The growing demand for more efficient materials for medical applications brought together two previously distinct fields: medicine and engineering. Regenerative medicine has evolved with the engineering contributions to improve materials and devices for medical use. In this regard, graphene is one of the most promising materials for bone tissue engineering and its potential for bone repair has been studied by several research groups. The aim of this study is to conduct a scoping review including articles published in the last 12 years (from 2010 to 2022) that have used graphene and its derivatives (graphene oxide and reduced graphene) in preclinical studies for bone tissue regeneration, searching in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and clinicaltrials.gov (to confirm no study has started with clinical trial). Boolean searches were performed using the defined key words “bone” and “graphene”, and manuscript abstracts were uploaded to Rayyan, a web-tool for systematic and scoping reviews. This scoping review was conducted based on Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Scoping Reviews and the report follows the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses – Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) statement. After the search protocol and application of the inclusion criteria, 77 studies were selected and evaluated by five blinded researchers. Most of the selected studies used composite materials associated with graphene and its derivatives to natural and synthetic polymers, bioglass, and others. Although a variety of graphene materials were analyzed in these studies, they all concluded that graphene, its derivatives, and its composites improve bone repair processes by increasing osteoconductivity, osteoinductivity, new bone formation, and angiogenesis. Thus, this systematic review opens up new opportunities for the development of novel strategies for bone tissue engineering with graphene.
NovoselovKSGeimAKMorozovSV, et al.Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science2004; 306: 666–669. DOI: 10.1126/science.1102896
2.
WallacePR. The band theory of graphite. Physical Review1947; 71: 622–634. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.71.622
3.
GeimAKNovoselovKS. The rise of graphene. Nat Mater2007; 6: 183–191. DOI: 10.1038/nmat1849
4.
NieCMaLLiS, et al.Recent progresses in graphene based bio-functional nanostructures for advanced biological and cellular interfaces. Nano Today2019; 26: 57–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2019.03.003
5.
PattnaikSSwainKLinZ. Graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites: biomedical applications and biosafety. J Mater Chem B2016; 4: 7813–7831. 20161121. DOI: 10.1039/c6tb02086k
6.
GeorgakilasVPermanJATucekJ, et al.Broad family of carbon nanoallotropes: classification, chemistry, and applications of fullerenes, carbon dots, nanotubes, graphene, nanodiamonds, and combined superstructures. Chem Rev2015; 115: 4744–4822. 20150527. DOI: 10.1021/cr500304f
7.
WickPLouw-GaumeAEKuckiM, et al.Classification framework for graphene-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl2014; 53: 7714–7718. 20140610. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201403335
8.
AmadeiCAArribasPVecitisCD. Graphene oxide standardization and classification: methods to support the leap from lab to industry. Carbon2018; 133: 398–409. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.091
9.
BiancoAChengHEnokiT, et al.All in the graphene family – A recommended nomenclature for two-dimensional carbon materials. Carbon2013; 65: 1–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.038
ISO/TS 80004-13:2017, Nanotechnologies — Vocabulary — Part 13: Graphene and related two-dimensional (2D) materials. 1 ed.Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2017. 21 p. https://www.iso.org/standard/64741.html
12.
FadeelBBussyCMerinoS, et al.Safety assessment of graphene-based materials: focus on human health and the environment. ACS Nano2018; 12: 10582–10620. 20181112. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b04758
13.
SanchezVCJachakAHurtRH, et al.Biological interactions of graphene-family nanomaterials: an interdisciplinary review. Chem Res Toxicol2012; 25: 15–34. 20111021. DOI: 10.1021/tx200339h
14.
BoggildP. The war on fake graphene. Nature2018; 562: 502–503. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-06939-4
15.
LiMXiongPYanF, et al.An overview of graphene-based hydroxyapatite composites for orthopedic applications. Bioact Mater2018; 3: 1–18. 20180203. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.01.001
16.
EchaveMCSaenz del BurgoLPedrazJL, et al.Gelatin as biomaterial for tissue engineering. Curr Pharm Des2017; 23: 3567–3584. DOI: 10.2174/0929867324666170511123101
NayakTRAndersenHMakamVS, et al.Graphene for controlled and accelerated osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Nano2011; 5: 4670–4678. 20110511. DOI: 10.1021/nn200500h
19.
CrowderSWPrasaiDRathR, et al.Three-dimensional graphene foams promote osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Nanoscale2013; 5: 4171–4176. DOI: 10.1039/c3nr00803g
20.
