Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-8
Effect of processing conditions on the physical-chemical and mechanical properties of chitosan-alginate polyelectrolyte complex films for potential wound dressing application
The combination of chitosan and alginate leads to the formation of polyelectrolyte complexes (PECs) that have been mainly used for applications such as wound dressings in biomedical areas. However, processing conditions can affect the resulting complex structure, influencing the final material properties. This work aims to evaluate the influence of processing conditions on the physical-chemical and mechanical properties of chitosan-alginate PEC films for wound dressing applications. The study was carried out using a Box-Behnken design, with controlled variables including pH, agitation speed, amounts of crosslinker and plasticizer, and the type of acid used in chitosan solubilization. Response variables were thickness, liquid absorption capacity, water vapor barrier, and mechanical properties, which are important characteristics in defining the applicability of dressings. All studied factors, as well as their interactions, showed significant effects on the properties of interest. The mathematical models obtained for the studied properties did not have a predictive character but rather a qualitative one, providing a good insight into the behavior of these materials regarding the modification of the evaluated experimental conditions, which strongly influence the characteristics of chitosan-alginate PEC films. Additional swelling and FTIR analyses performed for a selected sub-set of samples confirmed, respectively: (i) the high equilibrium values and stability at the equilibrium of the films regarding liquid absorption for both water and PBS; (ii) no degradation of the chitosan and alginate functional groups or loss of interaction between them under the considered processing conditions.
MehmandostNSorianoMLLucenaR, et al.Recycled polystyrene-cotton composites, giving a second life to plastic residues for environmental remediation. J Environ Chem Eng2019; 7: 103424.
2.
MogosanuGDGrumezescuAM. Natural and synthetic polymers for wounds and burns dressing. Int J Pharm2014; 463: 127–136.
3.
BaiMYChenMCYuWC, et al.Foam dressing incorporating herbal extract: an all-natural dressing for potential use in wound healing. J Bioact Compat Polym2017; 32: 293–308.
4.
MuxikaAEtxabideAUrangaJ, et al.Chitosan as a bioactive polymer: processing, properties and applications. Int J Biol Macromol2017; 105: 1358–1368.
5.
D’AyalaGGMalinconicoMLaurienzoP. Marine derived polysaccharides for biomedical applications: chemical modification approaches. Molecules2008; 13: 2069–2106.
6.
MndlovuHdu ToitLCKumarP, et al.Development of a fluid-absorptive alginate-chitosan bioplatform for potential application as a wound dressing. Carbohydr Polym2019; 222: 114988.
7.
RinaudoM. Main properties and current applications of some polysaccharides as biomaterials. Polym Int2008; 57: 397–430.
8.
PotaśJSzymańskaEWinnickaK. Challenges in developing of chitosan – based polyelectrolyte complexes as a platform for mucosal and skin drug delivery. Eur Polym J2020; 140: 110020.
9.
PiresALRMottaLde ADiasAMA, et al.Towards wound dressings with improved properties: effects of poly(dimethylsiloxane) on chitosan-alginate films loaded with thymol and beta-carotene. Mater Sci Eng C2018; 93: 595–605.
10.
KulkarniADVanjariYHSanchetiKH, et al.Polyelectrolyte complexes: mechanisms, critical experimental aspects, and applications. Artif Cells, Nanomed Biotechnol2016; 44: 1615–1625.
11.
MekaVSSingMKGPichikaMR, et al.A comprehensive review on polyelectrolyte complexes. Drug Discov Today2017; 22: 1697–1706.
HartigSMGreeneRRDasGuptaJ, et al.Multifunctional nanoparticulate polyelectrolyte complexes. Pharm Res2007; 24: 2353–2369.
14.
LuoYWangQ. Recent development of chitosan-based polyelectrolyte complexes with natural polysaccharides for drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol2014; 64: 353–367.
TsuchidaEAbeK. Interactions between macromolecules in solution and intermacromolecular complexes. In: TsuchidaE.AbeK. (eds) Advances in Polymer Science. Berlin: Springer-Verla, 1982, pp. 1–125.
17.
WebsterLHuglinMBRobbID. Complex formation between polyelectrolytes in dilute aqueous solution. Polymer (Guildf)1997; 38: 1373–1380.
18.
WuDZhuLLiY, et al.Chitosan-based colloidal polyelectrolyte complexes for drug delivery: a review. Carbohydr Polym; 238. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116126, Epub ahead of print 2020.
19.
SchatzCDomardAVitonC, et al.Versatile and efficient formation of colloids of biopolymer-based polyelectrolyte complexes. Biomacromolecules2004; 5: 1882–1892.
20.
MoeiniAPedramPMakvandiP, et al.Wound healing and antimicrobial effect of active secondary metabolites in chitosan-based wound dressings: a review. Carbohydr Polym2020; 233: 115839.
21.
AbruzzoABigucciFCerchiaraT, et al.Chitosan/alginate complexes for vaginal delivery of chlorhexidine digluconate. Carbohydr Polym2013; 91: 651–658.
22.
WasupalliGKVermaD. Molecular interactions in self-assembled nano-structures of chitosan-sodium alginate based polyelectrolyte complexes. Int J Biol Macromol2018; 114: 10–17.
