The role of periosteum rich in a variety of bone cells and growth factors in the treatment of bone defects has gradually been discovered. However, due to the limited number of healthy transplantable periosteum, there are still major challenges in the clinical treatment of critical-size bone defects. Various techniques for preparing biomimetic periosteal scaffolds that are similar in composition and structure to natural periosteal scaffold have gradually emerged. This article reviews the current preparation methods of biomimetic periosteal scaffolds based on various biomaterials, which are mainly divided into natural periosteal materials and various polymer biomaterials. Several preparation methods of biomimetic periosteal scaffolds with different principles are listed, their strengths and weaknesses are also discussed. It aims to provide a more systematic perspective for the preparation of biomimetic periosteal scaffolds in the future.
MajiKDasguptaSPramanikK, et al.Preparation and characterization of gelatin-chitosan-nanoβ-TCP based scaffold for orthopaedic application. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2018; 86: 83–94.
2.
ZhangXXieCLinAS, et al.Periosteal progenitor cell fate in segmental cortical bone graft transplantations: implications for functional tissue engineering. J Bone Miner Res2005; 20(12): 2124–2137.
3.
ZhangXAwadHAO'KeefeRJ, et al.A perspective: engineering periosteum for structural bone graft healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res2008; 466(8): 1777–1787.
BauerTWMuschlerGF. Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res2000; 371: 10–27.
6.
SiddiquiJAPartridgeNC. Physiological bone remodeling: systemic regulation and growth factor involvement. Physiology (Bethesda)2016; 31(3): 233–245.
7.
LiCWeiGGuQ, et al.Donor age and cell passage affect osteogenic ability of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Biochem Biophys2015; 72(2): 543–549.
8.
WangPZhangFHeQ, et al.Flavonoid compound icariin activates hypoxia inducible factor-1α in chondrocytes and promotes articular cartilage repair. PLoS One2016; 11(2): e0148372.
9.
FujioMYamamotoAAndoY, et al.Stromal cell-derived factor-1 enhances distraction osteogenesis-mediated skeletal tissue regeneration through the recruitment of endothelial precursors. Bone2011; 49(4): 693–700.
10.
WinterLCWalboomersXFBumgardnerJD, et al.Intermittent versus continuous stretching effects on osteoblast-like cells in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A2003; 67(4): 1269–1275.
11.
NakaharaKHaga-TsujimuraMIizukaT, et al.Periosteum-induced bone formation by distraction osteogenesis: histologic and microcomputed tomography analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants2016; 31(4): 785–792.
12.
SchönmeyrBClavinNAvrahamT, et al.Synthesis of a tissue-engineered periosteum with acellular dermal matrix and cultured mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng A2009; 15(7): 1833–1841.
13.
SunTWZhuYJChenF, et al.Ultralong hydroxyapatite nanowire/collagen biopaper with high flexibility, improved mechanical properties and excellent cellular attachment. Chem Asian J2017; 12(6): 655–664.
14.
LiHWangHPanJ, et al.Nanoscaled bionic periosteum orchestrating the osteogenic microenvironment for sequential bone regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Inter2020; 12(33): 36823–36836.
15.
WuLGuYLiuL, et al.Hierarchical micro/nanofibrous membranes of sustained releasing VEGF for periosteal regeneration. Biomaterials2020; 227: 119555.
16.
GaioNMartinoATothZ, et al.Masquelet technique: the effect of altering implant material and topography on membrane matrix composition, mechanical and barrier properties in a rat defect model. J Biomech2018; 72: 53–62.
17.
ChenYYeSHSatoH, et al.Hybrid scaffolds of Mg alloy mesh reinforced polymer/extracellular matrix composite for critical-sized calvarial defect reconstruction. J Tissue Eng Regen Med2018; 12(6): 1374–1388.
18.
Masoudi RadMNouri KhorasaniSGhasemi-MobarakehL, et al.Fabrication and characterization of two-layered nanofibrous membrane for guided bone and tissue regeneration application. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2017; 80: 75–87.
19.
HassanzadehAAshrafihelanJSalehiR, et al.Development and biocompatibility of the injectable collagen/nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds as in situ forming hydrogel for the hard tissue engineering application. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol2021; 49(1): 136–146.
20.
D'ElíaNLRial SilvaRSartuquiJ, et al.Development and characterisation of bilayered periosteum-inspired composite membranes based on sodium alginate-hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. J Colloid Interf Sci2020; 572: 408–420.
21.
ChenKLinXZhangQ, et al.Decellularized periosteum as a potential biologic scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater2015; 19: 46–55.
22.
HeJLiZYuT, et al.Preparation and evaluation of acellular sheep periostea for guided bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A2020; 108(1): 19–29.
