Peripheral nerve injuries are common and a major source of pain that can lead to debilitating loss of function. Current treatments are limited, with autologous nerve grafts being the gold standard treatment for nerve injuries. However, autografting is not always successful and can lead to increased debilitation through donor site morbidity. Tissue engineering seeks to improve nerve injury treatment though the use of nerve conduits. Conduits made from a functional biomaterial can be implanted into a nerve injury site encouraging and controlling axonal regrowth without causing additional harm to the patient. Both silk fibroin (SF) and hyaluronic acid (HA) have been proven successful in the field of neural tissue engineering. SF has excellent mechanical properties and is biocompatible. HA is part of the extracellular matrix and had been used in nerve regeneration applications. This study developed aligned combination SF-HA nanofibers through electrospinning that could be used within a nerve conduit. Both materials were methacrylated to allow for photocrosslinking and additional control over material properties. Methcrylated SF-HA was tested alongside a material containing only methacrylated HA that has already proven to be effective in literature. When characterizing the materials, it was found that through chemical methacrylation HA was substituted at 60% while SF reported a 30% substitution. Electrospun SF-HA nanofibers were found to have a greater diameter than HA fibers; however, SF-HA was found to be more aligned with greater surface hydrophobicity. Mechanically, it was found that both materials exceeded the elastic modulus of native tissue, but SF-HA far exceeded HA in elasticity and overall fiber extension. Furthermore, human Schwann cells attached, proliferated, and released more pro-regenerative growth factors on SF-HA than HA. Dorsal root ganglia neurons also displayed longer neurite extensions on SF-HA fibers. We concluded that SF-HA nanofibers have potential as a nerve conduit material.
GrinsellDKeatingCP. Peripheral nerve reconstruction after injury: a review of clinical and experimental therapies. BioMed Res Int2014; 1: 1–13.
2.
GaudetADPopovichPGRamerMS. Wallerian degeneration: gaining perspective on inflammatory events after peripheral nerve injury. J Neuroinflammation2011; 8(1): 110. DOI: 10.1186/1742-2094-8-110 (acccessed 2023-12-20).
3.
MokarramNDymanusKSrinivasanA, et al.Immunoengineering nerve repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2017; 114(26): E5077–E5084. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1705757114 (acccessed 2024-01-07).
4.
VijayavenkataramanS. Nerve guide conduits for peripheral nerve injury repair: a review on design, materials and fabrication methods. Acta Biomater2020; 106: 54–69.
5.
MukhatyarVKarumbaiahLYehJ, et al.Tissue engineering strategies designed to realize the endogenous regenerative potential of peripheral nerves. Adv Mater2009; 21: 4670–4679.
6.
XueWShiWKongY, et al.Anisotropic scaffolds for peripheral nerve and spinal cord regeneration. Bioact Mater2021; 6: 4141–4160.
7.
BellamkondaR. Peripheral nerve regeneration: an opinion on channels, scaffolds and anisotropy. Biomaterials2006; 27: 3515–3518.
8.
MuheremuAAoQ. Past, present, and future of nerve conduits in the treatment of peripheral nerve injury. BioMed Res Int2015; 2015: 237507. DOI: 10.1155/2015/237507.
9.
LohmeyerJAKernYSchmaussD, et al.Prospective clinical study on digital nerve repair with collagen nerve conduits and review of literature. J Reconstr Microsurg2014; 30: 227–234.
10.
DealNGriffinJWHoganMV. Nerve conduits for nerve repair or reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2012; 20: 63–68.
11.
ZareMGhomiERVenkatramanPD, et al.Silicone-based biomaterials for biomedical applications: antimicrobial strategies and 3D printing technologies. J Appl Polym Sci2021; 138(38): 50969. DOI: 10.1002/app.50969 (acccessed 2023-12-20).
12.
BaeSBKimMHParkWH. Electrospinning and dual crosslinking of water soluble silk fibroin modified with glycidyl methacrylate. Polym Degrad Stabil2020; 179: 109304.
13.
KunduBRajkhowaRKunduSC, et al.Silk fibroin biomaterials for tissue regenerations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2013; 65: 457–470.
14.
WangY-l.GuXMKongY, et al.Electrospun and woven silk fibroin/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nerve guidance conduits for repairing peripheral nerve injury. Neural Regen Res2015; 10: 1635–1642.