LeeWCLimCHShiH, et al.Origin of enhanced stem cell growth and differentiation on graphene and graphene oxide. ACS Nano2011; 5: 7334–7341. 20110729. DOI: 10.1021/nn202190c
21.
YoonHHBhangSHKimT, et al.Dual roles of graphene oxide in chondrogenic differentiation of adult stem cells: cell-adhesion substrate and growth factor-delivery carrier. Advanced Functional Materials2014; 24: 6455–6464. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201400793
22.
XieHCaoTRodriguez-LozanoFJ, et al.Graphene for the development of the next-generation of biocomposites for dental and medical applications. Dent Mater2017; 33: 765–774. 20170508. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.008
23.
GaoCLiuTShuaiC, et al.Enhancement mechanisms of graphene in nano-58S bioactive glass scaffold: mechanical and biological performance. Sci Rep2014; 4: 4712. 20140416. DOI: 10.1038/srep04712
24.
BaradaranSMoghaddamEBasirunWJ, et al.Mechanical properties and biomedical applications of a nanotube hydroxyapatite-reduced graphene oxide composite. Carbon2014; 69: 32–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.054
25.
ChenYQiYTaiZ, et al.Preparation, mechanical properties and biocompatibility of graphene oxide/ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene composites. European Polymer Journal2012; 48: 1026–1033. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.03.011
26.
WuMZouLJiangL, et al.Osteoinductive and antimicrobial mechanisms of graphene-based materials for enhancing bone tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med2021; 15: 915–935. 20210907. DOI: 10.1002/term.3239
27.
MouraJTeixeiraLNRavagnaniC, et al.In vitro osteogenesis on a highly bioactive glass-ceramic (Biosilicate). J Biomed Mater Res A2007; 82: 545–557. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31165
28.
HenkelJWoodruffMAEpariDR, et al.Bone regeneration based on tissue engineering conceptions - a 21st century perspective. Bone Res2013; 1: 216–248. 20130925. DOI: 10.4248/BR201303002
MikosAGTemenoffJS. Formation of highly porous biodegradable scaffolds for tissue engineering. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology2000; 3, doi:10.2225/vol3-issue2-fulltext-5.
31.
ZhouTLiGLinS, et al.Electrospun Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate)/graphene oxide scaffold: enhanced properties and promoted in vivo bone repair in rats. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2017; 9: 42589–42600. 20171129. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b14267
32.
PetersMDJMarnieCTriccoAC, et al.Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth2020; 18: 2119–2126. DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
33.
TriccoACLillieEZarinW, et al.PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med2018; 169: 467–473. 20180904. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850
34.
MunnZPetersMDJSternC, et al.Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol2018; 18: 143. 20181119. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
35.
ChenYZhengZZhouR, et al.Developing a strontium-releasing graphene oxide-/collagen-based organic-inorganic nanobiocomposite for large bone defect regeneration via MAPK signaling pathway. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2019; 11: 15986–15997. 20190416. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b22606
36.
ElkhenanyHBourdoSHechtS, et al.Graphene nanoparticles as osteoinductive and osteoconductive platform for stem cell and bone regeneration. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine2017; 13: 2117–2126. DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2017.05.009
37.
GhoraiSKMajiSSubramanianB, et al.Coining attributes of ultra-low concentration graphene oxide and spermine: an approach for high strength, anti-microbial and osteoconductive nanohybrid scaffold for bone tissue regeneration. Carbon2019; 141: 370–389. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.062
38.
MedeirosJOliveiraAMCarvalhoJO, et al.Nanohydroxyapatite/graphene nanoribbons nanocomposites induce in vitro osteogenesis and promote in vivo bone neoformation. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2018; 4: 1580–1590. 20180412. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b01032
39.
KawamotoKMiyajiHNishidaE, et al.Characterization and evaluation of graphene oxide scaffold for periodontal wound healing of class II furcation defects in dog. Int J Nanomedicine2018; 13: 2365–2376. 20180418. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S163206
40.
KimJWShinYCLeeJJ, et al.The effect of reduced graphene oxide-coated biphasic calcium phosphate bone graft material on osteogenesis. Int J Mol Sci2017; 18: 20170808. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18081725
41.
LiDNieWChenL, et al.Self-assembled hydroxyapatite-graphene scaffold for photothermal cancer therapy and bone regeneration. J Biomed Nanotechnol2018; 14: 2003–2017. DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2018.2646
42.
