 315–39.
51.
GrengsJ.2010. “Job Accessibility and the Modal Mismatch in Detroit.”Journal of Transport Geography18: 42–54.
52.
GuilianoG.2005. “Low Income, Public Transit, and Mobility.”Journal of the Transportation Research Board1927: 63–70.
53.
GurleyT.BruceD.. 2005. “The Effects of Car Access on Employment Outcomes for Welfare Recipients.”Journal of Urban Economics58: 250–72.
54.
HancockA.-M.2004. The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity of the Welfare Queen. New York: New York University Press.
55.
HanlonB.VicinoT.ShortJ. R.. 2006. “The New Metropolitan Reality in the US: Rethinking the Traditional Model.”Urban Studies43: 2129–43.
56.
HodgeD. C.1996. “And In Conclusion: ‘It Depends’”. The Professional Geographer48: 417–9.
57.
HodgsonG. M.2003. “Capitalism, Complexity, and Inequality.”Journal of Economic Issues37: 471–8.
58.
HolzerH. J.1991. “The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: What Has the Evidence Shown?”Urban Studies28: 105–22.
59.
HolzerH. J.1994. “Black-Employment Problems—New Evidence, Old Questions.”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management13: 699–22.
60.
HolzerH. J.1996. What Employers Want: Job Prospects for Less-Educated Workers. New York: Russell Sage.
61.
HoustonD. S.2005a. “Employability, Skills Mismatch and Spatial Mismatch in Metropolitan Labour Markets.”Urban Studies42: 221–43.
62.
HoustonD. S.2005b. “Methods to Test the Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis.”Economic Geography81: 407–34.
63.
IhlanfeldtK. R.SjoquistD. L.. 1998. “The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: A Review of Recent Studies and Their Implications for Welfare Reform.”Housing Policy Debate9: 849–92.
64.
ImmergluckD.1998. Neighborhood Jobs, Race, and Skills: Urban Unemployment and Commuting. New York: Garland.
65.
JaretC.AdelmanR. M.ReidL. W.. 2006. “Suburban Sprawl, Racial Segregation, and Spatial Mismatch in Metropolitan America.”Sociation Today4. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Sociological Association.
66.
JargowskyP. A.2002. “Sprawl, Concentration of Poverty, and Urban Inequality.” In Urban Sprawl: Causes, Consequences, & Policy Responses, edited by SquiresG. D.ix, 364. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
67.
JarrettR. L.BurtonL. M.. 1999. “Dynamic Dimensions of Family-Structure in Low-Income African American families: Emergent Themes in Qualitative Research.”Journal of Comparative Family Studies30: 177.
68.
JencksC.MayerS. E.. 1990. “Residential Segregation, Job Proximity, and Black Job Opportunities.” In Inner-City Poverty in the United States, edited by LawrenceJ.LynnE.McGrearyM. G. H., 187–222. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
69.
JonesP. M. (1987). “Mobility and the Individual in Western Industrial Society.” In Transportation Planning in a Changing World, edited by NijkampP.ReichmanS., xii, 340. Aldershot, England: Gower in association with the European Science Foundation.
KainJ.1968. “Housing Segregation, Negro Employment, and Metropolitan Decentralization.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics82: 175–97.
72.
KainJ.1992. “The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: Three Decades Later.”Housing Policy Debate3: 371–460.
73.
KawabataM.2002. Job Access and Work Among Autoless Adults on Welfare in Los Angeles. Los Angeles, CA: The Ralph and Goldy Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies, UCLA.
74.
KawabataM.2003. “Job Access and Employment Among Low-Skilled Autoless Workers in US Metropolitan Areas.”Environment and Planning A35: 1651–68.
75.
KeelsM.DuncanG. J.DelucaS.MendenhallR.RosenbaumJ.. 2005. “Fifteen Years Later: Can Residential Mobility Programs Provide a Long-Term Escape from Neighborhood Segregation, Crime, and Poverty?”Demography42: 51–73.
76.
KirschenmanJ.NeckermanK. M.. 1991. “We’d Love to Hire them, but.” The Meaning of Race for Employers.” In The Urban Underclass, Edited by JencksC.PetersonP. E., 203–32. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
77.
KleitR. G.2001. “The Role of Neighborhood Social Networks in Scattered-Site Public Housing Residents’ Search for Jobs.”Housing Policy Debate12: 541–73.
78.
KleitR. G.2002. “Job Search Networks and Strategies in Scattered-Site Public Housing.”Housing Studies17: 83–100.