15.
YanSHanGWangQ, et al.Directed assembly of robust and biocompatible silk fibroin/hyaluronic acid composite hydrogels. Compos B Eng2019; 176: 107204.
16.
BurdickJAChungCJiaX, et al.Controlled degradation and mechanical behavior of photopolymerized hyaluronic acid networks. Biomacromolecules2005; 6(1): 386–391. DOI: 10.1021/bm049508a (acccessed 2023-12-21).
17.
WrobelMR. Biomaterials approaches for utilizing the regenerative potential of the peripheral nerve injury microenvironment. Wayne State University ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2017.
HongHLeeOJLeeYJ, et al.Cytocompatibility of modified silk fibroin with glycidyl methacrylate for tissue engineering and biomedical applications. Biomolecules2020; 11(1): 35. DOI: 10.3390/biom11010035 (acccessed 2023-12-21).
23.
WhiteheadTJ. An enhanced nerve conduit combined with exercise to improve functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury. Wayne State University, 2017.
24.
BarrosoIAManKVillapunVM, et al.Methacrylated silk fibroin hydrogels: pH as a tool to control functionality. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2021; 7: 4779–4791.
25.
KimSHYeonYKLeeJM, et al.Precisely printable and biocompatible silk fi broin bioink for digital light processing 3D printing. Nature2018; 9: 1620.
26.
MaysEAEllisEBHussainZ, et al.Enzyme-mediated nerve growth factor release from nanofibers using gelatin microspheres. Tissue Eng2023; 29: 333–343.
27.
PuhlDLFunnellJLNelsonDW, et al.Electrospun fiber scaffolds for engineering glial cell behavior to promote neural regeneration. Bioengineering2020; 8(1): 4. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering8010004.
28.
LiW-JMauckRLCooperJA, et al.Engineering controllable anisotropy in electrospun biodegradable nanofibrous scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. J Biomech2007; 40(8): 1686–1693. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.09.004.
29.
LiHChangLJNeubauerDR, et al.Immortalization of human normal and NF1 neurofibroma Schwann cells. Lab Invest2016; 96(10): 1105–1115. DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2016.88.
30.
SundararaghavanHGMonteiroGAFiresteinBL, et al.Neurite growth in 3D collagen gels with gradients of mechanical properties. Biotechnol Bioeng2009; 102(2): 632–643. DOI: 10.1002/bit.22074.
31.
ZachariMAChondrouPSPouliliouSE, et al.Evaluation of the alamarblue assay for adherent cell irradiation experiments. Dose Response2014; 12(2): 246–258.
32.
Al-NasirySGeusensNHanssensM, et al.The use of Alamar Blue assay for quantitative analysis of viability, migration and invasion of choriocarcinoma cells. Hum Reprod2007; 22(5): 1304–1309. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem011.
33.
WrobelMRSundararaghavanHG. Biomaterial cues to direct a pro-regenerative phenotype in macrophages and schwann cells. Neuroscience2018; 376: 172–187.
34.
MaysEKallakuriSSundararaghavanH. Heparin-hyaluronic acid nanofibers for growth factor sequestration in spinal cord repair. J Biomed Mater Res2020; 108: 2023–2031.
35.
OhgoKBagusatFAsakuraT, et al.Investigation of structural transition of regenerated silk fibroin aqueous solution by Rheo-NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc2008; 130: 4182–4186.
36.
YuanHShiHQuiX, et al.Mechanical property and biological performance of electrospun silk fibroin-polycaprolactone scaffolds with aligned fibers. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 27: 263–275.
37.
KimSHNamYSLeeTS, et al.Silk fibroin nanofiber. Electrospinning, properties, and structure. Polym J2002; 35: 185–190.
38.
CaoHChenXHuangL, et al.Electrospinning of reconstituted silk fiber from aqueous silk fibroin solution. Mater Sci Eng C2009; 29: 2270–2274.
39.
JinHJChenJKarageorgiouV, et al.Human bone marrow stromal cell responses on electrospun silk fibroin mats. Biomaterials2004; 25: 1039–1047.
40.
StepanyanRSubbotinACuperusL, et al.Fiber diameter control in electrospinning. Appl Phys Lett2014; 105(17): 173105. DOI: 10.1063/1.4900778.