LiuSMouSZhouC, et al.Off-the-shelf biomimetic graphene oxide–collagen hybrid scaffolds wrapped with osteoinductive extracellular matrix for the repair of cranial defects in rats. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces2018; 10: 42948–42958. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b11071
43.
LiuSZhouCMouS, et al.Biocompatible graphene oxide-collagen composite aerogel for enhanced stiffness and in situ bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2019; 105: 110137. 20190827. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110137
44.
Lopez TenorioDValenciaCHValenciaC, et al.Evaluation of the biocompatibility of cs-graphene oxide compounds in vivo. Int J Mol Sci2019; 20: 20190329. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20071572
45.
MahantaAKPatelDKMaitiP. Nanohybrid scaffold of chitosan and functionalized graphene oxide for controlled drug delivery and bone regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2019; 5: 5139–5149. 20190925. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00829
46.
OliveiraFCCarvalhoJOGusmaoSBS, et al.High loads of nano-hydroxyapatite/graphene nanoribbon composites guided bone regeneration using an osteoporotic animal model. Int J Nanomedicine2019; 14: 865–874. 20190129. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S192456
47.
OuLLanYFengZ, et al.Functionalization of SF/HAP Scaffold with GO-PEI-miRNA inhibitor complexes to enhance bone regeneration through activating transcription factor 4. Theranostics2019; 9: 4525–4541. 20190609. DOI: 10.7150/thno.34676
48.
QiCDengYXuL, et al.A sericin/graphene oxide composite scaffold as a biomimetic extracellular matrix for structural and functional repair of calvarial bone. Theranostics2020; 10: 741–756. 20200101. DOI: 10.7150/thno.39502
49.
RashkowJTTalukdarYLalwaniG, et al.Vivo hard and soft tissue response of two-dimensional nanoparticle incorporated biodegradable polymeric scaffolds. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2017; 3: 2533–2541. 20170829. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00425
50.
RuanJWangXYuZ, et al.Enhanced physiochemical and mechanical performance of chitosan-grafted graphene oxide for superior osteoinductivity. Advanced Functional Materials2016; 26: 1085–1097. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201504141
51.
SaravananSChawlaAVairamaniM, et al.Scaffolds containing chitosan, gelatin and graphene oxide for bone tissue regeneration in vitro and in vivo. Int J Biol Macromol2017; 104: 1975–1985. 20170112. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.034
52.
ShinUSParkJSOhJS, et al.Graphene-incorporated nanofibrous hybrid membrane with enhanced properties. Macromolecular Research2017; 25: 1057–1062. DOI: 10.1007/s13233-017-5151-4
53.
SilvaEVasconcellosLMRRodriguesBVM, et al.PDLLA honeycomb-like scaffolds with a high loading of superhydrophilic graphene/multi-walled carbon nanotubes promote osteoblast in vitro functions and guided in vivo bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2017; 73: 31–39. 20161123. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.075
54.
WangWJuniorJRPNalessoPRL, et al.Engineered 3D printed poly(varepsilon-caprolactone)/graphene scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2019; 100: 759–770. 20190316. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.047
55.
WangWLiuYYangC, et al.Mesoporous bioactive glass combined with graphene oxide scaffolds for bone repair. Int J Biol Sci2019; 15: 2156–2169. 20190808. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.35670
56.
WuJZhengALiuY, et al.Enhanced bone regeneration of the silk fibroin electrospun scaffolds through the modification of the graphene oxide functionalized by BMP-2 peptide. Int J Nanomedicine2019; 14: 733–751. 20190118. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S187664
57.
WuXZhengSYeY, et al.Enhanced osteogenic differentiation and bone regeneration of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) by graphene via activation of PI3K/Akt/GSK-3beta/beta-catenin signal circuit. Biomater Sci2018; 6: 1147–1158. DOI: 10.1039/C8BM00127H
58.
XueJFengCXiaL, et al.Assembly preparation of multilayered biomaterials with high mechanical strength and bone-forming bioactivity. Chemistry of Materials2018; 30: 4646–4657. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01272
59.
YuZXiaoCHuangY, et al.Enhanced bioactivity and osteoinductivity of carboxymethyl chitosan/nanohydroxyapatite/graphene oxide nanocomposites. RSC Advances2018; 8: 17860–17877. DOI: 10.1039/c8ra00383a
60.
ZhangWChangQXuL, et al.Graphene oxide-copper nanocomposite-coated porous cap scaffold for vascularized bone regeneration via activation of hif-1alpha. Adv Healthc Mater2016; 5: 1299–1309. 20160304. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201500824
61.
