Hierarchically porous surface of HA-sandblasted Ti implant screw using the plasma electrolytic oxidation: Physical characterization and biological responses
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2024
Hierarchically porous surface of HA-sandblasted Ti implant screw using the plasma electrolytic oxidation: Physical characterization and biological responses
The surface topological features of bioimplants are among the key indicators for bone tissue replacement because they directly affect cell morphology, adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. In this study, we investigated the physical, electrochemical, and biological responses of sandblasted titanium (SB-Ti) surfaces with pore geometries fabricated using a plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) process. The PEO treatment was conducted at an applied voltage of 280 V in a solution bath consisting of 0.15 mol L−1 calcium acetate monohydrate and 0.02 mol L−1 calcium glycerophosphate for 3 min. The surface chemistry, wettability, mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of PEO-treated sandblasted Ti implants using hydroxyapatite particles (PEO-SB-Ti) were improved with the distribution of calcium phosphorous porous oxide layers, and showed a homogeneous and hierarchically porous surface with clusters of nanopores in a bath containing calcium acetate monohydrate and calcium glycerophosphate. To demonstrate the efficacy of PEO-SB-Ti, we investigated whether the implant affects biological responses. The proposed PEO-SB-Ti were evaluated with the aim of obtaining a multifunctional bone replacement model that could efficiently induce osteogenic differentiation as well as antibacterial activities. These physical and biological responses suggest that the PEO-SB-Ti may have a great potential for use an artificial bone replacement compared to that of the controls.
WubnehATsekouraEKAyranciC, et al.Current state of fabrication technologies and materials for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater2018; 80: 1–30.
2.
ChaiQXuHXuX, et al.Mussel-inspired alkaline phosphatase-specific coating on orthopedic implants for spatiotemporal modulating local osteoimmune microenvironment to facilitate osseointegration. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces2023; 225: 113284.
3.
BartolomeuFDouradoNPereiraF, et al.Additive manufactured porous biomaterials targeting orthopedic implants: a suitable combination of mechanical, physical and topological properties. Mater Sci Eng C2020; 107: 110342.
4.
BoseSRoyMBandyopadhyayA. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol2012; 30: 546–554.
5.
ShiraziSRavindranSCooperLF. Topography-mediated immunomodulation in osseointegration; ally or enemy. Biomaterials2022; 291: 121903.
6.
RichesPJiaLTurnbullG, et al.3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioact Mater2018; 3: 278–314.
7.
ThukkaramMCorynRAsadianM, et al.Fabrication of microporous coatings on titanium implants with improved mechanical, antibacterial, and cell-interactive properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2020; 12: 30155–30169.
8.
KurupADhatrakPKhasnisN. Surface modification techniques of titanium and titanium alloys for biomedical dental applications: a review. Mater Today Proc2021; 39: 84–90.
9.
García-CabezónCGodinhoVPérez-GonzálezC, et al.Electropolymerized polypyrrole silver nanocomposite coatings on porous Ti substrates with enhanced corrosion and antibacterial behavior for biomedical applications. Mater Today Chem2023; 29: 101433.
10.
ZhangLCChenLY. A review on biomedical titanium alloys: recent progress and prospect. Adv Eng Mater2019; 21: 1801215.
11.
BucurAILinulETaranuBO. Hydroxyapatite coatings on Ti substrates by simultaneous precipitation and electrodeposition. Appl Surf Sci2020; 527: 146820.
12.
LiPMaXTongT, et al.Microstructural and mechanical properties of β-type Ti–Mo–Nb biomedical alloys with low elastic modulus. J Alloys Compd2020; 815: 152412.
13.
KravanjaKAFinšgarM. A review of techniques for the application of bioactive coatings on metal-based implants to achieve controlled release of active ingredients. Mater Des2022; 217: 110653.
14.
LimB-SChoH-RChoeH-C. Corrosion behaviors of macro/micro/nano-scale surface modification on Ti-6Al-4V alloy for bio-implant. Thin Solid Films2022; 754: 139314.
15.