QuJWangDWangH, et al.Electrospun silk fibroin nanofibers in different diameters support neurite outgrowth and promote astrocyte migration. J Biomed Mater Res2013; 101(9): 2667–2678. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34551.
43.
WangHBMullinsMECreggJM, et al.Varying the diameter of aligned electrospun fibers alters neurite outgrowth and Schwann cell migration. Acta Biomater2010; 6: 2970–2978.
44.
CastroVOMerliniC. Aligned electrospun nerve conduits with electrical activity as a strategy for peripheral nerve regeneration. Artif Organs2021; 45(8): 813–818. DOI: 10.1111/aor.13942.
45.
KimY-THaftelVKKumarS, et al.The role of aligned polymer fiber-based constructs in the bridging of long peripheral nerve gaps. Biomaterials2008; 29(21): 3117–3127. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.042.
46.
MadduriSPapaloizosMGanderB. Trophically and topographically functionalized silk fibroin nerve conduits for guided peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials2010; 31: 2323–2334.
47.
FerrariMCirisanoFMoranMC. Mammalian cell behavior on hydrophobic substrates: influence of surface properties. Colloids and Interfaces2019; 3: 48.
48.
SoriaJMMartínez RamosCBahamondeO, et al.Influence of the substrate's hydrophilicity on the in vitro Schwann cells viability. J Biomed Mater Res2007; 83: 463–470.
49.
PayneWSvechkarevDKyrychenkoA, et al.The role of hydrophobic modification on hyaluronic acid dynamics and self-assembly. Carbohydr Polym2018; 182: 132–141.
50.
ZhouWFengYYangJ, et al.Electrospun scaffolds of silk fibroin and poly(lactide-co-glycolide) for endothelial cell growth. J Mater Sci Mater Med2015; 26(1): 5386. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-015-5386-6.
51.
BorschelGHKiaKFKuzonWM, et al.Mechanical properties of acellular peripheral nerve. J Surg Res2003; 114(2): 133–139. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4804(03)00255-5.
52.
LehmannHCWunderlichGFinkGR, et al.Diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy. Neurol Res Pract2020; 2(1): 20. DOI: 10.1186/s42466-020-00064-2.
53.
AlesssandrinoAFregnanFMiagiottiM, et al.SilkBridge™: a novel biomimetic and biocompatible silk-based nerve conduit. Biomater Sci2019; 7: 4112–4130.
54.
KernsJPiponovHHelderC, et al.Mechanical properties of the human tibial and peroneal nerves following stretch with histological correlations. Anat Rec2019; 302(11): 2030–2039. DOI: 10.1002/ar.24250.
55.
AmiraliyanNNouriMHaghighat KishM. Structural characterization and mechanical properties of electrospun silk fibroin nanofiber mats. Polym Sci2010; 52(4): 407–412. DOI: 10.1134/s0965545x10040097.
56.
SedaghatiTJellGSeifalianA. Investigation of Schwann cell behaviour on RGD-functionalised bioabsorbable nanocomposite for peripheral nerve regeneration. N Biotech2014; 31: 203–213.
57.
Vleggeert-LankampCLAMPêgoAPAPLakkeEAJF, et al.Adhesion and proliferation of human Schwann cells on adhesive coatings. Biomaterials2004; 25(14): 2741–2751. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.067.
58.
ThompsonDMBuettnerHM. Neurite outgrowth is directed by schwann cell alignment in the absence of other guidance cues. Ann Biomed Eng2006; 34(4): 161–168. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-005-9053-9.
59.
LiuTHouleJDXuJ, et al.Nanofibrous collagen nerve conduits for spinal cord repair. Tissue Eng2012; 18(9–10): 1057–1066. DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0430.
60.
EvansEBBradySWTripathiA, et al.Schwann cell durotaxis can be guided by physiologically relevant stiffness gradients. Biomater Res2018; 22: 14. DOI: 10.1186/s40824-018-0124-z.
61.
YiSYuanYChenQ, et al.Regulation of Schwann cell proliferation and migration by miR-1 targeting brain-derived neurotrophic factor after peripheral nerve injury. Sci Rep2016; 6(1): 29121. DOI: 10.1038/srep29121.
62.
YamadaHIgarashiYTakasuY, et al.Identification of fibroin-derived peptides enhancing the proliferation of cultured human skin fibroblasts. Biomaterials2004; 25: 467–472.