ZhangYAliSFDervishiE, et al.Cytotoxicity effects of graphene and single-wall carbon nanotubes in neural phaeochromocytoma-derived PC12 cells. ACS Nano2010; 4: 3181–3186. DOI: 10.1021/nn1007176
62.
ZhaoYChenJZouL, et al.Facile one-step bioinspired mineralization by chitosan functionalized with graphene oxide to activate bone endogenous regeneration. Chem Engineer Jour2019; 378. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122174
63.
ZhouCLiuSLiJ, et al.Collagen functionalized with graphene oxide enhanced biomimetic mineralization and in situ bone defect repair. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2018; 10: 44080–44091. 20181207. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b17636
64.
DantasPCLMartins-JuniorPACoutinhoDCO, et al.Nanohybrid composed of graphene oxide functionalized with sodium hyaluronate accelerates bone healing in the tibia of rats. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2021; 123: 111961. 20210212. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.111961
65.
DuYYuMLuW, et al. Three-dimensional (3D), macroporous, elastic, and biodegradable nanocomposite scaffold for in situ bone regeneration: toward structural, biophysical, and biochemical cues integration. Composites Part B: Engineering2021; 225: 109270, doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109270.
66.
FengCXueJYuX, et al.Co-inspired hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds for vascularized bone regeneration. Acta Biomater2021; 119: 419–431. 20201110. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.010
67.
GeYWLiuXLYuDG, et al.Graphene-modified CePO4 nanorods effectively treat breast cancer-induced bone metastases and regulate macrophage polarization to improve osteo-inductive ability. J Nanobiotechnology2021; 19: 11. 20210107. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-020-00753-9
68.
GengBFangFLiP, et al. Surface charge-dependent osteogenic behaviors of edge-functionalized graphene quantum dots. Chemical Engineering Journal2021; 417: 128125, doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.128125.
69.
GuoBFengXWangY, et al.Biomimetic and immunomodulatory baicalin-loaded graphene oxide-demineralized bone matrix scaffold for in vivo bone regeneration. J Mater Chem B2021; 9: 9720–9733. 20211208. DOI: 10.1039/d1tb00618e
70.
JiangL-BDingS-LDingW, et al. Injectable sericin based nanocomposite hydrogel for multi-modal imaging-guided immunomodulatory bone regeneration. Chemical Engineering Journal2021; 418: 129323, doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.129323.
71.
JiaoDZhengALiuY, et al.Bidirectional differentiation of BMSCs induced by a biomimetic procallus based on a gelatin-reduced graphene oxide reinforced hydrogel for rapid bone regeneration. Bioact Mater2021; 6: 2011–2028. 20201231. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.12.003
72.
KashteSDhumalRChaudharyP, et al. Bone regeneration in critical-size calvarial defect using functional biocompatible osteoinductive herbal scaffolds and human umbilical cord Wharton’s Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Materi To Communi2021; 26: 102049, doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102049.
73.
KhoramgahMSGhanbarianHRanjbariJ, et al. Repairing rat calvarial defects by adipose mesenchymal stem cells and novel freeze-dried three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffolds. BioImpacts2021; 13: 31–42, doi:10.34172/bi.2021.23711.
74.
LeeSJNahHHeoDN, et al.Induction of osteogenic differentiation in a rat calvarial bone defect model using an In situ forming graphene oxide incorporated glycol chitosan/oxidized hyaluronic acid injectable hydrogel. Carbon2020; 168: 264–277. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.05.022
75.
LiYJiaHCuiX, et al. Bending properties, compression properties, biocompatibility and bioactivity of sulfonated carbon fibers/PEEK composites with graphene oxide coating. Applied Surface Science2022; 575: 151774, doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151774.
76.
LiangJLiWZhuangN, et al.Experimental study on bone defect repair by BMSCs combined with a light-sensitive material: g-C3N4/rGO. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed2021; 32: 248–265. 20201008. DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2020.1827923
77.
LiuSLiZWangQ, et al.Graphene oxide/chitosan/hydroxyapatite composite membranes enhance osteoblast adhesion and guided bone regeneration. ACS Appl Bio Mater2021; 4: 8049–8059. 20211025. DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.1c00967
78.
LiuWDongXQinH, et al.Three-dimensional porous reduced graphene oxide/hydroxyapatite membrane for guided bone regeneration. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces2021; 208: 112102. 20210909. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112102
79.
Lopes NalessoPRWangWHouY, et al. In vivo investigation of 3D printed polycaprolactone/graphene electro-active bone scaffolds. Bioprinting2021; 24: e00164, doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00164.