KneeboneE.GarrE.. 2010. The Suburbanization of Poverty: Trends in Metropolitan America, 2000 to 2008. The Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Opportunity Series, No. 4.
82.
KorsuE.WenglenskiS.. 2010. “Job Accessibility, Residential Segregation and Risk of Long-term Unemployment in the Paris Region.”Urban Studies 47: 2279–324.
83.
LaddH. F. 1994. “Spatially Targeted Economic Development Strategies: Do They Work?”Cityscape1: 193–218.
84.
LaneJ.MikelsonK. S.SharkeyP. T.WissokerD. A.. 2001. Low-Income and Low-Skilled Workers’ Involvement in Nonstandard Employment. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, Prepared for U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=410374.
85.
LeeC. M.CulhaneD. P.WachterS. M.. 1999. “The Differential Impacts of Federally Assisted Housing Programs on Nearby Property Values: A Philadelphia Case Study.”Housing Policy Debate10: 75–93.
86.
LeventhalT.Brooks-GunnJ.. 2003. “New York City Site Findings: The Early Impacts of Moving to Opportunity on Children and Youth.” In Choosing a Better Life: Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity Social Experiment, edited by GoeringJ.FeinsJ. D., 213–43. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
87.
LichtenwalterS.KoeskeG.SalesE.. 2006. “Examining Transportation and Employment Outcomes: Evidence for Moving Beyond The Bus Pass.”Journal of Poverty10: 93–115.
88.
LucasM. T.NicholsonC. F.. 2003. “Subsidized Vehicle Acquisition and Earned Income in the Transition from Welfare to Work.”Transportation30: 483–501.
89.
LucyW. H.PhillipsD. L.. 2001. Suburbs and the Census: Patterns of Growth and Decline. Washington, DC: Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Brookings Institution.
90.
LudwigJ.DuncanG. J.PinkstonJ. C.. 2004. “Housing Mobility Programs and Economic Self-Sufficiency: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.”Journal of Public Economics89: 131–56.
91.
MartinR.2001. “The Adjustment of Black Residents to metropolitan Employment Shifts: How Persistent is Spatial Mismatch?”Journal of Urban Economics50: 52–76.
92.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A.. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
93.
McClureK.2004. “Section 8 and movement to job opportunity: Experience after welfare reform in Kansas City.”Housing Policy Debate15: 99–131.
94.
McLaffertyS.PrestonV.. 1996a. “Spatial Mismatch and Employment in a Decade of Restructuring.”The Professional Geographer48: 420–31.
95.
McLaffertyS.PrestonV.. 1996b. “Spatial Mismatch and Employment in a Decade of Restructuring.”The Professional Geographer48: 420–31.
96.
MossP.TillyC.. 1991. Why Black Men are Doing Worse in the Labor Market: A Review Of Supply-Side and Demand-Side Explanations. New York: SSRC.
NelsonA. C.DuncanJ. B.. 1996. Growth Management Principles and Practice. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
100.
NelsonA. C.PendallR.DawkinsC. J.KnaapG. J.. 2004. “The Link between Growth Managment and Housing Affordability: The Acedemic Evidence.” In Growth Management and Affordable Housing: Do they Conflict?, edited by DownsA.ix, 290. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
O’ReganK. M.QuigleyJ. M.. 1998. “Cars for the Poor.”Access 12: 20–25.
103.
OakleyD.TsaoH.-S.. 2006. “A New Way of Revitalizing Distressed Urban Communities? Assessing the Impact of the Federal Empowerment Zone Program.”Journal of Urban Affairs28: 443–71.
104.
OngP. M.2002. “Car Ownership and Welfare-to-Work.”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management21: 239–52.
105.
OngP. M.HoustonD.. 2002. “Transit, Employment and Women on Welfare.”Urban Geography23: 344–64.
106.
OngP. M.MillerD.. 2005. “Spatial and Transportation Mismatch in Los Angeles.”Journal of Planning Education and Research25: 43–56.
107.
OrrL.,FeinsJ. D.JacobR.BeecroftE.SanbonmatsuL.KatzL. F.2003. Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing: Interim Impacts Evaluation. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development & Research.
108.
PapkeL. E.1994. “Tax Policy and Urban Development: Evidence from the Indiana Enterprise Zone Program.”Journal of Public Economics54: 37–49.
109.
ParksV.2004. “Access to Work: The Effects of Spatial and Social Accessibility on Unemployment for Native-Born Black and Immigrant Women in Los Angeles.”Economic Geography80: 141–72.
110.
PastorM. J.AdamsA. R.. 1996. “Keeping Down with the Joneses: Neighbors, Networks, and Wages.”Review of Regional Studies26: 115–45.