23.
BiancoPRiminucciMGronthosS, et al.Bone marrow stromal stem cells: nature, biology, and potential applications. Stem Cells2001; 19(3): 180–192.
24.
EnnekingWFCampanacciDA. Retrieved human allografts: a clinicopathological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am2001; 83(7): 971–986.
25.
SaldinLTCramerMCVelankarSS, et al.Extracellular matrix hydrogels from decellularized tissues: Structure and function. Acta Biomater2017; 49: 1–15.
26.
YangZYangZDingL, et al.Self-adhesive hydrogel biomimetic periosteum to promote critical-size bone defect repair via synergistic osteogenesis and angiogenesis. ACS Appl Mater Inter2022; 14(32): 36395–36410.
27.
CrapoPMGilbertTWBadylakSF. An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials2011; 32(12): 3233–3243.
28.
BadylakSFFreytesDOGilbertTW. Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: structure and function. Acta Biomater2009; 5(1): 1–13.
29.
ZhangJZhangQChenJ, et al.Preparation and evaluation of tibia- and calvarium-derived decellularized periosteum scaffolds. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2017; 3(12): 3503–3514.
30.
ColnotCZhangXKnothe TateML. Current insights on the regenerative potential of the periosteum: molecular, cellular, and endogenous engineering approaches. J Orthop Res2012; 30(12): 1869–1878.
31.
TsujiKBandyopadhyayAHarfeBD, et al.BMP2 activity, although dispensable for bone formation, is required for the initiation of fracture healing. Nat Genet2006; 38(12): 1424–1429.
32.
LoKWKanHMGagnonKA, et al.One-day treatment of small molecule 8-bromo-cyclic AMP analogue induces cell-based VEGF production for in vitro angiogenesis and osteoblastic differentiation. J Tissue Eng Regen Med2016; 10(10): 867–875.
33.
LinXZhaoCZhuP, et al.Periosteum extracellular-matrix-mediated acellular mineralization during bone formation. Adv Healthc Mater2018; 7(4): 1700660.
34.
NudelmanFPieterseKGeorgeA, et al.The role of collagen in bone apatite formation in the presence of hydroxyapatite nucleation inhibitors. Nat Mater2010; 9(12): 1004–1009.
35.
FantnerGEHassenkamTKindtJH, et al.Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bone fracture. Nat Mater2005; 4(8): 612–616.
36.
LovatiABBottagisioMMorettiM. Decellularized and engineered tendons as biological substitutes: a critical review. Stem Cells Int2016; 2016: 7276150–7276224.
37.
FoolenJvan DonkelaarCCMurphyP, et al.Residual periosteum tension is insufficient to directly modulate bone growth. J Biomech2009; 42(2): 152–157.
38.
QiuPLiMChenK, et al.Periosteal matrix-derived hydrogel promotes bone repair through an early immune regulation coupled with enhanced angio- and osteogenesis. Biomaterials2020; 227: 119552.
39.
GeorgeSMNayakCSinghI, et al.Multifunctional hydroxyapatite composites for orthopedic applications: a review. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2022; 8(8): 3162–3186.
40.
LiuKMengCXLvZY, et al.Enhancement of BMP-2 and VEGF carried by mineralized collagen for mandibular bone regeneration. Regen Biomater2020; 7(4): 435–440.
41.
BendtsenSTWeiM. Synthesis and characterization of a novel injectable alginate-collagen-hydroxyapatite hydrogel for bone tissue regeneration. J Mater Chem B2015; 3(15): 3081–3090.
42.
SzpalskiCWetterauMBarrJ, et al.Bone tissue engineering: current strategies and techniques--part I: scaffolds. Tissue Eng B Rev2012; 18(4): 246–257.
43.
ZhouYChyuJZumwaltM. Recent progress of fabrication of cell scaffold by electrospinning technique for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Biomater2018; 2018: 1953636–1953710.
44.
BodaSKLiXXieJ. Electrospraying an enabling technology for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications: a review. J Aerosol Sci2018; 125: 164–181.
45.
YinALiJBowlinGL, et al.Fabrication of cell penetration enhanced poly (l-lactic acid-co-ɛ-caprolactone)/silk vascular scaffolds utilizing air-impedance electrospinning. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces2014; 120: 47–54.
46.
YuJLeeARLinWH, et al.Electrospun PLGA fibers incorporated with functionalized biomolecules for cardiac tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A2014; 20(13–14): 1896–1907.
GreinerAWendorffJH. Electrospinning: a fascinating method for the preparation of ultrathin fibers. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl2007; 46(30): 5670–5703.
49.