23.
MüllerMKeßlerBFröhlichJ, et al.Polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles of poly(ethyleneimine) and poly(acrylic acid): preparation and applications. Polymers2011; 3: 762–778.
24.
AnkerforsCOndaralSWågbergL, et al.Using jet mixing to prepare polyelectrolyte complexes : complex properties and their interaction with silicon oxide surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci2010; 351: 88–95.
25.
YilmazTMaldonadoLTurasanH, et al.Thermodynamic mechanism of particulation of sodium alginate and chitosan polyelectrolyte complexes as a function of charge ratio and order of addition. J Food Eng2019; 254: 42–50.
26.
SchatzCLucasJMVitonC, et al.Formation and properties of positively charged colloids based on polyelectrolyte complexes of biopolymers. Langmuir2004; 20: 7766–7778.
27.
Castel-MolieresMConzattiGTorrisaniJ, et al.Influence of homogenization technique and blend ratio on chitosan/alginate polyelectrolyte complex properties. J Med Biol Eng2018; 38: 10–21.
28.
RodriguesAPSanchezEMSCostaAC, et al.The influence of preparation conditions on the characteristics of chitosan-alginate dressings for skin lesions. J Appl Polym Sci2008; 109: 2703–2710.
29.
AfzalSMaswalMDarAA. Rheological behavior of pH responsive composite hydrogels of chitosan and alginate: characterization and its use in encapsulation of citral. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces2018; 169: 99–106.
30.
ChenPHHwangYHKuoTY, et al.Improvement in the properties of chitosan membranes using natural organic acid solutions as solvents for chitosan dissolution. J Med Biol Eng2007; 27: 23–28.
31.
PavoniJMFLucheseCLTessaroIC. Impact of acid type for chitosan dissolution on the characteristics and biodegradability of cornstarch/chitosan based films. Int J Biol Macromol2019; 138: 693–703.
32.
SobczykAELucheseCLFaccinDJL, et al.Influence of replacing oregano essential oil by ground oregano leaves on chitosan/alginate-based dressings properties. Int J Biol Macromol2021; 181: 51–59.
33.
ASTM-E96. Standard test methods for water vapor transmission materials. ASTM Int2016. DOI: 10.1520/D4279-95R09.2, Epub ahead of print.
34.
ASTM D882 - 18. Standard test method for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. ASTM Int. DOI: 10.1520/D0882-18, Epub ahead of print 2018.
35.
ZhaoYWangZZhangQ, et al.Accelerated skin wound healing by soy protein isolate–modified hydroxypropyl chitosan composite films. Int J Biol Macromol2018; 118: 1293–1302.
36.
BakraviAAhamadianYHashemiH, et al.Synthesis of gelatin-based biodegradable hydrogel nanocomposite and their application as drug delivery agent. Adv Polym Technol2018; 37: 2625–2635.
37.
ASTM D570. Standard test method for water absorption of plastics. ASTM Stand2014; 98: 25–28.
38.
SchaeferEWPavoniJMFLucheseCL, et al.Influence of turmeric incorporation on physicochemical, antimicrobial and mechanical properties of the cornstarch and chitosan films. Int J Biol Macromol2020; 148: 342–350.
39.
BierhalzACKWestinCBMoraesÂM. Comparison of the properties of membranes produced with alginate and chitosan from mushroom and from shrimp. Int J Biol Macromol2016; 91: 496–504.
40.
BuenoCZDiasAMADe SousaHJC, et al.Control of the properties of porous chitosan-alginate membranes through the addition of different proportions of Pluronic F68. Mater Sci Eng C2014; 44: 117–125.
41.
Arzate-VázquezIChanona-PérezJJCalderón-DomínguezG, et al.Microstructural characterization of chitosan and alginate films by microscopy techniques and texture image analysis. Carbohydr Polym2012; 87: 289–299.
42.
WangLKhorELimLY. Chitosan-alginate-CaCl2 system for membrane coat application. J Pharm Sci2001; 90: 1134–1142.
43.
JhaPKDesaiPSLiJ, et al.pH and salt effects on the associative phase separation of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes. Polymers2014; 6: 1414–1436.
44.
LimHHoagSW. Plasticizer effects on physical-mechanical properties of solvent cast Soluplus® films. AAPS PharmSciTech2013; 14: 903–910.
45.
SachanNPushkarSJhaA, et al.Sodium alginate: the wonder polymer for controlled drug delivery. J Pharm Res2009; 2: 1191–1199.
46.
PavoniJMFdos SantosNZMayIC, et al.Impact of acid type and glutaraldehyde crosslinking in the physicochemical and mechanical properties and biodegradability of chitosan films. Polym Bull2021; 78: 981–1000.
47.
LounisFMChamiehJLeclercqL, et al.Interactions between oppositely charged polyelectrolytes by isothermal titration calorimetry: effect of ionic strength and charge density. J Phys Chem B2017; 121: 2684–2694.
48.
MirtičJIlašJKristlJ. Influence of different classes of crosslinkers on alginate polyelectrolyte nanoparticle formation, thermodynamics and characteristics. Carbohydr Polym2018; 181: 93–102.