111.
PendallR.1999. “Opposition to Housing - NIMBY and Beyond.”Urban Affairs Review35: 112–36.
112.
PendallR.2000. “Why Voucher and Certificate Users Live in Distressed Neighborhoods.”Housing Policy Debate11: 881–910.
113.
PetersA. H.FisherP. S.. 2002. State Enterprise Zone Programs: Have they Worked?Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
114.
PetersA. H.FisherP. S.. 2004. “The Failures of Economic Development Incentives.”Journal of the American Planning Association70: 27–37.
115.
PhillipsJ.GoodsteinE.. 2000. “Growth Management and Housing Prices: the Case of Portland, Oregon.”Contemporary Economic Policy18: 334–44.
116.
PopkinS. J.BuronL. F.LevyD. K.CunninghamM. K.. 2000. “The Gautreaux Legacy: What Might Mixed-Income and Dispersal Strategies Mean for the Poorest Public Housing Tenants?”Housing Policy Debate11: 911–42.
117.
PopkinS. J.RosenbaumJ. E.MeadenP. M.. 1993. “Labor Market Experiences of Low-Income Black Women in Middle-Class Suburbs: Evidence from a Survey of Gautreaux Program Participants.”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management12: 556–73.
118.
PowellJ.1999. “Race, Poverty, and Urban Sprawl: Access to Opportunities through Regional Strategies.”Forum for Social Economics28: 1–20.
119.
PowellL. M.SlaterS.MirtchevaD.BaoY.ChaloupkaF. J.. 2007. Food Store Availability and Neighborhood Characteristics in the United States. Preventive Medicine44: 189–95.
120.
PresserH. B.CoxA. G.. 1997. “The Work Schedules of Low-Educated American Women and Welfare Reform.”Monthly Labor Review120: 25–34.
121.
PrestonV.McLaffertyS.. 1999. “Spatial Mismatch Research in the 1990 s: Progress and Potential.”Papers in Regional Science78: 387–402.
122.
PrestonV.McLaffertyS.LiuX. F.. 1998. “Geographical Barriers to Employment for American-born and Immigrant Workers.”Urban Studies35: 529–45.
123.
QuillianL.2002. “Why is Black-White Residential Segregation so Persistent?: Evidence on Three Theories from Migration Data.”Social Science Research31: 197–229.
124.
RaphaelS.1998. “The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis and Black Youth Joblessness: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area.”Journal of Urban Economics43: 79–111.
125.
RaphaelS.RiceL.. 2002. “Car Ownership, Employment, and Earnings.”Journal of Urban Economics52: 109–30.
ReardonS. F.FarrellC. R.MatthewsS. A.O’SullivanD.BischoffK.FirebaughG.. 2009. “Race and space in the 1990s: Changes in the geographic scale of racial residential segregation, 1990-2000.”Social Science Research38: 57–72.
RosenbaumJ. E.1991. “Black Pioneers-Do their Moves to the Suburbs Increase Economic Opportunity for Mothers and Children?”Housing Policy Debate2: 1179–214.
130.
RosenbaumJ. E.. 1992. “Why Working Families need a Car.” In The Car and the City: The Automobile, the Built Environment, and Daily Urban Life, edited by WachsM.CrawfordM., xx, 325. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
131.
RosenbaumJ. E.. 1995. “Changing the Geography of Opportunity by Expanding Residential Choice–Lessons from the Gautreaux Program.”Housing Policy Debate6: 231–69.
132.
RosenbaumJ. E.HarrisL.. 2001. “Residential Mobility and Opportunities: Early Impacts of the Moving to Opportunity Demonstration Program in Chicago.”Housing Policy Debate12: 321–46.
133.
RosenbaumJ. E.PopkinS. J.. 1991. “Employment and Earnings of Low-Income Blacks Who Move to Middle-Class Suburbs.” In The Urban Underclass, edited by JencksC.PetersonP. E., xiv, 490. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
RosenbloomS.FieldingG. J.. 1998. Transit Markets of the Future: The Challenge of Change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
136.
RoyK. M.TubbsC. Y.BurtonL. M.. 2004. “Don’t Have No Time: Daily Rhythms and the Organization of Time for Low-Income Families.”Family Relations53: 168–78.
137.
RuckerC. J.2006. “Landing a Job in Urban Space: The Extent and Effects of Spatial Mismatch.”Regional Science and Urban Economics36: 331–72.
138.
SanchezT. W.2008. “Poverty, Policy, and Public Transportation.”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice42: 833–41.
