This article makes a case for why natural hazard mitigation planning researchers should extend their focus beyond planning agencies to individual planners and the influence they can have on fostering hazard mitigation in new development projects. Building on existing literature and personal interview data, the author explores particular facets of the current status of land use planning practice that can be expected to provide room for planners to exercise discretion to promote hazard mitigation. The author then proposes hypotheses regarding the level of discretion associated with a set of land use tools and identifies directions for future research.
Berke, Philip R.1998. Reducing natural hazard risks through state growth management . Journal of the American Planning Association64:76-87.
2.
Berke, Philip, Michael Backhurst, Maxine Day, Neil Ericksen, Lucie Laurian, Jan Crawford, and Jennifer Dixon.2006. What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand. Environment and Planning B33:581-600.
3.
Berke, Philip R., and Steven P. French .1994. The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research13:237-50.
4.
Berke, Philip, Joseph MacDonald, Nancy White, Michael Holmes, Dan Line, Kat Oury, and Rhonda Ryznar.2003. Greening development to protect watersheds: Does new urbanism make a difference?Journal of the American Planning Association69:397-413.
5.
Berke, Philip R., Yan Song, and Mark Stevens.2009. Integrating hazard mitigation into New Urban and conventional developments. Journal of Planning Education and Research28:441-55.
6.
Brody, Samuel D., Jung E. Kang, and Sarah Bernhardt .2010. Identifying factors influencing flood mitigation at the local level in Texas and Florida: The role of organizational capacity. Natural Hazards52:167-84.
7.
Burby, Raymond J.2001. Involving citizens in hazard mitigation planning: Making the right choices. Australian Journal of Emergency Management16:45-51.
8.
---. 2005. Have state comprehensive planning mandates reduced insured losses from natural disasters? Natural Hazards Review6:67-81.
9.
Burby, Raymond J., Timothy Beatley, Philip R. Berke, Robert E. Deyle, Steven P. French, David R. Godschalk, Edward J. Kaiser, Jack D. Kartez, Peter J. May, Robert Olshansky, Robert C. Paterson, and Rutherford H. Platt .1999. Unleashing the power of planning to create disaster-resilient communities. Journal of the American Planning Association65:247-58.
10.
Burby, Raymond J., with Beverly A. Cigler , Steven P. French, Edward J. Kaiser, Jack Kartez, Dale Roenigk, Dana Weist, and Dale Whittington.1991. Sharing environmental risks: How to control governments’ losses in natural disasters. Boulder: Westview Press.
11.
Burby, Raymond J., and Linda C. Dalton .1994. Plans can matter! The role of land use plans and state planning mandates in limiting the development of hazardous areas. Public Administration Review54:229-38.
12.
Burby, Raymond J., and Peter J. May , with Philip R. Berke, Linda C. Dalton, Steven P. French, and Edward J. Kaiser.1997. Making governments plan: State experiments in managing land use. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.
Dalton, Linda C.1986. Why the rational paradigm persists: The resistance of professional education and practice to alternative forms of planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research5:147-53.
14.
Dalton, Linda C., and Raymond J. Burby .1994. Mandates, plans, and planners: Building local commitment to development management. Journal of the American Planning Association60:444-61.
15.
Daniels, Tom.1997. Where does cluster zoning fit in farmland protection? Journal of the American Planning Association63:129-37.
16.
Edwards, George C., III.1980. Implementing public policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
17.
Forester, John.1987. Planning in the face of conflict: Negotiation and mediation strategies in local land use regulation. Journal of the American Planning Association53:303-14.
18.
Godschalk, David R., Edward J. Kaiser, and Philip R. Berke .1998. Integrating hazard mitigation and local land use planning, in Cooperating with nature: Confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities, ed. Raymond J. Burby.Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
19.
Heimer, Carol A.2008. Thinking about how to avoid thought: Deep norms, shallow rules, and the structure of attention. Regulation & Governance2:30-47.
20.
Kendig, Lane H.1982. Developers and performance zoning. Urban Land January:18-21.
21.
Kendig, Lane, with Susan Connor, Cranston Byrd, and Judy Heyman.1980. Performance zoning. Washington, DC: American Planning Association.
22.
Lipsky, Michael.1980. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
23.
Malone, Linda A.1990. Environmental regulation of land use. New York: Clark Boardman Company.
24.
May, Peter J., and Walter Williams .1986. Disaster policy implementation: Managing programs under shared governance. New York: Plenum Press.
25.
Meyers, Marcia K., and Susan Vorsanger .2003. Street-level bureaucrats and the implementation of public policy. In Handbook of public administration, ed. B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre.London: SAGE.
26.
Mileti, Dennis S.1999. Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington DC: Joseph Henry Press.
27.
Moore, Colleen G., and Cheryl Siskin.1985. PUDs in practice. Washington DC: The Urban Land Institute.
28.
Morris, Marya.1997. Subdivision design in flood hazard areas. Planning Advisory Service. Chicago: American Planning Association.
29.
Nakamura, Robert T., and Frank Smallwood .1980. The politics of policy implementation . New York: St. Martin’s Press .
30.
Petak, William J., and Arthur A. Atkisson .1982. Natural hazard risk assessment and public policy: Anticipating the unexpected. New York : Springer-Verlag.
31.
Peters, B. Guy, and Jon Pierre.2003. Introduction: The role of public administration in governing. In Handbook of public administration, ed. B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre.London: SAGE.
32.
Porter, Douglas R.1988. Flexible zoning: How it works. Urban Land April:6-11.
33.
---. 1996. Performance standards for growth management. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
34.
Porter, Douglas R., Patrick L. Phillips, and Terry J. Lassar .1988. Flexible zoning: How it works . Washington, DC: The Urban Land Institute.
35.
Sandfort, Jodi R.2000. Moving beyond discretion and outcomes: Examining public management from the front lines of the welfare system. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10:729-56.
36.
Song, Yan, Philip R. Berke, and Mark R. Stevens .2009. Smart developments in dangerous locations: A reality check of existing New Urbanist developments. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters27:1-24.
37.
Stevens, Mark R., Philip R. Berke, and Yan Song.2008. Protecting people and property: The influence of land-use planners on flood hazard mitigation in New Urbanist developments. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management51:737-57.
38.
---. 2010a. Creating disaster-resilient communities: Evaluating the promise and performance of New Urbanism. Landscape and Urban Planning94:105-15.
39.
---. 2010b. Public participation in local government review of development proposals in hazardous locations: Does it matter, and what do local government planners have to do with it?Environmental Management45:320-35.
40.
Stevens, Mark R., Yan Song, and Philip R. Berke .2010. New Urbanist developments in flood-prone areas: Safe development, or safe development paradox?Natural Hazards53:605-29.
41.
Tomioka, Seishiro, and Ellen M. Tomioka .1984. Planned unit developments: Design and regional impact. New York: John Wiley.