80.
LyuCLiCSunJ, et al. Rapid hard-tissue-embedding method for embedding graphene nanomaterials: a multilayered graphene hydrogel membrane. Macromolec Materi Engineer2020; 306: 2000535, doi:10.1002/mame.202000535.
81.
MaLFengXLiangH, et al.A novel photothermally controlled multifunctional scaffold for clinical treatment of osteosarcoma and tissue regeneration. Materials Today2020; 36: 48–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.12.005
82.
OliveiraFCCarvalhoJOMagalhaesL, et al.Biomineralization inspired engineering of nanobiomaterials promoting bone repair. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2021; 120: 111776. 20201204. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111776
83.
SunJLiLXingF, et al.Graphene oxide-modified silk fibroin/nanohydroxyapatite scaffold loaded with urine-derived stem cells for immunomodulation and bone regeneration. Stem Cell Res Ther2021; 12: 591. 20211204. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-021-02634-w
84.
Valencia-LlanoCHSolanoMAGrande-TovarCD. Nanocomposites of chitosan/graphene oxide/titanium dioxide nanoparticles/blackberry waste extract as potential bone substitutes. Polymers (Basel)2021; 13: 20211110. DOI: 10.3390/polym13223877
85.
VasconcellosLMRSantana-MeloGFSilvaE, et al.Electrospun Poly(butylene-adipate-co-terephthalate)/nano-hydroxyapatite/graphene nanoribbon scaffolds improved the in vivo osteogenesis of the neoformed bone. J Funct Biomater2021; 12: 20210205. DOI: 10.3390/jfb12010011.
86.
WangWLiuYYangC, et al.Delivery of salvianolic acid b for efficient osteogenesis and angiogenesis from silk fibroin combined with graphene oxide. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2020; 6: 3539–3549. 20200508. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00558
87.
WangXGuoWLiL, et al. Photothermally triggered biomimetic drug delivery of Teriparatide via reduced graphene oxide loaded chitosan hydrogel for osteoporotic bone regeneration. Chemical Engineering Journal2021; 413: 127413, doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.127413.
88.
WuTLiBWangW, et al.Strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite grown on graphene oxide nanosheet-reinforced chitosan scaffold to promote bone regeneration. Biomater Sci2020; 8: 4603–4615. 20200706. DOI: 10.1039/d0bm00523a
89.
XiongXBLiuCNiXY, et al.Polyvinyl alcohol/graphene oxide interlayer for enhancing adhesive performance of ha coating on c/c composites prepared by hydrothermal electrodeposition/hydrothermal treatment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2020; 12: 55710–55722. 20201202. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c17649
90.
ZapataMEVHernandezJHMGrande TovarCD, et al. Osseointegration of antimicrobial acrylic bone cements modified with graphene oxide and chitosan. Applied Sciences2020; 10: 6528, doi:10.3390/app10186528.
91.
ZhengZChenYHongH, et al.The “Yin and Yang” of immunomodulatory magnesium-enriched graphene oxide nanoscrolls decorated biomimetic scaffolds in promoting bone regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater2021; 10: e2000631. 20201109. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202000631
92.
ZhuCHeMSunD, et al.3D-printed multifunctional polyetheretherketone bone scaffold for multimodal treatment of osteosarcoma and osteomyelitis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2021; 13: 47327–47340. 20210929. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c10898
93.
ZouMSunJXiangZ. Induction of M2-Type macrophage differentiation for bone defect repair via an interpenetration network hydrogel with a go-based controlled release system. Adv Healthc Mater2021; 10: e2001502. 20210119. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202001502
94.
LeeJHShinYCLeeSM, et al.Enhanced osteogenesis by reduced graphene oxide/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. Sci Rep2015; 5: 18833. 20151221. DOI: 10.1038/srep18833
95.
LinYHChuangTYChiangWH, et al.The synergistic effects of graphene-contained 3D-printed calcium silicate/poly-epsilon-caprolactone scaffolds promote FGFR-induced osteogenic/angiogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2019; 104: 109887. 20190624. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109887
96.
NieWPengCZhouX, et al.Three-dimensional porous scaffold by self-assembly of reduced graphene oxide and nano-hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering. Carbon2017; 116: 325–337. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.013
97.
PengSFengPWuP, et al.Graphene oxide as an interface phase between polyetheretherketone and hydroxyapatite for tissue engineering scaffolds. Sci Rep2017; 7: 46604. 20170420. DOI: 10.1038/srep46604
98.
