Annexation is the most common and frequent type of local boundary adjustment. It is a complex process with significant implications for communities. This article summarizes past and recent scholarly research relating to the state requirements guiding annexation, and the fiscal impacts, local motivations, and social and political implications of the process. Its purpose is to integrate literature from across disciplines to better understand the many dimensions of annexation and the challenges that confront planners in planning for or reacting to boundary change. It concludes with suggestions for future research.
Aiken, Charles S.1987. Race as a factor in municipal underbounding. Annals of the Association of American Geographers77 (4): 564-79.
2.
Austin, D. Andrew.1999. Politics vs. economics: Evidence from municipal annexation . Journal of Urban Economics45:501-32.
3.
Blair, John P., and Samuel R. Staley .1996. The central city elasticity hypothesis. Journal of the American Planning Association62 (3): 345-53.
4.
Bollens, J.1949. Annexation of fringe areas. Public Management (April): 98-102.
5.
Breen, Eleanor, Frank Costa, and William Hendon.1986. Annexation: An economic analysis: Whether a small village or town should annex adjacent land as a cost/revenue problem . American Journal of Economics and Sociology45 (2):159-72.
6.
Bromley, David G., and Joel Smith.1973. The historical significance of annexation as a social process. Land Economics49 (3): 294-309.
7.
Brown, Bernard.1967/68. Municipal finances and annexation: A case study of post-war Houston. The Southwestern Social Sciences Quarterly48 (3): 339-51.
8.
Carr, Jered B., and Richard C. Feiock .2001. State annexation constraints and the frequency of municipal annexation. Political Research Quarterly54 (2): 459-70.
9.
Carruthers, John I., and Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson .2002. Fragmentation and sprawl: Evidence from interregional analysis. Growth and Change33:312-40.
10.
Cho, Y.H.1969. Fiscal implications of annexation: The case of metropolitan central cities in Texas. Land Economics (August):368-72.
11.
Cotrell, C.L., and R.M. Stevens.1979. The 1975 Voting Rights Act, annexation policy, and growth in the Sunbelt. The Urban Law Review3:1-37.
12.
Dusenbury, Patricia J.1980. Suburbs in the city: Municipal boundary changes in the southern states. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth Policies Board.
13.
Dye, T.R.1964. Urban political integration: Conditions associated with annexation in American cities. Midwest Journal of Political Science8:430-46.
14.
Edwards, Mary M.2001. Annexation: A "winner take all" process?State and Local Government Review31 (2): 221-31.
15.
Facer II, Rex.2006. Annexation activity and state law in the United States . Urban Affairs Review41 (5): 697-709.
16.
Fleischmann, Arnold.1986a. The goals and strategies of local boundary changes: Government organization or private gain?Journal of Urban Affairs21 (Fall): 63-75.
17.
---. 1986b. The politics of annexation: A preliminary assessment of competing paradigms. Social Science Quarterly67 (1): 128-42.
18.
Florestano, Patricia S., and Vincent L. Marando .1981. The states and the metropolis . New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
19.
Gabler, L.R.1971. Population size as a determinant of city expenditures and employment-Some further evidence. Land Economics (May): 130-38
20.
Galloway, Thomas D., and John D. Landis .1986. How cities expand: Does state law make a difference?Growth and Change17 (4): 25-45.
21.
Gonzalez, R.A., and Mehay, S.L.1987. Municipal annexation and local monopoly power. Public Choice52:244-55.
22.
Heim, Carol E.2006. Border wars: Tax revenue, annexation and urban growth in Phoenix. Amherst, MA: Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts.
23.
Hirschmann, A.O.1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to declines in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Hovey, Harold.1989. Financing state and local services. In A decade of devolution: Perspectives on state-local relations, edited by E. Blaine Liner.Washington DC: Urban Institute Press.
25.
Jackson, Kenneth T.1985. Crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Johnson, James H. Jr., Allan Parnell, Ann Moss Joyner, Carolyn J. Christman, and Ben Marsh.2004. Racial apartheid in a small North Carolina town. The Review of Black Political Economy31:89-107.
27.
Kelly, Eric D.1993. Managing community growth: Policies, techniques, and impacts . Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers .
28.
Knaap, Gerrit, and Steve Juelich.1992. The fiscal impacts of detachment: Is it better to give than to receive?State and Local Government Review (Winter): 28-35.
29.
Kotvol, Zenia, and John Mullin.2006. Fiscal impact analysis: Methods, cases, and intellectual debate. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Working Paper.
30.
Landis, J.1992. Do growth controls work? A new assessment. Journal of the American Planning Association58 (4): 489-508.
31.
---. 2006. Growth management revisited. Journal of the American Planning Association72 (4): 411-30.
32.
Lang, Robert, and Jennifer LeFurgy .2007. Boomburb "buildout": The future of development in large, fast-growing suburbs. Urban Affairs Review42 (4): 533-52.
33.
Lichter, Daniel T., Domenico Parisi, Steven Michael Grice, and Michael Taquino .2007. Municipal underbounding: Annexation and racial exclusion in small southern towns. Rural Sociology72 (1): 47-68.