ChouirfaHBouloussaHMigonneyV, et al.Review of titanium surface modification techniques and coatings for antibacterial applications. Acta Biomater2019; 83: 37–54.
16.
ChopraDGulatiKIvanovskiS. Understanding and optimizing the antibacterial functions of anodized nano-engineered titanium implants. Acta Biomater2021; 127: 80–101.
17.
KaseemMFatimahSNashrahN, et al.Recent progress in surface modification of metals coated by plasma electrolytic oxidation: principle, structure, and performance. Prog Mater Sci2021; 117: 100735.
18.
HouCAnJZhaoD, et al.Surface modification techniques to produce micro/nano-scale topographies on Ti-based implant surfaces for improved osseointegration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2022; 10: 835008.
19.
ZehraTFattah-alhosseiniAKaseemM. Surface properties of plasma electrolytic oxidation coating modified by polymeric materials: a review. Prog Org Coating2022; 171: 107053.
20.
KasalicaBRadić-PerićJPerićM, et al.The mechanism of evolution of microdischarges at the beginning of the PEO process on aluminum. Surf Coating Technol2016; 298: 24–32.
21.
AliofkhazraeiMMacdonaldDDMatykinaE, et al.Review of plasma electrolytic oxidation of titanium substrates: mechanism, properties, applications and limitations. Appl Surf Sci Adv2021; 5: 100121.
22.
BabaeiKFattah-alhosseiniAChaharmahaliR. A review on plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) of niobium: mechanism, properties and applications. Surface Interfac2020; 21: 100719.
23.
MortazaviGJiangJMeletisEI. Investigation of the plasma electrolytic oxidation mechanism of titanium. Appl Surf Sci2019; 488: 370–382.
24.
NahumEZLugovskoySLugovskoyA, et al.The study of hydroxyapatite growth kinetics on CP – Ti and Ti65Zr treated by Plasma electrolytic oxidation process. J Mater Res Technol2023; 24: 2169–2186.
25.
LiuSLiZYuQ, et al.Dual self-healing composite coating on magnesium alloys for corrosion protection. Chem Eng J2021; 424: 130551.
26.
NikoomanzariEFattah-alhosseiniAPajohi AlamotiMR, et al.Effect of ZrO2 nanoparticles addition to PEO coatings on Ti–6Al–4V substrate: microstructural analysis, corrosion behavior and antibacterial effect of coatings in Hank’s physiological solution. Ceram Int2020; 46: 13114–13124.
27.
KellyCNEvansNTIrvinCW, et al.The effect of surface topography and porosity on the tensile fatigue of 3D printed Ti-6Al-4V fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng C2019; 98: 726–736.
28.
CivantosADomínguezCPinoRJ, et al.Designing bioactive porous titanium interfaces to balance mechanical properties and in vitro cells behavior towards increased osseointegration. Surf Coating Technol2019; 368: 162–174.
29.
YangGHYeoMChoiE, et al.Investigating the physical characteristics and cellular interplay on 3D-printed scaffolds depending on the incorporated silica size for hard tissue regeneration. Mater Des2021; 207: 109866.
30.
GrebņevsVLeśniak-ZiółkowskaKWalaM, et al.Modification of physicochemical properties and bioactivity of oxide coatings formed on Ti substrates via plasma electrolytic oxidation in crystalline and amorphous calcium phosphate particle suspensions. Appl Surf Sci2022; 598: 153793.
31.
Leśniak-ZiółkowskaKBrodaczKBabilasD, et al.Fungistatic and bacteriostatic Mg-enriched oxide coatings on titanium formed via plasma electrolytic oxidation. Appl Surf Sci2023; 615: 156285.
32.
LiLHKongYMKimHW, et al.Improved biological performance of Ti implants due to surface modification by micro-arc oxidation. Biomaterials2004; 25: 2867–2875.
33.
KimD-YKimMKimH-E, et al.Formation of hydroxyapatite within porous TiO2 layer by micro-arc oxidation coupled with electrophoretic deposition. Acta Biomater2009; 5: 2196–2205.
34.