WuCXiaLHanP, et al.Graphene-oxide-modified β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramics stimulate in vitro and in vivo osteogenesis. Carbon2015; 93: 116–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.04.048
99.
YaoQLiuHLinX, et al.3D interpenetrated graphene foam/58S bioactive glass scaffolds for electrical-stimulation-assisted differentiation of rabbit mesenchymal stem cells to enhance bone regeneration. J Biomed Nanotechnol2019; 15: 602–611. DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2019.2703
100.
BahramiSBaheiraeiNShahrezaeeM. Biomimetic reduced graphene oxide coated collagen scaffold for in situ bone regeneration. Sci Rep2021; 11: 16783. 20210818. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96271-1
101.
FuCJiangYYangX, et al.Mussel-inspired gold nanoparticle and PLGA/L-lysine-g-graphene oxide composite scaffolds for bone defect repair. Int J Nanomedicine2021; 16: 6693–6718. 20210930. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S328390
102.
LiTHanFXueJ, et al. Well ordered-microstructure bioceramics. Applied Materials Today2021; 25: 101194, doi:10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101194.
103.
LiYZhangXDaiC, et al.Bioactive three-dimensional graphene oxide foam/polydimethylsiloxane/zinc silicate scaffolds with enhanced osteoinductivity for bone regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2020; 6: 3015–3025. 20200407. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01931
104.
SunXTongSYangS, et al. The effects of graphene on the biocompatibility of a 3D-printed porous titanium alloy. Coatings2021; 11: 1509, doi:10.3390/coatings11121509.
105.
WangSDuanCYangW, et al.Two-dimensional nanocoating-enabled orthopedic implants for bimodal therapeutic applications. Nanoscale2020; 12: 11936–11946. DOI: 10.1039/d0nr02327b
106.
WengWLiXNieW, et al.One-step preparation of an AgNP-nHA@RGO three-dimensional porous scaffold and its application in infected bone defect treatment. Int J Nanomedicine2020; 15: 5027–5042. 20200714. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S241859
107.
ZhouGLinJ. Graphene-based nanomaterials combined with early exercise rehabilitation training in the treatment of patients with infectious bone defects. International Journal of Nanotechnology2020; 17: 291, doi:10.1504/ijnt.2020.110720.
108.
NishidaEMiyajiHKatoA, et al.Graphene oxide scaffold accelerates cellular proliferative response and alveolar bone healing of tooth extraction socket. Int J Nanomedicine2016; 11: 2265–2277. 20160524. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S104778
109.
HermeneanACodreanuAHermanH, et al.Chitosan-graphene oxide 3D scaffolds as promising tools for bone regeneration in critical-size mouse calvarial defects. Sci Rep2017; 7: 16641. 20171130. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16599-5
110.
ChopraVThomasJSharmaA, et al.Synthesis and evaluation of a zinc eluting rGO/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite optimized for bone augmentation. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2020; 6: 6710–6725. 20201106. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00370
111.
Stramandinoli-ZanicottiRTCarvalhoALRebelattoCL, et al.Brazilian minipig as a large-animal model for basic research and stem cell-based tissue engineering. Characterization and in vitro differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Appl Oral Sci2014; 22: 218–227. DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720130526
112.
HutmacherDW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials2000; 21: 2529–2543. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00121-6
113.
MoroniMLombardiniESalberR, et al.Hematological changes as prognostic indicators of survival: similarities between Gottingen minipigs, humans, and other large animal models. PLoS One2011; 6: e25210. 20110928. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025210
114.
FernandesTLShimomuraKAspertiA, et al.Development of a novel large animal model to evaluate human dental pulp stem cells for articular cartilage treatment. Stem Cell Rev Rep2018; 14: 734–743. DOI: 10.1007/s12015-018-9820-2
115.
MastrogiacomoMCorsiAFranciosoE, et al.Reconstruction of extensive long bone defects in sheep using resorbable bioceramics based on silicon stabilized tricalcium phosphate. Tissue Eng2006; 12: 1261–1273. DOI: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.1261
116.
ZhuLLiuWCuiL, et al.Tissue-engineered bone repair of goat-femur defects with osteogenically induced bone marrow stromal cells. Tissue Eng2006; 12: 423–433. DOI: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.423
117.
MohanVBLauKHuiD, et al.Graphene-based materials and their composites: a review on production, applications and product limitations. Composites Part B: Engineering2018; 142: 200–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.013
118.