34.
Lindsey, Greg.2004. Annexation activity and policy in the United States. In Redrawing local government boundaries, edited by John Meligrana (Vancouver, BC: The University of British Columbia Press).
35.
Liner, Gaines.1990. Annexation rates and institutional constraints. Growth and Change21 (4): 80-94.
36.
---. 1992. Annexation impact on municipal efficiency. The Review of Regional Studies22:75-87.
37.
Liner, Gaines H., and Rob Roy McGregor .2002. Optimal annexation. Applied Economics34:1477-85.
38.
MacManus, Susan, and Robert D. Thomas .1979. Expanding the tax base: Does annexation make a difference?The Urban Interest1 (2): 15-28.
39.
Mehay, Stephen L.1981. The expenditure effects of municipal annexation. Public Choice36:53-62.
40.
Meligrana, John.2007. Testing the elastic-cities concept within a nonmetropolitan environment: Evidence from British Columbia, Canada 1971-2001. Environment and Planning A39: 700-27.
41.
Miller, David.2002. The regional governing of metropolitan America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
42.
Miller, Joel.1984. Annexation: The outer limits of city growth. American Demographics (November): 31-35.
43.
Moeser, John V.1982. The politics of annexation: Oligarchic power in a southern city. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company.
44.
Muller, Thomas, and Grace Dawson.1973. The impact of annexation on city finances: A case study in Richmond, Virginia. Washington DC: The Urban Institute.
45.
---. 1976. The economic effects of annexation: A second case study in Richmond, Virginia. Washington DC: The Urban Institute.
46.
Murphy, Thomas P.1978. Race-base accounting: Assigning the costs and benefits of a racially motivated annexation. Urban Affairs Quarterly14 (2): 169-94.
47.
Mushkatel, Alvin H., and Linda G. Mushkatel .1978. Annexation policy: Remedy or problem?State and Local Government Review: 20-27.
48.
Mushkatel, Alvin H., L.A. Wilson II, and Linda G. Mushkatel .1973. A model of citizen response to annexation. Urban Affairs Quarterly9:139-63.
49.
National League of Cities.1966. Adjusting municipal boundaries: Law and practice. Washington DC: National League of Cities.
50.
Norman, John F., and Harry A. Green .1995. Annexation issues in Tennessee: A report to the 99th general assembly. TN: Nashville.
51.
Ostrom, V., C.M. Tiebout, and R. Warren1961. The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. The American Political Science Review55 (4): 831-42.
52.
Palmer, Jamie L., and Greg Lindsey.2001. Classifying state approaches to annexation . State and Local Government Review33 (1): 60-73.
53.
Palumbo, George.1983. City government expenditures and city government reality: A comment on Sjoquist. National Tax Journal36:249-51.
54.
Paytas, Jerry.2001. Does governance matter? The dynamics of metropolitan governance and competitiveness. Carnegie MellonCenter for Economic Development.
55.
Reynolds, Laurie.1992. Rethinking municipal annexation powers. The Urban Lawyer24 (2): 247-303.
56.
Rubin, Irene.1982. Running in the red: The political dynamics of urban fiscal stress. Albany: State University of New York Press.
57.
Rusk, David.1993. Cities without suburbs. Washington DC: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
58.
Sengstock, Frank D.1960. Annexation: A solution to the metropolitan area problem . Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Law School.
59.
Sjoquist, David L.1982. The effect of number of local governments on central city expense. National Tax Journal35:79-87.
60.
Smirnova, Olga, and Jerry Ingalls.2007. The influence of state annexation laws on the growth of selected southern cities. Southeastern Geographer47 (1): 71-85.
61.
Smith, J., D. Bromley, and K. Manton.1979. Changes in the coincidence of the boundaries and populations of central cities. Social Forces57:931-51.
62.
Spain, August O.1949. Politics of recent municipal annexation in Texas. The Southwestern Social Science Quarterly (June): 18-28.
63.
Steinbauer, Paula E., Betty J. Hudson, Harry W. Hayes, and Rex L. Facer II.2002. An assessment of municipal annexation in Georgia and the United States. Athens, GA : Carl Vinson Institute of Government, University of Georgia.
64.
Stephens, G.R. and Nelson Wikstrom .2000. Metropolitan government and governance: Theoretical perspectives, empirical analysis, and the future. New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
Thomas, Robert D.1984. Metropolitan structural development: the territorial imperative . Publius14:83-115.
66.
Tiebout, Charles M.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy64 (5): 416-24.
67.
Ulfarsson, Gudmundur F., and John I Carruthers .2006. The cycle of fragmentation and sprawl: A conceptual framework and empirical model. Environment and Planning B33:767-88.
68.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.2007. Boundary and annexation survey. Washington DC: US Bureau of the Census, Geography Division.
69.
Wheeler, Raymond H.1965. Annexation law and annexation success. Land Economics41:354-60.
70.
Williams, Oliver P.1971. Metropolitan political analysis. New York: Free Press.
71.
Wyatt, 1991. Report on annexation and local development in larger Wisconsin cities and villages, 1980-1991. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Towns Association.