WangHYZhuRFLuYP, et al.Preparation and properties of plasma electrolytic oxidation coating on sandblasted pure titanium by a combination treatment. Mater Sci Eng C2014; 42: 657–664.
35.
Le GuehennecLLopez-HerediaMAEnkelB, et al.Osteoblastic cell behaviour on different titanium implant surfaces. Acta Biomater2008; 4: 535–543.
36.
BaeJYWonJEParkJS, et al.Improvement of surface bioactivity of poly(lactic acid) biopolymer by sandblasting with hydroxyapatite bioceramic. Mater Lett2011; 65: 2951–2955.
37.
YuJ-MKimH-JAhnS-G, et al.Plasma electrolytic oxidation of Ti-6Al-4V alloy in electrolytes containing bone formation ions. Appl Surf Sci2020; 513: 145776.
38.
NisarSSArunSChoeHC. Plasma electrolytic oxidation coatings on femtosecond laser-treated Ti-6Al-4V alloy for bio-implant use. Surf Coating Technol2023; 464: 129553.
39.
ArunSAhnSGChoeHC. Surface characteristics of HA-coated and PEO-treated Ti-6Al-4V alloy in solution containing Ag nanoparticles. Surface Interfac2023; 39: 102932.
40.
KyrylenkoSSowaMKazek-KęsikA, et al.Nitrilotriacetic acid improves plasma electrolytic oxidation of titanium for biomedical applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2023; 15: 19863–19876.
41.
MartinJNominéABrochardF, et al.Delay in micro-discharges appearance during PEO of Al: evidence of a mechanism of charge accumulation at the electrolyte/oxide interface. Appl Surf Sci2017; 410: 29–41.
42.
NikoomanzariEKarbasiMMeloW, et al.Impressive strides in antibacterial performance amelioration of Ti-based implants via plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO): a review of the recent advancements. Chem Eng J2022; 441: 136003.
43.
Trivinho-StrixinoFMenckMACPissolittoYB, et al.Alumina coatings containing niobium pentoxide polymorphs prepared by plasma electrolytic oxidation of aluminum. Adv Eng Mater2023; 25: 2201284.
44.
VenkateswarluKRameshbabuNSreekanthD, et al.Role of electrolyte chemistry on electronic and in vitro electrochemical properties of micro-arc oxidized titania films on Cp Ti. Electrochim Acta2013; 105: 468–480.
45.
Kahaie KhosrowshahiAKhoshfetratABKhosrowshahiYB, et al.Cobalt content modulates characteristics and osteogenic properties of cobalt-containing hydroxyapatite in in-vitro milieu. Mater Today Commun2021; 27: 102392.
46.
KalidossMBashaRYDobleM, et al.Theranostic calcium phosphate nanoparticles with potential for multimodal imaging and drug delivery. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2019; 7: 1–10.
47.
El BoujaadyHMourabetMEl RhilassiA, et al.Adsorption of a textile dye on synthesized calcium deficient hydroxyapatite (CDHAp): kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J Mater Environ Sci2016; 7: 4049–4063.
48.
FrankOZukalovaMLaskovaB, et al.Raman spectra of titanium dioxide (anatase, rutile) with identified oxygen isotopes (16, 17, 18). Phys Chem Chem Phys2012; 14: 14567–14572.
49.
ProsolovKAPopovaKSBelyavskayaOA, et al.RF magnetron-sputtered coatings deposited from biphasic calcium phosphate targets for biomedical implant applications. Bioact Mater2017; 2: 170–176.
50.
CampilloMLacharmoisePDReparazJS, et al.On the assessment of hydroxyapatite fluoridation by means of Raman scattering. J Chem Phys2010; 132: 244501.
51.
FrauchigerVMSchlottigFGasserB, et al.Anodic plasma-chemical treatment of CP titanium surfaces for biomedical applications. Biomaterials2004; 25: 593–606.
ChenYFrithJEDehghan-ManshadiA, et al.Mechanical properties and biocompatibility of porous titanium scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2017; 75: 169–174.
54.