SanchezT. W.ShenQ.PengZ.-R. 2004. “Transit Mobility, Jobs Access and Low-income Labour Participation in US Metropolitan Areas.”Urban Studies41: 1313–31.
141.
SchillM. H. 1992. “Federal Role in Reducing Regualtory Barriers to Affordable Housing in the Suburbs.”Journal of Law and Politics8: 703–30.
142.
SchorJ.1998. The Overspent American: Upscaling, Downshifting, and the New Consumer. 1st ed. New York: Basic Books.
143.
SchwartzA. F.2006. Housing Policy in the United States: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
144.
SenA.MetaxatosP.SootS.ThakuriahV.. 1999. “Welfare Reform and Spatial Matching between Clients and Jobs.”Papers in Regional Science78: 195–211.
145.
ShenQ.2001. “A Spatial Analysis of Job Openings and Access in a U.S. Metropolitan Area.”Journal of the American Planning Association67: 53–68.
146.
ShroderM.2002. “Does Housing Assistance Perversely Affect Self-Sufficiency? A Review Essay.”Journal of Housing Economics11: 381–417.
147.
SpencerJ. H.2004. “People, Places, and Policy: A Politically Relevant Framework for Efforts to Reduce Concentrated Poverty.”Policy Studies Journal32: 545–68.
TaylorB. D.OngP. M.. 1995. “Spatial Mismatch or Automobile Mismatch? An Examination of Race, Residence and Commuting in US Metropolitan Areas.”Urban Studies32: 1453–73.
151.
TeafordJ. C.2000. “Urban Renewal and its Aftermath.”Housing Policy Debate11: 443–65.
152.
TegelerP. 2007. “Connecting Families to Opportunity: The Next Generation of Housing Mobility Policy.” In All Things Being Equal: Instigating Opportunity in an Inequitable Time, edited by SmedleyB.Jenkins, 79–95A.. New York, NY: The New Press.
153.
ThakuriahP. 2011. “Variations in Employment Transportation Outcomes: Role of Site-Level Factors.”Papers in Regional Science. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00371.x.
154.
ThakuriahPMetaxatosP.. 2000. “Effect of Residential Location and Access to Transportation on Employment Opportunities.”Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1726: 24–32.
155.
The Urban Institute. 2002. Discrimination in Metropolitan Housing Markets: National Results from Phase I of HDS2000. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
156.
TurnerM. A.1998. “Moving Out of Poverty: Expanding Mobility and Choice through Tenant-Based Housing Assistance.”Housing Policy Debate9: 373–94.
157.
TurnerM. A.BriggsX. D. S.. 2008. Assisted Housing Mobility and the Success of Low-Income Minority Families: Lessons for Policy, Practice, and Future Research. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
US Government Accountability Office. 1998. Welfare Reform: Transportation's Role in Moving From Welfare to Work. Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office.
161.
US Government Accountability Office. 2006. “Empowerment Zone and Enterprise Community program: Improvements Occurred in Communities, but the Effect of the Program Is Unclear,”http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06727.pdf.
162.
US Government Accountability Office. 2010. “Revitalization Programs: Empowerment Zones, Enterprise Communities, and Renewal Communities,”http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10464r.pdf.
163.
VaradyD. P.WalkerC. C.. 2000. “Vouchering Out Distressed Subsidized Developments: Does Moving Lead to Improvements in Housing and Neighborhood Conditions?”Housing Policy Debate11: 115–62.
164.
WangF.2003. “Job Proximity and Accessibility for Workers of Various Wage Groups.”Urban Geography24: 253–71.
165.
WeberJ.SultanaS.. 2008. “Employment Speawl, Race and the Journey to Work in Birmingham, Alabama.”Southeastern Geographer48: 53–74.
166.
WheelerC. H.2008. “Urban Decentralization and Income Inequality: Is Sprawl Associated with Rising Income Segregation Across Neighborhoods?”Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Regional Economis Development4: 41–57.
167.
WheelerL. A.1990. A Review of the Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: Its Impact on the Current Plight of the Central City of the United States. Syracuse, NY: Metropolitan Studies Program, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University.
168.
WilderM. G.RubinB. M.. 1996. “Rhetoric Versus Reality–A Review of Studies on State Enterprise Zone Programs.”Journal of the American Planning Association62: 473–91.
169.
YiC.2006. “Impact of Public Transit on Employment Status: Disaggregate Analysis of Houston, Texas.”Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1986: 137–44.
170.
ZhanM.2007. “Assets, Human Capital Development, and Economic Mobility of Single Mothers.”Families in Society-the Journal of Contemporary Social Services88: 605–15.