63.
HuMSabelmanEETsaiC, et al.Improvement of schwann cell attachment and proliferation on modified hyaluronic acid strands by polylysine. Tissue Eng2000; 6: 585–593.
64.
SchuhCMonforteXHackethalJ, et al.Covalent binding of placental derived proteins to silk fibroin improves schwann cell adhesion and proliferation. J Mater Sci Mater Med2016; 27: 188.
65.
RuttenMJJanesMAChangIR, et al.Development of a functional schwann cell phenotype from autologous porcine bone marrow mononuclear cells for nerve repair. Stem Cell Int2012; 2012: 738484. DOI: 10.1155/2012/738484.
66.
LiRLiD-HZhangH-Y, et al.Growth factors-based therapeutic strategies and their underlying signaling mechanisms for peripheral nerve regeneration. Acta Pharmacol Sin2020; 41(10): 1289–1300. DOI: 10.1038/s41401-019-0338-1.
67.
WeiZFeiYSuW, et al.Emerging role of schwann cells in neuropathic pain: receptors, glial mediators and myelination. Front Cell Neurosci2019; 13: 116. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00116.
68.
XuHYuYZhangL, et al.Sustainable release of nerve growth factor for peripheral nerve regeneration using nerve conduits laden with Bioconjugated hyaluronic acid-chitosan hydrogel. Compos B Eng2022; 230: 109509.
69.
UebersaxLMattottiMPapaloizosM, et al.Silk fibroin matrices for the controlled release of nerve growth factor (NGF). Biomaterials2007; 28: 4449–4460.
70.
LinY-CRamadanMHronik-TupajM, et al.Spatially controlled delivery of neurotrophic factors in silk fibroin–based nerve conduits for peripheral nerve repair. Ann Plast Surg2011; 67: 147–155.
71.
PfisterLPapaloizosMMerkleH, et al.Nerve conduits and growth factor delivery in peripheral nerve repair. J Peripher Nerv Syst2007; 12: 65–82.
72.
AparicioGILeonAGutierrez FusterR, et al. Endogenous glycoprotein GPM6a is involved in neurite outgrowth in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Biomolecules2023; 13(4): 594. DOI: 10.3390/biom13040594.
73.
FilousARSilverJ. Neurite outgrowth assay. Bio Protoc2016; 6(1): e1694. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.1694.
74.
SnowDMBrownEMLetourneauPC. Growth cone behavior in the presence of soluble chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG), compared to behavior on CSPG bound to laminin or fibronectin. Int J Dev Neurosci1996; 14(3): 331–349. DOI: 10.1016/0736-5748(96)00017-2.
75.
WangXHeJWangY, et al.Hyaluronic acid-based scaffold for central neural tissue engineering. Interface Focus2012; 2(3): 278–291. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2012.0016.
76.
McMurtreyR. Patterned and functionalized nanofiber scaffolds in three-dimensional hydrogel constructs enhance neurite outgrowth and directional control. J Neural Eng2014; 11: 066009.
77.
NaminiMSEbrahimi-BaroughSAiJ, et al.Tissue-engineered core-shell silk-fibroin/poly-l-lactic acid nerve guidance conduit containing encapsulated exosomes of human endometrial stem cells promotes peripheral nerve regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2023; 9(6): 3496–3511. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00157.
78.
RaoJChengYLiuY, et al.A multi-walled silk fibroin/silk sericin nerve conduit coated with poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) sheath for peripheral nerve regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C2017; 73: 319–332. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.085.
79.
XueCZhuHTanD, et al.Electrospun silk fibroin-based neural scaffold for bridging a long sciatic nerve gap in dogs. J Tissue Eng Regen Med2018; 12(2): e1143–e1153. DOI: 10.1002/term.2449.
80.
YanYZhangWWuR, et al.Promising application of a novel biomaterial, light chain of silk fibroin combined with NT3, in repairment of rat sciatic nerve defect injury. Int J Biol Macromol2023; 240: 124447. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124447.
81.
WhiteheadTJMaysEAPrasadM, et al.Mechanical, topographical and chemical cues combined with physical therapy for peripheral nerve injuries. Regen Med2020; 15(10): 2193–2207. DOI: 10.2217/rme-2020-0059.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