SunFChenJJinS, et al.Development of biomimetic trilayer fibrous membranes for guided bone regeneration. J Mater Chem B2019; 7(4): 665–675.
50.
LiNSongJZhuG, et al.Periosteum tissue engineering-a review. Biomater Sci2016; 4(11): 1554–1561.
51.
De-PaulaMMMAfewerkiSVianaBC, et al.Dual effective core-shell electrospun scaffolds: promoting osteoblast maturation and reducing bacteria activity. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2019; 103: 109778.
52.
HasanAWaibhawGSaxenaV, et al.Nano-biocomposite scaffolds of chitosan, carboxymethyl cellulose and silver nanoparticle modified cellulose nanowhiskers for bone tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol2018; 111: 923–934.
53.
WangTZhaiYNuzzoM, et al.Layer-by-layer nanofiber-enabled engineering of biomimetic periosteum for bone repair and reconstruction. Biomaterials2018; 182: 279–288.
54.
XieJJiangJDavoodiP, et al.Electrohydrodynamic atomization: a two-decade effort to produce and process micro-/nanoparticulate materials. Chem Eng Sci2015; 125: 32–57.
55.
ZhuangZJohnJVLiaoH, et al.Periosteum mimetic coating on structural bone allografts via electrospray deposition enhances repair and reconstruction of segmental defects. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2020; 6(11): 6241–6252.
56.
SharminFO'SullivanMMalinowskiS, et al.Large scale segmental bone defect healing through the combined delivery of VEGF and BMP-2 from biofunctionalized cortical allografts. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater2019; 107(4): 1002–1010.
57.
SharminFAdamsDPensakM, et al.Biofunctionalizing devitalized bone allografts through polymer-mediated short and long term growth factor delivery. J Biomed Mater Res A2015; 103(9): 2847–2854.
58.
UchiyamaHYamatoMSasakiR, et al.In vivo 3D analysis with micro-computed tomography of rat calvaria bone regeneration using periosteal cell sheets fabricated on temperature-responsive culture dishes. J Tissue Eng Regen Med2011; 5(6): 483–490.
59.
CaplanAI. Adult mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering versus regenerative medicine. J Cell Physiol2007; 213(2): 341–347.
XingQQianZKannanB, et al.Osteogenic differentiation evaluation of an engineered extracellular matrix based tissue sheet for potential periosteum replacement. ACS Appl Mater Inter2015; 7(41): 23239–23247.
62.
KangYRenLYangY. Engineering vascularized bone grafts by integrating a biomimetic periosteum and β-TCP scaffold. ACS Appl Mater Inter2014; 6(12): 9622–9633.
63.
GomesJAGeraldes MonteiroBMeloGB, et al.Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of human immature dental pulp stem cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2010; 51(3): 1408–1414.
64.
RenLKangYBrowneC, et al.Fabrication, vascularization and osteogenic properties of a novel synthetic biomimetic induced membrane for the treatment of large bone defects. Bone2014; 64: 173–182.
65.
LealAICaridadeSGMaJ, et al.Asymmetric PDLLA membranes containing Bioglass® for guided tissue regeneration: characterization and in vitro biological behavior. Dent Mater2013; 29(4): 427–436.
66.
LiJZuoYChengX, et al.Preparation and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 composite GBR membrane with asymmetric porous structure. J Mater Sci Mater Med2009; 20(5): 1031–1038.
67.
WeiJJiaJWuF, et al.Hierarchically microporous/macroporous scaffold of magnesium-calcium phosphate for bone tissue regeneration. Biomaterials2010; 31(6): 1260–1269.
68.
MurphyWLKohnDHMooneyDJ. Growth of continuous bonelike mineral within porous poly(lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res2000; 50(1): 50–58.
69.
MartinsAAraújoJVReisRL, et al.Electrospun nanostructured scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Nanomedicine (Lond)2007; 2(6): 929–942.
70.
GaleaLBohnerMThueringJ, et al.Control of the size, shape and composition of highly uniform, non-agglomerated, sub-micrometer β-tricalcium phosphate and dicalcium phosphate platelets. Biomaterials2013; 34(27): 6388–6401.
71.
WangXZhangPDongL, et al.Microstructure and characteristics of interpenetrating β-TCP/Mg–Zn–Mn composite fabricated by suction casting. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2015; 54: 120–132.
72.
MaFChenSLiuP, et al.Improvement of β-TCP/PLLA biodegradable material by surface modification with stearic acid. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2016; 62: 407–413.
73.
ChenJPChenSHLaiGJ. Preparation and characterization of biomimetic silk fibroin/chitosan composite nanofibers by electrospinning for osteoblasts culture. Nanoscale Res Lett2012; 7(1): 170.