49.
MaJWangHHeB, et al.A preliminary in vitro study on the fabrication and tissue engineering applications of a novel chitosan bilayer material as a scaffold of human neofetal dermal fibroblasts. Biomaterials2001; 22: 331–336.
50.
HubnerP. Desenvolvimento de filmes de hidrogel à base de gelatina E pva contendo óleos essenciais de lavanda E de pinus para aplicação como curativo. PhD Thesis: Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia quìmica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2023.
51.
PiresALRMoraesÂM. Improvement of the mechanical properties of chitosan-alginate wound dressings containing silver through the addition of a biocompatible silicone rubber. J Appl Polym Sci2015; 132: 1–9.
52.
HubnerPDonatiNQuinesLKM, et al.Gelatin-based films containing clinoptilolite-Ag for application as wound dressing. Mater Sci Eng C2020; 107: 110215.
53.
LeeSMParkIKKimYS, et al.Physical, morphological, and wound healing properties of a polyurethane foam-film dressing. Biomater Res2016; 20: 15.
54.
BonillaJAtarésLVargasM, et al.Effect of essential oils and homogenization conditions on properties of chitosan-based films. Food Hydrocoll2012; 26: 9–16.
55.
WittMA. Obtenção e caracterização de filmes finos de multicamadas de polieletrólitos naturais depositados por layer‐by‐layer. PhD Thesis: Programa de Pós-graduação em Química, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2012.
56.
DabiriGDamstetterEPhillipsT. Choosing a wound dressing based on common wound characteristics. Adv Wound Care2016; 5: 32–41.
57.
ShojaeeMNavaeeFJalili-FiroozinezhadS, et al.Fabrication and characterization of ovalbumin films for wound dressing applications. Mater Sci Eng C2015; 48: 158–164.
TorresFGCommeauxSTroncosoOP. Starch-based biomaterials for wound-dressing applications. Starch/Staerke2013; 65: 543–551.
60.
SiracusaV. Food packaging permeability behaviour: a report. Int J Polym Sci2012. DOI: 10.1155/2012/302029, Epub ahead of print 2012.
61.
TakaraEAMarcheseJOchoaNA. NaOH treatment of chitosan films: impact on macromolecular structure and film properties. Carbohydr Polym2015; 132: 25–30.
62.
MengXTianFYangJ, et al.Chitosan and alginate polyelectrolyte complex membranes and their properties for wound dressing application. J Mater Sci Mater Med2010; 21: 1751–1759.
63.
BoltonLLMonteKPironeLA. Moisture and healing: beyond the jargon. Ostomy/Wound Manag2000; 46.
64.
WuPFisherACFooPP, et al.In vitro assessment of water vapour transmission of synthetic wound dressings. Biomaterials1995; 16: 171–175.
65.
JanigováNElblJPavlokováS, et al.Effects of various drying times on the properties of 3D printed orodispersible films. Pharmaceutics; 14. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020250, Epub ahead of print 2022.
66.
DautzenbergHKaribyantsN. Polyelectrolyte complex formation in highly aggregating systems . Effect of salt : response to subsequent addition of NaCl. Macromol Chem Phys1999; 200: 118–125.
67.
DelairT. Colloidal polyelectrolyte complexes of chitosan and dextran sulfate towards versatile nanocarriers of bioactive molecules. Eur J Pharm Biopharm2011; 78: 10–18.
68.
AnnaidhANOttenioMBruyèreK, et al.Mechanical properties of excised human skin. IFMBE Proc2010; 31: 1000–1003.
69.
EvansNDOreffoROCHealyE, et al.Epithelial mechanobiology, skin wound healing, and the stem cell niche. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2013; 28: 397–409.
70.
ZhaoYJaliliS. Dextran, as a biological macromolecule for the development of bioactive wound dressing materials: a review of recent progress and future perspectives. Int J Biol Macromol2022; 207: 666–682.
71.
FrickJMAmbrosiAPolloLD, et al.Influence of glutaraldehyde crosslinking and alkaline post-treatment on the properties of chitosan-based films. J Polym Environ2018; 26: 2748–2757.
72.
NegreaPCauniiASaracI, et al.The study of infrared spectrum of chitin and chitosan extract as potential sources of biomass. Dig J Nanomater Biostructures2015; 10: 1129–1138.
73.
YonchevaKBenbassatNZaharievaMM, et al.Improvement of the antimicrobial activity of oregano oil by encapsulation in chitosan–alginate nanoparticles. Molecules; 26. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26227017, Epub ahead of print 2021.
74.
LawrieGKeenIDrewB, et al.Interactions between alginate and chitosan biopolymers characterized using FTIR and XPS. Biomacromolecules2007; 8: 2533–2541.
75.
MeskelisLAgondiRFDuarteLGR, et al.New approaches for modulation of alginate-chitosan delivery properties. Food Res Int2023; 175: 113737.
76.
PanJLiYChenK, et al.Enhanced physical and antimicrobial properties of alginate/chitosan composite aerogels based on electrostatic interactions and noncovalent crosslinking. Carbohydr Polym2021; 266: 118102.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
