In this paper, a complex porous dental implant with biodegradable magnesium alloy was designed based on selective laser melting (SLM). Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to simulate the stress distribution of dental implant and alveolar bone in two models of preliminary and later stages of implant. The stress concentration area of dental implants was found not in the porous structure, and the weak part of mechanical properties accords with the work requirements. The porous structure of dental implants can promote the function of cancellous bone in the process of conducting the stress of the dental implant, thus improving the bearing capacity of dental implants. In vitro fatigue experiments were carried out on the experimental samples produced by 3D printing. Through the cell contrast experiment, it was proved that the decomposed Mg2+ could reach the titanium surface smoothly through the porous structure and complete the proliferation of osteoblasts.
BlockMS.Dental implants: the last 100 years. J Oral Maxillofac Surg2018;
76: 11–26.
2.
SandipanRSwatiDNiloyK.Design of patient specific dental implant using FE analysis and computational intelligence techniques. Appl Soft Comput2018;
65: 272–279.
3.
ThomasDLRaghavanV.3D metal printing technology. IFAC-PapersOnLine2016;
49: 103–110.
4.
DaniloCChunXJeffreyV, et al.
Additively manufactured iron-manganese for biodegradable porous load-bearing bone scaffold applications. Acta Biomater2020;
103: 346–360.
5.
LeordeanDRaduSAFrătilăD, et al.
Studies on design of customized orthopedic endoprostheses of titanium alloy manufactured by SLM. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2015;
79: 5–8.
6.
NybergELFarrisALHungBP, et al.
3D-printing technologies for craniofacial rehabilitation, reconstruction, and regeneration. Ann Biomed Eng2017;
45: 45–57.
7.
DavidFPaulFBCarloE, et al.
Biomechanical analysis of the osseointegration of porous tantalum implants. J Prosthet Dent2019; 123: 811–820.
8.
MullenL, StampRC, FoxP, et al.
Selective laser melting: a unit cell approach for the manufacture of porous, titanium, bone in-growth constructs, suitable for orthopedic applications. II. Randomized structures. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater2010;
92: 178–188.
9.
BaptisteCMathieuMMarianneB, et al.
Custom-made macroporous bioceramic implants based on triply-periodic minimal surfaces for bone defects in load-bearing sites. Acta Biomater2020; 109: 254–266.
10.
FukudaA, TakemotoM, SaitoT, et al.
Osteoinduction of porous Ti implants with a channel structure fabricated by selective laser melting. Acta Biomater2011;
7: 2327–2336.
11.
Amin YavariSVan der StokJChaiYC, et al.
Bone regeneration performance of surface-treated porous titanium. Biomaterials2014;
35: 6172–6181.
12.
ChangBSongWHanTX, et al.
Influence of pore size of porous titanium fabricated by vacuum diffusion bonding of titanium meshes on cell penetration and bone ingrowth. Acta Biomater2016;
33: 311–321.
13.
ArabnejadSBurnett JohnstonRPuraJA, et al.
High-strength porous biomaterials for bone replacement: a strategy to assess the interplay between cell morphology, mechanical properties, bone ingrowth and manufacturing constraints. Acta Biomater2016;
30: 345–356.
14.
BonfanteEACoelhoPG.A critical perspective on mechanical testing of implants and prostheses. Adv Dent Res2016;
28: 18–27.
15.
YamanishiYYamaguchiSImazatoS, et al.
Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models. J Periodontol2014;
85: e333.
16.
ToniolloMBMacedoAPRodriguesRC, et al.
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution on Morse taper implants surface. J Prosthodont Res2013;
57: 206–212.
17.
DimorvanBBergamoETPFardinVP, et al.
Fracture strength and probability of survival of narrow and extreme-narrow dental implants after fatigue testing: in vitro and in silico analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2017;
71: 244–249.
18.
SayuriYAndrewBAaronB.Magnesium ion stimulation of bone marrow stromal cells enhances osteogenic activity, simulating the effect of magnesium alloy degradation. Acta Biomater2014;
10: 2834–2842.
19.
JiangfengSJiaSDaolunC, et al.
Latest research advances on magnesium and magnesium alloys worldwide. J Magnesium Alloys2020;
8: 1–41.
20.
LuXZLaiCPChanLC.Novel design of a coral-like open-cell porous degradable magnesium implant for orthopaedic application. Mater Des2020;
188: 108474.
21.
RadhaRSreekanthD.Insight of magnesium alloys and composites for orthopedic implant applications – a review.J Magnesium Alloys2017;
5: 286–312.
22.
GhaziAMWatahaJCO’DellNL, et al.
Quantitative concentration profiling of nickel in tissues around metal implants: a new biomedical application of laser ablation sector field ICP-MS. Anal At Spectrom2002;
17: 1295–1299.
23.
Ann-KathrinGStefanJChristianK, et al.
Investigation of degraded bone substitutes made of magnesium alloy using scanning electron microscope and nanoindentation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2020;
109: 103825.
24.
MartinMDanielHJohannesD.Bone-implant degradation and mechanical response of bone surrounding Mg-alloy implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2017;
71: 307–313.
25.
RanQYangWHuY, et al.
Osteogenesis of 3D printed porous Ti6Al4V implants with different pore sizes. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2018;
84: 1–11.
26.
CoelhoPGSilvaNRBonfanteEA, et al.
Fatigue testing of two porcelain-zirconia all-ceramic crown systems. Dent Mater2009;
25: 1122–1127.
YouwenYChongxianHDian YuE.Mg bone implant: features, developments and perspectives. Mater Des2020;
185: 108259.
29.
SuchatANantakritYNattawutJ.Finite element analysis of dental implant prosthetics. Mater Today Proc2018;
5: 9525–9534.
30.
AyllónJMNavarroCVázquezJ, et al.
Fatigue life estimation in dental implants. Eng Fract Mech2014;
123: 34–43.
31.
BartłomiejWPiotrMAgnieszkaK.Microstructure and mechanical properties investigation of CP titanium processed by selective laser melting (SLM). J Mater Process Technol2017;
241: 13–23.
32.
DuanYGonzalezJAKulkarniPA, et al.
Fatigue lifetime prediction of a reduced-diameter dental implant system: numerical and experimental study. Dent Mater2018;
34: 1299–1309.
33.
Jui-TingHYen-WenSChih-WeiK.Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant. J Formosan Med Assoc2017;
116: 582–590.