CodreaCICroitoruAMBaciuCC, et al.Advances in osteoporotic bone tissue engineering. J Clin Med2021; 10: 20210112. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020253
119.
BarnesCPSellSABolandED, et al.Nanofiber technology: designing the next generation of tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2007; 59: 1413–1433. 20070825. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.04.022
120.
Geetha BaiRMuthoosamyKManickamS, et al.Graphene-based 3D scaffolds in tissue engineering: fabrication, applications, and future scope in liver tissue engineering. Int J Nanomedicine2019; 14: 5753–5783. 20190724. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S192779
121.
HanSSunJHeS, et al.The application of graphene-based biomaterials in biomedicine. Am J Transl Res2019; 11: 3246–3260.
122.
KhademhosseiniALangerR. A decade of progress in tissue engineering. Nat Protoc2016; 11: 1775–1781. 20160901. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2016.123
123.
NovoselECKleinhansCKlugerPJ. Vascularization is the key challenge in tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2011; 63: 300–311. 20110317. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.004
124.
ShadjouNHasanzadehMKhalilzadehB. Graphene based scaffolds on bone tissue engineering. Bioengineered2018; 9: 38–47. 20171130. DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2017.1373539
125.
AkhavanO. Graphene scaffolds in progressive nanotechnology/stem cell-based tissue engineering of the nervous system. J Mater Chem B2016; 4: 3169–3190. 20160426. DOI: 10.1039/c6tb00152a
126.
LalwaniGD'AgatiMGopalanA, et al.Three-dimensional macroporous graphene scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A2017; 105: 73–83. 20160827. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35867
127.
XieXHuKFangD, et al.Graphene and hydroxyapatite self-assemble into homogeneous, free standing nanocomposite hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Nanoscale2015; 7: 7992–8002. DOI: 10.1039/c5nr01107h
128.
PorwalHGrassoSCordero-AriasL, et al.Processing and bioactivity of 45S5 Bioglass((R))-graphene nanoplatelets composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med2014; 25: 1403–1413. 20140212. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5172-x
129.
ZhouMWangYZhaiY, et al.Controlled synthesis of large-area and patterned electrochemically reduced graphene oxide films. Chemistry2009; 15: 6116–6120. DOI: 10.1002/chem.200900596
130.
PatelSCLalwaniGGroverK, et al.Fabrication and cytocompatibility of in situ crosslinked carbon nanomaterial films. Sci Rep2015; 5: 10261. 20150528. DOI: 10.1038/srep10261
131.
SuCYLuAYWuCY, et al.Direct formation of wafer scale graphene thin layers on insulating substrates by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Lett2011; 11: 3612–3616. 20110815. DOI: 10.1021/nl201362n
132.
GiraoAFSousaJDominguez-BajoA, et al.3D reduced graphene oxide scaffolds with a combinatorial fibrous-porous architecture for neural tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2020; 12: 38962–38975. 20200821. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c10599
133.
LiuHChengJChenF, et al.Gelatin functionalized graphene oxide for mineralization of hydroxyapatite: biomimetic and in vitro evaluation. Nanoscale2014; 6: 5315–5322. DOI: 10.1039/c4nr00355a
134.
QiYYTaiZXSunDF, et al.Fabrication and characterization of poly(vinyl alcohol)/graphene oxide nanofibrous biocomposite scaffolds. Journa Appli Poly Scie2013; 127: 1885–1894. DOI: 10.1002/app.37924
135.
ShadjouNHasanzadehM. Silica-based mesoporous nanobiomaterials as promoter of bone regeneration process. J Biomed Mater Res A2015; 103: 3703–3716. 20150611. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35504
136.
DonatoKZTanHLMarangoniVS, et al.Graphene oxide classification and standardization. Sci Rep2023; 13: 6064–20230413. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33350-5
137.
ISO/TS 21356–1:2021, Nanotechnologies — structural characterization of graphene — Part 1: graphene from powders and dispersions.1 ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2021. 48 p. https://www.iso.org/standard/70757.html
138.
WangX-YNaritaAMüllenK. Precision synthesis versus bulk-scale fabrication of graphenes. Natu Revie Chemi2017; 2, doi:10.1038/s41570-017-0100.
139.
RaoCNRBiswasKSubrahmanyamKS, et al. Graphene, the new nanocarbon. Journa Materi Chemi2009; 19: 2457, doi:10.1039/b815239j.
140.
SunZFangSHuYH. 3D graphene materials: from understanding to design and synthesis control. Chem Rev2020; 120: 10336–10453. 20200827. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00083
141.