74.
BehringJJunkerRWalboomersXF, et al.Toward guided tissue and bone regeneration: morphology, attachment, proliferation, and migration of cells cultured on collagen barrier membranes. A systematic review. Odontology2008; 96(1): 1–11.
75.
BottinoMCThomasVJanowskiGM. A novel spatially designed and functionally graded electrospun membrane for periodontal regeneration. Acta Biomater2011; 7(1): 216–224.
76.
MaSChenZQiaoF, et al.Guided bone regeneration with tripolyphosphate cross-linked asymmetric chitosan membrane. J Dent2014; 42(12): 1603–1612.
77.
KausarA. Phase inversion technique-based polyamide films and their applications: a comprehensive review. Polym-plast Technol2017; 56(13): 1421–1437.
78.
FuLWangZDongS, et al.Bilayer poly(Lactic-co-glycolic acid)/nano-hydroxyapatite membrane with barrier function and osteogenesis promotion for guided bone regeneration. Materials (Basel)2017; 10(3): 257.
79.
TsuiYKGogolewskiS. Microporous biodegradable polyurethane membranes for tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med2009; 20(8): 1729–1741.
80.
ChaeJLimTChengH, et al.Modification of the surface morphology and properties of graphene oxide and multi-walled carbon nanotube-based polyvinylidene fluoride membranes according to changes in non-solvent temperature. Nanomaterials (Basel)2021; 11(9): 2269.
81.
GenovaTRoatoICarossaM, et al.Advances on bone substitutes through 3D bioprinting. Int J Mol Sci2020; 21(19): 7012.
82.
GaoGCuiX. Three-dimensional bioprinting in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biotechnol Lett2016; 38(2): 203–211.
83.
MaHFengCChangJ, et al.3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds: from bone tissue engineering to tumor therapy. Acta Biomater2018; 79: 37–59.
84.
ZhangLYangGJohnsonBN, et al.Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair. Acta Biomater2019; 84: 16–33.
85.
LiangHXuXFengX, et al.Gold nanoparticles-loaded hydroxyapatite composites guide osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells through Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Int J Nanomedicine2019; 14: 6151–6163.
86.
WangQChenBMaF, et al.Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles accelerate osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells via modulation of long noncoding RNA INZEB2. Nano Res2017; 10: 626–642.
87.
NaruphontjirakulPTsigkouOLiS, et al.Human mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into an osteogenic lineage in presence of strontium containing bioactive glass nanoparticles. Acta Biomater2019; 90: 373–392.
88.
ZhangDLiuDZhangJ, et al.Gold nanoparticles stimulate differentiation and mineralization of primary osteoblasts through the ERK/MAPK signaling pathway. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2014; 42: 70–77.
89.
SkardalAZhangJMcCoardL, et al.Photocrosslinkable hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogels for two-step bioprinting. Tissue Eng Part A2010; 16(8): 2675–2685.
90.
ChawlaSMidhaSSharmaA, et al.Silk-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater2018; 7(8): e1701204.
91.
TarafderSBallaVKDaviesNM, et al.Microwave-sintered 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med2013; 7(8): 631–641.
92.
JariwalaSHLewisGSBushmanZJ, et al.3D printing of personalized artificial bone scaffolds. 3D Print Addit Manuf2015; 2(2): 56–64.
93.
NybergELFarrisALHungBP, et al.3D-printing technologies for craniofacial rehabilitation, reconstruction, and regeneration. Ann Biomed Eng2017; 45(1): 45–57.
94.
TataraAMKoonsGLWatsonE, et al.Biomaterials-aided mandibular reconstruction using in vivo bioreactors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2019; 116(14): 6954–6963.
95.
ObregonFVaquetteCIvanovskiS, et al.Three-dimensional bioprinting for regenerative dentistry and craniofacial tissue engineering. J Dent Res2015; 94(9 Suppl): 143S–152S.
96.
RappSJJonesDCGeretyP, et al.Repairing critical-sized rat calvarial defects with progenitor cell-seeded acellular periosteum: a novel biomimetic scaffold. Surgery2012; 152(4): 595–604.
97.
ShiXLiLOstrovidovS, et al.Stretchable and micropatterned membrane for osteogenic differentation of stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Inter2014; 6(15): 11915–11923.
98.
EvansSFChangHKnothe TateML. Elucidating multiscale periosteal mechanobiology: a key to unlocking the smart properties and regenerative capacity of the periosteum?Tissue Eng Part B Rev2013; 19(2): 147–159.
99.
Knothe TateMLYuNYJalilianI, et al.Periosteum mechanobiology and mechanistic insights for regenerative medicine. Bonekey Rep2016; 5: 857.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