YangGHKimMKimG. Additive-manufactured polycaprolactone scaffold consisting of innovatively designed microsized spiral struts for hard tissue regeneration. Biofabrication2017; 9: 015005.
55.
GeJWangFXuZ, et al.Influences of niobium pentoxide on roughness, hydrophilicity, surface energy and protein absorption, and cellular responses to PEEK based composites for orthopedic applications. J Mater Chem B2020; 8: 2618–2626.
56.
MaCDuTNiuX, et al.Biomechanics and mechanobiology of the bone matrix. Bone Res2022; 10: 1–17.
57.
KaseemMChoeHC. Acceleration of bone formation and adhesion ability on dental implant surface via plasma electrolytic oxidation in a solution containing bone ions. Metals2021; 11: 1–13.
58.
ShahNJHyderMNMoskowitzJS, et al.Surface-mediated bone tissue morphogenesis from tunable nanolayered implant coatings. Sci Transl Med2013; 5: 191ra83.
59.
RevieRW. Uhlig’s corrosion handbook. 3rd ed.New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2011, pp. 1129–1174.
60.
McCaffertyE. Introduction to corrosion science. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2010.
61.
ToloeiAStoilovVNorthwoodD. The relationship between surface roughness and corrosion. ASME Int Mech Eng Congr Expo Proc, 2013.
62.
KimHSKhoYTPickeringHW. Active and passive behavior of sintered iron in ammoniacal ammonium carbonate solution. Metall Trans A1991; 22B: 323–332.
63.
KaseemMChoeH-C. Simultaneous improvement of corrosion resistance and bioactivity of a titanium alloy via wet and dry plasma treatments. J Alloys Compd2021; 851: 156840.
64.
SousaMPArab-TehranyECleymandF, et al.Surface micro- and nanoengineering: applications of layer-by-layer technology as a versatile tool to control cellular behavior. Small2019; 15: 1901228.
65.
AmaniHArzaghiHBayandoriM, et al.Controlling cell behavior through the design of biomaterial surfaces: a focus on surface modification techniques. Adv Mater Interfac2019; 6: 1900572.
66.
GautrotJEMalmströmJSundhM, et al.The nanoscale geometrical maturation of focal adhesions controls stem cell differentiation and mechanotransduction. Nano Lett2014; 14: 3945–3952.
67.
BiggsMJPRichardsRGDalbyMJ. Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med2010; 6: 619–633.
68.
DeligianniDDKatsalaNDKoutsoukosPG, et al.Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. Biomaterials2001; 22: 87–96.
69.
PatelKDKimTHLeeEJ, et al.Nanostructured biointerfacing of metals with carbon nanotube/chitosan hybrids by electrodeposition for cell stimulation and therapeutics delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2014; 6: 20214–20224.
70.
HuangZNelsonERSmithRL, et al.The sequential expression profiles of growth factors from osteroprogenitors to osteoblasts in vitro. Tissue Eng2007; 13: 2311–2320.
71.
ChoeYEKimGH. A PCL/cellulose coil-shaped scaffold via a modified electrohydrodynamic jetting process. Virtual Phys Prototyp2020; 15: 403–416.
72.
ChoeY-EKimY-JJeonS-J, et al.Investigating the mechanophysical and biological characteristics of therapeutic dental cement incorporating copper doped bioglass nanoparticles. Dent Mater2022; 38: 363–375.
73.
JangCHLeeHKimM, et al.Accelerated osteointegration of the titanium-implant coated with biocomponents, collagen/hydroxyapatite/bone morphogenetic protein-2, for bone-anchored hearing aid. J Ind Eng Chem2018; 63: 230–236.
74.
XiaLXieYFangB, et al.In situ modulation of crystallinity and nano-structures to enhance the stability and osseointegration of hydroxyapatite coatings on Ti-6Al-4V implants. Chem Eng J2018; 347: 711–720.
75.
WenZShiXLiX, et al.Mesoporous TiO2 coatings regulate ZnO nanoparticle loading and Zn2+ release on titanium dental implants for sustained osteogenic and antibacterial activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2023; 15: 15235–15249.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