ChengJLiuJWuB, et al.Graphene and its derivatives for bone tissue engineering: in vitro and in vivo evaluation of graphene-based scaffolds, membranes and coatings. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2021; 9: 734688. 20210929. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.734688
142.
KazantsevaJIvanovRGasikM, et al.Graphene-augmented nanofiber scaffolds demonstrate new features in cells behaviour. Sci Rep2016; 6: 30150. 20160722. DOI: 10.1038/srep30150
143.
FuCBaiHZhuJ, et al.Enhanced cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in electrospun PLGA/hydroxyapatite nanofibre scaffolds incorporated with graphene oxide. PLoS One2017; 12: e0188352. 20171129. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188352
144.
ValapaRBPugazhenthiGKatiyarV. Effect of graphene content on the properties of poly(lactic acid) nanocomposites. RSC Advances2015; 5: 28410–28423. DOI: 10.1039/c4ra15669b
145.
ThompsonBCMurrayEWallaceGG. Graphite oxide to graphene. Biomaterials to Bionics. Adv Mater2015; 27: 7563–7582. 20150427. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201500411
146.
KumarSParekhSH. Linking graphene-based material physicochemical properties with molecular adsorption, structure and cell fate. Communica Chemis2020; 3, doi:10.1038/s42004-019-0254-9.
147.
KanayamaIMiyajiHTakitaH, et al.Comparative study of bioactivity of collagen scaffolds coated with graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. Int J Nanomedicine2014; 9: 3363–3373. 20140711. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S62342
148.
ChengXWanQPeiX. Graphene family materials in bone tissue regeneration: perspectives and challenges. Nanoscale Res Lett2018; 13: 289. 20180918. DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2694-z
149.
HarrisJSBemenderferTBWesselAR, et al.A review of mouse critical size defect models in weight bearing bones. Bone2013; 55: 241–247. 20130214. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.02.002
150.
TianYWuDWuD, et al.Chitosan-based biomaterial scaffolds for the repair of infected bone defects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2022; 10: 899760. 20220504. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.899760
151.
RaslanASaenz Del BurgoLCirizaJ, et al.Graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide-based scaffolds in regenerative medicine. Int J Pharm2020; 580: 119226. 20200313. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119226
152.
ObataSSaikiKTaniguchiT, et al. Graphene oxide: a fertile nanosheet for various applications. Journ Physic Soci Japan2015; 84: 121012, doi:10.7566/jpsj.84.121012.
153.
VargheseNMogeraUGovindarajA, et al.Binding of DNA nucleobases and nucleosides with graphene. Chemphyschem2009; 10: 206–210. DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200800459
154.
WeiSZouXTianJ, et al.Control of protein conformation and orientation on graphene. J Am Chem Soc2019; 141: 20335–20343. 20191212. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b10705
155.
Lopez-DoladoEGonzalez-MayorgaAGutierrezMC, et al.Immunomodulatory and angiogenic responses induced by graphene oxide scaffolds in chronic spinal hemisected rats. Biomaterials2016; 99: 72–81. 20160510. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.012
156.
LiuTDanWDanN, et al.A novel grapheme oxide-modified collagen-chitosan bio-film for controlled growth factor release in wound healing applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2017; 77: 202–211. 20170328. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.256
157.
DepanDMisraRD. The interplay between nanostructured carbon-grafted chitosan scaffolds and protein adsorption on the cellular response of osteoblasts: structure-function property relationship. Acta Biomater2013; 9: 6084–6094. 20121220. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.019
158.
ZhouMZhaiYDongS. Electrochemical sensing and biosensing platform based on chemically reduced graphene oxide. Anal Chem2009; 81: 5603–5613. DOI: 10.1021/ac900136z
159.
PurkaitTSinghGKumarD, et al.High-performance flexible supercapacitors based on electrochemically tailored three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide networks. Sci Rep2018; 8: 640. 20180112. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18593-3
160.
MokkapatiVPanditSKimJ, et al.Bacterial response to graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide integrated in agar plates. R Soc Open Sci2018; 5: 181083. 20181114. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.181083
161.
MehraliMBagherifardSAkbariM, et al.Blending electronics with the human body: a pathway toward a cybernetic future. Adv Sci (Weinh)2018; 5: 1700931. 20180801. DOI: 10.1002/advs.201700931
AchôaG. A scoping review of graphene-based biomaterials for in vivo bone tissue engineering. Library and Dataset2023, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23731071.
